upcoming2007-08 2 41 Science/Engineering freshmen) College of Computer, Mathematics & Physical Sciences08/08/08 1 30 pre-freshman Workshop07/16/01 College Bound Program 1 122002-07 ESTEEM Program 3 332008-09 Gear Up Camp Step – Career planning 2 4410/29/09 Home-Schooled Students 1 112/14/04 International Baccalaureate
3.00reactive powers in AC circuits5. Determine time constants and analyze transient response 2.88 3.51 2.34 3.32of RL and RC circuits.6. State the resonance conditions of an RLC circuit and 2.64 2.80 2.63 2.80calculate resonant frequency7. State the basic operation of diodes, transistors, power 2.08 2.00 3.19 2.96supplies, and amplifiers8. Apply the concepts of Wheatstone bridge and transducers NA 3.15 NA 2.759. Learn to function effectively in laboratory groups 3.24 3.00 2.5 3.2010. Plan and conduct experiments in a disciplinary manner, 3.56 3.23
to struggle with the program, although progress is still possible inthe on-campus version used in 2009. The on-campus version appears to be very helpful inkeeping students with math ACT scores of 25 and 26 focused on the program, thereby increasingtheir likelihood of success.This project is to be continued over at least the next few years and additional data will begathered on factors impacting the success of the students. The data presented here provided abasis for developing and modifying the program, and future modifications will continue to bemade as the program develops. For example, one planned modification for the 2010 program isto use student mentors, who will be employed to not only help with the engineering projectsportion of the
phase is increasingly more expensive, and each is dependent on the success of the Page 15.607.3previous phase.As summarized in Figure 1, the testing and approval process is expected to take ten years. If allgoes according to plan, the drug would have 10 years of exclusive marketing rights, beginningwith FDA approval. In Phase I testing, the drug would be given to 20 – 80 healthy people todetermine human safety. The testing is expected to cost $8 million (in year 2) and take two yearsto complete, with an estimated 70% chance of success. In Phase II testing, the drug would begiven to 100 – 300 people to determine the efficacy for treating
Divertidos can be incorporated to P-12 science classroomswithout modifying the existing curriculum at the different types and modalities offered at theselevels in Mexico. Our program is fostering that students learn science and engineering DOINGscience and engineering.Results to date indicate the importance of placing teachers in the role of “students” and allowingthem to experience hands-on and minds-on inquiry-based activities as well as grapple withdesigning their own lesson plans in a peer group setting where they can brainstorm and receivefeedback. Therefore annually we hold on-campus one-week summer workshops in order to helpP-12 school teachers incorporate the developed experiments, ETKs and pedagogical practices5.To further promote the
Iteach such course was what programming language I should adopt. One constrain was theavailable programming language licenses at that institution. Usually I opted forFORTRAN, and a computer algebra system if available. My decision was mostlymotivated by its intrinsic array, its mathematical library and the available free source Page 15.46.5codes which turned out to very useful for the algorithms I had planned to illustrate andthe for the projects included in this course. I also use C/C++ for selected projects, helpingto show the interoperability of two programming languages.A distinctive aspect of our approach is that the physics drives the course
so as to become skilled in designing and component layout of such systems.Thereby, the interactive applets show real time simulations for several basic topologies with theflexibility to change the input system parameters and observe the real output waveformscorrespondingly7-10.1.1 Brief Description of the Renewable Energy CourseThis course covers the principles of energy conversion in the distinct areas of wind, solar PV, aswell as fuel cell power generation, system planning and design. It also covers the modeling,analysis, and control of major components of the AEDG system shown in Figure 1. This courseis different from other renewable energy courses recently developed at other universities2, 3, inthat it is more broad based and covers the
attributes of global competence.We believe the virtual teaming approach has the following potential advantages:≠ The proposed format—virtual international design teams—scales relatively well. Students already take design courses. Faculty already teach such courses. Students would not be required to travel, although some may wish to travel at the beginning or end of the project. We are interested to learn if this format might be an efficient way to teach global skills.≠ The process is similar to the process being adopted by industry. As tools for collaboration become more sophisticated, companies are conducting design and manufacturing process planning via Internet-based web tools. The authors recently experienced this first hand
