witheventual success in the field after graduation [4-6]. Some universities have implementedintervention strategies by gearing curriculum and department culture towards supportingstudents’ development of their individual engineering identities with this known promise ofstudent success [6]. Some major curricular changes surround the emphasis on design problemsused throughout engineering courses that inherently help students to feel more like an engineerafter completing the project [7]. Because the act of problem-solving correlates with the directdevelopment of all three of Godwin’s facets of engineering identity, providing more opportunityfor students to solve real-world problems correlates to retention [8] and success in the field [9].Studies have
. 35. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 277–349. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_4.[12] E. M. Holcombe, A. J. Kezar, N. Ueda, and D. Vigil, “Shared equity leadership: Working collectively to change campus cultures,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1037/dhe0000536.[13] G. P. King, T. Russo-Tait, and T. C. Andrews, “Evading race: STEM faculty struggle to acknowledge racialized classroom events,” LSE, vol. 22, no. 1, p. ar14, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-06-0104.[14] H. N. McCambly, “Rising tides don’t create racialized change: Analyzing institutional change projects in postsecondary philanthropy’s college completion agenda,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 95, no. 4, pp
Paper ID #47521Accelerating Student Success in Mathematics through Personalized AdaptiveLearningDr. Melissa A Dagley, University of Central Florida Dr. Melissa Dagley is the Executive Director of the Center for Initiatives in STEM (iSTEM) at the University of Central Florida. Dr. Dagley has served as PI and Co-PI on numerous NSF projects, facilitates the women’s mentoring network at UCF, created a STEM learning community model for transfer students and directs Math Launch, a success program targeted to expediting calculus readiness for students in STEM majors. In addition to guiding undergraduates towards a successful
also seeks to address key challenges in infrastructure sustainability while promoting long-term resilience in construction.Michael Oluwafemi Ige, Morgan State University Michael Ige is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Morgan State University, Maryland, where he is pursuing his M.Sc. in Civil and Environmental Engineering with a concentration in Construction Management and Transportation Engineering. He earned his B.Tech. in Building Structure from the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Michael has extensive professional experience managing large-scale heavy construction and fac¸ade projects, including high-rise and industrial developments across
picking up dropped pieces, ”finger“ could have been better designed.” • “it was great! it offered a very unique experience that allowed me to work this project remotely with a hands on type experience.” • “It didn’t distract me from learning. On the contrary, I think it aided in learning.”Overall, participants appreciated having the opportunity to experience real-time manipulation ofphysical lab equipment from a remote location—an experience many of them had neverencountered in prior online courses. However, several areas emerged where TeleopLab could beenhanced.Although TeleopLab successfully demonstrated remote teleoperation, periodic network glitchesundermined the smoothness of the robot’s movement
research interests include dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, artificial intelligent in Manufacturing, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in Progress: Assessing ABET SO6 through Innovative Labs in Solid Mechanics: A comprehensive guide for Mechanical Engineering InstructorsAbstractDuring ABET Assessment Cycle 2 (Fall 2023-Summer 2024) Department of MechanicalEngineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology (WIT), unanimously included a sophomorecourse, Mechanics of Materials, to be assessed for Student Outcome 6 (SO6) starting from Fall2024 (September-December) semester. To assess this
benefits from integrating UDL and inclusive design principles.Inclusive design projects, like creating assistive tools for individuals with disabilities, fosterempathy, innovation, and real-world problem-solving skills among students [2, 7]. Such projectsresonate particularly with underrepresented groups, including SWDs, who are motivated by thesocietal impact of their work. Capstone courses, for example, effectively incorporate UDL toencourage students to consider diverse user needs in their designs [2].Despite these advancements, SWDs report significant barriers, including difficulties navigatingmultiple LMS platforms, inconsistent use of accessible tools, and limited instructor awareness.Surveys reveal that centralized platforms, captioned
Paper ID #47253BOARD # 14: Aircraft Misfuelling: A Case Study Using Bayesian ProbabilityRisk AssessmentJiahao Yu, Purdue University Jiahao ”Hal” Yu is a Ph.D. student at Purdue University WL in Aviation Technology and Management with research interests spanning various aviation-related projects. He is concurrently pursuing Graduate Certificates in Aviation Financial Management and Applied Statistics while completing his Ph.D.Prof. Mary E. Johnson Ph.D., Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Mary E. Johnson is a Professor and Associate Head for Graduate Studies and Research in the School of Aviation and Transportation
] and Microsoft HoloLens [32], whichenables holographic MR experiences by projecting virtual content directly into the user’s field ofview. This technology is valuable for teaching complex manufacturing tasks such as assemblyprocedures, design validation, and collaborative production planning. It allows educators toprovide their learners with advanced training environments that mirror the complexities ofmodern manufacturing, preparing them for future industry-specific roles.Therefore, the features of both VR and MR offer significant advantages over AR, particularly formanufacturing training. Both technologies provide a higher level of immersion compared to AR,which has been proven to enhance information retention and skill acquisition [33
