first Executive Board of JLLA: Randi Mendes, President;Stephany Santos, Vice President; Arshia Yusuf Mirza, Secretary; Justin Fang, Treasurer; DonyeilHoy, Parliamentarian and Armin Tahmasebi Rad, Event Coordinator. Thank you for paving theway for future John Lof Scholars.References[1] A. M. Agogino, Educating the Engineer of 2020, vol. 3, no. 2005. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[2] Tang, X., Burris, L., Hu, N., & Brenkus, N. (n.d.). Preparing ethical leaders in engineering research and practice: Designing an ethical leadership module. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33190[3] Sullivan, S., & Koufteros, B. (n.d.). Meaning and impact: A review of Personal
television in early developmental stages. Looking at a flatscreen exposes children to a two-dimensional environment and reduces their playing time withphysical 3D objects, missing the opportunity to develop hand-eye coordination that is thefoundation of spatial skills.Continuous efforts have been made to create training methods and exercises that increase spatialvisualization skills. In 2003 Sorby, S., A., Wysocki, A. F., and Baartmans B. J., published amultimedia software-workbook package which contained the course “Introduction to 3D SpatialVisualization” [11], now used for engineering graphics education throughout the nation. In 2009Sorby, S.A. identified several strategies that can be effective in developing 3‐D spatial skills andin contributing
: Essential Project Design Elements. Downloaded from https://www.pblworks.org/blog/gold-standard-pbl-essential-project- design-elementsChilukuri, K., C., (2020). A novel framework for active learning in engineering education. ScienceDirect, 172.Cornell University. (2023, February 12). Active Learning. Center for Teaching Innovation. https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/active-collaborative-learning/active- learning Cornell University. (2023, February 12). Collaborative Learning. Center for Teaching Innovation. https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/active-collaborative- learning/collaborative-learningDrake, S. & Burns, R. (2014). Meeting standards through integrated
the Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.[3] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[4] N. Nemati, P. Andersson, V. Stenberg, and M. Rydén, “Experimental Investigation of the Ef- fect of Random Packings on Heat Transfer and Particle Segregation in Packed-Fluidized Bed,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 60, no. 28, pp. 10365–10375, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01221.[5] P. R. Wright, X. Lru, and B. J. Glasser, “A FLUIDIZED BED ADSORPTION LABORA- TORY EXPERIMENT,” Chem. Eng. Educ., 2004.[6] N
Wellbeing Course,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, USA, Jul. 2023.7. D. C. Zhang and T. L. Renshaw, “Personality and College Student Subjective Wellbeing: A Domain-Specific Approach,” Journal of Happiness Studies, Apr. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00116-8.8. E. Diener, S. Oishi, and L. Tay, “Advances in subjective well-being research,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 253–260, Feb. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6.9. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, 4th ed. Los Angeles Etc.: Sage, Cop, 2018.10. J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative
(January 9, 2017): 010102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010102.Fastl, Hugo, and Eberhard Zwicker. Psychoacoustics – Facts and models, Springer-Verlag (2007).Feisel, Lyle D., and Albert J. Rosa. “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 94, no. 1 (January 2005): 121–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.Finkelstein, N. D., W. K. Adams, C. J. Keller, P. B. Kohl, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky, S. Reid, and R. LeMaster. “When Learning about the Real World Is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
. (2017). “Peer-led team learning in a college of engineering: First-year students’ achievements and peer leaders’ gains”. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55, 660 - 671. 5. Hirsch, K., Odom, S. F., & Moore, L. L. (2021). An Examination of the Impact of Peer Mentoring on First-Generation College Student Peer Mentors’ Development of the Five Practices of Exemplary Leaders. Journal of Leadership Education, 20(4), 154–169. 6. Layton, Richard & Loughry, Misty & Ohland, Matthew & Ricco, George. (2010). Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria. Advances in Engineering Education. 2. 1-9. 7. Beigpourian, B., &
՟ՑՖՌ = Ծ՟ՑՖՌ * փ (where փ is a catch-all efficiencyparameter that incorporates many factors). The remainder of the lesson comes withunderstanding the large losses that come from the conversion of the captured wind energy,ԾՋՉ՜՝՚ՍՌ ՟ՑՖՌ, and the electrical power, ԾՍՔՍՋ՜՚ՑՋՉՔ = ՄԷ, found by multiplying the measuredvoltage, V, and current, I. While this classroom exercise gets some of the points across, the sheermagnitude of useful wind turbines are still hard to grasp. The serious game was developed, inlarge part, to help undergraduate college students see how different wind turbine design choiceswould impact the generation of power with full-scale turbines. The serious game was developedto run on the Oculus Rift S virtual reality headset. The
