Contemporary Engineering Ethics Issues in anIntroductory Freshman Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006b.iii Mullin, J.S., Lohani, V.K., and Lo, J.L., “WIP: Introduction to Engineering Ethics through Student Skits in theFreshman Engineering Program at Virginia Tech,” to be published in the Proceedings of the 2006 Frontiers inEducation Conference, San Diego, CA, October 27- November 1, 2006b. Page 13.533.14iv Lohani, V., and Mullin, J. S., 2006. “International activities in a freshman engineering course,” Posterpresented at the International Education Fair
3.524 4.0288 Critical thinking 3.578 3.9789 Ability to identify and formulate problems 3.564 3.97210 Importance of a broad and general education 3.803 3.95811 Expectation of the need for lifelong learning 3.433 3.95012 Understanding of ethical and professional responsibilities 3.208 3.92413 Ability to be a leader 3.155 3.83414 Ability to apply knowledge of basic science & chem eng fundamentals 4.063 3.75415 Management
. Page 13.705.3 CADET BASIC TRAINING Afghan, Regional, & Information Pre-Calculus & Ethics, Moral Intro to the Military1 Foreign Language Composition Islamic Culture Technology Modeling Theory & Islam Profession Introduction to2 Foreign Language World History Composition Chemistry Calculus I
distance education,” Journal of Distance Education, vol. 13, 1998, pp. 1–32. 13. McAlpine, H., L. Lockerbie, D. Ramsay, and S. Beaman, “Evaluating a web-based graduate level nursing ethics course: thumbs up or thumbs down?,” Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 33, 2002, pp. 12–18. 14. Able, K., “Modernizing the teaching method in the classroom-Does it impact student performance?” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007, AC 2007-2525. 15. Salamonson, Y., and J. Lantz, “Factors influencing nursing students’ preference for a hybrid format delivery in a pathophysiology course,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 25, 2005, pg. 9-16. 16. Young, J.R., “Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between
thestudent who achieves a bachelor degree in civil engineering will essentially only be acquiring a Page 13.1398.8‘pre-engineering’ level of knowledge. There will be greater emphasis on history, globalawareness, business and economics, environment and ethics. It just may be that the BS in civilengineering will not suffice for an entry-level position in civil design or construction firms, andthat the new-normal for entry to civil engineering practice will be the Masters Degree. How willthis new-normal level affect the civil engineering industry in the U.S.?As civil engineering education is broadened to be more of a pre-engineering course of study,then
Research Experiences for Undergraduates(REU) program [1]. The goal of this program is to support active research participation by undergraduate studentswith the long-term goal of encouraging more students to pursue advanced degrees and to increase participation ofgroups traditionally underrepresented in science and engineering. One key attribute of such a program is that theREU projects must involve students in meaningful ways – i.e. the undergraduates may not be simply lab technicians.It is viewed favorably if the REU Sites include professional development training including ethics. Also, involvingparticipants from diverse schools across the country (especially those from primarily undergraduate institutions) aswell as inclusion of an
,and solve engineering 22.5 1.5 0 0 0 14problems 4.94f. understanding ofprofessional and ethical 17 3 4 0 0 14responsibility 4.54g. ability to communicateeffectively 19 5 0 0 0 14 4.79h. ability to understand theimpact of engineering in a 11 5 4 0 0 18global context 4.35i. recognition of the need for,and ability to engage in life- 14 7 2 0
analog/digital, dynamic reconfiguration for implementing new functionality and obtaining better performance.In terms of ABET’s (a)-(k) criteria4, the following are the primary outcomes set for the course:(a) Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering.(b) Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as, analyze and interpret data.(c) Ability to design a system, component, or process, to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, and safetymanufacturability, and sustainability.(d) Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.(e) Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems.(g) Ability to communicate effectively.(k
of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: • planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine, the built environment; • stewards of the natural environment and its resources; • innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors; • managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats; and • leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy.As used in the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025, “master” means to possess widely
the best chapter in the Northeast region 16. Suchconsistent recognition is indicative of a program’s performance versus a finite set of individualsin a particular year. The criteria used for this recognition is based planning, conducting andparticipating in a variety of specified and directed professional activities. These activities,deemed by ASCE to be critical activities for students to engage in to successfully introduce themto expected professional activities include technical seminars, ethics and licensure seminars, fieldtrips, professional conferences, and local society meetings.28 The sustained success in thisactivity implies the students are identifying knowledge and attitudes for professional practice(Analysis) and are developing
