Conference Session

Professional Skills and Community Building in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joaquin Rodriguez, University of Pittsburgh

with all the information, including in-person or virtual presentation orhands-on activity, pre- and post- surveys to the audience, interactions with K-12teachers, flyersand other materials (i.e., materials for demonstrations, activities). Schoolteachers frequently reporton their impression or evaluation of the activities. Students gather and analyze surveys on theimpact of their activities. All classmates review and peer grade deliverables from other teams.Students evaluate their teammates’ performance in this project. Students provide a self-assessmentof their individual experience. They earn up to 10% of the definitive grade of the course for thisoutreach project. This approach has proved to be fully sustainable, and with an

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 1: Adapting to COVID and other Design Challenges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo

engineering [5], chemical engineering [3, 4, 6], aeronautical engineering [5], industrialengineering [7], and manufacturing engineering [3, 4, 8], but none addressed engineering designcapstone courses.This work involves senior projects thus it relies heavily on pedagogical methods of PBL as a partof experiential learning [10-12]. In addition, since students work in teams, peer learning (PL) isimplemented as well. PL methods are well-represented and justified in education and psychologyliterature [13-17]. In engineering education literature, PL implementations are addressed inmechanical engineering [18], computer science [19], and electrical engineering [20]. Advantagesand disadvantages of group/teamwork, as well as best practices are also well

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Accreditation and Curriculums - What Changes Are Occurring?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Swenty, Virginia Military Institute; Brian Swenty, University of Evansville

c. Communicate any risks and limitations related to their work d. Present the consequences to clients and employers if their engineering judgment is overruled e. Keep clients’ and employers’ proprietary information confidential f. Perform services only in areas of their competence g. Approve, sign, or seal only work under their responsible charge Peers (5) a. Only take credit for professional work they have completed b. Provide attribution for the work of others c. Foster health and safety in the workplace d. Promote and exhibit inclusive, equitable, and ethical

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Noe Vargas Hernandez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Arturo Fuentes, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

theirDesign • Taking Informed Decisions define options, evaluate own perceptions. • Explaining Decisions choices, tradeoffs, and • Communicating Alternatives communicate decision.Wednesday: • Problem Framing Problem Framing: Peer Reviews: students willReverse • Effective Communication of ability to understand, evaluate their own work,Engineering technical ideas to non-engineers; define and prioritize individually and as a team. Writing Skills complex problems. • Conflict ManagementThursday: • Safety Considerations Project Management: External Reviews

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlyn Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Kelly Cross, University of Nevada, Reno

, we conducted a literature review as part of a larger study to understand what has beenstudied in EER regarding women’s epistemologies. The purpose of this paper is to explore thelandscape of women’s epistemologies in recent EER. Our guiding research question is: “Howhave women’s epistemologies been studied in published engineering education research?”To begin this literature review, we searched through the ASEE conference proceedings database(also known as PEER) for student women’s epistemologies from 2016 to 2021. We chose thistime frame to focus on current research of epistemologies in EER. The keywords used in thesearch were “Epistemology + Women + Engineering.” We focused on engineering students tohighlight the epistemologies that relate

Conference Session

ETD - ET Curriculum and Programs I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gloria Fragoso-Diaz; Billy Gray, Tarleton State University

scholarship programs[11], or through peer advising, mentoring, tutoring and professional development workshops tolearn more about factors associated with their persistence in their programs [12], or studyminorities [13], etc. We can also find efforts that begin before technologists go to a four-yearinstitution. In [11], the authors introduce the approach to understanding better of the“professional identity, culture and formation” of the technologists that will go on to four-yeardegree programs colleges. We can also find reviews of approaches to student retention such asthe work reported by Mann and Tan [14]. These authors analyzed several approaches toundergraduate engineering education including “1) development of interdisciplinaryundergraduate

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Best Diversity Paper

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiayun Shen, Clemson University; LaToya McDonald, Clemson University; Marian Kennedy, Clemson University

skill development, and an overview of the researchprocess for enrolled students. Using prior published work on pre-research programs and the materialsdeveloped for the ‘Research Foundations’ program offered at Clemson, the authors included a series ofmodules within a Canvas portal for the enrolled students: (1) What is research, and who are researchers;(2) What can you expect to do as an undergraduate research assistant; (3) Basic safety training andResponsible Conduct of Research training; (4) Documenting your research in laboratory notebooks; (5)Finding research articles and building a reference library; (6) Reading research articles and understandingthe peer review process; (7) Writing an abstract for conference submission, (8) Disseminating

