ofcompetencies, even though they are not listed in the revised version[9].The NICE Framework was developed from some of the earlier attempts in the US to develop aminimum foundation that CSEC professionals graduating from an academic program shouldhave. An example here is the NSA Centers for Academic Excellence (CAE) in InformationSecurity that focused more on the theoretical aspects of CSEC and not much on the skills andabilities [10]. The next large-scale effort was more international and was spearheaded by theIEEE-CS and ACM and produced the Joint Task Force on Cybersecurity EducationCybersecurity Curriculum Guidelines for Post-Secondary Degree Programs in Cybersecurity(CSEC 2017). But here again, workforce development was not a large focus (if any
leadership programs into three clusters: technical integration, developingsocial impact, and influencing core curriculum. A popular option adopted in many schools[4-11] is the creation and implementation of engineering leadership development programswhich are positioned to supplement the engineering education awarding academic credit,certification, or both. Some of these programs, particularly the Gordon-MIT LeadershipDevelopment Program culminating in certificates of leadership at the undergraduate level[7], the Gordon-Northeastern Leadership Program at the graduate level [14], and the PennState Engineering Leadership Development Minor [4], are successful engineeringleadership models which have been in existence for many years and serve as
Paper ID #32320The Use of Virtual Design Modules in an Introduction to EngineeringCourse: Impact on Learning Outcomes and Engineering IdentityDr. Shannon Barker, University of Virginia Dr. Shannon Barker completed her PhD at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and completed two post-doctoral fellowships at the University of Washington and Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lau- sanne, specializing in gene delivery. Shannon has been in graduate higher education leadership for seven years both at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Virginia, and is currently the Undergraduate Program Director for the
redesigned a project in an introductory bioengineering course to explore stress managementtechniques through physiology, biosensors, and design. The project allows students to developdesign skills and to explore the impact of wellness practices on human physiology. Assessmentof the curricular redesign will be measured by student evaluations of the offering and theirwillingness to engage in the mindfulness portion of the course. The COVID-19 pandemic hasemphasized the need to focus on student wellbeing in addition to physical health. Integration ofwellness into the core curriculum promotes the use of existing campus resources presented inclass and may normalize the use of these resources within engineering departments and colleges.Ultimately, the
Colorado Denver, and curriculum lead at Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She is currently division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Comparing Student Outcomes from Four Iterations of an Engineering Learning CommunityAbstractThis Complete Evidence-based Practice paper evaluates the impact of learning communities onthe academic success of first-year engineering students. The Engineering Learning Community(ELC) at a large urban university is
graduating from the United States Air Force Academy(USAFA). In 2010 there were 28 graduates. In 2020 there were 15 ECE graduates. This declineis not necessarily unique to USAFA. The United States saw only 10% of the global science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) bachelor’s degrees in 2018 [1]. About half ofstudents who enter a STEM program do not graduate with a STEM degree; most of thesestudents drop out during their first or second year of college due to the increasing difficulty andcomplexity of STEM programs [2], [3], [4]. To motivate and engage students, undergraduateeducators must design a curriculum that integrates hands-on learning early in the program that isrelevant and can provide students a sense of ownership of their educations
. The program has developed an academic innovation ecosystem in which S-STEMscholars will be embedded in order to benefit from the talents and knowledge of over 300underrepresented engineering peers. However, the NSF scholars will be the strategic focus of theBEATS’ academic and social integration programs that include specialized counseling, mentoring,and professional development but will not exist as a separate S-STEM cohort apart from peers. Tothat end, a collateral project objective is to further develop a more cohesive multiculturalcommunity in which S-STEM low income and “At Risk” scholars can gain a strong sense ofbelonging, self-efficacy, teamwork and collective sense of academic purpose.3) Thirdly, the project team seeks to gain