part of a research project on GenAI use inteaching, “We're working to incorporate some discussion-based AI like in the course. It's notimplemented yet, but [it is] something we're working on now”. Michael stated that after participating in the survey he became interested in trying outChatGPT for designing rubrics and animations, but he was not satisfied with the GenAI’soutcomes. However, he utilized ChatGPT to design simple quizzes, “I refer to ChatGPT togenerate some questions. It is one of the resources. It's not the only one that I use, but it is goodfor simple questions”. Michael also described using ChatGPT to generate code for algorithmslike Horsepool and Merge Sort, though these attempts often resulted in errors
psychological factors of procrastination,and address common cognitive distortions that can contribute to difficult emotions. Our contentends with a feature called the goal tracker which prompts users to set a specific goal for theupcoming week. Throughout the week, participants record their progress, procrastinationtendencies, and ACT skills that they practice daily. It serves as a final project of our content,asking users to apply all the ACT skills they learned.Our design prioritizes high content clarity and minimal cognitive load. The reason is to help usersengage with our content as effectively as possible without additional stress. In order to achievehigh content clarity, we integrated multimedia resources through which ClearMind’s content
[42]. We used thevalues and equations provided in the paper to recreate plots to teach students the concepts ofsolving differential equations, including receptor-ligand binding in electrophysiology. Thestudent’s work is not a research project on the results of the work in [42] but rather a study on thepedagogical paradigm of using Generative AI and ChatGPT while trying to employ suchpractices in a lab-based exercise. The students were not informed of the source of the questions,and so the students did not have a chance to feed ChatGPT material from our source [42] whiletrying to prompt it to generate the results for this study. The responses to the questions (1 – 4)mentioned above will help us understand the answers to our research questions
Science Foundation (NSF) No.EEC-1653140 given to the third author. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect those of the NSF.Author ContributionsGA: Conceptualization, Project Administration, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Software,Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, YW: Conceptualization, Data Curation,Formal Analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, IVA:Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing, EZM:Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing. References[1] I. Villanueva et al., “What Does Hidden Curriculum in Engineering
model latent variables and relationships to other socioeconomic variablesin tandem. We identified that three latent factors, Parent Educational Involvement, HouseholdEducational Resources, and School Hindrances existed and that differences across the sample arean outcome of broader socioeconomic inequality driven by racism, sexism, and classism. Thispaper discusses the development of this model, our findings, and potential implications for futureresearch, including our larger project which uses the measure to predict engineering studentapplication to, and enrollment and persistence in, engineering.Keywords: low-income students, social inequality, Intersectionality Theory, student successIntroductionLow-income students, referred to henceforth as
their classrooms more inclusive and supportive for allstudents. This includes giving students tools to be aware of the impact of their projects,motivating students from diverse backgrounds, and ensuring that students feel safe in theclassroom. Building a community of equity-minded faculty and learning from peers are alsosignificant motivators. Participants value the opportunity to collaborate with colleagues whoshare a commitment to DEI and create systemic change within engineering education. They seekto center DEI as a driver of innovation and to change the mindset that DEI does belong inengineering. Participants showcase a strong desire to be agents of change by turning DEIawareness into action and addressing structural and societal issues
to worry about food or having a placeto sleep. I’ve always lived like a princess.” His parents offer emotional and financialstability, creating a secure environment that allows him to focus on his studies. As far asacademic guidance goes, Phil appreciates the support provided by engineering faculty,describing a mentor’s role as pivotal in his personal and professional growth. He says,“Professor Patel is easily my favorite professor. I started doing [design] with him, and wedo research projects. You can just tell he's always looking out for his students. he's verypersonal. He, he's kind of, you know, he feels like a, like a family member in some ways.”Here, we can see that while Phil does not receive engineering support from his
Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Computer Science Education. Additionally, he is the CS Department Coordinator for Experiential Learning, where he leads several initiatives to enhance students’ learning through out-of-classroom experiences, including the CS Study Abroad program. Mohammed has 20+ years of experience in teaching university level courses, and he presented and conducted multiple talks and workshops in different countries. Among other courses, he taught: Software Engineering, Database Systems, Usability Engineering, and Software Project Management. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Can AI Transform Graduate Computer Science Admissions
things to involveuniversities in innovation processes. In the summer of 2024, there was a call with several sub-projects entitled “Ethical Innovation in Health Care Technology”. One of these sub-projectswas related to the development of a PPP. Based on extensive data analysis, the PPP helps toidentify patients' presumed treatment preferences when they are no longer able to make deci-sions themselves. The PPP acts as a neutral and emotionally uninvolved support system. Thiscan be particularly helpful in cases where relatives are unable to cope or existing living willscannot be clearly applied to the current situation. Such technological support not only relievesthe burden on relatives, but also strengthens the confidence that the medical care