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 1: Innovative Approaches to Teaching Energy-Related Concepts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Mativo, University of Georgia; Jacob Lancaster, University of Georgia

configurations made toimprove air flow is presented. The perspectives for students and faculty from the University ofGeorgia are presented. The student main engineer took the lead to formulate this paper. Fiveother students that worked on the project were unable to engage in writing the paper.Introduction The Formula SAE activities at the University of Georgia are recognized as a platform thatprovides experiential learning to its undergraduate students. Most of the students in the FormulaSAE program come from engineering disciplines. Students range from Freshmen to Seniors.Freshmen, Sophomores, and Juniors participate as non-capstone members. Senior studentsmostly participate as cap-stone members. Regardless of one’s category, the students design

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Wade Goodridge, Utah State University; Assad Iqbal, Utah State University

during the Week 9 to further support the participants’ writing skill. Moreover, each participant submitted a final report that described lessons learned during the 10-week program. This online ten-week REUFigure 1. REU 2021 Front Canvas Page program was conducted at the

Conference Session

Bringing Engineering Leadership Pedagogy to Life!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Moore, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Patricia Sheridan, University of Toronto; Samina Hashmi, University of Toronto

their own leadershipidentities through a variety of lectures, discussions, case studies and experiential exercises.Students write weekly reflections on their learning using a Describe-Analyze-Evaluate format[5]. At the end of the term, they submit a summative reflection on the course in which they areasked how their understanding of leadership has evolved, and which concepts, frameworks orexercises have had a strong impact.We have used the ELO inventory for a number of years in our classroom as a self-assessmentactivity. Students are introduced to the ELO framework through a lecture and course reading.After completing the inventory in class, they gather in groups by orientation with large posterboards that characterize each of the orientations

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabia Abidi, Rice University; Javier Lasa; Parag Jain; Kirsten Ostherr, Rice University; Austin Hwang, Northwestern University; Nellie Chen

: A B ICU Physician Briefing Core Lecture Topics: - Engineering Design Core Lectures Process - Needs Finding Virtual Round - Storyboarding Observation - Family Engagement - Communication Challenges Individual Reflection - Technology in Pediatrics Writing Time

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 5: COVID-19 Pandemic Lessons and Best Practices

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gloria Kim, University of Florida; Yong Yoon; Jin-woo Choi, Louisiana State University and A&M College

Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA in 2004. He held a postdoctoral position at the Georgia Institute of Technology from 2004 to 2006. He was an Assistant Professor of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the State University of New York at Buffalo between 2006 and 2010. Currently, he is a Professor and the Graduate Coordinator of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. He spent his sabbatical in ECE at the Seoul National University from July and Dec. 2017. He received the NSF Early Career Development Award (CAREER) and SUNY Young Investigator Award. He has more than 250 peer reviewed publications. He is a

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Kwak, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale

expand the problem-solving approaches, and identifying peer-review opportunities for examining the design solutions. This method of Inquiry-BasedLearning began with identifying problems and questions to be answered. [6] Based on theirinitial analysis, location, and common interest, the students defined environmental design andurban agriculture as the main research topic. The students’ interest in the urban agriculture topicderived from the previous pilot project on campus. In the past year, this design project waslaunched collaboratively with a local food bank to provide solutions for regional food insecurity.[7] This collaboration offered the students the opportunity to evaluate and assess the existingstructure and served to catalyze their

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Shakour, Clemson University; Kapil Chalil Madathil, Clemson University; Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University; Karen Johnson, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Jonathan Beck; Rebecca Short, Clemson University; Tim Ransom, Clemson University; Gayatri Anoop, Clemson University

Paper ID #38231Aviation Maintenance Technology Schools Response to theCOVID-19 PandemicKatie Shakour Katie Shakour is a Research Associate at the Clemson University Center for Workforce Development and Research Assistant Professor in Anthropology. Dr. Shakour’s research has focused on community resilience during, after disasters as well as tools for improving academic continuity, and disaster heritage. She recently published peer-reviewed articles about responses to the pandemic in educational settings and researcher and stakeholder interactions which discuss balancing research and community needs.Tim Ransom

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Garcia; Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Diane Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Irma Torres-Catanach; Nora Cuvelier, University of Texas at El Paso; Crystal Cholewa; Karla Ayala Mendoza

professional development; educator integration of technology; supporting minoritized student in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM); and student and peer mentorship. She is the Director of the University of Texas El Paso (UTEP) Yes, SHE Can Program, a Department of Education funded program designed to engage, motivate and support minoritized students, especially women in engineering. Her work continues in the realm of improved STEM education as she leads the Department of Education, STEMSHINE initiative. Diane Elisa is a 2022 recipient of the Academy of Distinguished Teachers Award for her outstanding contributions to teaching and learning at UTEP.Crystal Cholewa (Program Manager)Nora Cuvelier (Research Assistant

