levels. He worked in consulting with CH2M Hill and Black &Veatch for 6.5 years. Dr. Mines holds a BS, ME, and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Military Institute,University of Virginia, and Virginia Tech. He’s a registered PE in Florida, New Mexico, and Virginia.JANET CARLSON POWELL is the Associate Director at the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, a non-profitdedicated to providing leadership in science education through curriculum and professional development, andresearch in these areas. She has a BA in environmental biology, an MS in curriculum and instruction, and a Ph.D. inscience education. She has taught and conducted research in elementary, secondary, and higher education settings.LAURA W. LACKEY has four years of
154 First-year Experience for Engineering Lab Course: The Mini-Rose Parade Float Project Update – Year 6 Jody Hamabata California State Polytechnic University, PomonaAbstractThis paper discusses how our university integrates the Cal State’s “learn by doing” philosophyinto the curriculum by combining both a lecture and lab to prepare students for careers inengineering through hands on activities. Each Winter Quarter, each EGR 100 Lab section is giventhe task of designing and building a miniature Rose Float. Under given specifications the
B.C.The context for our FYI must be noted. The integration of Critical Thinking has been tried –successfully and unsuccessfully – in higher education for many years. Among General Education(GenEd) faculty at DeVry, we have experienced three models to promote critical thinking acrossthe curriculum.1. Persuade faculty to incorporate Critical Thinking in every course. ½This can be achieved by: ½ Getting students to answer in complete sentences on labs, quizzes, exams Avoiding regurgitative multiple-choice questions that only assess memory not thinking ½ or problem-solving ½ Giving students problems to trouble-shoot individually and in groups Encouraging substantiated
available professor prep., in-class for the students to spend using this product? safety expectations How safe must the product be? durability expectations How long does the user expect product to last? course purpose, future What are their future plans? (engineer, pilot, graduate plans school, lawyer, business school, something else, not sure) Is this an elective or required course? current course and How do the activities need to fit into the course curriculum curriculum? Should they be in-class, lab, or assigned to be done outside of class?3.2 Defining the Educational Goals / Objectives based on
modulated-IR detectors and abumper system capable of detecting contact at left front, front, and right front. All robots wererequired to maintain an IR beacon so that the guard (killer-cop) robots could locate them. Theguard robots would then attempt to ram the contestant robots. The guard robots were equippedwith software routines that supported three modes of operation; search, attack, maneuver. Themaneuver mode of operation prevented the robots from becoming stuck in a corner and allowedthem to find their way around intervening obstacles while pursuing a beacon signal. In additionto being an integral part of the contest event, these robots served as an example of simple, yetruggedly constructed robots of base-line capability. The software design
third-party application for talent recruitment. This third-party applicationhas partnered with Textio that integrates the data-driven language insights for recruiters andhiring managers when they write job posts in Workday [62]. Textio is an online service basedon Gaucher et al. encoded list that helps to minimize the gender bias in job postings [49]. Itis likely that those job postings published through Workday empowered university recruitmentsites may have been gender neutralized through the tool offered in the application. Moreover,postdoc postings from non-academic institutions reported less masculine-coded, which mayencourage more female applicants for postdoc careers outside of academia. The feminine-codedpostings also had a slightly
Paper ID #24651A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering Design ProjectDr. James ”Jamie” Canino, Trine University Jamie Canino is currently an associate professor at Trine University where he focuses on undergraduate education research. He teaches in the thermal-fluids and aerospace engineering fields and can be reached at caninoj@trine.edu.Dr. Kendall B. Teichert, Trine University Dr. Teichert received his B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. His Masters research studied behavior of microelectromechanical sensors/actuators. He worked for a small engineering firm in Salt Lake City, Utah
instruction. She is a member of ASEE, ASME, and IEEE.Tracy D Blake, Utah State University Tracy Blake, a lecturer in the Engineering and Technology Dept. at Utah State University, instructs engineering courses at the Tooele regional campus. His industry experience covers a variety of fields including component and system level design. He has several years of teaching experience in electrical engineering at Arizona and Utah State Universities. His current position involves assisting in the building of an educational program that will allow students to take engineering courses at locations remote to the main campus.Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University Dr. Wade Goodridge, Principal Lecturer in the Department of
