into the space of a single chapter or perhaps two 11.Remarkably little work has been done in creating instruments of evaluation 12,13 and research-basedcurriculum exploring rotational mechanics. Without additional evidence, it would seem a validconjecture that any student difficulties which exist concerning rectilinear motion would continue tobe carried forward, further compounded by the inherent two-dimensionality of rotation about astationary axis adding layers of complexity to an already murky understanding of that rectilinearmotion. Page 24.34.3The InstrumentWe decided to address this question using the TUG-K developed in the early 1990’s
P 0.5PU ∞ 0 PI 0.45PU 1 TU 0 12 . PID 0.6PU 0.5TU 0.125TUIn the second method, the control loop is opened, the plant is subjected to a unit step and theresulting reaction curve is observed. If the system response to the step input resembles an S-shaped curve, the lag time L and time constant T can be measured, as shown in Figure 2-4. Ifthe reaction curve does not resemble an S-shaped curve, the second method cannot be used
. U n i v e r s i t y K a t e G l e a s o n C o l l e g e o f E
steam. Properties are calculated as a function of temperature and pressure. Theinterface allows users to call out temperature (T ) and pressure (p) explicitly by name or simplypass them in order like in a traditional function call. Here, we calculate the enthalpy (h) andspecific heat (c p ) of air at 450K and 1.47bar.>>> steam.h(T=450., p=1.47)2827.075794818073>>> steam.cp(450., 1.47)2.000229350330389>>> steam.cp()4.181097326774104In the last example, no arguments are given, so PYroMat defaults to standard values for tem-perature and pressure (300K, 1.013bar). The interested user can reconfigure those numbers. Allof the properties are standardized to a kJ, kg, s, K, bar system. These units were chosen to
Quality points social and political constraints. FA 2011 Sample Size Evaluation Performance Indicators Stra tegi es As s es s m Da ta
-efficacy and engineeringidentity, thereby facilitating the transition of LIAT undergraduates to graduate-level programs;and (3) it aspires to cultivate leaders proficient in technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation,who will contribute to and fortify the economy of the South Coast of New England—a regionnoted for its diversity and post-industrial economic challenges marked by significant poverty.ResultsIn its inaugural year, the AccEL program generated a large applicant pool, with 46% of eligiblestudents applying, the cohort included 8 eligible female students and a substantial number fromunderrepresented racial/ethnic backgrounds. Eight M.S. students were successfully recruited intothe first cohort of AccEL S-STEM scholars, reflecting
answers but were questioned until the answers were veryspecific. Extensive notes were taken throughout the interview using personal shorthand andincluding as many direct quotes as possible. The transcriptions were prepared as Microsoft© textfiles and imported into Atlas TI © hermeneutic software. The demographic information suppliedby the participants was incorporated into each transcript. Using the coding function in Atlas TI©,each file was coded for demographic information: age, profession, gender, max degree, whatdegree(s), time in career, etc. This permitted confirming adequate representation in the sampleset. The sample set was found to include at lease one representative in each of seven age bracketsand representatives from B.S., M.S., and
Liberal Learning Revisited: A Historical Examination of the Reasons, Frustrations, and Continued Prospects for Engineering and Liberal Arts IntegrationAbstractIn December of 1968, the American Society for Engineering Education issued a report, LiberalLearning for the Engineer, directed by Sterling P. Olmstead. However, the Olmstead Report wasjust one in a series of organized studies, carried out within the society‟s well honed investigativetradition, which sought to bring about greater integration between engineering and liberaleducation. One subsequent study was the 1975 O. Allan Gianniny Report—which blunted thecritiques found in the 1968 Olmstead Report—while earlier studies included
