, wefound opportunities for all of us to support people transitioning from school to work and create amore harmonious multi-generational workplace. Organizations and universities can create amore collaborative and innovative future by promoting mentorship, fostering opencommunication, and dispelling generational stereotypes.References1. J. M. Twenge, S. M. Campbell, B. J. Hoffman, & C.E. Lance, “Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing.” Journal of Management, vol 36, no. 5, pp. 1117-1142, Sept. 2010.2. H. Schroth, “Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace?” California Management Review, vol 61, no. 3, pp. 5- 18, Apr. 2019.3. P. R. Clance and S. A
: developing entrepreneurialthinking in STEM (Entre-STEM)." Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets ThroughSTEM Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 165-194, 2023[11] T. Siller, T., & G. Johnson, G. Curriculum, Pedagogy, And Assessment In EngineeringEducation Reform. In 2004 Annual Conference (pp. 9-366), 2004 (June).[12] I. K. Amalina, S. Suherman, T. Vidákovich, L. Puspita, & N. Supriadi. The Comparison ofHungarian and Indonesian Curriculum: A Case Study of ISCED 2 Mathematics and ScienceCurriculum. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 112-122, 2023.[13] Y. Supriani, F. Meliani, A. Supriyadi, S. Supiana, & Q.Y. Zaqiah. The Process ofCurriculum Innovation: Dimensions, Models, Stages, and Affecting Factors. Nazhruna
formation – creativity exercise, introductions, update of current project status from former team member(s), access to SWO, navigation model, document brief and final report from last term Assignment 1: Revise or Create Strategic Web Objective, Navigation Model, and Client Brief Documents, (see http://axle.doit.wisc.edu/~gwp/WEB.html) 3 Sep 18 4:30 - 5:00 Stress Management I (Rob Sepich) 5:00 – 6:00 Planning and Preparation for Initial Client Meeting –George Pasdirtz, Strategic Consultant, DoIT 6:00 – 7:00 Team meetings: plan for client meeting Assignment 2: Report
(ourkids) perceive themselves as getting a bargain. This drives our teenagers to buy the latestin CD’s, cellphones or other technologies.Coupling of Computing and Electronic TechnologiesComputer and electronic technologies are relatively new fields compared to the othersciences. Since the development of the first commercial computers in the 1950’s, thegrowth of computing technology in the last 50 years has significantly impacted our lives.With the introduction of personal computers in 1981, computers have been assimilatedinto our businesses and homes at a phenomenal exponential rate. Today, the averagehousehold owns 2.5 televisions (Consumer Research, [CR], 1999), 1.5 VCRs (CR, 1999),.25 DVDs (CR, 1999), 1.25 (Bailey, 2001) or (160 million
and hydrogen, a constant current would flow between the electrodes. Thesealed containers held water as well as the gases, and he noted that the water level rose inboth tubes as the current flowed.The technology advanced slowly over the years but took a giant leap in the 1960's.During the early 1960’s, General Electric produced the first practical application for afuel cell when it provided onboard electrical power for the Gemini and Apollo spacecapsules. In the early 1970’s, DuPont introduced the Nafion® membrane from which allPEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) fuel cells had been constructed. This material is quiteexpensive to manufacture which has limited the market application of fuel cells. Also, theoperating conditions for this type of PEM
0.4Acceleration (ft/s )2 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 No Base Isolation With Base Isolation -0.8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (Seconds) Figure 8. Responses of the model structures under free vibration Forced
, although he noted that the things they print are usually not often for use onvehicles, but ‘just personal stuff, objects.’ Personal digital fabrication items such as these can befound on Thingiverse11, and microproduction and the “democratization of manufacturing” is putforth as a “promise[s] to revolutionize the means of design, production and distribution ofmaterial goods and give rise to a new class of creators and producers12.”Implications for Undergraduate Engineering EducationIn undergraduate engineering education, it is typical for junior and senior students to takecourses involving design-build-test projects. Some of these projects can involve the constructionand fabrication of mechanical systems, for example ASME’s Human Powered
