Third Field 20 Second Field 15 First Field 10 5 0 Table 2: Fields of Engineering Named by RespondentsWhen the teachers were asked to list five characteristics, besides science and mathematicalaptitude, that students interested in engineering would possess, they listed initially: curiosity toknow, work ethic, problem solver, innovative, ability to manipulate mental models. Secondresponses included intuition, imagination, being technologically savvy, and having the ability towork in teams. Third responses included flexibility, ability
) Page 22.599.6through (k) Student Outcomes. ABET (a) through (k) are given here (ABET Criteria, 2010): Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain the following outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering
graduate level education. ABET, formerly the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology, Criterion 3 outcomes a-k recommend that engineering Page 22.454.2programs must demonstrate that their graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, (f) an understanding of professional and ethical
basiccategories: (1) direct application in the mechanics of design and construction (acoustics,physics, astronomy, drawing, geometry, materials, and arithmetic); (2) making the architect’swork intelligible and meaningful to his client and to other members of his culture(communication, cultural history); (3) making his project workable in relation to context anduse, including connection to various social systems and customs (geography, religious customs,medicine, law); and (4) making the architect ethical or “high-minded” (philosophy).Throughout the Ten Books, he is guided by a concrete vision of the use to which a design orsystem will be put. He defines the context of engineering broadly, and considers factors rangingfrom religious and social customs to
more demanding.The priority of topics covered has also shifted slightly away from written and oralcommunication; although communication remains important, engineering ethics and projectplanning are now the most prevalent topics taught (Figure 7, Table 1). Additionally, conceptgeneration has replaced decision making in the top five topics addressed in the course. Thepercentage of programs that taught concept generation in 2005 is about the same as it is today,but in 2005 concept generation was not among the top 10 topics. Page 15.1217.7 Oral Communications Teamwork Project Planning
face the challenges of the future. The ten traits include 1) analyticalskills, 2) practical ingenuity, 3) creativity, 4) communication skills, 5) business &management skills, 6) high ethical standards, 7) professionalism, 8) leadership, 9)dynamism/agility/resilience/flexibility, 10) desire to be a lifelong learner.Research ApproachThe study takes a quantitative approach to analyzing an on-line survey conducted with anational sample of 289 African American student and alumni members participating in up tothree types of non-curricular activities: BGOs, MEPs, NSBE. “Students” in this study aredefined as current undergraduate members of an organization and “alumni” are members whoare no longer enrolled as undergraduate students (i.e., graduate
had a significant impact on both education and practiceof engineering and related disciplines. The history of practice in many engineering disciplines is,in large part, the story of failures, both imminent and actual, and ensuing changes to designs,standards and procedures made as the result of timely interventions or forensic analyses. Inaddition to technical issues, professional and ethical responsibilities are highlighted by therelevant cases. Student learning was assessed through surveys and focus group discussions.Students were asked specifically about the technical lessons learned, as well as their response tothe case studies. Case study questions were included on homework assignments andexaminations. Survey questions linked student
field that meets performance,constraints such as economic, environmental, social, cost, time, safety, quality, materials, andpolitical, ethical, health and safety, manufacturing requirements.manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 4. Function as a member of a multidisciplinary team and be able to assume leadership roles on the team.(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve 5. Identify, formulate, critically analyze, and solveengineering problems engineering problems in energy conversion and
courses and can be established in a number of effective ways: - By having students work within multi-disciplinary design teams.2 - By providing instruction geared toward oral and written communication skills.3,4 - By focusing on the ethical foundation of the engineering profession.4 - By teaching social awareness through interaction with real-life customers.5While the ERAU aircraft capstone sequence incorporates the first three of these attributes, it isunique in that it provides the additional components of induced collaboration with a team ofstudents which may have been previously seen as adversarial, and the introduction of thepotential for loss in terms of a project down-select. These components allow students toexperience
approaches to GenAI regu-hybrid AI approach that safeguards student data while enabling lation, from strict AI bans in assessments to AI-integratedAI-driven learning in compliance with privacy regulations. curricula with clear ethical guidelines. Table I summarizes different institutional policies regarding AI in education and II. BACKGROUND AND R ELATED W ORK privacy protection. Generative AI (GenAI) has demonstrated significant tabularxpromise in enhancing educational methodologies, improv-ing personalized learning, and automating administrative TABLE I
Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She graduated with her BS in Environmental Engineering from Northwestern University and with her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering with an emphasis on Environmental River Mechanics from Colorado State University. Her graduate work focused on exchange of surface water and groundwater, as well as nitrate uptake, in streams with varying degrees of rehabilitation. Dr. Mueller’s areas of interest include water quality, sustainable design, watershed hydrology, and river hydraulics. Current projects involve pedagogical studies for incorporating sustainability and ethical decision making in undergraduate engineering education, with an emphasis on touchpoints throughout the four