outreach materials toaddress region-specific disparities and needs can be a powerful and impactful strategy forexpanding energy-STEM participation across both urban and rural Nebraska.Keywords: energy, energy literacy, sustainable energy, renewable energy, STEM, engineering,K-12, education, outreach, Nebraska, Behavioral Health Regions, teacher training, virtualtrainingIntroduction.Why energy literacy matters. Energy literacy [1]–[5] is essential for building a skilled anddiverse workforce to meet the demands of the growing energy industry. Clean energy jobs in theU.S. are projected to grow by 6.4% by 2025 [6], yet 76% of energy technology employers reportdifficulties in finding qualified workers [7]. While colleges are expected to fill much of
control, vehicle communication systems, resource virtualization, cyber-physical systems, Internet of Things, ubiquitous and mobile computing, wireless and mobile networks, and distributed networks and systems. She has more than ten years of research experience in academia with over twenty research publications and open-source software packages with rich programming and project development experience. She has mentored and worked closely with minority undergraduate students. She has also continuously devoted herself to advertising engineering and computer science programs and reaching out to historically underserved populations. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 From
January 2025].[2] S. Atwood, M. T. Siniawski and A. R. Carberry, "Using Standards-based Grading to Effectively Assess Project-based Design Courses," in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Anual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[3] M. Henri, D. Johnson and B. Nepal, "A review of Competency-Based Learning: Tools, Assessments, and Recommendations," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 607-638, 2017.[4] B. M. Munoz and T. R. Guskey, "Standards-based grading and reporting will improve," Kappan, pp. 64-68, April 2015.[5] J. Gargac, "Failing Forward: A mastery-based learning learning approach in a theory of machine kinematics and dynamics course," in ASEE 2024 National Conference and Exhibition, Portland, OR
on it. Exploration and Dialogue promoting • Open-ended questions M: How does this align Reflection deeper thinking about • Self-assessment with goals? experiences and • Reflective discussions S: Need more practical decisions. projects. Note: M = Mentor; S = Student/Mentee. Examples are abbreviated for space.2.5.1 Framework Development and ValidationThe adaptation of this framework for peer mentoring contexts involved several keyconsiderations including category flexibility, where statements may exhibit characteristics ofmultiple categories; response dynamics, where
considered for this endeavorbut was quickly dismissed after creating a few pages due to the challenges and frustrations itcaused the authors. Key Canvas features utilized in this project included quizzes, which wereassigned to instructors enrolled as ‘students’ in the course, discussion boards, and modules toorganize materials for each activity.Flexibility for online and distance learningThe first semester deploying the Shoebox Kits for statics was Spring 2021, when instruction wasmoved online. Kits were labeled and assigned to students who checked them out for the semesterto perform the activities synchronously online via Zoom. Over 75% of the kits were returned atthe end of the semester. Answers to questions were put into the private chat on Zoom
neutral. This shows that while a majority felt comfortable expressing theircultural identity, a few students still felt hesitant, see figure 5.For participation and collaboration, the results again showed mostly positive responses.Regarding opportunities for collaboration with students from diverse backgrounds, 40% (10students) strongly agreed, and 48% (12 students) agreed, with 4% (1 student) stronglydisagreeing and 8% (2 students) remaining neutral. Similarly, 32% (8 students) strongly agreedand 52% (13 students) agreed that they felt encouraged to participate in group activities,discussions, and projects, while 4% (1 student) strongly disagreed, and 12% (3 students)remained neutral.Figure 5. Perception towards Campus ClimatePerception of
women engineering leaders in academia.Increasing the number of women leaders in engineering, for both industry and academia, willweaken masculinist norms around leadership in the profession and provide role models foraspiring engineers. Research focused on GEPs is also needed as both quantitative and qualitativeresearch within engineering education has focused on the undergraduate level within the USenvironment, and we lack studies addressing the unique needs of graduate engineering studentsin Canada, with a few notable recent exceptions [8, 9].Using quantitative and qualitative data collected and analyzed from a larger research project, thispaper seeks to answer the following two research questions: 1. How has the proportion of women
indicate a critical need to refine AGT orapply a grounded theory perspective that would shed light on a broader array of motivationalconstructs that are relevant to minoritized students, particularly in fields like engineering, wherecultural and structural factors can significantly influence educational outcomes. My next step inthis project is to conduct a grounded theory study examining the reasons why engineering Latinxstudents engage in competence-relevant behaviors. 10 Appendix A Table 1 Demographic information for each sample analyzed in this study
challenges that can arise during collaborative efforts. Burtet al. [21] echoed and emphasized the significance of structured interactions in promotingeffective interdisciplinary interactions among team members. Swayne et al. [24] emphasized thatthe project-based learning (PBL) approach effectively facilitates interdisciplinary exposure,which is crucial for developing innovation capacities among graduate students.4.2 Need for Cognition in Higher Education3 Need for Cognition enhances students' abilities to engage in critical thinking, problem-solving, and creative ideation, which are central to innovation e.g., [25],[26],[14]. It has evolvednot merely a psychological tendency but developmental construct [26]. For example, Liu &Nesbit