solution to this problem in the form of a new approach tolab courses that emphasizes relevancy to the student and student participation in devising the lab.We maintain that labs designed with these two elements in mind, along with a set of guidingprinciples we discuss, increase the likelihood of deep and lasting learning in the student. Weclose with a proposal to implement labs of this nature not only in engineering and physicalscience courses, but in certain mathematics courses as well, with the intention of deepeningstudent learning and retention of mathematical concepts.The Problem: Shallow Learning“Education’s what’s left over after you’ve forgotten everything you’ve learned.” James Conant As an undergraduate physics major, the first
Paper ID #14759Integrating Literature and Problem-Based Learning in a First-Year Engi-neering AcademyDr. Susan McGrade, Indiana Institute of Technology Dr. McGrade is a Professor of English at Indiana Institute of Technology, where she teaches a range of classes from First-Year Composition to African American Literature. She often works closely with the College of Engineering, and has developed both an integrated model for English instruction within a Software Engineering program, and a problem-based learning curriculum for a First-Year Engineering Academy. She is also the current NSBE Chapter Advisor
Technically Speaking3and Tech Tally,4 sponsored by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), and theTechnology and Engineering Literacy Assessment, developed for all K-12 students as partof the National Assessment of Educational Progress carried out by the US Department ofEducation5. These works developed and elaborated on the elements of technological andengineering literacy that should be achieved by all Americans. In the time since 2000, theNAE has also produced The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the NewCentury6,7. The Engineer of 2020 advocated an effort to clarify and establish engineers as“as broad-based technology leaders, in the mind of the public and prospective students.”Similarly, the NAE’s Changing the Conversation: Messages
arts through the studio-baseddesign pedagogy. In order to design technically feasible and socially acceptable products andservice, students combine the methods and tools from a variety of disciplines, such as designthinking (e.g., mind-mapping), engineering technology (e.g., Arduino), and cultural studies (e.g.,ethnography). In contrast to the focus on problem solving in typical engineering classrooms,teaching in PDI emphasizes problem finding. PDI students usually start their design projects bystudying the relevant objectives and constraints from rich and heterogeneous real-world context,such as the shortage of food and clear water in underdeveloped regions and the stagnation ofpublic schools in American cities. Students also critically
Paper ID #16581Understanding the Effects of Transferring In Statics Credit on Performancein Future Mechanics CoursesDr. Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Ms. Michelle M Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering
Paper ID #15634Physics Jam, a Physics Preparation Program to Increase Student Performanceand Success in Introductory Physics Courses ˜Dr. Courtney Hadsell, Canada College I graduated with my PhD in Physics from The University of North Carolina in 2013. I am currently a physics instructor and physics program services coordinator at Ca˜nada College. I have a deep passion in promoting understanding and success for physics students thought pre-semester and continuing academic support. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Physics Jam, a Physics Preparation
liberal education2 he argued, in a development ofKrupczak et als paper, that “the defining characteristic of liberal education was “enlargementof mind. This “enlargement” was achieved by the capacity to perceive inter-relationshipsbetween the areas that comprise “universal knowledge” as it is currently understood. Itfollows that consideration of the “product” (technological literacy) without consideration ofthe “process” (engineering literacy) is not a liberal education.”5 Using the model he hadpresented in the earlier paper (exhibit 3) he argued that the solution to engineering problems(the technology) required not only knowledge of engineering science and the mechanics ofmanufacturing but an understanding of the ways of thinking in such areas
Paper ID #14736”Turning away” from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of theCultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Program-ming ClassMr. Stephen Douglas Secules, University of Maryland, College Park Stephen is an Education PhD student at UMD, researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught introduction to engineering design in the Keystone Department at the UMD A. James Clark Engineering School. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the
management. 4 Leadership SkillsOur thinking about leadership skills follows the work of two teams of engineering leadershipresearchers. John Farr and his colleagues were the first to identify leadership qualities relevant toengineers. These include: big thinker, ethical and courageous, masters of change, risk taker,mission that matters, decision-maker, uses power wisely, team builder and good communicator35, 36 . While this list of competencies was developed with an audience of engineers in mind,Simon Pitts and his colleagues took their list a step further by generating it in collaboration withprofessional engineers working in industry. Pitts et al