Orthopaedic and Trauma Hospital, she brings hands-on expertise in network setup, system troubleshooting, and ICT support. Mary is proficient in multiple programming languages and tools, including Java, C++, PHP, JavaScript, MySQL, Apache, and Microsoft SQL Server. Mary is pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Information Technology from the University of Eldoret and holds both a Diploma and Craft Certificate in ICT from RVTTI-Eldoret. Known for her strong work ethic, problem-solving abilities, and collaborative spirit, she is passionate about leveraging technology to drive positive change. Her interests extend beyond the workplace into volunteering, community engagement, and exploring tech innovations. She thrives in dynamic
finish a final capstone in forAY 2026-27. The results of initial interest, enrollment, and student surveys will be presented inthis paper to measure the potential to develop and expand this effort. Discussions on future workto generate a maritime-focused microcredential with courses such as “Literature of the Sea” and“Sea Shanties and Work Songs” will also be addressed.StructureThe microcredential sequence requires the completion of four Gen Ed electives followed by acapstone course. The Gen Ed courses are Environmental Literature, Sustainable Ethics byDesign, History of the US Environmental Movement, and Economics of Sustainability. Thecapstone course will be Capstone in Engineering Leadership.The Environmental Literature course will be
Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to be felt both in academia and industry, yetits full potential is yet to be exploited for the common good. While AI technologies areincreasingly being implemented, questions linger over their long-term impact on education andthe workforce. Recent research efforts have focused on promoting the ethical and responsible useof AI. As a result, explainable AI, which focuses on helping users understand how AI systemsmake decisions, has received a lot of interest [1].Even though some skepticism about AI decisions still lingers, it is already transformingworkplaces by enhancing efficiency, automating repetitive tasks, and enabling data-drivendecision-making. AI technologies such as natural language processing help to
educators can significantly improvestudents’ understanding of disaster resilience, proactive planning, and the ethical use oftechnology in civil engineering contexts.IntroductionThe frequency of wildfires in California has markedly increased in recent years, driven by acombination of climatic and anthropogenic factors. Rising temperatures, prolonged droughts, andshifting precipitation patterns, all exacerbated by climate change, have created more favorableconditions for wildfires (Lee and Banerjee 2021, Keelay, J. et al. 2009). Additionally, increaseddevelopment in fire-prone areas and accumulated vegetation due to past fire suppression effortshave further heightened the risk. As a result, the state has seen a surge in both the number andintensity
Communication in Engineering (Routledge, 2014). In 2016, Dr. Leydens won the Exemplar in Engineering Ethics Education Award from the Na- tional Academy of Engineering, along with CSM colleagues Juan C. Lucena and Kathryn Johnson, for a cross-disciplinary suite of courses that enact macroethics by making social justice visible in engineering education. In 2017, he and two co-authors won the Best Paper Award in the Minorities in Engineering Division at the American Society for Engineering Education annual conference. Dr. Leydens’ recent research, with co-author Juan C. Lucena, focused on rendering visible the social justice dimensions in- herent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences
................................................................................................................................ 25 4.3 Manufacturing and Construction .................................................................................. 28 4.4 Operations and Maintenance ......................................................................................... 28 4.5 Professional Ethics ........................................................................................................... 29 4.6 Business, Legal and Public Policy.................................................................................. 29 4.7 Sustainability and Societal and Environmental Impact ............................................. 30 4.8 Engineering Economics
school stakeholder groups. Then thethirteen FE program outcomes that were evaluated in this research are: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering. 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data 3. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 4. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams 5. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. 6. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 7. An ability to communicate effectively 8. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. 9. A recognition of
– Material Science and Outcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as ones that may be challenging for programs to fully implement. This paper examines those challenges in the context of NC State. The first edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21 st Century 1 (BOK1) was released in January 2004. Based on various inputs, a second edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21 st Century 2 (BOK2) was developed and released in February 2008. The BOK1 has already impacted accreditation criteria and civil engineering curricula. The BOK2, while being more recent and not yet addressed within accreditation criteria, is motivating additional change in some civil engineering curricula
accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET (EAC/ABET); four years or more of acceptable and progressive engineering experience; documentation of having passed both the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) examination and the Principles and Practices of Engineering (PE) examination, and; a record which is clear of violations of ethical standards. 2. While many states have other additional pathways to engineering licensure for those not having an EAC/ABET degree (commonly also requiring additional years of engineering experience), the NCEES Model Law does not provide for any alternative formal educational path other than being a “graduate of an engineering of 4 years or
