Learning and Socialization: How is the student experience (at all levels) and knowledge of engineering design processes changed as a result of VIP involvement? What other skills and knowledge have they gained (technical skills, working within a team, communication, attitudes and interest in engineering, etc.) that may be attributed to the VIP experience? How do these coincide with faculty expectations of the student experience? If there are differences, what might explain them and how can the VIP program be improved? Student Mentoring Experiences: What expectations do students have regarding faculty and peer mentoring in the VIP environment? What types of mentoring exchange are considered to be most valuable with the VIP design team environment
to clearly illustratewhy chemical engineering is particularly suited to these kinds of problems and what our skill setoffers to biotechnological problem-solving that no other engineering discipline is whollyequipped to do. These skills include defining systems with multiple unit operations and complexinterconnections, writing and solving systems of equations based on chemical reactionstoichiometry and kinetics, and scale-down of a system from human-scale to “lab-on-a-chip”micro-scale using dimensionless numbers. Additionally, we wanted to create a project thatwould encourage teamwork and cooperation in developing problem-solving strategies and in theanalysis and evaluation of the results. Here students would learn about dividing
data (grounded).21 Charmaz, whileacknowledging the constructivist grounded theory research process is not linear, advocates sevensteps: (1) collecting rich data, (2) coding the data, (3) memo writing throughout the study, (4)theoretical sampling, saturation, and sorting, (5) reassessing what theory means, (6) writing adraft, and (7) reflecting on the process.21 This paper will discuss data collection and initialcoding. Page 15.1310.3 MethodsThe specific procedures and techniques for this study include developing and using ademographic
tools based on systematically collecteddata. Embedded in a system where students, teaching assistants and instructors use a common Page 15.1085.4rubric to generate iterations of peer assessment, TA feedback, and final evaluation for a grade.The rubric for every MEA addresses: (1) the appropriateness of the model generated, explainedor modified, (2) the generalizability of the model so it can be used in similar situations or readilyadapted to slightly different situations, and the (3) share-ability of the model so that itcommunicates readily with the intended client. By developing clear definitions of each of thesecharacteristics of a good
teams, communication, and public speaking. First year femaleengineering students were found to be less confident then their male peers on math and scienceabilities, but equally confident in professional and interpersonal skills8. Therefore, if femalestudents see the value of professional and interpersonal skills in the careers of engineers theymay feel more confident of their overall ability in engineering.Many students also want their college experience to provide a broad experience that preparesthem for a rich life. For these students, the rigid curriculum requirements in engineering can bediscouraging and may lead them to select other majors.13,14 At the University of Colorado atBoulder (CU) our civil engineering (CVEN) B.S. degree of 128
15.1221.3 peer assisted learning (PAL) for undergraduate COE students who study in targeted gateway core courses course cross linkages, wherein concepts in problem sets and assignments are linked among target pre-engineering coursesThe fourth arm of the retention program is directed at increased faculty connections withentering students, primarily through designated Connector Faculty.Of the four retention efforts, the Connector Faculty (CF) program is the only one targeting theentire freshman intenders (FI), but is specifically aimed at the student who chooses to go toanother discipline even though academic achievement is not an issue. These “leavers” werestudied extensively by Seymour and Hewitt1, with a major conclusion
engineeringmanagement or manufacturing systems. An ill-defined domain is categorised by Lynch,Aleven, et al. 8 as one in which there is a lack of a systematic way in which to determine if aproposed solution is optimal, and by King and Kitchener 9 as one in which problems cannotbe described with a high degree of certainty or completeness.Commenting on university courses in manufacturing, Sanderson 10 says that, “the type ofanalysis, modeling and decision-making required to integrate manufacturing into real-worldapplications are beyond the scope of traditional lecture and textbook materials”, whilstDessouky 11 writes that, “traditional pedagogy in manufacturing [courses] is ill-equipped forthe task”. Woolf et al. 12 maintain that, “New tools that go beyond
Writing Exam _______ Fall Seventh Semester Spring Eighth Semester Name (Units) Taken Name (Units) Taken ME 145 – Heat and Mass Transfer –(3) _______ ME 155 – Elements of Systems Design –( 3) _______ ME 154 – Design of Machine Elements –( 3) _______ ME 166 – Design –( 3) _______ ME 156 – Advanced Thermodynamics –( 3