-Based Activities to Repair Student Misconceptions in EngineeringDynamics. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Laws, P., D. Sokoloff, and R. Thornton, Promoting Active Learning Using the Results of Physics Education Research. UniServe Science News, 1999. 13.2. Prince, M. (2004) Does Active Learning Work: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Engineering Education, pp 223-231.3. Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking, How People Learn: Body, Mind, Experience and School. 2000, Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National Research Council
Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 281-297, 19675. Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., and Cohen, J. Quiet interfaces that help students think. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 191–200, 2006.6. Romero, C., Romero, J., Luna, J., and Ventura S. Mining Rare Association Rules from e-Learning Data. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 2010.7. Van Arsdale, T. and Stahovich, T. Does Neatness Count? What the Organization of Student Work Says About Understanding. In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
520 References1. U.S. Department of Education, N.C.f.E.S., The Nation's Report Card: America's high school graduates. Results from the 2005 NAEP High School Transcript Study by C. Shettle et al. (NCES 2007-467), (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office). 2007.2. Society of Women Engineers , Where are all the women going? http://www.societyofwomenengineers.org/regionb/docs/06springnewsletter.pdf. p..3. Nord, C., S. Roey, R. Perkins, M. Lyons, N. Lemanski, J. Brown, and J. Schuknecht, The nation’s report card: America’s high school graduates (NCES 2011-462). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, 2011.4. Hyde, J.S
casting. The comparison of tensile test results ofthe plastic and metal 3D printed students-created test samples has value as a pedagogical tool.Through experimentation, students gained experience in using an important and novel engineeringdesign tool. A questionnaire developed and administered to measure students’ perspective oninexpensive 3D printing technologies shows positive preliminary results but it should be furtherimproved/changed (to measure student learning outcomes directly) and administered to a largernumber of students (to allow statistical analysis). Finally, this paper is envisioned to serve as avaluable resource in implementing a metal clay 3D printer for creating small metal parts.Bibliography1. Lai-Yuen, S., and Herrera, M
area’s urbanicity and are less common in rural areas [39, p. 201], [40]. In agreement withthis, Saw and Agger [41] found that high schools in rural and small-town settings have less APmath and science class; have less math and science fairs; are less likely to sponsor after schoolprograms; and are less likely to inform students about extracurricular math and scienceprograms. Students attending rural high school, then, tend to have less opportunities to engage inSTEM-related activities, and therefore, lower STEM participation.Conceptual Framework We draw on Main et al.’s [42] conceptual framework on the factors associated withengineering major choice across life stages to inform this study. Whereas Main et al.’sframework focuses on
A key activity was obtaining the purposive sample by identifying and gaining access toindividuals and schools who would become the subjects of this research. The selection processbegan by looking at private, Christian universities with an ABET accredited engineeringprogram. I was most interested in schools that had either grown rapidly or were regionallylocated. Cedarville University of Cedarville, OH created its engineering program and quicklybecame accredited in the early 1990’s. Over the next ten years, their engineering department "Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
Churchill and Chu8.Experimental Equipment List • Hartman Pro-Tech Model 1600 hair dryer, 1600 watts • 25 ¼ in x 22 in x 16 in cardboard heating box, used for heating the plates • 1 3/16 in thick Styrofoam® insulation, lining the cardboard boxProceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3 • Wooden stand to hold and elevate the aluminum plate • 18 in x 12 in x 1 ½ in aluminum plate, with a black painted finish • Omega HH12 thermocouple reader • 1/8 in diameter x 12 in long sheathed thermocouples • Stopwatch, graduated in 0.01 s time intervals • 1 3/16
of experience workingwith metals and now must begin working with composites. In this industry, one course does notfit all, because of such varying degrees of the knowledge base along with the specific applicationrequirements put forth by the industry users. Working with such dynamic materials andprocesses in conjunction with meeting the needs of designers and manufacturers will continue tochallenge educational institutions in the future.IntroductionThe vast world of composites has grown rapidly and significantly since its first large scaleapplications within the military sector during WWII and the late 1940’s and early 1950’s. Theunique combination of performance benefits offered by composite materials has now propelledits use into almost