serves as the college’s assessment and evaluation expert, currently planning and implementing evaluation for several externally funded programs, including the Designing Our Community Program (originally funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation), the Enhancing Access to Computer Science and Engineering program (funded by NSF), the Service in Engineering for Reservations Via Education program (funded by the U.S. Department of Education), and the Teaching Engineering Applications in Math an Science Program (funded by Toyota Foundation). For the MSU American Indian Research Opportunities program, Plumb evaluates two NIH-sponsored programs and an NSF-sponsored program, all of
exchangedamaged balsa wood for a new sheet; however, this is not an option in the second design in orderto reinforce the planning and specificity required for completion of the detailed design phase.Robustness is emphasized to focus students on construction techniques and considerations so thatthey are more experienced and familiar with what works and what doesn’t better preparing themfor their second design attempt. Page 15.677.3Glider Flight Test and Competition The first design attempt ends with a competition that measures the performance of eachstudent’s glider by measuring its maximum straight line distance perpendicular to a launch pointfrom
most interesting]. ≠ Making the cells. Now I can discuss with students in both Chemistry and AP Environmental Science how the cells are made and how they work. I felt that they [solar cells] were a “black box” of sorts before taking the course.Teachers were also asked to be specific about what they had adapted or planned to adapt to usein their courses. Three of the teachers had been able to use some content from the solar cellscourse: ≠ Energy and electron movement. Understanding how solar cells are made. Use of solar cells. ≠ I have a pre-engineering unit for my 9th grade physical science class. Materials from the solar cell course will be added in order to provide more information on what engineers do
results willbe presented and analyzed, the focus of the paper will be the lessons learned through the firstyear experience from both the student and faculty perspectives. Overall, the students’ feedbackon CPBL has been very positive. Most students considered the in-class projects the mostvaluable and helpful parts in their learning. Through the in-class projects, they not only gainedbetter understanding of the course material and the design process, but also developed strongerinterest in engineering careers. Nevertheless, the assessment findings also indicated a fewchallenges to be addressed. In this paper, we will describe how to continuously improve theimplementation of CPBL, how to adjust the teaching strategy and plans to revise in-class
enhance their lives as they search forrelevance in the activities they choose and the classes that they take. A challenge to educators isto increase the relevance of engineering core courses without spending an enormous amount oftime planning changes to enhance student engagement. As educators, we are aware of topics inthe core courses that are difficult for our students to learn, yet necessary for their development asengineers. Teaching styles that work with millennial students involve an instructor acting asfacilitator of learning. Providing directed active engagement within the educational environmentfrom the start of their experience will greatly assist the learning process of these students.The modules described in this paper were created to
experience. They also encounter the V&V step in the SimCafe modules used in theother three courses listed in Table 1. We plan to incorporate the latest V&V thinking into thetutorials and introduce students to related standards from ASME2 and AIAA1. Thisconcomitantly will address the ABET requirement that students be exposed to engineeringstandards. In the process, V&V can be given a more prominent and consistent role in thecurriculum. Page 15.1065.10SimCafe TemplatesWe are developing templates on SimCafe which educators can use to author new web-basedsoftware tutorials that follow the structure discussed above. In the templates, each high
Based on 4 quadrants of thinking preferences generally characterized as:Dominance i) mathematical, technical, logical, ii) organizational, planned,Instrument conservative, iii) interpersonal, emotional, spiritual, and iv) imaginative, conceptual, artisticDunn and Dunn Multidimensional stimuli groups encompassing environmental,Learning Styles emotional, sociological, physiological, and psychological areas and 21Model subcategories or elements that are ranked according to influence on individuals’ learning.Gardner’s Theory of Based on 7 intelligences including: verbal/linguistic
Century 4. The last sections present the findings of the instructors‟experiences with the course.Previous WorkOverall lessons from past capstone coursesPrevious work examining the learning in engineering capstone courses has focused on team-based learning, problem-based learning, and impacts of the learning environment. Yost andLane (2007) argue that effective team-based learning in capstone courses require that teams beheterogeneous and have shared goals, meaningful activities, timely internal feedback, andexternal comparisons and feedback 5. Thus, for faculty to facilitate an effective team-basedlearning experience, they must be very deliberate in the planning of team projects, milestones,activities, and feedback methods and timing.Quinn et al