. Prior to teaching technical communication, Aaron served as a lecturer in Mississippi State's Department of English. As a lecturer, he also worked in the Quality Enhancement Program as a Writing Coordinator, where he worked with faculty to encourage writing across the curriculum.Shelly Sanders (Instructor) (Mississippi State University) Shelly is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University's James Worth Bagley College of Engineering and has taught technical writing as well as various English composition and literature courses at MSU since 2005. She also tutored writing with the English department's Writing Center from its inception in the early 2000's until 2015
separately.An expanded analysis of participants’ survey responses with respect to their race and ethnicitymay provide insight into cultural norms, beliefs or expectations that may affect decisionsregarding studying engineering. A longitudinal study may be implemented to track participants’high school class selections, summer STEM experiences, college major, intent to major andpersistence to major in engineering or other major. The results of the study are insightful andmay inform the way high schools, colleges, and organizations support, guide, and inspirestudents to become engineers.References 1. S. Alpaslan, “Factors Affecting High School Students’ Stem Career Interest: Findings from A 4-Year Study,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 22, Issue 3
thathelped them overcome various obstacles if there was this camaraderie bonus.Example builds:There were several types of builds. Many employed springs and some distance measurements.Several used potentiometers to generate a signal corresponding to the mass. One useddisplacement of water to mass the object(s). Photos of example builds are provided below.Figure 1: A balance utilizing a force sensingresistor in an enclosure Figure 3: A suspended design using an ultrasonic distance sensorFigure 2: A design using springs, pulleys,gears, and a potentiometerFigure 4: A platform using a linkage andpotentiometer enclosed in a 3-D printedhousing
strategies that enhance critical thinking.19. Butchart S, Forster D, Gold I, Bigelow J, Korb K, Oppy G, and Serrenti A (2009). Improving critical thinking using web based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1154.20. King PM, and Kitchener KS (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5– 18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2.21. Heft IE, and Scharff LFV (2017). Aligning best practices to develop targeted critical thinking skills and habits. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching &
supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2025035 through the PFE:RIEF program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to thank Mr. BakerMartin for his input and discussions on this work.References[1] Culberson, O.L. “Attrition of ChE Undergrads,” Chemical Engineering Education, 4(1), 24- 27 (1970)[2] Felder, R.M., Forrest, K.D., Baker-Ward, L., Dietz, E.J., and Mohr, P.H. “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. I. Success and Failure in the Introductory Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), 15-21 (1993)[3
, and vice versa. Given the need to better support engineering GSs inobtaining a graduate education that will serve them in a variety of careers as well as to supportthem in feeling as though they belong and can persist in their chosen field, we see GIFT as beinga promising model to be implemented in conjunction with engineering graduate programs.Importantly, this is a model that is transferable to any engineering and/or STEM graduateprogram, does not place a huge burden on GSs in terms of coursework, and does not requiregrant money or university appropriations to run successfully.AcknowledgementsFunding for this work comes from NSF Award #1806698.References[1] S. D. Porter and J. M. Phelps, “Beyond skills: An integrative approach to
. Borrego and A. Boklage, "Self-Efficacy and Belonging: The Impact of Makerspaces.," International Journal of STEM education, vol. 8, no. 24, 2021.[3] E. Hilton, Forest, CR and J. Linsey, "Slaying Dragons: An Empirical Look at the Impact of Academic Makerspaces," in International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, Stanford, CA, 2018.[4] L. Rosenbaum and B. Hartmann, "Making Connections: Project Courses Improve Design Self-Efficacy and Interdisciplinary Awareness," in International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, Stanford, CA, 2018.[5] V. Bean, N. Farmer and B. Kerr, "An exploration of women's engagement in makerspace.," Gifted and Talented International, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 61-67, 2016.[6] A. S. Masters, "How Making and
the Role of Affect in Learning: MonitoringStudents’ Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, and Science Identity,” LSE, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6–15, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241.[5] S. L. Rodriguez and J. M. Blaney, “‘We’re the unicorns in STEM’: Understanding howacademic and social experiences influence sense of belonging for Latina undergraduatestudents.,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1037/dhe0000176.[6] P. Dawson, J. van der Meer, J. Skalicky, and K. Cowley, “On the Effectiveness ofSupplemental Instruction: A Systematic Review of Supplemental Instruction and Peer-AssistedStudy Sessions Literature Between 2001 and 2010,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 84,no. 4, pp. 609–639, 2014.[7] E. M. Buchanan, K