Conference Session

Thinking Outside the STEM Box: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan Fertig, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Subha Kumpaty, Milwaukee School of Engineering

theirprograms. Further persistence questions targeted involvement in or a sense of having a place inone’s engineering program, in addition to level of satisfaction with interactions with faculty.Participants also completed items indicating their intention to remain in their chosen engineeringfield and on the reverse side: considering changing majors; disenfranchisement from program ofchoice; and disappointment with program of choice. A short measure of engineering self-efficacywas embedded in the self-report items [16] in addition to a measure of individual empathy [17].Respondents were also asked about degree of peer and family support for their career choice, andthe likelihood of pursuing graduate education or a professional job in engineering. Open

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 8: Effective Teaching and Learning in Post-Pandemic Classrooms and Other Curricular Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyler Gamvrelis, University of Toronto; Hamid Timorabadi, University of Toronto

platforms, which spawned new administrative questions, such as whatthe lab sessions would look like and how lecture recordings could be accessed. Another possibleexplanation for the Piazza trends may be the notion of positive feedback. That is, as morestudents asked questions and received quick and satisfactory responses, then more students mayhave felt it was worthwhile to participate. Finally, it may be the case that students were moreinclined to discuss their questions with their peers prior to going online, while after going onlinestudents were more inclined to ask their questions directly to the teaching team. Further study isrequired to determine what the exact reasons were for the increase in Piazza participation since,as shown by this

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 5: Remote, Hands-On Laboratories

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clark Hochgraf, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)

array of take-home lab experiments, including a ball and beam. Seehttps://thl.okstate.edu/index.htm The labs are intended to be thoroughly documented, enabling astudent to complete the experiment without the support of a teaching assistant. Control is doneusing MATLAB and Simulink tools so that student do not have to write code using C or Python.An image of the ball on beam experiment is shown in figure 1, showing its 3D printed base andbeam.Figure 1Ball and beam experiment from Take Home labs site at Oklahoma state https://thl.okstate.edu/SoftwareFiles.htmlMorimoto [4] developed a low-cost haptic handle kit that provides force feedback, engaging thelearner’s sense of touch. The kit, however, required 3D printing of parts. Many students may

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Van Treuren, Baylor University; Cynthia Fry, Baylor University; Bradley Norris

addition to being the Faculty Advisor for the Women in Computer Science (WiCS), Director of the Computer Science Fellows program, and the Co- Director for the Technology Entrepreneurship Initiative at Baylor. She is the co-PI on a series of grants from the Kern Family Foundation, and a KEEN Fellow. She has authored and co-authored over sixty peer- reviewed papers.Bradley R Norris BRADLEY NORRIS MSM, Director of the Center for Technology Entrepreneurship As Director of the Center for Technology Entrepreneurship, Nr. Norris serves as a cross campus liaison for the Lab-To-Market Collaborative, Baylor University’s unique approach to technology commercialization. Additionally, Mr. Norris serves as faculty in the

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa Larkin, American University; Shams El-Adawy; Victoria Vogel, American University

. Tori’s undergraduate focus on Sociology and Applied Physics allows her to easily translate between technical and non-technical team members. Tori obtained an MBA from the University of Texas and is a continued advocate of increasing the number of women in STEM careers.Teresa L. Larkin (Associate Professor of Physics Education) Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts educational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a

Conference Session

ERM: Identity Impacts (Identity Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cristian Vargas Ordonez, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

National University of Quilmes in Argentina, and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of America in Colombia.Siqing Wei Siqing Wei received B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education program at Purdue University. After years of experience serving as a peer teacher and a graduate teaching assistant in first-year engineering courses, he has been a research assistant at CATME research group studying multicultural team dynamics and outcomes. The research interests span how cultural diversity impacts teamwork and how to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Terry Kohutek; Arun Srinivasa; Andrew P. Conkey

E G E G E G Exploratory, define need Force and Equilibrium Concept design Analysis Tensile testing Testing/final report* Note: Other topics (MATLAB, company visits, communication skills {report writing}, etc) must be included ineach lecture.Project factor 9 requires that professors, instructors, teaching assistants, and peer teachers arecomfortable with material required for the project. Although it might be expected that theinstructors would recognize connections

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Jeffrey Froyd; Donald A. Maxwell

E G E G E G Exploratory, define need Force and Equilibrium Concept design Analysis Tensile testing Testing/final report* Note: Other topics (MATLAB, company visits, communication skills {report writing}, etc) must be included ineach lecture.Project factor 9 requires that professors, instructors, teaching assistants, and peer teachers arecomfortable with material required for the project. Although it might be expected that theinstructors would recognize connections