1 _-— . .- . . S e s s i o n 2230 ‘ .— ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CONTINUING ENGINEERING EDUCATION Meg Karakekes, Susan Anderson, Jim Moharam, Ray Chen The University of Texas at Austin/SPIE/University of Central Florida/The University of Texas at Austin I. INTRODUCTION Continuing education is critical for engineers and the organizations that employ them (Gomes, Houche-Mong, Houche-Mong and Wakelin, 199 1; Wolff, 1993). However, findings
of the the engineering world.1940’s resisted the push back into the home. @ A female engineer is no different than a maleThose that continued working as engineers is the engineer.late 1940’s and 1950’s were considered The above statements imply equality and are“curiosities” by their male counterparts, for society perhaps politically correct, yet the subliminalno longer considered engineering a suitable career message in these statements is that women arefor women. Many of the women engineers bonded being welcomed into engineering as though theyand gave support to each other during these were men. A woman can be an
. Page 25.4.10References 1. L. D. Feisel, A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005. 2. Susan S. Matthew, Joshua Earnest, “Laboratory-Based Innovative Approaches for Competence Development”, Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 2, Australia, 2004, and UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Mumbai, India, 2004. 3. Cliff Mirman, Promod Vohra, “Programmatic Assessment within an Engineering Technology Program”, Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education; Sectional Conference, Valparaiso, IN, 2003. 4. J. O. Campbell, J. R. Bourne, P. J. Mosterman, A. J. Brodersen, “The Effectiveness
systems involved were extremely dilute.The rigorous equations were known for some time and one of these is as follows: y2 V dy Z= ∫ (1) ky a S y1 (1 − y )( y − y i ) (1 − y )ilmThree additional equations could be written to accomplish the same result. Z is thenecessary height of packing. Since some of the terms did not change greatly in a dilutesystem it was common practice to remove some of these from under the integral sign andmaking use of an average value between the top of the column and the bottom. The
20 0 100 80 60 40 20 0 Question Score (%)Figure 4: Histogram comparing results on a final exam question regarding pole locations andstep response from the year before this project was introduced (2019) to this past year (2021) 7 + b c a D(s) G(s
. The first topic is steady-state three-phase inductionmotor theory. The presented motor theory is based on the equivalent circuit model.5 Thismodel requires rotor and stator resistances, rotor and stator leakage reactance, and the motormagnetization reactance parameters. Locked-rotor and no-load tests find these parameters.Solving the equivalent circuit model gives the rotor and stator currents as a function of motorslip, s. After rotor current is obtained, the rotor developed power and motors losses can be foundfor any operating point. The tutorial introduces the motor developed torque equation anddemonstrates how to plot the motor torque-speed curve from the developed power found fromthe equivalent circuit.Machine load factor and efficiency
/EMTCDreal-time simulation software package is used in this case, and the results of the simulation arealso discussed. Similar projects are assigned to graduate students in IAPE and AEPS, whileundergraduate students perform studies of lower complexity as part of their homeworkassignments.3.1 Control System Stability StudyFigure 1 shows a control system in a typical closed-loop configuration [4], which allows for thecontinuous correction of the output signal, Y(s). The system consists of four blocks: a) an errordetector that calculates the difference between the reference signal R(s) and the measurement (orfeedback) B(s), b) a PI controller that acts in a way that will minimize any errors, c) a plant thattranslates the input from the controller to a
