named in his honor.Mr. Boz N Bell, HP Inc.Mrs. Tiffany Grant King, HP Inc. Mechanical engineer with both academic research experience and industry experience in the areas of automotive, pharmaceutical, paper manufacturing, consumer products/goods, and technology engaged in the challenges in STEM education, talent acquisition, and global business systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023DIVERSIFYINGSTEM PATHW AYS:MATH CIRCLES OFCHICAGO Doug O’ Roark Boz BellA Ne wJ o u rn e y 1. The Need 2. A Solution 3. Outcomes 4. Shared Vision 5. Reflecting on the JourneyIn t ro d u c t io n s Doug O’ Roark
thesebarriers?3) How might these barriers further motivate or challenge students’ pursuit ofengineering in post-secondary education?4) How could we get research off the pedestal and into something tangible in the realworld?5) How can we do a better way of describing engineering research in a way that studentscan relate to?ERVA-ASEE Listening SessionCommon Themes:1) No major differences between the described barriers & opportunities based oneducational level.2. Fundamental human needs (financial, food, shelter security), and mental healthsupport, are critical to student success at all levels.3. Students consider access to/ability to be a part of an inclusive engineeringcommunity (peers, faculty, student organizations) to be valuable.4. Students
professoriate ages and due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The number ofnew faculty with disabilities is also expected to increase because greater numbers of individualswith disabilities are graduating with PhDs in STEM and are thus potential candidates for joiningthe professoriate [1]–[3]. Because students benefit from role models who reflect their ownidentities—as well as from exposure to instructors and mentors with diverse backgrounds—it isworthwhile to cultivate a diverse faculty, including disabled faculty [4]. People with disabilitiesbenefit from meeting or learning about role models and mentors that have navigated issuessurrounding accessibility and accommodations in education and employment settings [5], [6].The AccessADVANCE project was funded in
ConductingResearch with University IndigenousCommunities FEBRUARY 2023 1 A d v e r tis in g c o m p any LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I want to acknowledge and thank the Tutelo/Monacan people, who are the traditional custodians of the land on which I work and live, and recognize their continuing
following practices employees use in job crafting,(1) changing task boundaries, (2) changing cognitive task boundaries, and (3) changing relationalboundaries. Changing task boundaries is a job crafting technique where employees alter eitherthe type of task or the number of tasks at work. Employees alter their perspectives, thoughts, orbeliefs about their job when they change the cognitive task boundaries of their job. Further,employees change the relational boundaries of their jobs when they alter the nature of theirrelationships with others in a helpful way. The job crafting model has connections with jobdesign, meaning of work and social identity theories [10]. Recently, [15] leveraged the jobcrafting model conceptualized by Wrzesniewski and
., assumptions, lessons, values, beliefs, attitudes, and perspectives) thatare not openly acknowledged in a given environment [1]. HC often consists of positive(inclusive) or negative (exclusionary) systemic messages that are structurally supported andsustained [2]. HC affects everyone but people with limited access to social and institutionalcapital are the most prone to be affected negatively by HC (e.g., first-generation) [1],[2]. The U.S. Department of Education classifies first-generation (FG) college students asthose who came from families where neither parent obtained a four-year college degree [3]. FGstudents are disproportionally people of color (POC) [4], therefore their disenfranchised andmarginal identities are intersectional [5]. The
NDSU Advocatesthrough their “Men allies for gender equity workshop”, which allowed the formation of an initialrelationship between several Advocates at these institutions. This relationship represents also thebasis on which we are announcing the launch of a national emailing list, ADVOCATES-GLOBE, and invite members of advocates groups to join. The list is intended to serve as aplatform to discuss and disseminate best practices and resources in support of gender equity.1. IntroductionPrevious studies [1], [2], [3] showed that engaging men in helping lead departmental effortsaimed at gender equity issues is crucial, particularly in units, such as chemistry, physics, andengineering departments, where there are so few women. For example, among