quantized systems with applications to adaptive and dual control and the design of distributed autonomous control systems; the development of advanced signal processing and data analytics for monitoring and tracking of physiological behavior in health and disease.Mr. Nicholas A. Barendt, Case Western Reserve University Nick Barendt is the Executive Director, Institute for Smart, Secure and Connected Systems (ISSACS) at Case Western Reserve University, in Cleveland, Ohio. He is also an Adjunct Senior Instructor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering and the Department of Computer and Data Sciences at Case Western Reserve University. He has worked in a variety of industries: Industrial
geometric design educationfrom being an almost mechanical implementation of design standards to assessing how AV im-pact human decision-making and safety. This, in turn, trains civil engineering students to be moreconscious of the needs of their clients and the community in their careers. This paper discusses how AVs were integrated into a geometric design class for upperclassmenand graduate students in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois througha Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach. The aim of the study is to discuss both changesto existing standards recommended by them as well as the reasoning behind it. Additionally, theeffectiveness of implementing this approach by building multi-disciplinary teams will be
Paper ID #34925Engineering Graduate Education: An Overwhelming Journey ofFirst-Generation ImmigrantsDr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a postdoctoral fellow at Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests
Paper ID #33017Successes and Lessons in Year 4 of an S-STEM Summer Sophomore Bridgeduring the COVID-19 PandemicDr. Katie Evans, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Katie Evans is the Associate Dean of Strategic Initiatives in the College of Engineering and Science, Academic Director of Mathematics and Statistics and Online Programs, the Entergy LP and L/NOPSI #3 and #4 Professor of Mathematics, the Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center, and the Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering and Louisiana Tech University. Dr. Evans also serves as the Chair of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program
. To do this work, she integrates methods from de- sign, human-computer interaction, and education to understand how collaborative discourse and learning occur.Dr. Emma Mercier Emma Mercier is an associate professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her work focuses on collaborative learning in classrooms, and in particular, the use of technology for teachers and students during collaborative learning. Most recently Mercier’s projects have focused on collaborative learning in required undergraduate engineering courses. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Investigating the
of the Computer Engineering program at UW-Stout. In this program an embedded system is viewed as any object that contains a computing device(e.g. a microprocessor, microcontroller, or a digital signal processor) with the object itself notfunctioning as a general purpose computer. This definition allows us to consider any object from asimple appliance (like a digital watch) to complex portable integrated devices such as medicalinstrumentation and 4G cellular devices containing gigabytes of memory and a complex operatingsystem supporting a variety of applications. Students are encouraged to engage their imaginations andengineering skills to solve real-life problems using embedded systems technologies (hardware andsoftware) as well as the
but to spread the collection and analysis of SO to many classes. Other than capstonesenior design classes, each required class collects and analyzes data for only two SO although manycourses address more than two. In the past cycle, the curriculum committee has worked to distributethe SO throughout the program so that there isn’t an imbalance with many courses providing datafor a SO while few courses contributing to another SO. This mapping of SO throughout thecurriculum is evaluated and adjusted at the beginning of an assessment cycle. Overall, each coursehas a reduced documentation load and more faculty become involved in the continuousimprovement process. This broader participation has encouraged faculty to document topics in theircourses
curriculum with theBuckingham Pi theorem, it is worthwhile to bring into the cornerstone class as a “check” toensure all expected quantities are accounted for. Other disciplines may not have the morerigorous Buckingham Pi coverage, so this may be the only time they encounter unit analysis.As engineering students understanding the why of calculus is often difficult as the mathematicalconcepts are taught by non-engineers who often enjoy math for its own sake and beauty.Engineering students on the other hand want to see how this tool helps them solve problems andapply engineering science to design. In our courses, we briefly spend time connecting numericalintegration to estimating areas. Numerical integration combined with dimensional analysis is