the ability to work together while solving an open-ended designproblem, and being able to overcome any obstacles that arise. These obstacles involve differingwork ethics, personalities, and communication styles. Inevitably, these differences can lead toconflict, and a need to resolve disagreements within the team. These ever-present emotionalaspects to working in a team are found not only in student projects, but also on the projects theywill be working on once they graduate. Finding the skills as a student to successfully navigatethe myriad of issues that may arise when working with others, sets student up for success in theirengineering careers after graduation, as shown by Jones (1996) [1] and Seat et al. (1996) [2].Often students who are
, engineers, andtechnologists the skills to be versed in technology ethics, regulatory policy, and emergingtechnology trends for business growth and societal impact.Development of the MELP program initiated with the formation of an interdisciplinary academiccommittee tasked with designing the MELP program. The interdisciplinary team was comprisedof twelve faculty members across the College of Engineering, the School of InternationalAffairs, Penn State Law and the LPE director. The team worked on MELP’s curricular structurebetween January and March 2020, including adopting a systems thinking approach as theframework for students to understand law and policy as systems within systems.The context of engineering is one dominated by systems and the
of EEP non-participants also shared criticism ofentrepreneurship and EEPs, moving beyond disinterest into specific concerns aboutentrepreneurial spaces. These women STEM academics described critiques or concerns about thepractices of entrepreneurship conflicting with their personal ethics and/or stances that academiashould not be about making money. For example, Dr. Madani shared: “I just want to be on the record as saying I am flat-out straight against entrepreneurship because as a scientist, I don’t want our students to grow up thinking, “I’m making this to sell it.” I am 100% supportive of entrepreneurship mindset” (Madani Interview, 04/29/2021)Dr. Madani’s exemplar animates the challenges some women STEM faculty
IT Principles and Applications CYS 523 Cybersecurity Law, Ethics, and Policy CYS 621 Cybersecurity Governance and Risk ManagementTable 2. Cybersecurity for Business Track’s Core Courses CYS 603 Cybersecurity Experimentation CYS 653 Business and IT Service Strategy © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceTable 3. Cyber-physical and Secure Software Systems Track’s Core Courses CYS 603 Cybersecurity Experimentation CYS 574 Secure Hardware and Cyber-physical SystemsThe elective classes are other graduate Cybersecurity courses, as well as approved graduatecourses in business and
Enhancing STEM Education with a Global and Interdisciplinary Perspective:Developing and Teaching a Course on Global Water Challenges through anInternational CollaborationPinar Omur-OzbekDr. Omur-Ozbek is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering at the Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Dr. Omur-Ozbek’s teaching interestsinclude environmental engineering concepts, environmental chemistry, water quality analyses, ecologicalengineering and environmental and social justice, and engineering ethics. Her research interests includedrinking water quality and treatment, odorous and toxic algal blooms, impacts of toxins on crops andhumans, impacts of wildfires and hydraulic fracking on
how people who historically resided in the Northern Great Plains helpedinsulate their homes (using snow, sod, animal hides, etc.) show how innovative Indigenouspeoples and homesteaders were able to adapt to this area before indoor heating improvements.Oil pipeline: One highly contentious issue within the Upper Midwest is the construction andreplacement of oil pipelines, most recently the Dakota Access Pipeline and Enbridge Line 3.Most students have some direct experience or knowledge of the protests surrounding theseprojects, yet often do not have the complete engineering and/or cultural understanding to fullyunderstand the complexity of the issues. Within both an engineering ethics course and a fluidscourse this topic is discussed. In the
strong feelings were required to develop and maintainproductive, positive and healthy relation ships. Part 2 of the survey was titled PersonalLeadership. It consisted of four skills that were essential to the learning and developmentof positive and responsible leadership. Personal Leadership was important because itrequired social skills, the ability to understand and respect the views of others, the abilityto solve problems, and the ability to lead one’s self in a positive way. Part 3 was titledSelf Management in Life and Career. There were four emotional skills essential to theeffective management of self. These skills consisted of Drive strength, TimeManagement, Commitment Ethic and Positive Personal Change. Self-Managementrequired motivation
3.95 19 .705 4.16 19 .765 describe how existing products can solve new problems -1.229, .235 4.42 19 .692 Connections: Consequences of Decisions identify potential ethical issues 4.00 19 .745 -1.166, .259 4.21 19 .713 3.79 19 .631 recognize the ethical considerations solutions
values in theirassumptions scaffolds the engineering ethics (Feister et al., 2016; Dyrud, 2017). Just withinsubfield of biomedical engineering, unaddressed biases have led to situations such as not includingwomen’s anatomy and physiology in the design of joint implants resulting in irreversible healthissues, given the fact that women form more than 65% of joint replacement patients makes thisissue even more painful (Hutchison, 2019), pulse-oximeters read the SpO2 level of patients withdarker skins 8% lower than real value, which can have some fatal consequences for the patientsespecially at the time of coivd-19 pandemic (Sjoding et al., 2020), left-handed surgeons notreceiving appropriate equipment during training (Adusumilli et al., 2004), and
-departure symposium, the students will travel together to Stockholm tobegin their research projects at SciLifeLab. The author will travel with the students and be onsiteduring the first 3 weeks of the program. During these first three weeks at the host institution,weekly 2-hour research development workshops are to be held (Table 3). These workshops aredesigned to provide students with information on how to be an effective and ethical scientist.Since many of the student participants will be new to scientific research, workshop topicsinclude: the scientific method, hypothesis formulation, searching the scientific literature,managing references, writing scientific reports, experimental design, laboratory documentation(lab notebooks and data