the submission of neat and accurate technical reports and through individual and group presentations is (g):19 After completing this course, I recognize the need for, and an ability to 11 11 1 3.43 engage in lifelong learning (h):20 As a result of this course, my ability to understand professional, ethical, 10 11 2 3.35 and social responsibilities is (i):21 As a result of this course, I have respect for diversity and a knowledge 10 11 1 1 3.26 of contemporary professional, societal, and global issues (j):22 After completing this course, I have a commitment to quality, 12 11
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education From the Proceedings of the 2008 meeting of the American Society of Engineering EducationF. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityG. an ability to communicate effectivelyH. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal contextI. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningJ. a knowledge of contemporary issuesK. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practiceThe knowledge areas11 in Table 4 that the students are expected to acquire is discussed in moredetail
include: identification of the problem, information gathering, definition of the problem, development plan, execution plan, design verification, scheduling, and technical level, • for constraints analysis, targets includes the consideration of the following constraints: economic, environmental, sustainability, manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and political, • for the oral presentation, targets include: content, visuals, presentation skills, organization, and handling of questions.Cooney and Reid13 present similar rubrics for assessing student outcomes. Rubrics are given forwritten reports, oral presentations, design project (design review), and teamwork. For oralpresentations, two
teachers who are: ‚ engineers according to IGIP principles and have studied according to the ‚ IGIP curriculum studies at accredited institutes ‚ plus have one year of teaching experience.2.2.2 Curriculum overview and recognitionIGIP has established a curriculum for engineering pedagogy which is used in several countries.This curriculum is a modular system which consists of core modules (8 Credit Points), theorymodules (4 Credit Points) and practice modules (8 Credit Points). The core modules includetheoretical and practical engineering pedagogy as well as laboratory methodology. The theorymodules include psychology, sociology, ethics, and intercultural competencies. The practicemodules consists of oral communication skills, scientific
NanoJapan program, an internship program with nanotechnology laboratories in Japan. She is the recipient of two Fulbright grants for international education administrators (Germany and Japan.)Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh and Professor of Industrial Engineering. He holds the Ph.D. in Operations Research from the Johns Hopkins University and the B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience and the ethical behavior of engineers. Dr. Shuman has published widely in the engineering education literature. He is the
transceiver radio modems and PCs in Peruvian clinics and WiFi prototype.Jr 45.334 3 Engineering Ethics Gene Mellican Research the ethical pros and cons of 120 120 (required for introducing TV into remote Peruvian engineering students) villages.Sr 22.342 3 Convective Processes Gene Niemi Piping design of water supply system 47 47 for Yanacaca village, PeruJr 22.361 3 Mathematical John McKelliget Statistical analysis of health indicators 65 65 Methods for in Peruvian villages with systems from
, Assistant Superintendent, Merrillville Public Schools, INDr. John Hutton, Assistant Superintendent (Secondary), Valparaiso School Corporation, INMr. Garry DeRossett, Principal of Boone Grove High School, IN12:30 - 2:00 p.m. LunchSpeaker: Michael Littman, Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, PrincetonUniversity “Educating Future Engineers and Citizens about the Grand Tradition in Engineering”2:15 - 3:45 p.m. Session #3: The Place of Humanities in the Engineering CurriculumDr. Gary Downey, Panel Leader, Professor of Science and Technology in Society, Virginia TechDr. Deborah Johnson, Professor of Applied Ethics in Science, Technology, and Society,University of VirginiaDr. Cornelius Delaney, Professor of Philosophy and Co-Director of the
publicity and media relations for the department. He holds a B.S. in Manufacturing Engineering Technology and a Masters Degree in Technology Management from Brigham Young University and is currently pursuing a PhD in Educational Leadership from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His dissertation research is focused on how to help engineers become leaders in a global environment utilizing capstone courses and other project-based curriculum. He worked for BD Medical for nearly13 years including work as a project/program manager, business leader, technical services leader, product development engineer, and quality engineer. In addition, he provided project management and ethics training to many
environments; Page 13.573.4 Develop viable, marketable products that address sustainable development needs; Gain knowledge and skills in product realization and project management, including the ability to transfer a work in progress to other team members of engineering/business students; Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context and achieve insight into professional and ethical responsibilities.The overall E-teams’ assignment was to develop a sustainable product from concept to prototypeto business plan. In doing this, students learned about needs