straight-forward book, movingto in-class discussion and guided learning exercises, through solving more complex homeworkproblems on their own or in groups.Active Learning and Peer Instruction: Each class period is conducted using a modifiedSCALE-UP2 approach. That is, classroom instruction is focused on in-class learning exercisessupplemented by critical reading by each student prior to class, mini-lectures at one or moretimes during class, physical demonstrations, and short reading/attention quizzes using“i>clickers”12. With this approach, attention span become less problematic and students quicklylearn that to perform in class, they must both be alert during class and prepare by reading the textbefore class. We are fortunate to have a
the EXCEL Center) by the First Year EXCEL academic advisor and other college advisors. 7. Mathematics and science tutoring offered (at least 60 hours per week) by graduate students at the EXCEL Center 8. Recitation sessions, offered at the EXCEL Center, by the math professors who are instructors of the Pre-Calculus, Calculus I and Calculus II courses 9. Peer tutoring sessions organized at the NIKE Housing community (where EXCEL students reside) on Sunday through Thursday evenings. 10. Undergraduate research experiences offered by UCF faculty to interested EXCEL sophomore students.The remainder of this paper is devoted to Activity # 5 (development and teaching of the Apps Iand II courses) and its
) on the role of thehumanities and social sciences in managing water in the west and the implications of waterresources technical and non-technical decisions on society.Assignments included (1) a written definition of “Hydrotopia”, (2) position papers on emergingwater resources issues, and (3) semester case study team project. The general learning objectivesfor the assignments were to stimulate critical thinking, to encourage students to explore thecontext of water resources problems beyond their disciplinary perspective, to encourageinteraction among the disciplines, and to acquire knowledge about important water resourcestopics. Writing and speaking skills were stressed and reinforced in all assignments. Writtensubmissions were required and
data for student performance, the goals were toevaluate the level of consistency among different reviewers and to gather feedback regarding thedesign of the rubric. Results are discussed in the next section.Criteria # Description 1 Organization - Paper is well organized with respect to overall structure (e.g. appropriate section headings are used, topics are discussed in the proper sections, etc.) 2 Sentence/Paragraph Structure - Well structured sentences and paragraphs are used 3 Grammar - Correct spelling and punctuation are used 4 Style - Writing style is appropriate for technical report (e.g. proper tense and voice are used, text is
have their own way of thinking, and theymust interact with individuals from other subcultures of engineering and business to “negotiatetheir differences”11. Vinck highlights the importance of careful collaboration and notes problemsthat can occur in engineering due to poor communication12. Work by Trevelyan and Tilli and by Collin note that traditional conceptions ofengineering work do not match these findings of the social nature of the work. In surveys of newengineers, Trevelyan and Tilli found that up to 60% of their work is communication with othersin some way—writing, emailing, direct meetings, etc.13 Collin further notes that problem solvingis not linear and solitary as typically perceived, but interdisciplinary and ill-defined14
examples).One homework assignment was given during the module, looking at different Raman signaturesfor molecules and student's ability at disseminating information from research papers. One take-home test was given at the end of the module. See appendix for more information.Go PublicIn pairs, students designed a 1-2 page study guide on a different technique than the onesdescribed in class. Their peers used this study guide on their take-home exam. See appendix for Page 15.680.6the rubric used in grading the study guide.Assessing Legacy CycleThe success of adding a LC module to the class was assessed using three methods. The first wasby having 3
students on a continuing basis? How do we replace ethics as a lecture during acourse with ethics as a way of life?” Some of these sample practices are as follows: • Students should personally sign their work. The mere exercise of signing your own work instills a sense of personal responsibility and ownership and helps to remove the general nature of academic submissions with personal and professional submissions. In professional engineering practice, deliverables are signed before submission. • Students review their peers’ assignments. Students can be asked to review and critique their classmates’ work. The review could be as