designand analysis programs have been developed to demonstrate concepts of high frequency design.This paper will detail some of the topics students need to understand in design and test of highfrequency circuits, and describe the computer programs that are used to assist them. Theseprograms are patterned after standard commercial design and analysis programs, but are simplifiedto be adaptable to the learning environment rather than the professional. The computer programscontain graphics and animation to assist with teaching and learning objectives, while alsoproviding the computer-assisted circuit design and simulation necessary at high frequencies.Topics learned include definition of s parameters, circuit design using s parameters and the
architecture degrees [4], which supports the development of non-traditional avenuesfor naval science and technology education, such as the certificate described here.To promote Naval STEM education in the Midwest, we launched an undergraduate certificateprogram titled “Naval Science & Technology” (Naval S&T) in 2019. Students in theMechanical Engineering (ME) department at the University of Iowa (UI) can earn the certificateby selecting elective courses in the baccalaureate degree. This certificate program replaced andaugmented an existing undergraduate certificate in naval hydrodynamics, taking advantage of anexpanding departmental curriculum in control, autonomous systems, and artificial intelligence.Therefore, the program objective is to
+x X (s) 1 2 (1b) 0 F (s) Ms Ds K -x Rest Position Before Application Damping of Force, f Coefficient, D Rigid SupportFigure 1: Virtual Mass-Spring-Damper SetupAfter taking Laplace transformation of equation (1a) that result (1b), the mechanical systemcould be expressed in the form of a function
feedback % Elimination of one loop numg=[1]; deng=[500 0 0]; sys1=tf(numg,deng); numc=[1 1]; denc=[1 2]; sys2=tf(numc,denc); sys3=series(sys1,sys2); % combine series blocks sys=feedback(sys3,[1]) % convert closed into open loop Figure 1-A: Elimination of a single loop example 1 s +1 s+2 2 500s Figure 1-B: Block Diagram of a closed loop systemTime-History CommandsThere are three general ways to create the time-history response
. Figure 3: A one dimensional deformed barSince the bar element is developed by using the same deflection technique as a spring,assemblage of a number of finite elements that are based on bar formulation is done by the sametechnique that is used for assembling a number of spring elements.Bar elements are used for modeling truss assemblies. In a truss, various truss elements can forman angle with the global coordinates as shown in figure 4. Figure 4: A bar element making an angle θ with X axis of global coordinate systemThe global stiffness matrix relating global forces to global displacements for the element shownin figure 5 is given in equation (13). [3] f1x C ∗ C C∗S
( ( C A B A B IC C IA IB ts ui s s g g g rs lu lu in in
. MATLAB Property FunctionsUsing the property evaluation stated above a series of MATLAB property functions were writtenas script files for each substance type. Table 1 show the functions available for ideal gases.The parameter IGAS identifies the specific ideal gas as shown below: IGAS = 0: air IGAS = 1: N2 IGAS = 2: O2 IGAS = 3: H2 IGAS = 4: CO IGAS = 5: OH IGAS = 6: NO IGAS = 7: H2O IGAS = 8: CO2The parameter IMS indicates if the properties are on a per mass basis (IMS = 0) or on a per molebasis (IMS = 1).For compressible substance property evaluation there is only one function used,CompSub(ISTM,T,P,v,h,s,u,Q,L,IFLD). To use the
for Engineering Education, 2011 Navy Metrology Engineering Center STEM Outreach through the STEP Program: Challenges, Lessons Learned and Application to DoD StrategyBackground:The United States and especially the Department of Defense (DoD) has historically reliedheavily upon scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians to innovate, design, produceand maintain a technically superior capability to defend and advance the interests of the UnitedStates, both at home and globally. The United States maintained a leading edge technologicadvantage through and beyond World War II until it was stunned by the Soviet Union‟s launchof Sputnik 1 on October 4, 1957. Sputnik 1 was the first artificial