’s. For example, the popular textbook 2by Fitzgerald, Kingsley and Umans1 was originally published in 1952. The sixth edition was re-leased in 2003, with a portion of the publisher’s summary statement as follows: “To a great extent, the fundamental concepts have not changed over the years since Pro- fessors Fitzgerald and Kingsley wrote the first edition of this text. As a result, significant portions of the material found in the fifth edition will be familiar to readers of the previ- ous editions. In recognition of this fact, coverage of the basics of these machine types has increased significantly in the
Engineering Materials Classes at PurdueThe School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University has long been dedicated to teachingstudents about engineering materials. This dedication began in 1883 with a laboratory for testingmaterials in the college of engineering [1]. In 1899, this lab was moved to the school of civilengineering and eventually became the foundation for CE 231 – Engineering Materials I and CE331 – Engineering Materials II. While these courses were referred to as the "Busting Labs" atthe turn of the century, since the 1960's these courses have strived to provide students with aProceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
. “Grad Schools Preview the Shape of Ph.D.’s to Come,” Science: New Series, Vol. 270, No. 5233 (Oct. 1995), pg. 128-133.10 Ng Kah Hwa and Jessica Ng, “From Rocket Scientists to Financial Engineers,” Engineering Science and Education Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, (February 2002), pg. 25-28.11 Rechtin, E. Systems Architecting: Creating and Building Complex Systems (New Jersey: Prentice Hall), 1991.12 Sheppard, Sheri D. and Silva, M. Kathleen, “Descriptions of Engineering: Student and Engineering Practitioner Perspectives,” Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pg. F3B-12-F3B-18.13 Speier, C., Harvey, M.G., and Palmer, J. “Virtual Management of Global Marketing Relationships,” IEEE
andAgricultural Engineering since 2004. Proceedings of the 2009 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 6Appendix:Edible Vehicle Design Competition (Materials Given to Student Design Teams)Problem: To be defined by your teamObjective(s): Also to be defined by your teamConstraints: 1. The vehicle must utilize at least three (3) different food items. 2. Each vehicle must be entirely edible. No toothpicks, tape, glue, etc. 3. The vehicle must have at least: a. A body b. 3 wheels (the wheels must rotate) c. 2 axles 4. The vehicle must travel
had nonumerical impact on the students‟ final grades. Instead, it was used to provide feedback forimproved student learning in anticipation of the grade-determining summative final exam to betaken at the end of the semester.The seventh learning outcome, associated with preparation and participation, was assessedcontinuously via readiness tests, daily instructor observation, and a peer assessment survey givenat approximately mid-semester. In the peer assessment the members of each group anonymouslyassessed each other‟s contributions to the group work process.Evaluation: Fall 2010Evaluation of the adapted TBL strategy as implemented in Fall 2010 was done using twoinstruments: continuous observation by the instructor throughout the semester, and
: CRC Press, 2009.[8] D. G. Rickerby and M. Morrison, "Nanotechnology and the environment: A European perspective," Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 8, pp. 19-24.[9] (28 March 2011). Washington nuclear sensors capable of detecting faintest amounts of radiation. Available: http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/washington-nuclear-sensors-capable-detecting-faintest- amounts-radiation[10] D. F. Emerich and C. G. Thanos, "Nanotechnology and medicine," Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 3, pp. 655-663, 2003.[11] J. F. S. Jr., "Nanotechnology and Environmental, Health, and Safety: Issues for Consideration ", C. R. Service, Ed., ed: CRS Report for Congress, John F. Sargent Jr
B) Output Power POutput = Q * p where Q is flow and p is the head POutput = 0.0000225 m3/s*6.55kPa*1000 Pa/kPa = 0.147W C) Efficiency Efficiency = POutput / PInput * 100% . Efficiency = *100% = 22.3% . These results are presented in Table 5 for impeller speeds from 2010 to 3510 rpm.C. Determination of System Curve and
. Funabashi, H. Fujita and H. Sekine. (2006). "Output power leveling of wind turbine generator for all operating regions by pitch angle control," in IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 467-475.[6] P. H. Mellor, S. G. Burrow, T. Sawata and M. Holme. (2005). "A wide-speed-range hybrid variable-reluctance/permanent-magnet generator for future embedded aircraft generation systems," in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 551-556.[7] E. L. Harder. (1977). "Specific output of windmills—A discovery," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1623-1625.[8] N. Rezaei-Hosseinabadi, A. Tabesh, R. Dehghani and A. Aghili. (2015). "An efficient piezoelectric windmill topology for
