AC 2010-414: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE SIMULATION FORUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERS: A TOOL FOR ENGAGING, EDUCATING ANDASSESSINGNaomi Chesler, University of Wisconsin, MadisonElizabeth Bagley, University of Wisconsin, MadisonEric Breckenfeld, University of Wisconsin, MadisonDevin West, University of Wisconsin, MadisonAlison Stace-Naughton, Dartmouth CollegeDavid Shaffer, University of Wisconsin, Madison Page 15.990.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Professional Practice Simulation for Undergraduate Engineers: A Tool for Engaging, Educating and AssessingAbstractWe are developing a novel computer simulation game based on authentic engineering
as teamwork, communication, connection to society and appreciation ofdiversity are recognized as important abilities that are necessary for all engineers graduatingfrom ABET-accredited programs [10]. With these facts in mind, the K-12 outreach teachingproject entitled “Body by Design” was developed as a central portion of an upper divisiontechnical elective course cross-listed between mechanical engineering and bioengineering.Structural Aspects of Biomaterials has been taught for nearly a decade and in this timeframe, thecourse has evolved from a survey course to a course with emphasis on project-based learning,interdisciplinary problems, teamwork, and outreach teaching. By the end of the semester,undergraduates are expected to have an
AC 2010-1696: ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE LEARNING INA CIVIL ENGINEERING GRADUATE VIBRATIONS COURSELuciana Barroso, Texas A&M University Page 15.120.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Active Learning Strategies to Enhance Learning in a Civil Engineering Graduate Vibrations CourseAbstractThis paper presents a first-semester graduate level course in structural dynamics that utilizesactive learning as a mechanism to address 1) higher expectations of learning, 2) varying levels oracademic background and preparation, and 3) diverse cultural backgrounds. Active learningstrategies used include cooperative learning, both
controllers inside their minds which permitsthem to damp out the oscillations. Their personal internal controllers advance the phase of thejoystick input, compared to the controller of Figure 2. What does this mean? The phase advanceis the result of our minds anticipating. We begin executing the turn before the car crosses thecenter line. To make the software-based controller work, students must incorporate that sametype of anticipation. All of them figure it out, some with a little help.It has been our experience that engineering students like to build things. They like to tinker. Theylike to figure out how to make things work. With the video game, all the tinkering takes place inthe virtual world. Nonetheless, we suspect that tinkering virtual
AC 2010-1059: PERCEPTIONS OF K-12 AND COLLEGIATE STEM TEACHINGCAREERS BY COMPUTING, ENGINEERING, AND SCIENCEADMINISTRATORS, FACULTY AND ADVISORSDonna Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn is the Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL)at Georgia Tech. Donna received her B.A. in Mathematics from Swarthmore College, her M.S. in Operations Research from Stanford University, and her Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University. After working as a faculty member in the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech, she changed career paths to lead CETL where she works with faculty, instructors, and graduate students to
AC 2010-493: INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY INTO STUDIO DESIGNCURRICULUMDaniel Davis, University of Hartford Page 15.774.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY INTO STUDIO DESIGN CLASS CURRICULUMAbstractAt the University of Hartford, we have established an architectural program founded onintegration. Architecture by its very nature is connected to other disciplines, yet architecturaleducation is often criticized for a lack of integration in the curriculum. By increasing theawareness of the interrelationship between different areas of study, we are attempting to strike anew and more effective
theoretical review and clarification. Br J Educ Psychol,. 63(Pt 1): p. 3-19. 14. Prosser, M. and K. Trigwell, (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. 15. Felder and Brent (2005) Understanding Student differences Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), p.57-72 16. Wilson, V., Harris, M. (2004) Review of Effective Teaching and Learning of Design and Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 223-241 17. Pink, D., (2005). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future the Berkely Publishing Group, Published by the Penguin Group. New York
