Paper ID #219302018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Leveraging a NSF S-STEM grant to initiate ”PEEPS” (Program for Engi-neering Excellence for Partner Schools) for recruiting and retaining studentsfrom underrepresented groups while covertly transforming ourselves and ouruniversityDr. Katherine Chen, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Katherine C. Chen is the Executive Director of the STEM Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her
in engineering.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. His research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity. Lee received his Ph.D in engineering education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in industrial & systems engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Jeremi S London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University in the
engineering student support centers in regards to student attrition and persistence rates. Ms. Boyd received her B.S. in Engineering Science from the University of Virginia in 2014.Ms. Amy L Hermundstad, Virginia Tech Amy Hermundstad is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Tech. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University and is currently pursuing an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include the professional development of engineering students through out-of-class activities.Ms. Mayra S Artiles , Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Mayra S. Artiles is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education
theproportional representation issue does not actually create an inclusive environment supportive ofstudent success [5-7]. Just as equality does not equal equity [8]; parity does not equal inclusion[6, 9]. Hurtado and colleagues (2012) pointed out how compositional diversity is only one factorin creating a diverse learning environment [10]. Efforts designed to increase compositionaldiversity neglect the experiences and different combinations of barriers that individuals mustconfront. "Underrepresented" could also be considered a form of spot-lighting, of continuouslyreminding students that each of them is a "representative" for their social identity group(s) [11].This socially-taxing language reminds individuals that their group is judged by the
stereotypes regarding AfricanAmericans academic capabilities, their numerical majority status within the HBCU context actsas a buffer enabling them to perceive their racial and professional identity as compatible andintegrated. On the contrary, the numerical minority status of African American engineeringstudents in PWI exacerbates their vulnerability to feel threatened by the negative stereotypesabout their group. Even as they struggle to maintain a positive ethnic identity, they question thecompatibility between their ethnic and professional identities. As Du Bois states, it is the tensionthat impedes “fluid participation in Black world(s) and white world(s)”. It is for this reason thatAfrican American engineering students in PWIs may struggle more
minimize doctoral attrition- A four stage framework. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2(1), 33-49.Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundemental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. The Adult Learner, 85.Brookfield, S. D. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241.Cole, D., &
ENGINEERING IDENTITY 10 ReferencesAuthor. (2017). [omitted for blind review]Bix, A. S. (2004). From "engineeresses" to" girl engineers" to" good engineers": A history of women's US engineering education. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 27-49.Bruning, M. J., Bystydzienski, J., & Eisenhard, M. (2015). Intersectionality as a framework for understanding diverse young women’s commitment to engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(1), 1-26.Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2013). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.Carlone, H. B
interviewed, hadgraduated over one thousand women doctorates but had hired only seven in the period in question. Apartfrom recruitment challenges, underrepresentation in engineering may also be due to poor science degreecompletion rates among these groups as racial minority students have much lower STEM completionrate than their white counterparts (Higher Education Research Institute [HERI], 2010). This createsscarcity of minority Ph.D.’s that feed the faculty ranks in engineering and related fields.The literature discusses many factors that affect recruitment of diverse faculty. Implicit bias is one ofthem. Greenwald and Krieger (2006) introduces implicit bias as “an aspect of the new science ofunconscious mental processes that has substantial
- team-activity-survival-on-the-moon.html[15] Project Implicit. [Online]. Available: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html. [Accessed Aug. 30, 2017].[16] A. Bartlett, “Rate my professor’s gender,” The Conversation, Feb. 9, 2015. [Online] Available: theconversation.com/rate-my-professors-gender-37370. [Accessed Aug. 30, 2017].[17] Ben Schmidt, “Gender and Teacher Reviews,” Feb. 2015. [Online]. Available: benschmidt.org/profGender/#. [Accessed Aug. 30, 2017]. [18] D. Cohn and A. Caumont, “10 Demographic Trends that are Shaping the U.S. and the World,” Pew Research Center, March 31, 2016. [Online] Available: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact- tank/2016/03/31/10-demographic-trends-that-are-shaping-the-u-s-and-the-world
. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.Sablan, J. R. (2014). The challenge of summer bridge programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1035-1050. 17St. John, E. P., Masse, J. C., Fisher, A. S., Moronski-Chapman, K., & Lee, M. (2014) Beyond the bridge: Actionable research informing the development of a comprehensive intervention strategy. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1051-1070.Strayhorn, T. L. (2011). Bridging the pipeline: Increasing underrepresented students’ preparation for college through a summer bridge program. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 142-159.Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the