longer-term program impacts with an alumnistudy, surveying program alumni 1-3 years after their participation in the program. This surveywill assess the degree to which the internship experience influenced interns’ interests, plans, andpersistence in pursuing engineering or STEM in higher education and/or their career, as well asany enduring impacts on their awareness and understanding of issues related to accessibility.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, award #2049109.References[1] National Science Board, National Science Foundation, “Science and Engineering Indicators2022: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering,” Alexandria, VA. NSB-2022-1, 2022.[2] M. Hynes, C. Joslyn, A. Hira, J
$22.18 4x Aquarium Thermometers $20 per pack of 4 $20 Total - $295.92 Average Price-per-Model - $43.76To put this price in reference, one could imagine a large university class of 150 undergraduatechemical engineers. If a university planned on purchasing 10 3D printers, and each studentwould want to print their own model, the university would be able to complete all prints within30-40 hours, depending on the downtime between print jobs and the size of models printed.Table 4 below outlines the hypothetical cost breakdown of this scenario. While it would cost theuniversity over CAD$9,050 in
; Flowers III, 2017). This suggests that merely establishing a support system does notensure positive outcomes; the system's design and interventions require careful planning(Pearson et al., 2022). Further, while the learners and the interventions are key components of this system, weposit that another striking gap exists in the research literature. To date, no empirical researchexists relative to the intentional study and mitigation of barriers that stakeholders face insupporting these students. Thus, our evaluation question was, “What are the facilitators andbarriers that stakeholders face when implementing program interventions within the university
responses arereported below. N=19 (except for statements 1 and 3, where N=18).From this week’s module, I became more confident in…Statement Avg ± Std1. Providing equal opportunities of ML-based medical devices to all groups of people. 5.28 ± 0.672. Taking action to prevent reproduction/maintenance of inequalities in machine learning. 4.74 ± 0.933. Designing, implementing, and assessing ML plans with a DEI perspective. 5.11 ± 0.904. Conveying values in DEI issues in ML. 5.16 ± 0.695. Educating ML engineers on DEI issues. 5.05
because of adesire to work with and mentor undergraduates. Overall, they were satisfied with theirexperience as mentors and would recommend it to other graduate students. However, they feltthat, from their perspective, the program structure was not always clear. They indicated that, atleast for some teams, there was not a clear plan for the semester early on or they did not havemeetings specifically for VIP (but more general lab meetings). In other cases, they had difficultysetting regular meeting times with their mentees outside of required weekly meetings. Similarly,there was uncertainty about how much time they could ask of undergraduates outside of therequired meeting (given that it is a one-credit hour class). One graduate student
resolution, while developing conflict resolution strategies thatapply to all group members.The overall survey findings were further supported in the examples that working groupsgenerated during the brainstorming part of the session (Activity 4). When asked about strategiesthat RED teams currently utilize to foster psychological safety and enable conflict resolution,ideas generated by the groups were coded by the REDPAR team and grouped into three maincategories: creating an appropriate meeting structure, role of project leader, and building trustand respect by all team members.Teams reflected on the importance of planning and implementing a meeting structure that isgoverned by clear and agreed-upon meeting norms, where the meeting agenda is
Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 2124953 and2124907. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or Purdue University.References[1] M. Davis and A. Feinerman, "Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1-17, 2012.[2] T. Phillips, F. Nestor, G. Beach, and E. Heitman, "America COMPETES at 5 years: An analysis of research- intensive universities’ RCR training plans," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, pp. 227-249, 2018.[3] N. D. Fila, J. L. Hess, and A. O. Brightman, "What do Biomedical Engineering Faculty Talk About When
semesterincluded four engineering students, described in additional detail in the participants section, andtwo instructors. During the planning phases of this pilot, the research team conducted a literature reviewand found a significant amount of literature on learning in engineering coops and internships,often focused on professional skill development (e.g. communication, writing, teamwork) [8].Due to the focus of integrating engineering work and curriculum, the team also searched forliterature on technical learning in engineering coops and internships and was surprised to findsignificantly fewer publications in this area. In a search of ASEE Proceedings from 2000-2023,the authors found a single paper focused on technical learning, a study by