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Lilley, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Gregory Larnell

found to help minoritizedstudents reach academic success [3, 5, 6]. About the GREATS program The GRaduate Education for Academically Talented Students (GREATS) program is aprofessional development initiative aimed at supporting historically minoritized students withinSTEM doctoral (PhD) programs at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The GREATS programis framed on the three educational pillars of self-advocacy: (i) Empowerment, (ii) Promotingself-awareness and (iii) Social Justice. For the first pillar of empowerment, minoritized STEMgraduate students learn leadership skills to help them experience social integration and increasetheir sense of belonging in their peer-groups. For the second pillar, the students build communitywithin

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 4: Student-centered Learning and Teaching Methodologies

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex Phan, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego

explain their thought process [4,5]. In utilizing the “think aloud''method, students have the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge of the topic or concept.Their ability to answer the question(s) in a complete manner is assessed using a predeterminedrubric. Examiners may provide hints, delve deeper into a particular aspect, and dynamicallyadjust questions to facilitate further discussion. This is in stark contrast to the traditional writtenexamination in which students are given fixed questions on a written test in which they wouldread thoroughly and write their answers on paper [5]. While oral examinations have been widelyadopted as an alternative form of assessment to traditional written examinations, they are notcommonly implemented in

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Robinson; James Lewis, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; Thomas Tretter; Fei Bi Chan

a bench-scalewindmill system that students continued to build upon as the course progressed. One associatedcomponent early in the semester was practice in experimentation that also provided studentsexposure in the additional fundamental skills of technical writing and practice with MS Excel.Since students under the remote course iteration did not have physical access to their ownconstructed windmill systems, course administrators had to be creative in accommodatingdesired, related objectives. Thus a demonstrative windmill was built by the instructors, followedby the creation of 200 different mini-videos with a systematic variation in experimentalconditions so that students could view experimental trial runs remotely while still

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaping Li, University of Michigan; Lea Marlor, University of Michigan; Laura Carroll, University of Michigan; Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan

-majorclasses.”Instructors also had trouble motivating students to participate in activities (e.g., solving problemsor group discussion). The instructors stated this happened partly because students weredisconnected from instructors and peers and did not experience instructor or peer pressure asthey did in face-to-face classes. Some instructors received student complaints about “time-wasting” activities.The time commitment required by the instructors for online active learning was another issue.Instructors reported it was time-consuming to design and search for effective learning activitiesand materials to engage online students. Meanwhile, they shared that estimating the amount oftime required for online activities was harder than in-person.Checking

Conference Session

Pedagogy in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stuart Adler, University of Washington

), requiring a classroom of its own to cover adequately. • Exam Feedback (1-2 times per quarter). Summative assessment comprised one or two 50- minute exams and a final exam. The students received detailed feedback from the instructor on their midterms, but (other than the final) had little opportunity to revise their thinking and be reaccredited.As the instructor of this course in 2012~2016, the author of this paper documented 4 notableobservations at our annual peer review meetings about Chem E 325 under a traditional lecture-homework format:1) Contact time was a bottleneck. Compared to our transport sequence (which naturally devotes a large fraction of lecture time to the mechanics of problem solving), Chem E 325 introduces a wider

Collection

2022 ASEE - North Central Section Conference

Authors

Holly Maribeth Plank, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

uneven ground rather than shorter than their peers disrupts Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 3deficit-based thinking in education.4The point is that simply throwing resources at underrepresented and racially minoritized studentsin engineering does not equate to liberation. Liberation involves understanding structural racismand other isms are the problem (in this analogy, the uneven ground) and barriers (the fence) likecultural stereotypes13 need to be dismantled.Underrepresentation is often intersectional.14 Students with dis/abilities are oftenunderrepresented in STEM and engineering.15 Universal

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 4 - Global South Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Gordon, University of Central Florida; Sandra Sousa, University of Central Florida

have authored over 150 peer-reviewed technical articles and two have been recognized as best papers in American Society of Mechanical Engineers journals. He is a Fellow of ASME. Ali has taught 11 different courses and leads an engineering- based study abroad course in Brazil as well as the jointly-funded NSF-DoD REU site on Hypersonics (HYPER). Ali is well-known for engaging undergraduates in research, and he is UCF’s 2019 Champion of Undergraduate Research inaugural awardee. At UCF and in the broader higher education community, Ali focuses his efforts on expanding the pipeline of graduate students qualified to pursue careers in academia. Just before joining UCF as an Assistant Professor, he earned a PhD in Mechanical