methodology.Keywords: Technical Education, Engineering, Assessment, Measurement, Sustainability.Introduction:Sustainability is a buzzword in modern times. Many areas have been attracted touse the term Sustainability to refer to keeping up, prolonging, and enduring.Sustainability have been used in areas such as development, ecology, energy,biology, to name a few. According to [1], sustainability is the noun form of theverb to sustain, and it means to keep up, prolong, endure, etc. The termSustainability is sometimes coupled with the synonym Maintainability whichmeans to keep in an appropriate condition or to sustain against opposition ordanger. The main difference between Sustainability and Maintainability is theamount of energy and the type of effort needed
, System Integration and LEAN Process Improvement (technical and business), Dr. Wickliff is passionate about Organizational Wellness and the Holistic Well- ness of individuals. She is also a professional Facilitator and Motivational Speaker. Dr. Wickliff earned a PhD in Interdisciplinary Engineering from Texas A&M University where she combined Industrial En- gineering and Organizational Development to conduct research in the area of talent management and organizational effectiveness. She also completed an executive MBA from the University of Texas-Dallas and a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Houston. She is founder of a nationally rec- ognized pre-college initiative program, FreshStart, which has
dialogue, an educator engineer, in addition to being empathic, critical, and capable of dialoguing, must also be open to learn throughout his/her life. S/he must be willing to learn from the endless praxis’ exercise and even to be taught by the supposedly naive grassroots group s/he is serving: learning from the group’s knowledge, strategies of political action, worldviews and values, etc.Since a grassroots engineer is supposed to be able to develop popular education alongside – or asan integrant part of – the technical support they provide to grassroots groups, they must be aneducator engineer. Defined like that, it can be said that “grassroots engineer” and “educatorengineer” are synonyms.It is
Learned” paper is to investigate how former graduate studentleaders can employ their experiences to achieve and excel in service requirements as juniortenure-track faculty members. Research skills, and increasingly teaching ability, have been coreto the graduate student curriculum, and match the majority of faculty tenure requirements.However, preparation for the service requirement is often overlooked at both the graduatestudent and faculty level. While a small part of the overall tenure package, there is an unspokenpresumption that faculty members will be able to serve effectively and efficiently. In STEMcurricula, the development of interpersonal skills is often overlooked. While this may not be animpediment in research communications, faculty
12.1201.8Fig. 7 Displacement measurement with an LVDT.Optically-coupled isolation amplifier: Significant differences in ground potentialsbetween a sensor and its signal conditioner may occur in some instrumentationapplications. A differential amplifier may not be suitable in these cases; the ground-potential difference may exceed the common-mode voltage range of the amplifier, ormay be sufficiently large to damage or destroy the amplifier [6]. Isolation amplifiers areappropriate in such instances. There are multiple approaches to making an isolationamplifier (e.g., transformer coupling, capacitive coupling, or optical coupling). TheEENG 4302 curriculum included the construction and test of an optically-coupledisolation amplifer using an MCT9001 dual
Engineering Thermodynamics, New York: Wiley and Sons, Fifth Edition, 2004.[2] Schmidt, P. S., O. A. Ezekoye, J. R. Howell, and D. K. Baker, Thermodynamics: An integrated Learning Page 11.65.12 System, New York: Wiley and Sons, 2006.[3] “MathCAD,” http://www.mathcad.com/, 2005.[4] “MATLAB 7.0.1: The Language of Technical Computing MatLab,” http://www.mathworks.com/products/ matlab/, 2005.[5] “EES: Engineering Equation Solver,” http://www.fchart.com/ees/ees.shtml, 2004.[6] Hodge, B. K. and W. G. Steele, “Computational Paradigms in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Education,” Presented at the 2001 ASEE Annual
to Engineering,” Defense Dept., Army, United States Military Academy, pp.210, 20022. Library of Congress: American Memory Collection, “Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record,” http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/habs_haer/.3. Ressler, S. J., “West Point Bridge Designer,” Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, West Point Military Academy, 2005, http://bridgecontest.usma.edu/.4. Integrated Engineering Software, Inc., Visual Analysis 4.0, 2000, http://www.iesweb.com/.CLAY NAITODr. Naito is an assistant professor of structural engineering in the department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering at Lehigh University and an associated faculty of the ATLSS Research Center. He received a