university we are working towards a situation that the potential engineeringstudent, and even those that do not intend to enter the engineering profession, willpossess a better understanding of what it means to be an engineer. Keeping the potential student interested is what this endeavor is all about. Andaccording to Anderson,L., Northwood,D., [11] – “A student retained is a student gained.” References[1] Wakerly, J.F., Digital Design Principles and Practices, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000[2] Widrow, B., Stearns, S., Adaptive Signal Processing, Prentice Hall, 1995[3] Chassaing, R., Digital Signal Processing With C and the TMS320C30, John Wiley Pub., 1992[4] Haykin, S., Widrow, B., Least
International Teamwork and Global Orientation," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 475-483.9. McGraw, D., 2004, "Putting It into Perspective," Prism, ASEE, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 24-29.10. Hsieh, S.J. and Hsieh, P.Y., 2004, "Integrated Virtual Learning System for Programmable Logic Controller," Journal of Engineering Education, April 2004, pp. 169-178.11. Kutlu A., 2004, MicroLab: A Web-based Multi-user Remote Microcontroller Laboratory for Engineering Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 879-885.12. You, S., Wang, T., Eagleson, R., Meng, C., and Zhang, Q., 2001," Low-cost Internet-based Telerobotic System for Access to Remote Laboratories," Journal of
chicken house to the incubator or storage. IntroductionBy the 1900’s, an average chicken farm was an extension of the family kitchen. Most ofthe chicken farms were usually owned and operated by families and had no automation.Very few sold poultry products. Chickens were used for the same purpose as they arenow which includes meat, eggs, and money. Most chicken or poultry farms today areowned and operated by companies and machines perform several tasks on the chickenfarms since production is large scale. The use of automated machines in the production Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
continuous assessment of the program outcomes. One of thebiggest obstacles in assessment is the inability to engage students in the awareness of programoutcomes and their importance in the curriculum. Many students see them as overly generalizedstatements that have no bearing on the concepts they need to pass a given course. Thus,dissemination of the notion and value of program outcomes is a major challenge for the faculty.Examples of freshman class assignments and projects that address specific program outcomes ina mechanical engineering department are presented. IntroductionIn the mid-1990’s, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) developeda new set of criteria for accrediting
curves, the amount of work it takes to pump liquidsfrom below ground, the forces against floodgates, the center of mass, etc. will be of greatbenefit to Calculus teachers. The design of this manual, and the success of itsimplementation, will generate the necessity of a Calculus Laboratory room. These are thefuture contributions of the authors. References1. Principles and Standards of School Mathematics, 2000, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., Virginia 2000, pp. 383-390.2. Arons, A. B., 1990, “A guide to Introductory Physics Teaching,” John Wiley and sons.3. Van Heuvelen, A.,1991, “Overview, Case Study Physics,” Am. J. Phys. 59, pp. 898- 907.4. McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., 1992
Role in Engineering Design Education. The Journal of Engineering Education. April 2001, p. 239.4. Rennie, S. C. and Crosley, J.R. “Are tomorrow’s doctors honest. Questionnaire study exploring medical students’ attitudes and reported behavior on academic misconduct. BMJ. February 2001;322:274-275.5. Madden, M. and Lenhart, A. “Pew internet & American life project.” The Pew Charitable Trust. 2003. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org. Retrieved February 2005.6. “Cheating is accepted when there is no enforcement.” Jim’s Blog. Available at: http://www.beernut.ca/jim/archives/001659.html. Retrieved February 2005.7. Goulet, R. “Ethics and engineering professionalism.” Presented at the Ethics Across the Curriculum
’ Perceptions of the Long-Term Impact of Attending a ‘CSI Science Camp,’” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 916–928, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10956-016-9635-3.[11] G. Hein, “Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits,” Museums & Social Issues, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 113–124, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1179/msi.2009.4.1.113.[12] Committee on Successful Out-of-School STEM Learning; Board on Science Education; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council, Identifying and Supporting Productive STEM Programs in Out-of-School Settings. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2015. doi: 10.17226/21740.[13] I. of D. at S. Plattner Hasso, “An Introduction to