introduce students to foundational engineeringmindsets. It emphasizes belonging through culture, the course, the engineering discipline, and theuniversity itself. This paper discusses the pedagogical approach, activities, assessment methods,and future evaluation plans, along with reflections from the instructor team andrecommendations for similar curriculum initiatives. Our institution is an open-access, research-intensive HSI on the US-Mexico border withapproximately 84% Hispanic students. Anyone with a high school diploma or GED who appliesto the university at the undergraduate level is accepted, creating opportunities for all while alsoposing unique challenges in the classroom. For instance, many of our students enter engineeringwith
-hour-and-50-minute session emphasizing teamwork and hands- Sessions on application of course topics.Semester-Long Project: Students collaborated in randomly assigned teams of 4–6 memberswithin their lab sections throughout the semester. The semester-long project required teams tointegrate concepts from lectures and lab activities to achieve several key objectives: identifyingsystem requirements, developing UML models for a given case study, creating security andorganizational planning documents, and implementing a database that met the identifiedrequirements. This collaborative approach emphasized the application of theoretical knowledgeto practical challenges, fostering both technical and teamwork skills. Given the team
duringthe interview (similar to the results attained in Section 3) that increased the correct responses to60%. Next section will contain a comprehensive analysis of the responses to both math questionsand the iff analysis of the results along with the future work plans.3. Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Responses to the Math QuestionsThe collected qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data is conducted by the PI. Thequantitative analysis is based on the statistical categories of the responses given by using thewritten information provided by the research participants. The qualitative analysis relied on thespecific key words used by the research participants as well as the match between their pre-interview responses and post
full-time undergraduate students who spend dedicated time on campus and areexpected to devote their entire time to their studies, adult learners often have competingcommitments and significant financial and family obligations.We have observed that our adult learners struggle not because of the course content, which wehave designed to be mastered with no prior computing background, but because of timecommitments that are not properly anticipated. For this reason, in our essays, we ask students toelaborate on how the iCAN program will fit into their lives. For example, one of the short answerquestions applicants must address is, “Discuss your plans for managing the significant timecommitment required to be in the iCAN program, given your
confidence developed during the first year and theongoing support offered by the program. Tracking future retention and graduation rates of thestudents in this study is planned, which will provide additional insights into the long-termoutcomes of SSP participants. Further research is needed to isolate and evaluate the specificeffects of SI on performance in first math and engineering courses, as well as its contribution tooverall academic success and persistence.Acknowledgement of Support and DisclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2221638.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the
societies.Reflecting on what has been done well and what could have been improved in those previousinvolvements contributed to the creation of this refined executive board structure. Byestablishing these roles and norms, a strong foundation has been created for the club, setting thestage for effective governance and active member engagement as it grows and develops. Withthese six positions, there are enough individual tasks to occupy each role and create a sense ofworth, while also not entailing an overwhelming amount of work to keep up with as a student.Community Building and MentorshipTable 3 gives a summary of events from SWME’s first year of operation. Events are planned byexecutive board members and aim to meet the needs of the membership body. For
technical courses, Gordon was asked to join the teaching team for arelatively new mandatory design course, outside of his disciplinary expertise, that had spurnedboth students and faculty due to its emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) topics.During an instructor meeting planning for the course, it came to his attention that the heavilyproject-based course did not have a course fee. Having previously taught courses with substantialstudent fees and resources, he found himself confused as to how he would be able to achieve thecourse learning objectives without the funding to buy prototyping supplies for the students. Afterthat meeting, he placed a quick call to Scott (pseudonym), an influential white, male, facultymember who held the