confidence to pursue a careerin engineering. Through an integrated approach to learning, engineering education has thepotential to not only be a catalyst for improving K-12 STEM education[8], but to enable girls intheir development towards a career choice in engineering. This increased investment in STEMeducation will boost U.S. global competitiveness by increasing productivity[3]. The 2010-11 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Report describes educational counselors asresponsible for, among many things, operating career information centers and career educationprograms in order to promote the career development of children and youth[9]. The AmericanSchool Counselor Association’s National Standards (standard A in the area of careerdevelopment
leadership positions for professional organizations such as ASME and ASEE. He is a past chair of the Engineering Ethics Division at ASEE and past chair of multiple groups in ASME. Dr. Barakat is also a program evaluator for ABET and a consultant for engineering programs development and evaluation under other systems. Dr. Barakat is an active consultant who is currently collaborating with international teams of professionals from academia and industry to build capacity and education programs in areas such as: Engineering Leadership, Engineering Ethics, Professionalism, Societal Impact of Technology, Curriculum Development, and Communication. Dr. Barakat expertise and interest include also the areas of Mechatronics, Control
they developcurriculum intended to ensure equal access to rich curricular learning opportunities for allstudents. The state and national standards highlight the comprehensive nature oftechnological literacy. Knowledge of the national and state technology standardsinforms teachers’ practice as they work to integrate all aspects of technology acrossdisciplines within the curriculum. Student Learning Objectives Students should be able to: 6a.) Identify aspects of state and national technology standards in their inquiry- based projects. 6b.) Incorporate issues related to technology in the K-8 curriculum. ImplementationThe course builds on the successful course for first-year
positions on campus, mentoring and beingmentored, and lifelong learning. Course topics were selected with an eye towards when students would make the best useof the materials. Also, short assignments were selected to encourage the students to reflect uponour discussions and take positive actions in their daily activities. Students are encouraged tocontribute to all discussions and to provide input on other topics they would like to see in thecourse. Approximately 90 students begin the first semester course, with most continuing onthrough the second semester. Students have consistently selected this course as the most usefulcourse from their first year and strongly urge other students to participate in future offerings.I. Introduction
Paper ID #11101Towards a Multimedia-based Virtual Classroom on Cyber-Physical System(CPS) Security Education for Both City and Rural SchoolsProf. Fei Hu, University of Alabama Dr. Fei Hu is currently an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alabama (main campus), Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA. He obtained his Ph.D. degrees at Tongji University (Shanghai, China) in the field of Signal Processing (in 1999), and at Clarkson University (New York, USA) in the field of Electrical and Computer Engineering (in 2002). He has published over 200 journal/conference papers, books
10.411.8Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 11. Summary of ILS results for Visual/Verbal attribute.5. DiscussionThese results suggest that the Ladder Logic Tool Kit design is instructionally effective, and thatstudents’ subjective impressions of the system are positive. It appears that we may safelycontinue to develop similar types of lessons. It also appears that the Toolkit’s visual, exploratoryis a good fit for active, visual learners.6. Conclusion and Future DirectionsThis paper has described continuing steps in the process of developing an Integrated VirtualLearning System, called
Paper ID #47853Readying the Workforce: Engineering Veteran Graduate Student ExperiencesPivoting Towards ResearchDr. Bradley Joseph Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University Brad Sottile is Associate Teaching Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering in The Pennsylvania State University’s College of Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.Dr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Pennsylvania State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science
inclassroom.To facilitate peer-to-peer interactions beyond the weekly class time, the iPodia technicalplatform also integrates three key additions to the mutually connected classrooms located indifferent places of the globe:(a) Learning Management System: In addition to gaining the synchronized “face-to-face time” with each other inside the classroom, students can review class archives and remain in constant communication with each in an un-synchronized manner via the Learning Management System (LMS). Figure 3 illustrates an iPodia course website built upon the Page 24.827.4 LMS of the Blackboard System.(b) Small Group Synergy: While working on