they solved structural failureinvestigations”, Proc. 2010 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Blacksburg, VA, April 2010.[7] Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.D. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001.[8] Vick, S.G., Degrees of Belief: Subjective probability and engineering judgment, ASCE Press, Reston, VA,2002.[9] Godoy, L. A., “Learning-by-Doing in a Web-Based Simulated Environment”, Proc. 6th Annual Int. Conf.Information Technology in Higher Education and Training, IEEE, Juan Dolio, Dominican Republic, July 2005.[10] Godoy, L. A., “Developing a Computer-Based Simulated Environment to Learn on Structural Failures”,Paper 1849 in: Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., Austin, TX, June
and clear when writing and creating slides. • Keep audience in mind. Giving an Oral Presentation: • Practice the presentation with some friends prior to the presentation. • Test the PowerPoint on a projector prior to the presentation. • Interact with the audience. • Slow down when speaking. • Explain technical terms. • Focus on different ways to communicate with different audiences. • Avoid note cards. o Know slides well enough to speak from them.In response to the question “Tell us what you would do to improve the WCC Workshop,” therewere a number of interesting responses including: • Give the workshop to freshmen engineering students. • Focus on how to practice giving a
. Page 15.31.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A functional conceptual framework for teaching technological literacyAbstract This is a presentation of an epistemological framework for teaching technologysuch that it will bring about improved technological literacy in ALL K-12 students.Design, Living, Productivity, and Foundational Technical Concepts anchor ourconceptual framework for teaching technology educators. This conceptual framework forteaching technology literacy is functional, standards based, and can accommodatemultiple pedagogies. It meets the standards of ITEA/CTTE, the _______ State Dept ofEd., NCATE, and others. It also aligns with drafts of the NAEP Technological LiteracyAssessment. We have
society.14. For some reason, even though I study, science seems unusually hard for me. Statement SA A N D SD15. I like to be challenged by science problems.16. Science labs help me to understand how science can be used in the real world.17. I feel confident in my ability to use lab equipment well.18. Science and engineering are of little relevance (importance) in my life.19. I am confident that I can get good grades in science.20. I don’t mind doing an experiment several times to check my answer.21. Science in enjoyable and stimulating to me.22. I feel like I am answering real questions during science labs.23. I don’t like working with partners during science labs.24. I
AC 2010-2278: FROM BRAINSTORMING TO C-SKETCH TO PRINCIPLES OFHISTORICAL INNOVATORS: IDEATION TECHNIQUES TO ENHANCESTUDENT CREATIVITYChristina White, Columbia UniversityAustin Talley, University of Texas, AustinDaniel Jensen, United States Air Force AcademyKristin Wood, George Washington UniversityAndy Szmerekovsky, US Air Force AcademyRichard Crawford, University of Texas at Austin Page 15.602.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 From Brainstorming to C-Sketch to Principles of Historical Innovators: Ideation Techniques to Enhance Student CreativityAbstractThe heart and soul of engineering is innovation and our ability to improve the human
collaboration in thereal world. There is a strong symbiosis as architects and engineers work together to determine the mostappropriate form and function of a structure or space. Each profession has certain goals in mind duringthe project. For example, the architect is mindful of how people will use and enjoy the structure orspace. The civil engineer looks to create a structure or space that is safe and efficient. Each professionalneeds to recognize what is important to them as well as their team members. Strong interpersonal skillssuch as: communication, patience, compromise, negotiation, leadership, listening, respect and others areneeded by all team members to achieve a common goal. This collaborative model was used to developthe IP coursework, and
AC 2010-129: TRAINED TO DISENGAGE? A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OFSOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AMONGENGINEERING STUDENTSErin Cech, University of California, San Diego Erin Cech’s research examines individual-level, cultural mechanisms that reproduce inequality, especially those pertaining to sex segregation in science and engineering fields. Her dissertation explores the self-expressive edge of inequality, analyzing how gender schemas and self-conceptions influence the career decisions of college students over time. Her other work examines the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual engineering students (with Tom Waidzunas), the work devotion of and perceptions of inequality among high
. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds). (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2. Seymour, E., G. Melton, D.J. Wiese, & L. Pederson-Gallegos (2005). Partners in innovation: teaching assistants in college science courses. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. 3. Allen, R. R., & Rueter, T. (1990). Teaching assistant strategies: An introduction to college teaching. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co. 4. NSF (2008), Graduate Students and Post doctorates in Science and Engineering: Fall 2006. National Science Foundation/Division of Science Resources Statistics, 08-306. 5. Prieto, L.R., Yamokoski, C. A
. 92, pp. 329-336, 2003.6. McNeill, N.J., M.F. Cox, H.A. Diefes-Dux, T. Medley, and J. Hayes, "Development of an Instrument to Collect Pedagogical Data from Graduate Teaching Assistants within Engineering Laboratories," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999. Page 15.375.8
AC 2010-242: FACILITATING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN THE LANGUAGECLASSROOM: MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES PROFILES TO IMPROVEFOREIGN LANGUAGE COMPETENCEAdrian Millward-Sadler, University of Applied Science, GrazAnnette Casey, Joanneum University of Applied SciencesFrank Newman, University of Graz Frank Newman is a senior lecturer at the Department of Translation Studies at the University of Graz in Graz, Austria. Frank has been teaching English, mainly writing skills, and American culture since 1984. He also teaches English for Engineers at the Graz University of Technology and was involved for many years in in-service teaching training in Austria and abroad. His current focus is using wikis in language teaching
To treat everyone fairly, we need to ignore the color of people’s skin. .82and Global KinshipSkilled Disposition I try to consider different points of view on an issue in my work before .91and Open-mindedness making up my own mind, even when I have a strong first impression.Peaceful Resolution If people in engineering (or business) industries were treated more fairly, .90 there would be fewer problems and less conflict and disagreement in this country.In concert with item response theory, in addition to item per subscale minimums, one to twoitems per subscale were reverse scored items in support of best practice in survey development.Although at first, the
that was appropriate for kindergarten students. Judy Robinson, a retired BostonPublic Schools teacher was working with TechBoston as a consultant to help new robotics 1teachers. Ms. Robinson took on the task of writing a curriculum that was appropriate for K-2students. Alpha-Robotics was developed with a several goals in mind. First of all, we wanted thecurriculum to be aligned with BPS's K-2 curriculum, particularly in science and math. Weenvisioned employed a multidisciplinary approach that would also address 21st Century skillssuch as teamwork and creativity. The Engineering Design Process, part of Massachusetts Scienceand Technology
lecturers could refer to and helpintegrate throughout the lectures and sessions to positively reinforce and provide relevantexamples of how these themes were/are used in real projects (Fig. 6). The human Arrogance is the Understand the Failure is not an mind – use it enemy of creativity mechanisms of option…it’s a failure requirement Pan out and zoom in Allow ideas time to Everyone is creative during the design incubate processFigure 6. – Innovative Engineering Design thematic icons.The
a sole proprietor, Setterfield provided residential design services, specializing in timber framing and environmental responsibility. As a Plans Examiner, Setterfield balanced building code requirements with real-life owner and contractor concerns.Eric Dunn, Sinclair Community College Eric Dunn is an associate professor in the Civil Engineering and Architectural Technologies department at Sinclair Community College. He has a masters degree in project management from Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio. He specializes in teaching construction management, cost estimating, means of construction and various CAD software packages. Dunn’s professional experiences include on site
AC 2010-783: NDEP-SUPPORTED K-12 STEM OUTREACH ACTIVITIES OF THEUS AIR FORCEGerald Mora, New Mexico Tech Gerald Mora is the Director of New Mexico Tech's Technology Transfer Support Group and the State of New Mexico Partnership Intermediary for the Air Force Research Laboratory at the Kirtland Air Force Base. Mr. Mora was awarded the 2001 New Mexico Distinguished Public Service Award for his development Kirtland’s La Luz program. Mr Mora has numerous publications based on his Systems Engineering work and his passion for education outreach.Ricardo Negron, WPAFB RICARDO NEGRON--Ricardo Negron is currently the Chief of the Domestic Partnering Branch at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (AFRL
Divertidos can be incorporated to P-12 science classroomswithout modifying the existing curriculum at the different types and modalities offered at theselevels in Mexico. Our program is fostering that students learn science and engineering DOINGscience and engineering.Results to date indicate the importance of placing teachers in the role of “students” and allowingthem to experience hands-on and minds-on inquiry-based activities as well as grapple withdesigning their own lesson plans in a peer group setting where they can brainstorm and receivefeedback. Therefore annually we hold on-campus one-week summer workshops in order to helpP-12 school teachers incorporate the developed experiments, ETKs and pedagogical practices5.To further promote the
