contributes heavily to the inconsistent application of engineering at the K-12levels[3], [4]. A sampling of some options proposed by a researcher [5]are sequenced, parallel,partial, enhanced, and total approaches for STEM Integration that have demonstrated someeffects on science learning[6]. In all of these models, what has been accepted is the importanceof the design process in providing students with a meaningful context for identifying multiplesolutions to be applied to problems.[7], [8], [9], [10].Although there has not been an agreed way to do integrated engineering and science, there is,however, an accepted tool for measuring the effectiveness of integrated curriculums (STEM-Integration Curriculum Assessment)[1], based upon a STEM Integration
graduate students, but rather begins at the precollege level because“innovative methods to develop critical thinking, ethical sensitivity, and moral reasoning willprovide a strong foundation for students who might later pursue science as a profession, andbuild on that foundation for more experienced scientists” [1]. Although neuroethics is not a topicthat is regularly integrated into curriculum at the pre-college level, learning standards for scienceand technology education do provide an opportunity for these topics to be included in science,engineering, and technology classrooms.Ethics in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science teachers in the U.S. are directed byThe Framework for K-12 Science Education, the Next Generation Science
, andCircuits Lab. In developing the CALSTEP online laboratory courses, consideration was given tothe thirteen objectives for engineering educational laboratories defined by the ABET/SloanFoundation effort [8][9]. CALSTEP curriculum development also employs evidence-basedapproaches that maximize persistence and learning in a distance environment, including the useof inquiry and design-oriented activities that engage students in authentic engineeringexperiences. Content is delivered using a variety of formats similar to those used in manyexisting online and hybrid engineering courses [10-16].Introduction to EngineeringThe Introduction to Engineering course is an ideal forum to create opportunities for a rich,engaging, and empowering experience for
integrates multiple elements and services to foster a learning environment thatmotivates scholarship students to persist in their engineering studies; and 3) Foster an inclusivelearning environment by engaging all engineering students in diversity, equity, and inclusionexperiences and nurturing an equity mindset in student leaders through participation in trainingprograms.To accomplish these goals, we identified 10 low-income, academically talented students toreceive scholarships. We also identified 80 additional engineering students who wished toparticipate in the Engineering Living/Learning Community (ELC). The scholarship students andother interested students were placed in the ELC starting in Fall 2023, where they areexperiencing first year
her an informed perspective of how policy moves from theory to practice. Dr. Olson’s current research interests include urban teacher preparation, teacher professional development and student voice. Her most recent publication in Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching and Research Becoming A Culturally Responsive Teacher: The Impact Of Clinical Experiences In Urban Schools focuses on elementary and secondary teacher candidates’ perspectives of how their clinical experiences influence their preparedness in becoming effective culturally responsive educators.Mr. Darrin Collins, University of Illinois at Chicago Darrin Collins is a PhD candidate in the department of Math and Science Curriculum and Instruction at
across the country on developing meaningful, standard-based STEM experiences for their students. Mia currently serves as the Director of Professional Development at WPI’s STEM Education Center and as PI of an IES funded grant, Seeds of STEM. In these roles she oversees the development and facilitation of STEM themed professional development programs for PreK-12 teachers and administrators and the development and testing of STEM curriculum for preschool classrooms. Dr. Dubosarsky has an undergraduate degree in Biology from Israel’s Institute of Technology and a Doctorate in Curriculum & Instruction (science education) from the University of Minnesota.Shakhnoza Kayumova, University of Massachusetts DartmouthDr
Learning Opportunities. Through this grant entrepreneurial learning has been integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs. Faculty development on entrepreneurial minded learning is a part of this effort.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is an Assistant Provost for Program Assessment and Effectiveness at the Uni- versity of New Haven, CT. She is also an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering in the De- partment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. She obtained her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech and her Bachelors of Engineering from MIT. She has over 12 years of experience in
