- Conference Session
- Gender Track - Technical Session VII
- Collection
- 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
- Authors
-
Tricia S. Berry, University of Texas, Austin
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, Gender
Paper ID #242572018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29A Leadership Collaborative Model: Fostering Community Through DiverseStudent Organization CollaborationsMs. Tricia S. Berry, University of Texas, Austin Tricia Berry, Director of the Women in Engineering Program (WEP) at The University of Texas at Austin, is responsible for leading the efforts on recruitment and retention of women in the Cockrell School of Engineering. She concurrently serves as Director of the Texas Girls Collaborative Project, connecting Texas organizations, companies and
- Conference Session
- Gender Track - Technical Session III
- Collection
- 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
- Authors
-
Julie Robinson, University of Massachusetts, Amherst ; Martina Nieswandt, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Elizabeth McEneaney, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, Gender
. 28 References[i]Bennett,J.&Hogarth,S.(2009).Wouldyouwanttotalktoascientistataparty?Highschool students'attitudestoschoolscienceandtoscience.InternationalJournalofScience Education,31(14),1975–1998.[ii]Britner,S.L.(2008).Motivationinhighschoolsciencestudents:acomparisonofgender differencesinlife,physical,andearthscienceclasses.JournalofResearchinScience Teaching,45(8),955–970.[iii]Brotman,J.S.&Moore,F.M.(2008).Girlsandscience:areviewoffourthemesinthe scienceeducationliterature.JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,45(9),971–1002.[iv]Miller,P.H.,Blessing,J.S.,&Schwarz,S.(2006).Genderdifferencesinhigh-school
- Conference Session
- Gender Track - Technical Session VII
- Collection
- 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
- Authors
-
Mayari I. Serrano, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Rachel Ann Baker
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, Gender
? race/ethnicity), conference information, and motivation for attending a non-technical conference. Selection of awardees wasB. Data Collection and Assessment Instruments student level-blind (graduate or undergraduate), race/ethnicity- This study presents data collected during a span of two years, blind, and based on responses to three questions: (1) Pleasewith four collection periods: Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring indicate why you would like to attend the conference(s), (2)2017, and Fall 2017. For each collection period, participants Please indicate how you plan to fully utilize the conference(s)completed an application form, conference pre-survey, and
- Conference Session
- Gender Track - Technical Session VI
- Collection
- 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
- Authors
-
Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, Gender
experiences are asked to indicate the gender of thefaculty or other university employee (e.g. counselors or administrators) with whom they firstdiscussed their experience provided they have discussed it with a university employee and howimportant the employee's gender was in their decision to approach them with the situation. Ifstudents indicated that they have not reported the incident(s), they are asked to indicate why andare provided with information regarding how to make such reports. The following are a list ofhypotheses the authors wish to test with these questions: ● Harassment, discrimination and unwelcomed gender-related comments towards gender- minority students is negatively correlated with the minority gender’s representation
- Conference Session
- Gender Track - Technical Session III
- Collection
- 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
- Authors
-
Tim John Weston, University of Colorado, Boulder; Wendy DuBow, National Center for Women & IT; Alexis Kaminsky, Kaminsky Consulting, LLC
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, Gender
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research is supported by the National Science Foundation under CNS 1441071 andCNS 0813956... Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thispaper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. REFERENCES [1] R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of counseling psychology, 47(1), p. 36. [2] Google. (2014). Women Who Choose Computer Science--What Really Matters: The Critical Role of Encouragement and Exposure. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B- E2rcvhnlQ_a1Q4VUxWQ2dtTHM/edit (Accessed August 8
- Conference Session
- Gender Track - Technical Session I
- Collection
- 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
- Authors
-
Maya Rucks, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, Gender
social cognitive career theory. Professional School Counseling, 91–97.Godwin, A. (2016). The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity. 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 15. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26122Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development