. ABET’saccreditation criterion 3.h, which requires that students recognize ‘…the need for, and an abilityto engage in life-long learning’, codifies the importance of these skills.3Certainly, lifelong learning requires strong content knowledge. Without fundamental subjectknowledge, there is no foundation upon which to learn new concepts and skills. However, asABET and the National Academy of Engineering above have noticed, students need to acquireother skills in order to be successful. Shuman, Besterfield-Sacre, and McGourty4 propose thatengineers undertaking lifelong learning need to ‘…demonstrate reading, writing, listening, andspeaking skills, demonstrate an awareness of what needs to be learned; follow a learning plan;identify, retrieve and organize
specific country. Completion of this project requires a recommend remedy that could reduce this problem. The Taking Sides project is another team effort that involves researching a current global controversy and reporting the facts of the opposing sides of the issue.Leadership: Level 2 – Comprehension determined from an exam question requiring the student to explain a concept of leadership. For example, “Considering Collin’s book, Good to Great, What are the two qualities that a level 5 leader must blend?” Level 3 – Application evaluated from a major writing assignment wherein a personal leadership theory is developed and explained. Application from a professional 360 instrument, that requires
sales techniques and strategies, from established technical sales programs toframe the syllabus for the course. A detailed course structure, with an associated lesson plan will be presented. A review wasconducted of peer institutions with similar technical sales engineering programs included the University of Florida, and PennState Erie - The Behrend College.Keywords: technical sales, sales engineering, industry collaborationDescription of the InnovationThe Iowa State University College of Engineering (COE) received a corporate gift from Trane corp. to establish anengineering sales program within the college. The original gift proposal initiated a review of sales and marketing positionsfor engineers, sales engineering programs at other
environments. New team dynamics wereapparent with video content associated with assignments. The video conferencing provided anopportunity to evaluate student performance in an unscripted interaction with their peers atanother university. Specifically, the sand castle competition session (Figure 1) engaged thestudents and promoted team spirit for winning the competition. The soil mechanics principlesassociated with sand castles was discussed in relation to the activity. The winner of thecompetition was sent a school pennant of the losing team to hang in their laboratory for theduration of the term. This provided continuity to the term-long collaborative experience and aplatform for friendly discussions during the future video conference meetings. The
documents.Class presentations to peers and formal presentations to judges also are important groupactivities. The class fosters essential joint learning activities such as role-playing, small groupdiscussion, and collaborative problem-solving. Mutual responsibility for the overall team effortand work product is cultivated within the group setting.The capstone design class is intended as a melding of components from multiple mid-levelcourses that connects and uses prior accumulated knowledge, background, concepts andexperiences. Prior course experiences, such as Technical Presentation and Writing, are linkedwith base knowledge from courses such as Construction Systems, Geotechnical Engineering
structure, with anassociated lesson plan will be presented. A review was conducted of peer institutions withsimilar technical sales engineering programs included the University of Florida, and Penn StateErie - The Behrend College.Keywords: technical sales, sales engineering, industry collaborationDescription of the InnovationThe Iowa State University College of Engineering (COE) received a corporate gift from Tranecorp. to establish an engineering sales program within the college. The original gift proposalinitiated a review of sales and marketing positions for engineers, sales engineering programs atother universities, and a literature and industry review of sales engineering curriculum. Theseactivities were performed by a committee established
instructor is changed from one whoseprincipal task is to give lectures to one who coordinates the delivery of course content, managesthe emporium activities, and responds to students’ questions. As such, a more consistentlearning experience is provided to the students in different sections of the same course asstudents work toward reaching the uniformly specified learning milestones. Another importantconsideration is that the emporium model can accommodate a larger number of students percourse section than the traditional approach because during the emporium sessions the instructoris assisted by a group of learning assistants (graduate teaching assistants or peer tutors) that helpprovide a timely response to the students’ questions.The major cost
