solutions that generate and strengthen career plans of students, as well as improve retention, graduation rates, and speed to graduation. He is recognized within education circles as standing at the vanguard of the progressive technological movement. He has taught students, trained corporate salespeople and career coaches, and advised entrepreneurs. His energy, passion, positivity, and attention to detail have served him well in bringing out the best in others.Dr. Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kishore Pochiraju is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education and a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Stevens Institute of Technology. He recently
conducted in a single junior-level course for environmentalengineering students. The innovation self-efficacy of participants was measured using a surveythat included items from the Very Brief Innovation Self-Efficacy scale (ISE.6), the InnovationInterests scale (INI), and the Career Goals: Innovative Work scale (IW). The drawings wereanalyzed for Artistic Effort (AE) and Creative Work (CW) by engineering and art evaluators,respectively. The ISE survey results were compared with the AE and CW scores and thecorrelations with travel, gender, and multilingualism on creativity attributes were explored. Astrong correlation between CW scores and AE scores was observed. A negative correlationbetween CW and ISE.6 was found. The CW scores were significantly
scienceconcepts in both didactic and experiential settings. Students appreciate the need to successfullycommunicate with data and be effective data storytellers but will often feel frustrated that datastorytelling skills are not “real data science.” An analysis of LinkedIn profiles indicates that over60% of graduated learners secured new employment in data careers since starting the program.To build on this success, further curriculum development should more explicitly connectfundamental data science concepts and broader concepts such as creative problem-solving anddata storytelling.KeywordsGraduate education, data analytics, distance learning, life-long learning, adult learning1. IntroductionWe are living in an era where the Volume, Velocity, Veracity
andopportunities faced by graduate students and higher education institutions in navigatinginterdisciplinary research and teaching landscapes. Key themes include but are not limited to: thecultivation of a community-oriented team culture to enhance scientific team cohesion andproductivity e.g., [5]; the importance of academic motivation and teamwork diversity ininterdisciplinary context [6]; the mechanisms that facilitate team science e.g., [7], and theperspectives of graduate students and early career academics on interdisciplinary research e.g.,[8]. These studies collectively underscore the complexity of interdisciplinary endeavors, andhighlight the need for supportive institutional structures, the development of interdisciplinarycommunication and
a scale we designed to quantify the successful developmentof target EML skills, had no consistent pattern based on race, but that female students reported asignificantly lower score compared to male students. We additionally developed a panel ofquestions gauging the extent to which certain groups of students were motivated by theirdemographics (e.g., gender, race, etc.) and individual economic benefits of BMEG (e.g., high-paying jobs, career preparation, etc.). Female students were also more likely to report that theywere motivated by their demographics and had significantly lower self-efficacy scores comparedto male students. While race had no impact on the final EML score, HRM groups were moremotivated by their demographics and were
many challenges. For instance, arocket project involves the collaboration of aerospace, mechanical, chemical, electrical, andcomputer engineering disciplines. As a result, students from diverse backgrounds and withdistinct career aspirations must collaborate to overcome the obstacles. This diversity fosters ateam-based and interdisciplinary learning approach that provides students with invaluable insightand skills beyond those learned in a typical classroom setting [7].Program PhilosophyAt Make to Innovate, we advocate for a practical learning experience emphasizing a hands-onapproach. Our students are motivated to tackle problems head-on and create innovative solutionsthat can be tested in real-world scenarios. Clear objectives are set for
critical challenges society faces. In the ever-advancing engineeringindustry, how would our Materials Engineering education system adequately prepare ourstudents with the essential knowledge and skills necessary to adapt and excel in their career?What are the learning outcomes that are required to support such excellence?To design these learning outcomes in our curriculum, gathering and analysing relevantstakeholders’ input is crucial. This paper presents our endeavour in partnering thestakeholders (students, educators/faculty, alumni and employers) to understand the gaps andneeds of Materials Engineering education. Consultations with the stakeholders were designedto rally around three main focus areas namely (i) to evaluate the existing
advocates forthe interdisciplinary infusion of engineering within the context of collaboratively engaginglearners in real-world problems (NGSS Lead States, 2013; ISTE, 2017; ITEEA, 2020). As such,K-12 STEM teachers need adaptable conceptual and epistemic understandings of engineering asdiscrete disciplinary knowledge, skills, and career paths (Bryan & Guzey, 2020). Understandingengineering in this way means being able to recognize and articulate it as more than merely a sub-construct of science (Van den Bogaard et al., 2021), but rather a related yet distinct disciplinewith its own highly contextual and culturally bound practices, processes, and outcomes (Lewis,2006; Pleasants, 2020). Nevertheless, research has repeatedly revealed gaps
foster an environment where diverse and creative people are successful in the pursuit of engineering and computing degrees. Jean’s efforts have been recognized with numerous awards including the National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development award, the American Society for Engineering Education John A. Curtis Lecturer award, and the Bagley College of Engineering Service award. Jean earned her B.S. and M.S. in computer engineering from Mississippi State University, and her Ph.D. in engineering education from Virginia Tech.Ms. Lorena Andrea Benavides Riano, Mississippi State University Lorena Benavides-Riano, originally from Colombia, is a first-year Engineering Ph.D. student at Missis- sippi State