Paper ID #14610Investigating and Comparing Two Different CAD Methodologies to CreateTop-down AssembliesDr. Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University Ibrahim Zaid is a professor of mechanical, industrial, and manufacturing engineering at Northeastern Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Akron. Zeid has an international background. He received his B.S. (with highest honor) and M.S. from Cairo University in Egypt. He has received var- ious honors and awards both in Egypt and the United States. He is the recipient of both the Northeastern Excellence in Teaching Award and the SAE Ralph R. Teetor
Paper ID #15222’Lion Leadership Lessons Video Series’ - Delivering Engineering LeadershipLessons to a Broad AudienceDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is currently the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that
Press, 19923. Ward J., Why can I see memories, Scientific American Mind, January/February 2016.4. Timoshenko S. and Young D. H., Engineering Mechanics: Statics, Preprint Copy, McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, New York, 19565. Popov P. P., Introduction to mechanics of materials, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliff’s, NJ, 19686. MSC Industrial Supply Co. Catalogue, 2010.7. Timoshenko S., and MacCullough G. H., Elements of Strength of Materials, D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton New Jersey, 1949.8. Boresi A. P. and Schmidt R. J., Advanced Mechanics of Materials, John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York New York, 200039. Bhonsle S. R. And Weinmann K. J., Mathematical Modeling for the Design of Machine
, and cultural objects and ideas.Dominic Francis GelfusoDr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Contextualizing 3D Printing’s and Photosculpture’s Contributions to Techno-Creative LiteraciesIntroductionAutodesk CEO Carl Bass, upon the 2011 release of Autodesk’s free “123D” CAD-to-3D printingsoftware, claimed that the future of design innovation would be found not within the engineeringindustry, but from the ranks of creative, tinkering consumers. “There are tens of thousands
Paper ID #16992Mixed Method Study of the Evolution of Leadership Traits during a Leader-ship ExperienceMs. Luisa Ruiz Mendoza, University of Texas - El Paso Luisa is a recipient of the Gates Millennium Scholarship since 2009. In May 2013, Luisa graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in Business Management. Then, in December 2014 she received a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Ms. Ruiz plans to pursue a doctorate degree in Educational Leadership and Foundations with a concentration in Engineering Leadership at UTEP. She would like to work on a
Paper ID #16321Using Peer-Generated Screencasts in Teaching Computer-Aided DesignDr. Dongdong Zhang, Prairie View A&M University Dongdong Zhang is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Prairie View A&M University. He graduated from University of Missouri-Columbia with a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include: Micro- and Nano-Fiber Reinforced Compos- ites Processing Simulation, Transport Phenomenon in Polymer Composites Processing; Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Computational and Numerical Algorithms; Computer-Aided Design and
Paper ID #16052Completing the Pass: Leadership ’On’ and ’In’ the FieldDr. Mary B. Vollaro, Western New England University Mary B. Vollaro is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Vollaro received her Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut, her M.S. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and her B.S.M.E. at Western New England University. She has held engineering positions in industry (in particular, the materials science area) and was Chair of the ASEE Materials Division. She has written in the area of materials science education and is now working on
Paper ID #15547Writing in STEM: A Synthesis of Two Adaptive ApproachesDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Education Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learn- ing in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a
efforts of WSU juniors and seniors working on design projects and the annualdesign project showcase that WSU invites EvCC students to attend: A group of WSU BSME students won 2nd place in the 2015 ASEE National Design and Manufacturing Competition. The project “Carnival Time” by two ME students was a finalists and won 2nd place in the 2015 Young Minds Award competition with top honors based on the criteria: creativity, comprehensiveness, clarity of expression, and demonstration. WSU Everett Engineering Club was founded in spring 2013. Club students designed, manufactured and programed a Mars rover. The WSU BSME Mars Rover Team has been selected as one of the 30 teams from 7 countries (out of a pool
Paper ID #17016Combined Contribution of 12 REU Students to the Development of the LEWASLabDebarati Basu, Virginia Tech Ms. Basu, is a PhD student in Engineering Education, advised by Dr. Lohani in the LEWAS Lab. She holds BS and MS in Computer Science and Engineering. For her dissertation, she is interested in analyzing user tracking data to examine students’ learning of environmental monitoring concepts facilitated by a cy- berlearning system. As a graduate teaching assistant, she has experience in teaching engineering problem solving and design process to freshman students in a project based environment at VT. She has
help society 26 Innovate such as more efficient computers, technologies that encourage sustainability, or improved medicine." Problem Solving "Engineers help solve problems and work to improve aspects of society. 7 Everything from the design and construction of structures to machines to energy to food, engineers are the problem solvers of society." Leaders "They can play the role as leaders because engineers tend to be open minded 1 and usually are full with ideas that they could apply to society not only by helping but by also encouraging others as well." Table 3. Participants comments about
