thinking skills that can help students program in any language. This paper illustrates the creation and implementation of an innovative approach to developalgorithmic reasoning and computational thinking with two popular programming languages, Cand Python for middle school female students by using a hands-on, application-oriented approach.The research questions for this study are: 1) What factors are involved in identifying STEM-confidence in middle-school female students when learning in a female-only STEM learning environment? 2) How are Femineer® students developing algorithmic reasoning or computational thinking through participation in this Innovative Coding curriculum?This curriculum will become part of the Femineer
. Can authoring an open source, case-based assignment (instead of a traditional term paper) capture self identity and lived experiences, create a stronger sense of agency in learners, and increase “stickiness” of the knowledge? 2. Can working collaboratively with other learners personalize the knowledge absorption process and build team based skills? 3. Does access to open educational resources facilitate integration of sustainability or social justice concepts into the engineering curriculum?This research discovered that student motivation is significantly improved through projects that extendbeyond the academic environment, particularly those that align with their interests in sustainability goals.Moreover
, H. (2014). Changes in elementary students’ engineering knowledge over two years of integrated science instruction. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN.[19] Cunningham, C. M., & Hester, K. (2007, March). Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Page 26.760.14 Exposition, Honolulu, HI.[20] Dyehouse, M., Diefes-Dux, H., & Capobianco, B. (2011). Measuring the effects of integrating engineering into
of specific roles within an industry. This context aids future career decisions.Specialist interviews equip someone exploring or pursuing an industry career with revelationsand advice for mapping out a rewarding professional journey ahead. The insights andconnections gained can prove invaluable for tuning one's career trajectory toward a fulfilling andsuccessful path.For many reasons, written reports and oral presentations are essential in the internshipexperience. These assignments help interns process and integrate what they learn from theirhands-on experiences at the internship site. They force interns to organize their thoughts, analyzewhat they have learned, and articulate the knowledge and skills they have developed. They allowinterns
. Teachers were alsodivided into grade-level groups and were tasked with presenting a lesson they would deliver totheir respective grade-level. The final assignment was an individual implementation plan thatrequired the teachers to explain how they would be integrating CS into their curriculum in thefollowing academic year.2.1.3. Saturday WorkshopsThe project included five half-day workshops held on Saturdays across the academic year. Thepurpose of these workshops was to support participants in enacting the CS they learned in the Figure 2. Summer PD program second-week CS pedagogy course schedule.summer, as well as to return to major CS topics (e.g., conditionals, flowcharts, variables, event-driven programming, etc.). An explicit focus of
Professor and Chairman Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering & Technology Bradley University, IL, 61625, USA AbstractBradley University plays an important role in educating ABET accredited manufacturingengineers to major industries, such as Caterpillar or John Deere nearby. In recent years, ourconstituencies have voiced that plastics product design and injection molding process beconsidered key competences in our manufacturing curriculum. It’s always crucial and beneficialfor plastics engineers to understand the whole picture of plastics product development, from theproduct conceptual design to the product validation. Therefore, the
CoNECD, Crystal City, VA, 2018.[11] N. Mallette, C. Kelly and M. Bothwell. “Work-in-Progress: Developing an Integrated Curriculum-Wide Teamwork Instructional Strategy.” Paper accepted for the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[12] W.R. Penuel, B.J. Fishman, B.H. Cheng and N. Sabelli. “Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design.” Educational Researcher, vol. 40(7), pp. 331-337, 2011.[13] N. Sabelli and C. Dede. “Empowering design-based implementation research: the need for infrastructure”. In B. Fishman & W. R. Penuel (Eds.), Design-Based Implementation Research: Theories, Methods, and Exemplars (Vol. 112, pp. 464-480
intriguing was the fact that even students that were awarded competitive academic scholarships (top grades and very high SAT scores) left their respective engineering programs after their first year, expressing anxiety with core engineering course (calculus) affecting their ability to maintain their required GPA and thus result in loss of their scholarship [4]. Consequently, there is a need to develop a first-year engineering curriculum that takes into consideration the diverse academic, social, cultural, and economic backgrounds of an incoming class of students. Although academically well prepared, today’s student lack the discipline to be individually responsible for the largely self-directed study required in college [5
University. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society, and the work of ASEE’s TELPhE division from whom he has received a best paper and meritorious service awards. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruc- tion which received an outstanding
, to do good for humankind” [5]. Much of the curriculum is hands-on and projectbased; many of the courses are co-taught by interdisciplinary teams and much of the content isintegrated across disciplines. Olin also emphasizes teamwork, design, and student autonomy,positioning students as co-creators of their own educational experiences. In addition, all studentscomplete an Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences concentration alongside their engineering major,and essential outcomes of a liberal education, per the Association of American Colleges andUniversities, are integrated throughout the curriculum [6], [7].Olin President Richard K. Miller brought this philosophy to GCSP as one of the three foundersof the nationwide program. Olin was one of the
a Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida’s College of Engineering . Richard is the Co-PI for an NSF grant that supports FLATE, Advanced Techno- logical Education in Florida ,the the NSF Center of Excellence, which was founded through substantial funding from NSF. FLATE, now funded by the NIST MEP program and the Florida Department of Ed- ucation, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The latter was for the
a secondoffering is planned for 2017 albeit with a more accessible project.References1. Goldman, S., & Carroll, M., & Zielezinski, M. B., & Loh, A., & Ng, E. S., & Bachas- Daunert, S. (2014, June), Dive In! An Integrated Design Thinking/STEM Curriculum Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.2. Biggers, M., & Haefner, L. A., & Bell, J. (2016, June), Engineering First: How Engineering Design Thinking Affects Science Learning Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.3. Menold, J., & Jablokow, K. W., & Kisenwether, E. C., & Zappe, S. E. (2015, June), Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Preferences on
on Undergraduate Research (CUR) Faculty Mentoring Award in Mathematics and Computer Science.Dr. Ann C. Gates, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Ann Quiroz Gates is the Vice Provost of Faculty Affairs at the University of Texas at El Paso. She holds the AT&T Distinguished Professorship and served as the Chair of the Computer Science Depart- ment (2005-2008 and 2012-2020) and Associate VP of Research and Sponsored Projects (2008-2012). Gates is the Executive Director of the Computing Alliance for Hispanic-Serving Institutions (CAHSI), an NSF National INCLUDES Alliance promoting the importance of inclusion and equity in advancing innovation and discovery. She also directs the NSF-funded CyberShARE Center
framework's impact relied on servicehours, outreach scales, and feedback collected during the summer camps.The analysis confirmed the framework's effectiveness in enhancing students'technical and soft skills, sustaining their interest in STEM, improving teamperformances, and fostering an inclusive community for collaboration. The LPSframework offers students flexibility in developing their skill sets and has beenproven to be sustainable, transformable, and scalable for integration into K-12thengineering curriculum and extracurricular programs.IntroductionRobotics has been identified as an interdisciplinary field encompassing electrical components,computer vision, mechanics, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence [1-5]. Innovation inrobotics
buildings, while developing a deeper understanding of indoor environmental quality, occupant impacts, and energy use. She is the Principal Investigator of a multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional research project, NSF EFRI-Barriers, Understanding, Integration – Life cycle Devel- opment (BUILD). As the associate director of education outreach in the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Pitt’s center for green design, she translates research to community outreach programs and develops sustainable engineering programs for K-12 education.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University Dr. Landis joined ASU in January 2012 as an Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engi- neering and the Built Environment
Logic Array (FPGA) architecture and design methodology, Engineer- ing Technology Education, and hardware description language modeling. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Ad- ditionally, Dr. Alaraje is a recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum revision in collaboration with the College of Lake County in Illinois, and a NSF award in collaboration with the University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community College. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college stu- dents about career opportunities in electronics
currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech
thetheorized utility of the experience for promoting student engineering self-efficacy andmotivation. Following an overview of theory behind the curriculum, we describe how theseprinciples align with the student experience while fabricating soft robots. Finally, we offerpreliminary reports on initial states and changes in student perceptions as they participated in thecurriculum.Girls in STEMAmong areas of concern for technology and engineering education, is the participation of adiverse body of students 1. For our field this includes female students, and a number of effortshave been made to understand factors related to this disparity 2, 3. In middle-school and high-school, as students are often first exposed to these elective courses, interest
methodol- ogy, Engineering Technology Education, and hardware description language modeling. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Additionally, Dr. Alaraje is a recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum re- vision in collaboration with the College of Lake County in Illinois, and a NSF award in collaboration with the University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community Col- lege. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college students about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a member of the American
inclusion into engineeringcourses. Specifically, the third author works to integrate content concerning folks withdisabilities and teaches an upper-division course on design for disability. In dynamics, the thirdauthor incorporates modified versions of this content and helps emphasize the ways in whichengineering solutions can contribute to equity and access. In addition, the fourth author hasexperience with issues of engineering and social justice and teaches an upper division class onengineering design theory and social justice. Similarly, the fourth author works to incorporatesociotechnical topics into all their courses, including engineering statics. We note ourpositionality because the topics we teach likely influenced student responses to the
for students from minoritybackgrounds [23]. While the range and type of learning communities may vary [24, 25], mostlearning communities embody several vital characteristics, including the use of smaller groupsamong faculty and students; the bringing together of faculty and students in more meaningfulways; curriculum integration; emphasis on the development of academic and social supportnetworks; and a focus on learning outcomes [26]. Learning communities help foster increasedstudent engagement, defined by Astin [27] as “the amount of physical and psychological energythat the student devotes to the academic experience” (p. 518).Description of InterventionThis project builds on a previous grant-funded project aimed at small cohorts of