basis for comparisonof quality between accredited programs.One of the causes that triggered the writing of this paper was a conversation that one of theauthor’s had around the kitchen table with a niece who was in high school and consideringstudying engineering in college. There was nothing new or profound in the points discussed.Indeed what was remarkable was how straightforward and ordinary the questions were. It islikely that every engineering member of the academy has been asked the same questions.Questions asked included: what’s a good college for engineering? What do you mean when yousay that some colleges teach engineering differently than others? Is it better to study anengineering technology program? Does everybody not agree on the
content of their work to others. Performance assessment is by nature aprocess that requires extended engagement by students in order to demonstrate their proficiencyin the selected subject. For these performances students will invest time and effort to prepareexperiments, write reports and scripts to communicate in a proficient way the content of theirlearning, and produce a final artifact that will accomplish the goal of the assignments that is, toeffectively communicate to the observer what they really learned. Although the exact nature ofthese tasks may differ in terms of (1) subject matter, (2) time for performance, (3) flexibility orchoice of topics, and (4) the amount of external support for the student, they share the commoncharacteristic
University builds proficiency in logic, critical thinkingand writing skills, dividing students into two sessions: a 12 day camp for 11th and 12th graders23,and a 9 day camp for 9th and 10th graders24, which focus on critical thinking skills in academicactivities: college level writing, research skills, logical thinking/argumentation, study skills, time Page 15.874.11management, course/major selection, note taking, critical reading, and presentations. EducationalUnlimited21 and Sally Ride Science Camps25 sponsor a camp for girls for girls entering 6th to 9thgrades, are overnight 10-day camps held on college campuses designed to interest girls
in highperformance workplaces need. These were (1) Basic skills in reading writing, arithmeticand mathematics, speaking and listening. (2) Thinking skills – the ability to learn, toreason, to think creatively, to make decisions, and to solve problems. (3) Personalqualities - individual responsibility, self-esteem and self-management, sociability andintegrity. The committee argued that each subject of the school curriculum couldcontribute to the development of these competencies and presented matrices todemonstrate their point at any level K - 12. The problem with that approach is that thesubjects of the curriculum may lose their integrity. If they don’t the students may not beat a sufficient level of development (in Piagetian/Perry terms) to
groups and group size, initial organization, and ongoing management) 4.3. Assessment 4.3.1. Criteria (e.g., to judge the quality of student products, processes, or performances relative to the learning outcomes and activities) Page 15.267.15 4.3.2. Methods and materials (e.g., rubrics for oral/written reflection methods, peer/team self-evaluation, assignments, lab reports, and standard quizzes embedded in the learning activities)4.4. Resources 4.4.1. Budget (e.g., recurring and non-recurring expenses) 4.4.2. Equipment and tools 4.4.3. Materials and supplies (e.g., reusable and
Page 15.1130.4often overlooked important social and systemic influences on the newcomer’s learning process.Socialization is a complex process comprising multiple actors and interactions.19, 20, 21, 22, 23Wanous also noted that the interactions among newcomers, insiders (peers and faculty), and thesituation (context) are important sets of factors influencing the socialization process. He foundthat increasing the level of interactions between the newcomer and his or her environmentincreased the success of socialization. 10 However, it seems reasonable that the quality of theinteractivity is important—not just the frequency of activity. Increasing the wrong kind ofinteractivity may promote the wrong kind of learning, thereby decreasing the
AC 2010-197: ADDRESSING THIRD WORLD POVERTY IN FIRST-YEARENGINEERING CAPSTONE PROJECTS: INITIAL FINDINGSJohn K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is Chair of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department, and Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science, at Ohio Northern University. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, first-year engineering instruction, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi
program…through the University of Cal-Poly, and I was really involved in that program…but I kind of got led into this field just because I hate English and I don‟t really like writing, reading, and doing all that kind of fun stuff, so that steered me towards engineering since it‟s physics and math. (10:4) Well, I know I hate English, and I hate foreign languages, and I didn‟t like history, so I needed something with math and science base. And senior year of high school I went to the [area university] Women in Engineering conference and I really liked it, it was good, and then when I came to [College] I originally was looking at chemistry classes and calculus classes, not engineering per se