Paper ID #16796Promoting School Earthquake Safety through a Classroom Education Grass-roots ApproachDr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, hears cases of academic misconduct, is responsible for ABET, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16
participants quoted in this paper were given anopportunity to review a draft of this paper prior to final submission for publication.The purpose of these interviews was to elicit pioneers’ views on their career trajectories, and inpart included questions about the contributions or impacts that participants felt they had had overthe course of their careers. This paper presents findings related specifically to that subset ofinterview data.Study participantsTo recruit study participants, we sought nominations from multiple communities related toengineering education: American Society for Engineering Education’s Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE ERM), ASEE’s Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND), ASEE’s Women in Engineering
Paper ID #15752A Qualitative Study Investigating How First-Year Engineering Students’ ValueBeliefs Influence their Choice of Selecting an Engineering MajorMr. Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin - Purdue University, West Lafayette ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is an assistant professor at Universidad EAFIT and served as the Head of the Process Engineering Department from 2010 to 2014. He holds an MS in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany) and is currently enrolled as a graduate student in the Engineering Education Doctoral Program at Purdue
Paper ID #16999Towards a Global Virtual Community of Female Engineering Students andProfessionals: II. Overview of Leadership Camp for Liberian UndergraduateWomen Studying EngineeringMs. Sara P Rimer, University of Michigan Sara P. Rimer is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Univer- sity of Michigan. She works with Professor Nikolaos Katopodes in the area of computational modeling and control of fluid flow in civil infrastructure systems. She is also pursuing a Certificate in Engineering Education Research and a Certificate in Computational Discovery and Engineering from the
students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests include develop- mental psychology; sociocultural theories of communication, learning, and identity; qualitative methods; and discourse analysis.Dr. Frederick A. Peck, University of Montana Frederick Peck is Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in
Paper ID #16209Igniting Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Students: The Case forTechnology and Society Courses in Engineering CurriculaDr. Sandy Chang, University of Calgary Dr. Chang’s current research interests lie in the areas of engineering education and international develop- ment. In particular, she is interested in ways to support and enhance diversity in the engineering student population, as well as curriculum development to best prepare students to meet the needs of the green economy. As an extension, she is also exploring ways to engage students in the social side of engineering through community
Paper ID #17346Engineering Uncertainty: A qualitative study on the way middle school teach-ers incorporate, manage and leverage the uncertainty of engineering designtaskMr. Beau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research
students, I wouldhypothesize that if I were to ask them how they viewed “failure”, their responses would likelynot paint it in as positive a light as Professor X does; the likely expectation of failure beingperceived as a bad thing may result in students being overly cautious or closed minded in theirengineering classes, particularly those that are project based, which could result in them notlearning subjects and concepts as deeply as they could be.The impact of expectations on student involvementIn addition to having differing opinions on what engineers are and what skills are important tothem, the student respondents also had noticeable differences in opinion when it came to thepurpose of extracurricular activities.Jimmy tends to view
and InnovationKeywords: Innovation, Cognitive Science, Engineering Education, Technology Education,Research1. IntroductionThis paper addresses an observed shortcoming of university efforts towards innovation –particularly at land grant STEM-focused institutions. Specifically the observation is thatconsiderably more effort has been expended on actions towards the realization andcommercialization of ideas than has been invested in research on the actual ideation process,how it occurs in the minds of the ideators, as well as which conditions promote it. Thishypothesis is borne out by comparing university investments in ideation research to fundsappropriated for realization and commercialization.The synthesis presented in this paper focuses on
develops an entrepreneurial mindset as described by the KEEN framework.The overall strategy for incorporating entrepreneurial minded learning (EML) into the coreengineering curriculum may be seen in Figure 2. Part of this effort has been the modification ofthe first year engineering course sequence as described by Gerhart et al2. The logical next stepwas then to make curricular modifications that enhance the development of the entrepreneurialmindset in the sophomore year. Using KEEN funding, Lawrence Tech is taking this next stepthrough the development and institutionalization of a multidisciplinary, design studio course tobe taken during the second year of the engineering curriculum. This course builds on thefoundations of the first year and