teaching by UTREE members effective?This work-in-progress paper outlines our plans to answer these two questions. First, toprovide a sense of possible teaching, research, and service that such an organizationcould provide to a college of engineering, this paper provides an overview of thoseactivities by UTREE at Pennsylvania State University. Second, to determine whether aformal analysis would even be warranted, this paper analyzes the results of two surveys.The first is a self-evaluation by the UTREE members of their own professionaldevelopment, and the second is a survey by faculty about the effectiveness of theteaching by UTREE members. Third, this paper discusses what would be needed to makean organization such as UTREE a sustainable
-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml, 2010.2. Diseth, A.; Pallesen, S.; Brunborg, G. S.; Larsen, S., Academic Achievement among First Semester Undergraduate Psychology Students: The Role of Course Experience, Effort, Motives and Learning Strategies. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning 2010, 59 (3), 335- 352.3. Oseguera, L.; Rhee, B. S., The Influence of Institutional Retention Climates on Student Persistence to Degree Completion: A Multilevel Approach. Research in Higher Education 2009, 50 (6), 546-569.4. Whalen, D. F.; Shelley, M. C., II, Academic Success for STEM and Non-STEM Majors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations
team members to ensure overall team success. As withcommunication, this disconnect between the rubric and engineering faculty beliefs may suggestthe need to adapt, and here expand, the rubric to capture components of teamwork that arecentral to professional engineering practice. In this case, engineering faculty do not appear toexpect everyone to be a leader, but rather, to be able to identify the strengths of individual teammembers and develop reasonable work plans that effectively utilize the team’s personnelresources.Implications and Future WorkAnalysis of a subset of 16 of 50 faculty interviews suggests that while faculty often articulatecriteria for effective communication that aligns with national standards, their beliefs show
” or“non-studio”, providing them with an option of having a hands-on art experience or competingjust the readings and quizzes. Students received a Certificate of Accomplishment aftercompleting five quizzes with an average of 70%. Those who also submitted 2 assignments were Page 24.907.9awarded a Statement of Accomplishment with Distinction. It was interesting to see that manystudents, who in the beginning were not planning to create artwork, enjoyed the art makingaspect of the course so much that they wanted to submit their assignments and evaluate theirpeers’ work. Section 5 discusses the insights discovered by mining the Art MOOC data
their students, whereas Texas State willinsert appropriate modules in existing courses. UT at Tyler also plans to offer these coursesonline to their students as well as industry professionals and community leaders. At Texas State,these modules will be taught face-to-face.Introductory Course: “Introduction to Nanotechnology Safety” introduces students tonanotechnology, nanomaterials and manufacturing, national security implications, and societaland ethical issues of nanotechnology. This course will be a freshman/sophomore level course.After completing this course, students will be able to: (a) understand the ethical and societalimpact of nanotechnology,(b) understand fundamental concepts in sustainable nanotechnology,and (c) understand the
summer in which to complete an externship. However, due Page 24.960.4to other graduation requirements, the majority spend less than four weeks with the most frequentduration being three weeks. The opportunities afforded to the students are diverse andcategorized into three general areas: 66% worked at a government lab/agency, 24% worked at anindustry lab or facility and 10% worked at another academic institution. For externships to be successful, planning begins a year in advance. The fall prior, facultyspends their time identifying where they want to focus their efforts and coordinating newexperiences. Externships that were conducted the
. Students are asked to answer aquestion individually; then they discuss the answers and can be given an opportunity tochange their answer. It takes time to plan good peer-instruction exercises, and it’s easierto justify the time when many students will benefit from it. Students may be moreunderstanding when asked to purchase a clicker for a large class rather than a small class.Tech support is needed to make clickers work smoothly, and it is more likely to beavailable if the class is large.Category 2: Less effort per credit hour taught. In a large class, on most campuses, youwill get TA or grader support; in a small class, you may not. If you have multiple TAs,they can specialize in performing different tasks. For example, in a recent class