The participants comprised a Policy Action Network Group (ANG). The following online Policy ANG meetings were planned for Fall 2024 and Spring 2025. Backbone Support Our research team is in partnership with Najera Consulting Organization Group. One research team member is the Chair of the Policy ANG. One participant is the Co-chair of the Policy ANG. The Chair and Co-chair will collaborate to facilitate the following online meetings in Fall 2024 and Spring 2025. Mutually Reinforcing We anticipate mutually reinforcing activities in
peer mentors are assigned on an individual basis,and they meet with their assigned scholar to provide guidance and support. In addition, students’academic advancement is supported by weekly tutoring opportunities (such as facilitated studygroups) and academic and career workshops. Academic and career workshops are conducted toincrease students’ awareness about future educational and career opportunities and to preparethem for the STEM workforce. To ensure that scholars are keeping on track throughout theirundergraduate studies, they are also assigned STEM counselors that help develop and track theirindividual education plans. In addition to the activities throughout the academic year, annualsummer bridge programs are offered to support bonding
-world problem related to the chosen focustopic for the given semester. Using the RFP as a guide, students develop a research proposal thatincludes a clear rationale, defined goals, and an assessment protocol designed to yield a finalrecommendation or solution relevant to the problem. Following proposal development, students execute their experiments during two on-campus laboratory visits. During the first visit, they implement their proposed plan, collect initialdata, and identify areas for further optimization. Between visits, students participate in a virtualclient consultation with graduate student mentors, where they receive feedback and proposemodifications to their experimental approach. In the second on-campus visit, students
, their time may be better spent on researchand core academic instruction rather than teaching highly applied courses. Some institutionshave found success in hiring industry retirees or industry professionals as adjunct instructors orfull-time faculty who bring valuable real-world experience and examples into the classroom.Both industry professionals and engineering professors may require additional training in TWC,data visualization strategies, and other tools commonly used by technical writers to effectivelyconvey complex information. Planning for these strengths and gaps can help programs optimizefor the best TWC instruction, curricular ‘timing’, and student learning outcomes.References[1] National Society of Professional Engineers. (2013
Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of entrepreneurship, business plans and marketing. She currently works as a teacher and academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering of the Andr´es Bello University. The areas of research interest are the impact, relationship and integration of the gender perspective within communications and marketing in the
beyond those covered in the camp to keep students with previous coding experienceor those with natural aptitudes for programming engaged. Once the project has been established, the Python coding lessons held throughout theweek can be planned (see Table 1, Fig. 1). The selection of Python lesson topics might not followthe order in which topics are covered in a formal class setting: lessons should be curated to coveronly the material needed for the students to complete the project. For example, some capstoneprojects might require external modules or advanced data structures that might need to becovered instead of simpler concepts or built-in functions. We visualize this approach using ananalogy to building with bricks (Fig. 2). A formal
partnerships and alliances, and leverage resulting attract support resources; build legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders Capability to adapt and Proactively anticipate and respond to new challenges; learn self- renew by doing; cope with change; develop resiliency Capability to balance Balance control and consistency with flexibility; integrate and diversity with coherence harmonize plans across a diverse set of actorsThe environment and culture within an organization play a crucial role in shaping how peopleinteract, as supportive environments foster healthy interactions. Research indicates that bothcontextual and individual factors—such as environment, culture, personality traits, andmotivation
the AIoT hands-on hardware learning modules have an impact on first-year engineering students' self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and interest in AIoT?For the next phase of this study, our team is planning to explore potential individualdifferences of the students’ career goals and actions after participating in the module,focusing on genders, ethno-cultural groups, and learning preferences. We believe that thisfuture endeavor will provide crucial information on how to support diverse groups of studentsin the field, aiming to unlock the students’ talent and perspectives not only for moreinnovative ideas in the field of engineering but for ensuring sustainable development of theworld.MethodsStudy Context and ParticipantsSupported by