suppose to we realized that we would have to meet again to finish it. So the best skillSkills that I gained from this project is time management.” “Some of the skills I gained were to efficiently and effectively work with a group, present and write a great final report, and how to accurately determine the best choice of a bike with the specific needs.” “I learned basic problem solving skills, as well as how to take an organized approach to engineering tasks and complete them effectively. … Lastly, I learned how to beProblem more creative and think with an open mind and consider all ideas for solutions, evenSolving Skills
AC 2010-1998: ARE FRENCH FRIES AND GRADES BAD FOR YOU?CONFLICTING EVIDENCE ON HOW K-12 TEACHERS SEARCH IN A K-12DIGITAL LIBRARYRene Reitsma, Oregon State University RENE F. REITSMA is an associate professor of Business Information Systems at Oregon State University's College of Business. He and his students are responsible for the design, development and maintenance of the TeachEngineering digital library system architecture. Reitsma’s research concentrates on how digital libraries are used and can be improved.Paul Klenk, Duke University PAUL A. KLENK received his PhD in mechanical engineering and materials science at Duke University’s Pratt School of Engineering in 2006. Since then, Paul has
AC 2010-2167: INNOVATIVE CONTENT IN A NEW CIRCUIT ANALYSISCOURSEL. Brent Jenkins, Southern Polytechnic State University Page 15.743.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Innovative Content in a New Circuit Analysis CourseAbstractRecently, a new Circuits I course was created during the development of a degree program. Thiscourse consists of three semester hours of lecture accompanied by a one semester hour concurrentlab. Lectures contain numerous formula and concept derivations, in keeping with similar courses.Lecture content of note includes an illustrative "derivation" of the superposition theorem. Labcontent reinforces and extends the lecture as it
AC 2010-2272: DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING CHAIN REACTIONS: ASTUDY OF SEVENTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE OF ELECTRICALCIRCUITSTirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Arizona State University. He has degrees and experience in engineering, computer science, and education. He has brought this experience to bear in previous research that examined the use of technologies in K-12 settings with diverse students. He has worked with the Children’s Museum of Houston on the development and implementation of Robotics-based STEM programming for urban youth. He is the Principal Investigator of the National Science
define problem-solving as “the cognitive process directed atachieving a goal when no solution is obvious to the problem solver (p. 287). xvi” This definitionsuggests that problem-solving has four characteristics. Problem-solving is 1) cognitive (i.e., it isan internal process that occurs in the person’s mind), 2) process-oriented (the manipulation ofknowledge), 3) goal-directed (i.e., the process is guided by the person’s goals), and 4) personal(dependent on the person’s skills and knowledge). According to Donald xvii, the problem-solvingprocess in engineering involves the following thinking skills: a) Breaking down complex problems to simpler ones b) Appling fundamentals to new problems
was created with two primary goals in mind. First, it was important to design thecourse in such a way that the students could see the relevance of their previous course work byproviding an opportunity to apply that core knowledge to solving an engaging problem, andsecond, the course must teach the students some of the fundamentals of systems engineering byshowing them how to decompose complex problems into a series of manageable steps. Withthese primary goals in mind, we conceived of an ECE Design course that would: ≠ Require students to apply material from their core ECE courses, ≠ Require material from at least one advanced core courses (since the core sequence requires 4 out of 5 available slots in a typical
Pre Survey 3.19 .963Is a problem solver for society's problems (pollution) Post Survey 3.56 .869 .0012. “Draw An Engineer” Assessment Results2.1 “Draw An Engineer” - Assessment Results of Teachers (Pre): Fifty-seven K-12 teachersparticipated in the Draw an Engineer pre-assessment exercise. Participants were asked to closetheir eyes and imagine an engineer at work and then, they were instructed to draw what theyimagined in a designated space. Next, they were asked to describe what the engineer was doingin the picture, describe three words/phrases that come to mind when you think of that engineerand what an engineer does in a typical day. The findings are