Blocks(i) We will utilize the code blocks editor for listening to an Arduino input pin. Next, the analogvalue or digital state will be print out in the SerialM onitor window. To open the code panel, astudent needs to click the “Code” button.(ii) Next, s/he is asked to click on the SerialM onitor which is located at the bottom of the codepanel.(iii) To run the Arduino code, s/he should click “Start Simulation”, and observe the numbers inthe Serial Monitor during the interaction with the potentiometer. As the potentiometer input valuechanges by moving the pointer on the dial, the serial output value will change accordingly. Sincethe circuit includes two independent Arduinos, students can click back and forth between the twoArduinos while the
environment.The objective of the study is to answer the questions: (1) Which factors affect the systemperformance measures and to what extent? and (2) can optimal settings be identified for thesystem to perform consistently over the range of the extraneous noise variable? To do this,Taguchi experiments will be utilized, along with Signal to Noise (S/N) ratios and factorial plots,to analyze the results. The aim of this paper is to introduce the application of quality controlmethods in performance optimization for an automated electrohydraulic position control system.The system setup, hardware, software, and programming will be introduced. The researchdesign, measurements, and experimental runs will be demonstrated and explained. The impact onstudents
descriptors (Dominance D, Influencing I, Steadiness S and Compliance C)described in table A1 of the Appendix, are probably the most revealing as far as creating anarrative of the emerging typologies associated with the three clusters. Figure 3 shows theranking of the DISC parameters for the three clusters. Figure 3 – The mean DISC rankings for the three distinct clusters.The DISC ranking has associated word descriptors that further illustrate the associated behaviors.These word descriptors are given for the DISC variables and for the three clusters in Table 2. Table 2 – Word descriptors of the four DISC traits for the three clusters Dominance Influencing Steadiness Compliance
can greatly improve students’understanding of thermodynamics by visualizing property relationships. As a highly visual andintuitive tool, property diagrams eliminate the time devoted to mastering steam tables. Afterteaching steam tables for multiple years within a year-long thermal-fluid sciences course andrecognizing the poor pedagogic utility, the steam tables were entirely replaced by thetemperature-entropy (T-s) diagram as the primary source for water thermodynamic properties.This paper discusses the implementation, challenges, and the outcomes of this introduction.Apart from developing instructions aligned solely to property diagrams, a number of visual toolswere identified, adopted, and developed to facilitate the transition. The
Load_Voltage (V)Angular Speed SSM - s (rad/s) B Generator Scope E
✂✁☎✄✆✄✆✝✟✞✡✠☞☛✍✌✏✎✏✑✓✒ ✔✖✕✘✗✚✙✜✛✣✢✥✤✧✦✩★✣✛✫✪✭✬✮✢✥✙✯✬✱✰✆✲✳✕✘✙✜✛✧✗✴✤✣✢✵✙✯✬✶✗✴✤✧✷✸✕✺✹✵✕✘✙✼✻✾✽✓✿❀✲❁✗✚✦❀✤✧✕✂✻✓✢✵✙✯✬✡❂❄❃❅✪❇❆✧✬✾✢✥✤✧✦✳❈❉✤✣✢❊✻✮✕ ✷❋✢❊●❍✕✘✽✓✕✺✤✧✙✯✕■✻✾✕✘✙✡✛✣✤✣✢✥❏✭❆✧✕✱✢✥✤✧✬☎✻✮✕✺✗✚✷❑✿☞▲▼✬☎✻✮✗✴✤✧✷✣✗✚✽✓✷✸✙✯✗✴✹✥✙✘❆✣✹✥❆✧✬✂◆ ❖◗✓❘ ✝ ✠❚❙❱❯✚❲❍✁☎❳❩❨ ❬❪❭❴❫❵❫❜❛❞❝❡❛✫❭❡❢✼❣✐❤❥❝❴❦❧❤❥❛❞❛❞♠♥❦❧❤❥❝❥♦q♣▼rtsq❤❥❛✧✉q✈✵r✆✈❊❛✭✇❀❤☎❦❜①❡❛❞♠✥②✵❦❜✈③s❡♦ ④ ❛❞✈❊♠✵❭❴❦❜✈❞♦✮⑤✖❦❧⑥♥⑦⑧❦❜❝❴r❡❤✓♦⑧✇✫✉q
). For overthree decades, many researchers conducted various conceptualization studies on PCK (Grossman1990; Cochran et al., 1993; Loughran et al., 2012; Van Driel et al., 1998; Gess-Newsome 1999;Magnusson et al., 1999; Hashweh, 2005; Abell, 2008; Park and Oliver, 2008; Kind, 2009). Amongthese models, Magnusson et al. (1999)’s PCK model has been widely used in pre-service and in-service teacher education. In these prior efforts, most of the studies have argued for threeknowledge domains: content (subject) knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and contextualknowledge were the basic domains affected by teachers’ PCK (Abell, 2008; Cochran et al., 1993;Gess-Newsome, 1999; Grossman, 1990). In our approach, we identified four knowledge domains by