on Initial Math PlacementAbstractThis work-in-progress (WIP) paper details a study of engineering student success and retentionbased on initial math placement. Many engineering programs' four-year plans of study are basedon first-semester placement in a Calculus math class. This makes math placement a criticaldeterminant for a student's ability to graduate in four years. Post-COVID, the math readiness ofgraduating high school students has been declining, resulting in more first-year engineeringstudents being placed in pre-calculus math classes. Gonzaga University’s School of Engineeringand Applied Science was experiencing a similar rise in pre-calculus math placement. Readilyavailable institutional data showed a decrease in student retention
Excellence in Student Leadership award and the 2025 Outstanding Leadership and Service in Mechanical Engineering award for her contributions to student mentorship and leadership. In addition to her academic work, Taylor is an Engineering and Computer Science Ambassador, where she supports recruitment and outreach efforts. She interned with Lockheed Martin Space from May 2024 to August 2025 in both mechanical and electrical engineering roles. She is a member of the Beta Beta chapter of Pi Tau Sigma, the Mechanical Engineering Honor Society, and is active in Aero at Baylor, where she served as project manager for a 3D Printed Aircraft competition team (2023–2024) and treasurer (2024–2025). Upon graduation, Taylor plans
andeffectively on a team whose execution of team assignments?members together provideleadership, create a 7 5b. Does the student demonstrate effective time management andcollaborative and inclusive project planning skills?environment, establish goals, 5c. Does the student contribute to a collaborative and inclusiveplan tasks, and meet objectives. environment?SO6. An ability to develop and 3, 4 6a. Can the student design and implement user testing to evaluateconduct appropriate system design requirements?experimentation, analyze and 6b. Can the student process and analyze data to evaluate
inclass with pen and paper and no longer linked to a participation grade. This adjustment aimed tostandardize the completion environment and minimize external influences. Since the assignmentwill be completed on paper during class, the instructor can visually ensure that external tools suchas large language models are not used. In future implementations, a statement such as “The use ofAI is not permitted in the completion of this assignment” will be included in the prompt. We alsoplan to develop a rubric to help guide the students in making connections across theircurriculum.We plan to continue incorporating the weekly reflections as an in class activity through the springquarter. Written reflections from winter and spring quarter will be
transposeswell-established concepts from teaching and learning into the context of faculty development. Itis an intriguing intellectual exercise to view the facilitator as a provider of a meaningfulframework in which faculty can share experiences, build a community, and learn collectively.Moreover, there are clear parallels between active learning in faculty development and inclassroom teaching. For instance, organizing an active learning session often requiressignificantly more effort than preparing a traditional slide presentation. When successful,participants are typically unaware of the effort involved in planning the session; however, if theactivity falls short, the organizer often bears the blame. This sentiment may resonate with facultymembers
Postdoctoral Opportunity Summit to bridge gaps in access andawareness. The Summit aimed to connect aspiring postdocs with postdoctoral mentors andopportunities in the STEM education field, fostering equitable access and supporting careerdevelopment in this specialized domain. This paper will examine how the project team designedand implemented the Summit to achieve these goals. We will explore the challenges faced andthe considerations taken during the planning and execution phases of the Summit and offeractionable recommendations for stakeholders seeking to build upon this impactful initiative.PurposeAcademic spaces have often been guided by the belief that “if we build it, they will come.” Inother words, creating opportunities is assumed to be
womenrelaunchers to give up their time and energy to conduct interviews when interviews were alreadyavailable via 3, 2, 1…iRelaunch. We obtained permission from the podcast host to utilize theepisodes in this study. Our IRB approval did not require obtaining permission from podcastparticipants to extract data from the podcast; however, we also plan to reach out to the podcastguests who have LinkedIn profiles to ask if they would like their names to be used and share thepaper for their review. We do not expect to receive responses from all interviewees, andtherefore, we chose to mask the last names of the interviewees. We recognize that thisinformation is available online, but we hope that readers can recognize the interviewees asrepresentative of a large