Engineering Attitudes Survey [36, 37]. As a whole, the Likert-type itemsfocused on social responsibility in engineering, how engineering and society are intertwined,students’ motivations for pursuing a career that involves helping people, their academic andengineering self-confidence, and their sense of belonging/satisfaction with engineering. Findingsfrom the student responses to these Likert-type items will be discussed in a future paper. Thiscurrent research focuses on student responses to six out of the nine open-ended questions,created specifically for this study. These open-ended questions appeared at the end of the surveyand provided students the opportunity to elaborate on how the course they were enrolled inaffected their sense of belonging
their high schools. Theyconcluded that most of the women were motivated by the purpose behind computing rather thanthe sheer act of interacting with a computer. Comparatively, they observed that internationalwomen were motivated to enter the computing field because they perceived it to be a pragmaticand highly employable career field.Along these lines, it is critical to note that women are not minoritized in computing globally.Countries such as Malaysia, Mauritius, and Taiwan have more equitable (or even higher)representation [13]. Studies have described how nuanced cultural factors may also play a role insuch choices and that they can influence perceptions about the field [16, 17]. For example, womenin certain countries with a high Muslim
society 2. The ease or difficulty of being an ethical aerospace engineer 3. Technical determinism and aerospace career pathways 4. Macroethics discussions within aerospace coursework 5. The ability of faculty to facilitate conversations on the macroethics of aerospaceThese five factors provide a new basis upon which we will generate additional survey items inthe future. Through this process, we will develop a survey that can effectively measure students’beliefs and experiences in regards to the macroethical implications of the field of aerospaceengineering.IntroductionThe impact of aerospace systems on society is regularly featured as part of the global news cycle.Recent topics have included protests against aerospace companies
involved in programs 31.4 33.0 37.5 39.4 37.8 40.5 45.9 49.2 to clean up the environment Working to correct social 44.9 NA NA NA 63.5 NA NA NA inequalitiesNA = not asked on the survey in that yearWithin engineering, there is evidence that females are particularly interested in sustainabilitytopics. Klotz et al. [18] found that female engineering students were significantly more interestedthan male engineering students in work in their careers related to disease, poverty anddistribution of resources, and opportunities for women and minorities; female engineeringstudents had lower interests in energy. Verdin et al. [19] found that community college
engineering degreepathway. The program's overarching goal is to engage students in teamwork, research, andprofessional development early in their undergraduate career and provide opportunities toexercise these skills in a variety of contexts. Originally designed to support new female students,RAMP has been expanded to all students, including high-school juniors and seniors. The missionis to provide students who are underrepresented in engineering the knowledge and resources tobe successful in engineering education and careers, while acquiring leadership skills thatcontribute to broadening the participation of women, ethnic, and racial minorities in engineering.RAMP takes place over six weeks in the summer before the Fall semester when students
, phone calls,websites, campus tours/visits (bringing students to your institution), booths at regional/nationalconventions, college fairs, visit high schools (via STEM programs, career events/programs, booths,etc.), social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.), and other (please fill in the blank). Thechange agents included in the survey are engineering bridge and success program team members,college admissions advisors, institutional inclusive offices/initiatives, high school guidancecounselors, high school STEM teachers, community partners, professional or studentorganizations, students/program alumni (ambassadors), influential figures in faith basedorganizations, social media influencers, faculty, instructors, mentors, parents or other
faculty at her Alma Mater in 2015, Robin has been coordinating and teaching the Cap- stone Senior Design program in Mechanical Engineering while pursuing graduate work in Engineering Education.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication
rates and the likelihood ofcontinued research participation and higher education. A new initiative at the University of Texasat Austin (UT Austin), the Freshman Introduction to Research in Engineering (FIRE) program,offers a select group of first-year students with an opportunity to participate in semester-long,faculty-sponsored mechanical engineering research and development projects. In addition to theirresearch, students attend bi-monthly lectures that introduce them to various topics in mechanicalengineering and current research in the field, the successes (and roadblocks) in engineeringresearch and how to overcome them, and career opportunities in engineering. An end of semesterposter session allows students to showcase their research
and record of supporting women faculty intheir department, colleges, and the university. Advocates are active and effective proponents of Page 26.905.4gender diversity and equity, specifically in terms of increasing the number of female faculty,encouraging the hiring and promotion of female faculty in administrative positions, and ensuringthe fair and equitable treatment of women within partner institutions. They are committed toincreasing their understanding of gender bias and its impact on the academic careers of women.At North Dakota State University, Advocates meet at least monthly and work toward specificgoals and outcomes, including the
culture of engineering foster or hinder be- longing and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chem- ical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, and the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions
earned, career histories, professional memberships, and publications. Much of thisinformation is not available from other sources.Although an increasing number of articles and books on academic engineering librarianship werepublished from the 1930s onward, few discussed the roles, qualifications, or work experiences ofengineering librarians. Few librarians from the period published biographies or articles abouttheir careers and work experiences. Modern librarians know much about historical engineeringinformation resources and how engineering libraries in the post-war period were organized,thanks to research published by librarians [4], student library handbooks [5, 6], and libraryannual reports [7]. However, we know very little about the
. With the perspective of a career centered in private sector technology and cybersecurity, she greatly values the contributions made by EdTech organizations, like Codio, to help faculty deliver better learning outcomes in CS and STEM for students of every level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Proposing a Response Hierarchy Model to Explain How CS Faculty Adopt Teaching Interventions in Higher EducationAbstractDespite the high volume of existing Computer Science Education research, the literatureindicates that these evidence-based practices are not making their way into classrooms. WhileK12 faces pressures from policy and increasing opportunities through
self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 8, no. 1, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00168- 5.[19] L. Carroll, C. Finelli, and S. DesJardins, “Academic Success of College Students with ADHD: The First Year of College,” Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Feb. 2022[20] S. Qiu et al., “‘All Together Now’ - Integrating Horizontal Skills in Career Technical Education Classes with Making and Micromanufacturing,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/all-together- now-integrating-horizontal-skills-in
; Ozkan, 2021). Problems areoften presented free of broader contexts in which the concepts might apply, and they ask studentsto employ complex math and physics concepts to scenarios that might bear little, if any,resemblance to the real world or their lived experiences. Such issues can present challenges forstudents as they struggle to understand the relevance or application of the concepts they arelearning both within their lives and the engineering profession more broadly. Without makingmeaningful connections between their lived experiences and the content they are learning,engineering students can lose motivation and expectations for success in their academic andprofessional careers (Kosovich, Hulleman, Phelps, & Lee, 2019).One way that
Paper ID #28386”She’s Walking into Like Systems Dynamics. What Is She Doing Here?” ANarrative Analysis of a Latina EngineerMrs. Tanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder TANYA D. ENNIS is the current BOLD Center Director at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her career in the telecommunications industry included positions in software and systems engineering and technical project
United States with morethan 11 thousand members. For more than 30 years, SHPE organized and hosted its premier, three-day leadership conference in the first week of August, known today as the National Institute forLeadership Advancement (NILA). As part of NILA, SHPE chapters send one of their electedrepresentatives, typically the chapter president, to be developed into a leader. After attendingNILA, the representatives, now leaders, would lead their chapter leadership and members towarda successful post-graduation transition into the STEM workforce (students) and career upward-mobility and positive impact within the Hispanic community (professionals). Throughout the first half of the past decade, NILA’s curriculum and overall design
Paper ID #20073Lessons Learned in K-12 Engineering Outreach and Their Impact on Pro-gram Planning (Evaluation)Dr. J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University Dr. Carroll is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Saint Louis University. His experimental research interests focus on reinforced and prestressed concrete, while his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll serves as a voting member on ACI Committee S802 - Teaching Methods and Educational Materials and is Chair of the Career Guidance Committee for the ASCE
textbook and applied very easily. Adamwanted a challenge. He thought about how his father—a professor—was happy, and Adambegan to consider a career in academia. Eventually, he decided to apply to Ph.D. programs.Preparing for the GRE proved fruitful, as he was admitted to and attended his first-choiceinstitution. Adam was excited about the proposition of being an independent researcher butperceived obtaining a Ph.D. as a hurdle to his ultimate goal. He wanted to work on ill-defineddesign problems. For Adam, choosing a research lab was predicated on finding a facultymember engaged in integrated-circuit (IC) design work. He was less concerned about theparticular application as it was unlikely, in his view, that he would be able to craft
engineering; e.g. Engineers can have a positive impact on society. Professional connectedness 19 (5N) Costs-benefits: trade-offs associated with engaging in socially responsible 4 engineering or service; e.g. I would be willing to have a career that earns less money if I were serving society.1 (Number of the survey items that are negatively or reverse worded)Survey Distribution and Respondents. In fall 2012, a survey invitation was distributed toentering first-year students, seniors, and graduate students majoring in civil, environmental, andmechanical engineering at five institutions. In addition, in spring 2014 the
computer sciences compared to 8.9% of their counterparts without disabilities [1].Recent science and engineering graduates without disabilities have a 91% employment rate vs.89% for recent graduates with disabilities [2]. While the disparity in education and employmentbetween people with and without disabilities may not be alarmingly large in the early careerstages, the gap is much larger as people progress past their early careers. Only 65% of scientistsand engineers with disabilities are employed vs. 81% employment for scientists and engineerswithout disabilities [2].This shortage is especially concerning in rehabilitation engineering, where the need forperspectives of people with disabilities is necessary. In nearly 75 percent of people who