the potential toexclude those with the most need such as core discipline instructors with a Clinical or Professorof Practice that often have no research obligation, but have a large impact on undergraduates dueto their high teaching loads. Second, accreditation bodies also recognize the need for communication, and require thiselement to be included in an accredited undergraduate engineering program. An example is inABET’s requirement in Criterion 3, Outcome 3, which is “an ability to communicate effectivelywith a range of audiences”. While accreditation agencies do require communication-focusedelements to be integrated within the curriculum, such activities are typically required only onceover a four-year curriculum, which offers
public involvement and social science theory in the CSS Department. Her research interests include community economic development, site selection for biofuels supply chains, the social acceptability of wood-based biofuels, and sustainable land use planning approaches. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Interdisciplinary Design Course Structure: Lessons for Engineering Instructors from a Capstone Design Course Abstract This paper provides lessons learned from 6 years of developing and delivering an interdisciplinary undergraduate capstone and graduate course titled the Integrated Design Experience (IDX) at Washington State University and the University of Idaho. The
Paper ID #44540Empowering Youth to Create a Healthier Future Through STEM EducationAbout Antimicrobial ResistanceHector Palala, University of Nebraska, Lincoln H´ector de Jes´us Palala Mart´ınez is a doctoral student in Curriculum Studies and new technologies in the Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. H´ector teaches courses related to the integration of technology for future high school teachers as well as bilingual education and in all his classes he promotes justice, dignity and human rights. Previously, he was a professor of education at the Universidad de
(Evaluation)IntroductionFor over twenty years, a first year introduction to engineering design course at the University ofColorado Boulder has provided an experiential hands-on design experience that has been shownto significantly improve retention of engineering students [1]. Many studies have previouslydescribed K-12 STEM programs (as reviewed in [2]) however this curriculum attempts to takeadvantage of the strengths of the engineering design course at the University of ColoradoBoulder and Sparkfun Electronics hardware. This course introduces a variety of engineeringdisciplines including mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering using both formaldelivery of technical curriculum and hands-on design projects. We leveraged the
critical to understanding the needs and constraints of teaching at themiddle school level in an under-resourced environment. Though many considerations were involved in theproposal submission stage, the real-world integration of this work was still a novel concept.Our intention was to create content that could be easily adapted by teachers after they were introduced tothe curriculum for their use. This meant that the lesson plans would need to fit within a standard period, ablock period (for intensive courses), or two successive normal class periods for a middle school class.Designing with a standard bell schedule in mind meant that on average we would have 40-60 minutes ofinstructional time per standard period. However, some of our proposed
outreach effort,and GOAL has been utilized as an aspect of the course curriculum in e4usaclassrooms. Teachers from all of these groups have participated in theco-development and design of new versions of the GOAL kits. Other area publicschools are expressing interest in the GOAL program and we are beginning to explorethe expansion of our partnerships to these new school systems.Campus Partners: The GOAL program originally launched from Women in Engineering(WIE) and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, and all aspects of the programstill run through these two main entities, including design, production, finances,partner relations, distribution, and events.Undergraduate education integration has been spearheaded by the newly
theinstrument, responses indicated that teachers thought DET was important and should be taught.However, they had low confidence in integrating DET into their classroom, low familiarity withDET, and held many common stereotypes about engineers [21]. These findings were all on in-service teachers, and some items in the survey may not be applicable to pre-service teachers. Forexample, the question “Did your pre-service curriculum include any aspects of DET?” Studentswho are earlier in the education curriculum may not yet have encountered science or mathmethods courses which is where one would typically encounter DET in an elementary educationcurriculum. The next instrument was the STEM Semantics survey. This consists of five scales, eachof which
behavior in learning environments. His academic training was in Physics and Philosophy before he turned to science (partic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Faculty Workshop on Teaching SustainabilityDespite the urgent need to integrate sustainability throughout the engineering curriculum, mostfaculty have little to no training or confidence in doing so. We report on a 4-day pilot facultyworkshop delivered in January 2023 by an interdisciplinary group of faculty at a large mid-Atlantic R1 university designed to help engineering instructors do this. After substantial effort tocreate a mutual understanding around the diverse approaches we as faculty bring from ourrespective