AC 2008-2537: ASSESSING COGNITIVE REASONING AND LEARNING INMECHANICSChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos earned BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He previously served on the faculty of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, where he is currently a research associate, grant writer, lecturer, and director of educational programs. His research interests include biomechanics, nonlinear structural mechanics, computational mechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics. He is an active member of American Society for
high schoolsophomores and juniors. The resulting Mississippi Summer Transportation Institute (MSTI) wasdeveloped with several specific objectives. First, we wanted to expose the participating studentsto science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) as it applies to the transportationand the civil engineering profession. MSTI was also designed to introduce participants to thenumerous technical and professional career opportunities that exist in the transportation industry. Page 13.120.2A third objective was to provide opportunities for the students to develop leadership skills andimprove their work ethic. Finally, it was hoped that
% 10% 15% Computer skills Ethics Self-motivated match credentials meet qualifications flexibility diversity public service/customer service critical thinking Professionalism-at work on time-appropriate behavior teamworkAgain these answers greatly depend on the sector and field of the interviewees. However, threeof the six respondents stated that a strong ethical foundation, good computer skills, and theability to back up educational
formthat the student could re-play over and over? Could student-instructor interaction be handledelectronically in an effective manner?One of the concerns related to e-learning might be the loss of the tangential “information” thatwould be lost with a decrease in face to face time with the students. How does one get impressupon the student the value of ethics and academic integrity related to the engineering professionthat is not specifically stated in the course outline, yet come up in class numerous times duringthe semester? Case in point would be the issue of simply filling in the summary sheet forcoupled assignments with duplicate information rather than going back though thedocumentation to enter the computed values. Being sloppy in this
problems g. an ability to communicate effectively h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementThese are the well known “a through k” criteria for engineering technology programs.EAC of ABET documentation 3 delineates a very similar set of criteria for engineeringprograms. The general criteria apply to all ET programs at both associate andbaccalaureate degree levels. For programs in specific disciplines, different
areas: • Engineering Design16,17,18,19 • Professional Communications • Professional Tools • Engineering Ethics20Engineering Design Plan integrates design-and-build experiences with a structuredapproach to problem solving across all four years of the curriculum, culminating in a yearlong senior project. Professional Communications and Tools are concurrently introducedin the design courses throughout the four-year sequence to support the execution ofdesign projects. The Engineering Ethics component provides students with a frameworkfor understanding and accommodating professional expectations.The interdisciplinary greenhouse heating project with the WKU Agriculture Departmentprovided an excellent vehicle for this integration and
phenomena. A system that illuminates humanity‟s scientific, moral, aesthetic, and religious experience, for example, is superior to one that only illuminates science.”15 The historic Christian viewpoint accounts for the vast array of realities in nature and in human experience, including the universe, abstract entities, ethics, human beings, and religious phenomena.16 Systems engineering is the synthesis of diverse information and resources into a combination of complex subsystems that work together as a unified whole to solve some problem or accomplish some purpose. A systems engineering mindset is useful in thinking about the power and scope of a worldview because diverse elements of the worldview must come together to form a
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
thinking, systems engineering and systems decision making throughout a career of professional excellence and service to the nation as an officer in the United States Army. Outcome 1.1: Define the problem, design solutions, make decisions, and implement the chosen engineering solution within a broad global and societal context. Outcome 1.2: Act professionally and ethically as a leader of character within each stage of the system lifecycle. Objective 2: Produce graduates who effectively lead interdisciplinary teams in Joint, Combined, inter-agency, and multicultural environments. Outcome 2.1: Lead and work effectively as a contributing member of multidisciplinary systems engineering teams
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
thinking, systems engineering and systems decision making throughout a career of professional excellence and service to the nation as an officer in the United States Army. Outcome 1.1: Define the problem, design solutions, make decisions, and implement the chosen engineering solution within a broad global and societal context. Outcome 1.2: Act professionally and ethically as a leader of character within each stage of the system lifecycle. Objective 2: Produce graduates who effectively lead interdisciplinary teams in Joint, Combined, inter-agency, and multicultural environments. Outcome 2.1: Lead and work effectively as a contributing member of multidisciplinary systems engineering teams