local library toprovide STEM activities to families by integrating at-home STEM activities with a libraries'summer reading program. We sought to partner with the local library for multiple reasons: 1)libraries reach a broad and diverse community, particularly those not typically represented inSTEM fields; 2) libraries can provide free and inclusive access to making; 3) pairing books withSTEM activities increases background knowledge and vocabulary in context; and 4) families areincreasingly engaging in STEM activities offered at libraries to support and foster theirchild(ren)’s learning. Below, we discuss four primary lessons learned as part of the pilot SummerFamily STEM Reading Challenge. First, we did not quite reach as diverse an audience
-Scientist Test (DAST), Science Communication, 29 (1), 35-64. 64. Chodkowski, K. (2014). “Inspire Her Mind,” An Initiative from Verizon Wireless, Stony Brook University Women in Leadership, Sept. 23, 2014.5. Duffy, J. J., Barrington, L., and Munoz, M. (2011). Attitudes of Engineering Students from Underrepresented Groups toward Service Learning, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.6. DeWaters, J., Powers, S., and Graham, M. E. (2006). Partners in Engineering: Outreach Efforts Provide Holistic Engineering Education for Middle School Girls, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.7. Weisgram, E. and Bigler, R. (2006). Girls and Science Careers
interactions with faculty.The experience gained from this program will help us to be more prepared and creative inorganizing a similar program this year. We believe these experiences would also benefit othereducators and researchers with the common goal of increasing the number of professionals in theSTEM fields.References:[1] Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. “A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics”. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), Article 2. 2019.[2] Nugent, G., Bruker, B., Grandgenett, N. and Welch, G., "Robotics camps, clubs, and competitions: Results from a US robotics project". Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 75, Part B, pp. 686-691, January 2016.[3
: https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/national-science-foundation- research-traineeship-program. [Accessed 11 July 2022].[4] J. S. Coker and E. Gatti, "Interdisciplinary Capstones for All Students," Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, vol. 5, (2), pp. 1, 2017.[5] L. M. Jiji, I. S. Schonfeld, and G. A. Smith, "Capstone interdisciplinary team project: a requirement for the MS in sustainability degree," International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 187-199, 2015.[6] K. A. Phillips and H. J. Doyle, "An interdisciplinary capstone expierence integrates science, technology, buisness, and law for joint MS students in environment and resources at Stanford University," Journal of
Peer Mentoring Benefits Mentees: What about Mentors?,” Proceedings of the 2011ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[3] R. D. Robnett, P. A. Nelson, E. L. Zurbriggen, F. J. Crosby, and M. M. Chemers, “Researchmentoring and scientist identity: insights from undergraduates and their mentors,” InternationalJournal of STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y.[4] A. M. Zaniewski and D. Reinholz, “Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoringprogram in the physical sciences,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, May2016, doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0043-2.[5] J.A. Coller, M. Su, L.K. Alford, S. Sheffield and R. Fowler, “Assessment of Peer Mentoring ofTeams in a First-Year Design-Build-Test
to create a bigger and better product in the future. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to thank the lab manager, Joseph Diecidue, for providing the materialsnecessary for this project, as well as Professor Filip Cuckov for his technical advice and suggestionsfor Future Directions in particular. REFERENCES[1] S. Islam, A. Pulungan, and A. Rochim, “Inventory management efficiency analysis: A case study of an SME company”, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1402, no. 2. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022040.[2] M. Paolanti, M. Sturari, A. Mancini, P. Zingaretti, and E. Frontoni, “Mobile robot for retail surveying and
, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005.[3] S. Root-Elledge et al., “The echo model® for enhancing assistive technology implementation in schools,” Assist. Technol. Outcomes Benefits, vol. 12, pp. 37–55, Jul. 2018.[4] B. S. Hoppestad, “Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: An overview of the current literature,” Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 189– 199, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1080/17483100701249540.[5] C. Ward-Sutton, N. F. Williams, C. L. Moore, and E. O. Manyibe, “Assistive Technology Access and Usage Barriers Among African Americans With Disabilities: A Review of the Literature and Policy,” J. Appl. Rehabil. Couns., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 115