Paper ID #34604Abruptly Transitioning an In-Person Hands-on Prototyping Course to FullyOnline Instruction: The Creative Tension Between Maintaining a PositiveExperience and Achieving Learning OutcomesMr. Adulfo Amador, Undergraduate StudentDr. Matthew Wettergreen, Rice University Matthew Wettergreen was appointed director of the department’s Master’s of Bioengineering Global Med- ical Innovation program in 2020. He is also an Associate Teaching Professor at the award-winning Osh- man Engineering Design Kitchen at Rice University, recruited as the first faculty hire in 2013. Wettergreen co-developed six of the seven engineering
Generation Science Standards(NGSS) [2] highlight the importance of including engineering in the K-12 curriculum. Theimplementation of NGSS requires that teachers understand engineers’ use of design in their workas well as the ways that engineering is connected to science, technology, and society. The waysin which an engineer’s work connects to science, technology, and society is dependent upon thespecific context in which they are working, and offering students opportunities to engage withproblems situated within realistic engineering contexts can help students meaningfully learnmathematics and science [3]. Providing these opportunities for students will require teachers tohave an understanding of the work of engineers and the way that work connects
University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 and the ”Engineering Society Teaching Award” in 2016 and the ”Outstanding Performance Award” in 2018 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who continuously introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement.Prof. Scott Walbridge P.E., University of Waterloo Scott Walbridge has been a professor in the University of
Paper ID #35106STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES): A reimagining of an onsiteNASA/TSGC/UTCSR high school internship programMrs. Celena Miller, University of Texas Austin - Center for Space Research Celena Miller is the Senior Outreach Program Coordinator for the Texas Space Grant Consortium in Austin, Texas. She has worked for over twelve years in education. During that time, Celena has worked in the Texas public school system, promoting earth and space education to students, teachers and the community through curriculum, professional development, science nights, and career exploration. Celena has been recognized for
Paper ID #33702An Evaluation of a University-Level, High School Course Taught to FosterInterest in Civil Engineering (Evaluation)Ms. Morgan R. Broberg, Purdue University Morgan Broberg is a current Ph.D. student in Civil Engineering at Purdue University. Her research inter- ests include modeling, analysis, and design of steel-concrete composite systems and effective teaching in civil engineering.Susan Khalifah P.E., S.E., Purdue University Ms. Susan Khalifah is the Director of Student Experience in the Lyles School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University. Additionally, she is an instructor for CE 479 (Design of Building
are drawn to engineering when theysee its potential for improving peoples’ lives and by integration of the social values that youngwomen care about with the emphasis on important and unique contributions to individuals and tothe overall society [6, 7]. Although many researchers point out that outreach as early as middleschool is important in embedding the idea that anyone can be an engineer, many universities donot offer many outreach programs to this age group because of the inexperience withage-appropriate pedagogy, risk management issues, and unknown benefits to the institution inrelation to the limited resources available [8]. Longitudinal studies suggest that special focus hasto be placed on generational aspects of Generation Y, and
statics.Due to these concerns, the author has structured dynamics in a fundamentally different way:using a spiral curriculum. Central to this approach is teaching the most fundamental topics ofdynamics in the first week: kinetics, kinematics, and computer simulation. This teaching takesplace in the context of rectilinear motion using examples that extend across all three topic areas.This gives students an overview of the course, allowing them to make connections between whatcan seem like isolated topics. It also makes the course more robust; students learn the big ideasearly on, and the rest of the course develops these ideas for cases of increasing complexity.Exciting examples that students can relate to are used to teach the material which helps
computer engineeringprogram at Utah Valley University (UVU) conclude their degree programs with a semestercapstone design experience. The intent is for students to utilize competencies developed in thefirst three years of the curriculum in the solution of an embedded design problem.Educational excellence requires exposing students to the current edge of research. To ensure thatstudent projects are along the same trajectory that the industry is moving, educators mustcontinually introduce emerging techniques, practices, and applications into the curriculum. Thefield of haptics is growing rapidly, and there is increasing interest in providingundergraduate students with a foundation in the area. It is crucial that the emerging field ofhaptics