: a) the differences in the demands of theengineering curriculum compared to other college majors5; b) the types of students who chooseto study engineering 6,7,8; and c) a belief that factors affect engineering students’ performanceand persistence decisions differently than non-engineering students9. Studies in engineering retention have been influenced by factors from the collegeretention literature. These factors include pre-entry characteristics such as skills and abilities10,11family background12, institutional experiences13,14, and finances15. While research in collegeretention has focused on integration into the university, research in engineering retention hasfocused more on integration into the engineering culture16
al.3 provide an in-depth summary and critique of prior research that focuses on post-transfer transition processesfor community college students who transfer to four-year institutions.3 In their review, theauthors identify, define, operationalize, and synthesize findings for five concepts that mostfrequently emerge in the existing body of literature; among them include: integration,involvement, environmental pull, capital, and transfer receptivity. In the following paragraphs,we briefly introduce each concept, explain its relevance to transfer student persistence, and pointto a small number of relevant studies for readers who seek a more in depth review. In this context, the concept integration is inspired by Tinto’s theory of
[its] parts,” and suggested that there was a lack of shared vision among faculty,leading to classroom efforts feeling siloed rather than a part of an integrated framework ofstudent development across the curriculum. Furthermore, there was a general sense ofhelplessness when it came to enhancing the curriculum, citing concerns that the curriculumalready felt too rigid and overloaded. Faculty recognized that representation and equity problemsexisted, in that different students entered the program with a wide range of experiences, skills,and knowledge. Diversity and inclusion efforts to help reduce these differentials were recognizedfor their value, although faculty felt they needed more guidance to improve effectiveness.Regarding the use of
Paper ID #33383Broadening the Middle School Computational Thinking Interventions Be-yondBlock ProgrammingDr. Mohsen M. Dorodchi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Dorodchi has been teaching in the field of computing for over 30 years of which 20 years as an educator. He has taught the majority of the courses in the computer science and engineering curriculum over the past 20 years such as introductory programming, data structures, databases, software engineering, system programming, etc. He has been involved in a number of National Science Foundation supported grant projects including Scholarship for STEM
to both STEM instructors and natural scientists, weselected a framework that helped participants realize how to integrate high-quality researchpractices into all aspects of the research design process, in a way that is intuitive, equitable, andmapped to the intellectual curiosity of the researcher. The framework upon which projectactivities were built is the Qualifying Qualitative Research Quality (Q3) framework pioneered byWalther, et al. [20]. This framework presents qualitative research quality as an essential andcontext-sensitive consideration in every aspect of a study’s design, rather than as a series ofspecific strategies that can be added to a research design to increase quality [20, 21]. Theframework divides research quality into
-incomepeople and/or persons of color [2]. Considering equity as an integral dimension of infrastructureis becoming more common, particularly in transportation [3, 4] and water [5]. The current ASCECode of Ethics [6] implies that civil engineers should strive for equitable infrastructure. Forexample, under the society stakeholder, civil engineers should “acknowledge the community'sdiverse historical, social, and cultural needs and incorporate these considerations in their work.”The idea of equitable infrastructure also aligns with the new ABET civil engineering programcriteria (CEPC). Specifically, in November 2023 the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC) of ABET approved new civil engineering criteria that state: “The curriculum mustinclude: A
curriculum.2-5 Ingeneral, women and underrepresented minority students are less likely to persist in engineering.6Reports also indicate that the persistence of women and underrepresented minority students inengineering may be adversely affected to a greater degree by their experiences within theengineering climate than their majority male counterparts. Here “climate” indicates perceptions ofstudent belonging and interpersonal interactions between student peers, students and faculty (bothin and out of the classroom), and individual compatibility with pedagogical styles in theirclasses.2,7 An undesirable climate also has the greatest impact on student retention in the first yearsof engineering study.8 Most students who leave engineering do so within
Engineering Community during their first year and on campus for two years.• Community Building: Group activities and social events outside of class are an integral part of developing a community within STARS. WSU includes a field trip to a local engineering firm as an additional component to the STARS seminar. UW incorporates an obstacle or ropes course. Additional activities like bowling, movie nights, and ultimate Frisbee have also been included.• Career Awareness and Vision: Students receive multiple views of the engineering and computer science fields so they can think about themselves as engineers/computer scientists now and in the future. Activities are designed so that students can picture what their life as an
integration of music into STEM than currently exists. Web-based applications can significantly contribute to this spread, as they allow easy access tointeractive hands-on experiences. 2LTW development went through three main stages. It started in a very small scale throughpersonal connections with teachers. Then, it moved to large public schools with heavy supportfrom LTW’s team. Finally, LTW created web-applications and curriculum to be used by teachersanywhere in the world with internet access. In this paper, I expand on the details of these stagesand offer general advice for developing impactful programs. To learn more about LTW, watchtutorials, and