Promoting Nanotechnology Education to Midwestern High School Students for Higher Enrolment Rates in Engineering Education 1 M. Ceylan, 1A. Usta, 2F.E. Barut, 3N. S. Ergul, and 1,*R. Asmatulu 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University 1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260-0133 2 Northeast Magnet High School, Wichita, KS 3 Andover High School, Andover, KS *Email: ramazan.asmatulu@wichita.edu; Tel: (316) 978-6368AbstractNanotechnology education has been gaining much attention worldwide, and offered by manyuniversities and
, 2010 106. Asmatulu, R., Asmatulu, E., and Yourdkhani, A. “Importance of Nanosafety in Engineering Education,” ASEE Midwest Conference, Lincoln, NB, September, 2009, pp. 1-8.7. Kumar, C. Nanomaterials—Toxicity, Health and Environmental Issues, WILEY-VCH., 2006.8. Karakoti, A.S., Hench, L.L., and Seal, S. “The Potential Toxicity of Nanomaterials—The Role of Surfaces,” JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Vol. 58, 2006, pp. 77-82.9. Brayner, Roberta. “The Toxicological Impact of Nanoparticles,” Nanotoday, Vol. 3, 2008, pp. 48-55.10. Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., and Weckert, J. Nanoethics: The
engineering graduates.A number of noted engineering education leaders have responded and commentedon these reports. Butcher claims the reports call for “ingenious leaders —ingenious engineers” and calls these engineers, “well-rounded RenaissanceEngineer”[s] [8]. Turns, Atman, et al., [9] use these reports as an input to what anengineer needs to know. Dym, et al. present how engineering education is beingchallenged to require students to consider additional design constraints required aspart of a “new fundamentals” [10]. In response to this challenge, the CoE at WSUwishes to establish its leadership in reshaping the undergraduate experience toprepare the engineer of 2020, and at the same time make the educationalexperience more meaningful to the
students that took the Communication Networks Modeling,Simulation and Testing class during Fall 2006: Jesse Bruce, Lucas Folegatti, Robert Hegedus,Chris Magnussen, Jason McConnell, Ryan Schroederr, Justin Vierra, John Vaughan, and CharlesWatkins. Charles Watkins’ model is shown in this paper, and Robert Hegedus’ full reportinitiated the idea of publishing this work.References[1] “Can WLAN Switches Support Voice?” Business Communications Review, pp. 42-47, October 2006.[2] Gast, M. S., “802.11 Wireless LANs – The Definitive Guide,” Chapter 25 – 802.11 Performance Tuning, 2nd Edition, O’Reilly Media.[3] E. Ferro and F. Potorti, “Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Wireless Protocols, A Survey and A Comparison”, IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol.12, No.1, pp
also found that theexperience was very positive for these new students. These qualitative results suggest that thelearning communities can be very useful for new engineering students by helping them meet andget to know students who are in the same classes as them and who have many of the sameconcerns.BibliographyProceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for EngineeringEducation 111. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs”, ABET, http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2007- 08%20EAC%20Criteria%2011-15-06.pdf2. Laufgraben, J. L., & Shapiro, N. S. (2004
: We rolled the large Cantenna to a distance of about 200 yards fromour building (Technology Center) and hooked it up through 2511 PLUS EXT2 wirelesscard to a laptop which was running Net Stumbler. We then turned the antenna to face theTech Center. Using our antenna we were able to pick up 8 access points with 4 of themhaving a signal to noise ratio (S/N) greater than or equal to 20 dB (a threshold required “Proceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 8for proper access). We then replaced the large cantenna with a smaller one and we
Proceedings of 2007 Midwest Section Conference of American Society for Engineering Education 10at UMR to design vital building blocks (such as adders, multipliers, accumulator units) usingNCL. Now due to the availability of the powerful Altera DE-2 FPGA board it is even possible toverify the entire building blocks like that of a multiplier (as in our case). The multiplier that wasused to for verification was an 8 bit 2’s complement multiplier implemented using Booth2algorithm. The design flow has been illustrated in Figure 11. Fig. 10 Waveforms showing the 1 bit output of the data out of RAM Fig. 11 Design flow for