screens, presentations and videos is also advisable. Use of tools such as the iPad & Apple TV set would allow us generating more fluent group dynamics. • Despite familiarization with student’s private computer tools, it is usually just limited to online web surfing and basic use of productivity tools. On both short experiences this interfered on development of activities since many doubts arisen among students. In the case of the third experience, the plan of a complete subject dedicated to the use of collaborative tools was also included. In any case, despite the initial lack of awareness, one of the things most appreciated by students were precisely those collaborative tools as they eased their
feature relations; correct feature terminations; correct feature duplication;correct part design intent; and part accommodates planned and unforeseen design modificationwithout feature failure. They further define the components of CAD expertise to include thegeneral categories of the part modeling task, procedural 3D CAD knowledge, strategic 3D CADknowledge, declarative 3D CAD knowledge, graphical and visualization capability, modelingdeconstruction capability, and metacognitive processes 19.Evaluating CAD ModelsStudies involving the evaluation of CAD models have been quite diverse. In a study of thecorrelation between parametric modeling ability and performance on the Mental Cutting Test,Steinhauer used the general categories of approach
and McTighe (2005) identified three stages: (1) Identify desiredoutcomes and results, (2) Determine what constitutes acceptable evidence of competency in theoutcomes and results, and (3) Plan instructional strategies and learning experiences that bringstudents to these competency levels. They posit this approach will help faculty designinstruction that promotes understanding and fosters student engagement.Another important approach to curricular reform that called for improvement throughoutundergraduate education has been in service-learning pedagogy. Service-learning is a teachingmethod in which students participate in organized service activity for academic credit that meetsidentified community issues, and that reflection done by the
an important aspect in the development ofmodeling strategies.Barnes et al.24 suggests that many of the exercises presented to students are in the form of“elegant solutions” which present essentially one single obvious modeling approach. Fortunately,even very simple parts such as those presented in standard graphics texts can be modeled usingdifferent strategies. In planning a part model, the designer must decompose or “featurize” thepart to be created in the solid modeling system. Two common strategies for modeling simpleparts involve decomposition into features based on either additive or subtractive approaches.30Metrics for Evaluating Solid Model Part ComplexityIt is important to choose parts for CAD instruction that present increasing
University uses the inverted classroom approach. Thestudy should be expanded to the entire first year engineering program to determine if there areany differences due to the different populations, different course content, different contact timeavailable, and different class sizes.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honorsinstructional staff for their assistance in developing materials used in this course andadministering the survey to collect data. Also, the authors would like to thank Dr. DebGrzybowski for her valuable input and guidance in the planning stages of this study.References1. J.F. Strayer. “How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task
practices faculty describe (including coaching, role modeling,being pushed to explain plans and decisions), they also tend to place more emphasis on therapport they are able to develop with their mentors and the encouragement and affirmation theyreceive, but may be less aware of the ways in which faculty mentors seek to protect studentsfrom both project failures and learning failures. The findings thus provide rich insights into howstudents experience teaching and learning in design environments, what they value about thoseexperiences, and, perhaps most importantly, what dimensions of mentoring are more and lessvisible as meaningful supports.By better understanding students’ experiences and perceptions, the findings from this study canhelp design
and our future plans. During the first year of thecollaboration each team has invested effort into building research capacity, coordinating thecollaboration, creating working relationships and an understanding of working habits betweenteams, and exploring the theoretical underpinnings of productive disciplinary engagement. Page 24.1137.3We begin by discussing our overarching theoretical framework, productive disciplinaryengagement. Next we describe the four contexts of the four different research teams represented(Washington - high school students, Oregon - undergraduate engineering students, Finland - highschool science students, Australia