additionalengineering schools to broaden the student demographic and is one of the few such STEMstudies we are aware of. An NSF grant enabled us to compare blended and flipped instruction ina numerical methods course for engineers at three universities – University of South Florida(USF), Arizona State University (ASU), and Alabama A&M University (AAMU) - between2014 and 2016 (Kaw et.al., 2013). These universities differ in their characteristics, therebyadding to the generalizability of our findings. At each school, the course covers basic numericalmethods for differentiation, nonlinear equations, simultaneous linear equations, interpolation,regression, integration, and ordinary differential equations. The course is taken primarily bymechanical engineers at
civil and environmental engineering department at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Ozis holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Southern California. Dr. Ozis is a licensed Professional Engineer, Environmental, in Arizona. Before joining CMU, Dr. Ozis was a faculty member at Northern Arizona University, and at University of Southern California. Dr. Ozis enjoys every dimension of being an engineering educator. She teaches across the curriculum from freshman introductory level, to graduate level courses. Dr. Ozis conducts research related to engineering classrooms and innovative pedagogical strategies. Dr. Ozis
inrecent research from Corbi et al., [15]. Engineering students often experience heightened stressand anxiety due to the rigorous demands of their curriculum, which can negatively affect theirconfidence and performance [16]. A study by Olivera-Carhuaz et al., [17] emphasizes the role ofanxiety, dysthymia, and negative affect in shaping academic self-efficacy, particularly among 5engineering students. The findings from the study underscore the need for pedagogical approachesthat address these emotional challenges. Hands-on pedagogies, such as Experiment-CentricPedagogy which help to mitigate these negative states by fostering an engaging and
to complete their 62.50% degree in 4 years Figure 7: FTIC students who anticipate graduating on timeThe students that anticipated to complete their degree on time reported that they wouldaccomplish that goal by (a) studying hard, passing their classes, and working hard; (b) taking asmany courses every semester as possible, such as 4 courses per a regular semester and 3 insummer, and not skipping semesters; (c) following their undergraduate major map andcompleting the required curriculum; (d) planning and managing their time efficiently; and (e)working with an advisor to create a career path and following the roadmap the
Lab. Currently, he is a Professor of Chemistry at Pasadena City College and runs an undergraduate research program attempting to infuse active learning in conjunction with remotely accessible microscopes into K-12 and university science curriculum. He is actively in- volved in bring micro nanotechnology technician programs to Community College campuses being a part of the Remotely Accessible Instruments in Nanotechnology (RAIN) Network and the Nanotechnology Professional Development Partnership (NPDP) Program.Prof. Jillian L Blatti, Pasadena City College Jillian L. Blatti is a chemistry professor at Pasadena City College. She was part of the algae biotechnology community as a graduate student at the
workshops to teach faculty about process safety.[11] Teaching learners to use theframework will help them to organize information learned, connect ideas, and identify areas forlearning growth. The process safety framework also has the potential to help departments definegoals for process safety by identifying which questions are addressed in their curriculum. Theframework also enables faculty to integrate content into their existing courses simply by askingthe questions. The framework can help faculty design new process safety courses by helpingthem identify what they are teaching and what they are missing.The Process Safety knowledge framework is composed of six key questions: 1. What are the hazards and how are they characterized? 2. How can
a sample scenarioabout modern challenges in managing electronic waste. Feedback from project advisory boardmembers are integrated in this discussion.BackgroundEngineering programs have an explicit need to define, teach and measure professional skillssince their introduction by ABET evaluation criteria for engineering programs in 2000. Theseskills include ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (3d), understanding of professionaland ethical responsibility (3f), ability to communicate effectively (3g), understanding of theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societalcontexts (3h), recognition of and ability to engage in life-long learning (3i), and knowledge ofcontemporary issues (3j). A well