asking students to givepeers positive feedback may benefit the giver (and receiver). Similarly, an opportunity in themiddle of the term to give positive feedback to teaching assistants (TAs) and/or the professorcould be meaningful. This can have a practical benefit by allowing students reinforce what theylike.In courses related to professional skills or transitioning to college, specific training on self-kindness could be integrated. Smeets et al. [18] described a group intervention around self-compassion. Although this was done outside-of-class with volunteers, a similar activity could beintegrated into a course with the appropriate scaffolding. For example, students could be giventhe assessment instrument (the 12-item self-compassion scale
- ally established cybersecurity professionals rather than under-shortage of nearly three million cybersecurity professionals represented minorities [8]. Other barriers to underrepresentedand staff [1]. Nearly 60 % of organizations report that they minority participation in CTF competitions include:are at an extreme or moderate cyber risk due to the highstaff shortage [1]. The ISC2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study • Students have limited knowledge or exposure to cyberreport notes that 17 % of the cybersecurity workforce who concepts in the undergraduate curriculum. Of the 300identified as being a minority were female, and 9 percent colleges and universities that are designated as
virtually going to factories, R&D studios, and laboratories. In addition,spreadsheets and video are used as part of the integrated PBL-VR modules. This work has beenongoing for several years, and several universities and companies have adopted the technology,however, the paper does not provide any formal assessments on its effectiveness.The authors in [58] develop a set of VR models, PBL, and case studies to be integrated withvarious courses in the industrial engineering curriculum and help address competency gaps inmanufacturing workforce. Student teams are assigned to work on industry-based projects thatrequire VR walk-through tours enabled by a discrete-event simulation model of an actual Boeingmanufacturing line. A formal rubric is used for
Teaching of Institutional Core CurriculaAbstract We have been teaching Institutional core curricula courses at The University of Texas atEl Paso (UTEP) since 1996. The course curricula, sources, and most relevant, the innovations inteaching each course have impacted STEM student success and learning. The Texas Core Curriculum (TCC) is defined by the Texas Education Code (TEC)Section 61.821 as: ... "the curriculum in liberal arts, humanities, and sciences and political,social, and cultural history that all undergraduate students of an institution of higher educationare required to complete before receiving an academic undergraduate degree." Texas Senate Bill(SB) 148, passed by the 75th Texas Legislature in
Paper ID #33711Assessing Elementary Students’ Engineering Design Thinking with an”Evaluate-And-Improve” Task (Fundamental)Nicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts University Nicole Batrouny is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Her engineering education research interests include upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and en- gineering, collaboration in engineering, and decision making in engineering. For her Master’s thesis, she uncovered talk moves used by 4th grade students that fostered collaborative, disciplinary decision-making during an engineering design outreach program. For
. Exam scores were improved when measuring studentsability to create use cases, especially clarity and completeness. Student performance was greatlyimproved when writing use cases, especially clarity and completeness which was reflected inimproved projects. Quantitatively, the same mindset objectives were assessed in other coursemodules as part a larger curriculum wide effort in Engineering. The numerical results indicatethat the modules in this course outperformed other modules in the curriculum for most of themindset objectives. Ultimately, the results indicate these types of modules may play an importantrole in entrepreneurial mindset development for computer science students.IntroductionThis paper describes a set of modules designed to
cohesion, collaboration, and communication, while widespreadpreference for Marginalization can result in weak workplace culture that lacks goals or missionand lead to low employee job satisfaction, engagement, and retention.By contrast, when most employees adopt an Integration attitude, the chances of diversitybecoming an accepted feature of the overall workplace culture are expected to increase, leadingto the multiculturalism of values, beliefs, and ideas that spawn creativity, innovation, equity, andinclusion [19]-[21]. Thus, maximizing the likelihood that engineers bring or are encouraged todevelop an Integration attitude to their jobs seems like the best approach for increasing thediversity in the engineering workforce. We will determine which