interviews, ability and confidencein introducing these topics within traditional coursework is lacking. Firstly, faculty areoften unfamiliar with basic sustainability concepts (e.g. it’s not just about globalwarming) and information (e.g. the UN SDGs, the IPCC). Secondly, faculty have notonly not been trained in these topics, but also have not been trained in teaching themeffectively, and they do not generally have the time required to learn that independently.Thirdly, it is not usually obvious how these topics can be sensibly integrated into variouscourses without appearing to be extraneous add-ons. Thus, faculty training and supportare important components of curriculum transformation activities.There have been “train the trainer” efforts
to both the lecture and laboratory componentsand the focus of the new course is on improving of the course. We modified the lectures to focus on thestudents’ performance and retention in calculus, we mathematics topics emphasized in the Wright Stateevaluated the effectiveness of the new course by curriculum, including trigonometry, vectors, solvinglongitudinally tracking students’ success and persistence systems of equations, and derivatives and integrals. We alsoin subsequent engineering mathematics courses. The incorporated using Matlab, with an emphasis on using it as aresults of these analyses show that students’ tool to solve engineering mathematics problems
bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engi- neering.Dr. Christina Marie Zambrano-Varghese, Rutgers University-Newark Christina Zambrano-Varghese is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Psychology at Rutgers University- Newark, where she teaches a wide variety of courses ranging from introductory to upper-level research methods. She has conducted research on plagiarism prevention strategies and has transformed her courses
Education at Purdue University (USA). Claudio received his Bachelor of Science degree from the Higher Education Institute of Amazonia, in Brazil, in 2011. In 2014 he received his Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Campinas in Brazil. In May 2020, he completed his Ph.D. at Purdue University. His research interests lie in the area of educational technology and digital learning in diverse settings.Dr. Gregory John Gage, Backyard Brains Dr. Gregory Gage is a Neuroscientist and the Co-Founder and CEO of Backyard Brains. Greg is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Molecular & Integrative Physiology department of the University of Michigan. His research focuses on
activity-based lessons,and then apply design and systems-level thinking skills in an integrative, real-world-based project.While mechatronics-based courses and modules are becoming commonplace in engineeringcurricula, many of these experiences occur later in the educational experience. The uniqueness ofthe module presented in this work is that it is designed for a first- or second-year engineeringcourse and could be adapted to complement existing design-based courses and expanded to anentire course. Another unique aspect of the module is the way it integrates creative thinking,systems engineering and microcontrollers to engage students in design-build-test real-worldprojects. The paper presents the rationale for the pedagogy used, the activity
activities. The survey also sought feedback onperceptions of the sufficiency of ESI education and broad perspectives regarding ESI. At theend of the survey, respondents were asked to provide their email address if they werewilling to be contacted for a follow-up interview. Of the 1448 survey respondents, 230indicated willingness to participate in an interview.The second phase of the study involved conducting interviews with educators to learn moreabout their ESI instructional practices and general perspectives regarding the integration ofESI into the engineering curriculum and educational experiences of engineering students.Between September 2016 and April 2017, 52 survey respondents were contacted forinterviews with the intention of conducting 36
,through the interactions of students, faculty, and industry, through participation in engineering-related activities, and through reinforcement of shared similarities. The goal of this project is todevelop a mechanical engineering program where students and faculty are immersed in a cultureof doing engineering with practicing engineers that in turn fosters an identity of being anengineer. This culture of “Engineering with Engineers” is created through changes in four areas:shared vision, reflective faculty, relevant curriculum and pedagogy, and supportive policies. Ineach, a variety of actions create the cultural change, address barriers to change, and ensuresustainability. A common theme unifying these changes is a significant connection to
training [11]. Thus, some students pursuing undergraduate and graduate courses inconstruction management may struggle to fully comprehend advanced concepts of programmingand AI languages. As such, during the development of a curriculum about automationtechnologies, programming, and AI techniques, socio-demographic background, and previousexperience in handling robotics technology should be considered to make the learning processeasier for CM students.Few studies have explored the benefits of integrating automation and simulation-relatedcurriculum that fosters technological skills among STEM students. For instance, an academicinstitution established a Robotics Academy to investigate the efficacy of various AI-basedlearning curriculum in the form of
to engineering in the K-12 classroom. The first pertains to the levelof integration for engineering curriculum, while the other concerns the type of service. Due to its relatively nascent emergence, a foremost challenge to the integration ofengineering curricula into the precollege educational experience is determining where in theacademic landscape it belongs. Here lies an important dilemma facing education reformers:should precollege engineering education exist for the sake of engineering and technology literacyor should it exist as a backdrop and a means to promote science and math content learning? Byits nature, engineering requires the synthesis and practical application of diverse contentknowledge in an endeavor toward
Batrouny is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Her engineering education research interests include upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and en- gineering, collaboration in engineering, and decision making in engineering. For her Master’s thesis, she uncovered talk moves used by 4th grade students that fostered collaborative, disciplinary decision-making during an engineering design outreach program. For her dissertation, she intends to explore the ways in which team mental models function in teams of novice engineers and how novice engineers can be trained to collaborate more effectively on diverse teams.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is
, but was not accomplishing some of theessential goals that instructors had for preparing students for the engineering curriculum. In mostsections of the class, a typical class meeting consisted of a lecture in which the instructorintroduced a type of differential equation and showed the students how to identify and solve thattype of differential equation. The students then completed a worksheet that had them repeat theprocess that the professor just demonstrated on one or more examples of that type of differentialequation. In short, students were trained to be good at mimicking a process and identifying whento use that process. Applications were briefly mentioned, but accounted for only a small portionof the class and were not integrated with
and extend our resources to as many underprivilegedschools as possible. The expansion of our outreach program guarantees a unique learningexperience that will strengthen students’ foundations in core STEM subjects.ConclusionOrganized by undergraduate students, the Bit Project outreach program grants teachers access toresources for easy integration of project-based learning into their classes. An analysis of the firstimplementation of the outreach program received positive feedback and promise for long-termcontinuation at the school. As a student-led effort, Bit Project recruits new curriculum developersand outreach coordinators every academic quarter, ensuring a continuous stream of lesson plans.Feedback from volunteers and teachers on
. The main impetusbehind the workshops is to share the combined knowledge gained through curriculumdevelopment efforts and the technical information derived from lab development experiences. Inaddition, participants learn how FANUC Robotics training can be integrated in the curriculum oftheir home institutions. These workshops are offered to faculty members of two- and four yearinstitutions and are designed to increase practical experience in Industrial Robotics as well asrenew the interest and empower those seeking to revamp existing courses or develop newcourses in Industrial Robotics.These 2-day, 16 contact hour workshops are designed to be an intense, immersive experiencethat provide a broad spectrum of activities to participants. The
industrialpartners through setting up an industrial advisory board1, 2. However, in order to sustain theinteraction and truly take advantage of the participation of industry leaders, many programs havedeveloped various models suitable for their specific needs3. Most programs involve their Page 26.538.2councils beyond a simple advisory role such as curriculum, extracurricular activities, research,and faculty development4, 5, some programs make use of industry-sponsored projects6, whileothers suggested integrate practice-oriented education of engineers by working with industrypartners7.In this paper, we present our experience in working with our industrial
Department at a private, mid-sized university was awarded theNational Science Foundation (NSF) Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer ScienceDepartments (RED) grant in July 2017 to support the development of a program that fostersstudents’ engineering identities in a culture of doing engineering with industry engineers. TheDepartment is cultivating this culture of “engineering with engineers” through a strongconnection to industry and through changes in the four essential areas of a shared departmentvision, faculty, curriculum, and supportive policies.As we conclude this project, we are auditing all the activities we did throughout our project. Inthis audit, we review our activities with an eye toward what was particularly impactful for us