(Kell, 2022). With a growing number of Hispanic immigrants in Virginia,institutions are recognizing the need to create more organizations and programs that celebrateand support Latin X cultures (VT Cultural and Community Centers, n.d.). Considering ourpositionality as engineering and computing education researchers, we are specifically interestedin how the engineering and computing communities within the institutions (micro level) aredoing their part to engage and serve the communities they were intended to support as defined inFigure 1. In the context of engineering and computing education, we draw out the presence ofservingness at three different types of top universities in Virginia: Hampton University, VirginiaPolytechnic University, and
for Engineering Education, 2023 Intersectionality: Professional identity formation and the success of women of color in higher education STEM disciplinesWelcome to our presentation titled:Intersectionality: Professional identity formation and the success of women of color inhigher education STEM disciplinesToday, we will present:(1) a counter narrative to how ‘success’ is defined by women of color faculty in STEM(2) the role of professional identity and how it interpolates with social identities to shapetheir experience of success, and(3) the sources of stress and support affecting the success among women of color in STEMdisciplines. 1
administrators to further realize how to support students.Keywords: community cultural wealth, ecological systems theory, asset frameworkIntroductionDeficit narratives hold historically marginalized students solely accountable for educationaloutcomes as a result of inequities and challenges they encounter in life [1]. These narratives failto recognize how systemic issues within institutions perpetuate unjust structures. Researchersagree there are several negative impacts of deficit narratives including: reinforcing a blame-the-victim orientation, ignoring systemic oppression, and reinforcing inequitable systems. [1] – [4].However, researchers can choose to view historically marginalized students from an assets-basedlens as opposed to a deficit lens
, and Native Pacific Islanderface challenges in graduate study in engineering and computer science not only due to the rigorof the academic work, but also because they may face a hostile climate, racial microaggressions,and racial trauma [1, 2]. This means that the advisor-advisee relationship can be a particularlypowerful determinant of students’ success and degree completion [3-5]. The North CarolinaAlliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP-NC) was created to improve 1)the departmental climate and 2) advising and mentoring practices that can impede students’success, particularly the success of US citizen students who are underrepresented in STEM. Inthis paper, we examine the advising practices that are known to positively
utilizesnarrative interview methodology to capture stories of the lived experience of Black graduate students inengineering. Specifically, there were three inclusion criteria for participants: (1) they had to identify asBlack, and (2) be a graduate student currently enrolled in a doctoral program in engineering at ahistorically white institution in the United States, and (3) attended an HBCU for undergraduateengineering studies. A phenomenographic lens was used during the analysis process to organize and codesalient themes identified in the interviews. Pilot study results show that through the process oftransitioning from an HBCU, an environment where participants felt valued, and supported, to an HWIfor graduate studies brought about a feeling of “culture
Engineering Education, 2023External review letters for promotion and tenure decisions atresearch-intensive institutions: An analysis of the content of template letters for bias and recommendations for inclusive language Minerick, A.1, Cervato, C.2, Cockrell, M.2, Bilen- Green, C.3 & Koretsky, C.4 1 Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 2 Iowa State University, Ames, IA 3 North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 4 Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MIExternal letters for tenure and promotion to associateprofessor ● Often requires letters from 3-20 external reviewers ● Requests typically sent to full professors with
Lucca in Winter Garden, Florida. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2023The Women of Color inEngineering CollaborativeASEE CoNECD ConferenceFebruary 26 - March 1, 2023 Supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 2040634 1 Session Objectives ´ Understand why the Women of Color in Engineering Collaborative was created ´ Learn about the process used to bring almost 30 organizations together in a virtual environment
challenging situations, students relied on what they learned about during the SBP.Finally, we conclude with questions based on a transition theory in student development forpractitioners to consider when developing or implementing a SBP.Keywords: undergraduate, engineering, transition theory, first-year engineering 1. Introduction The transition from high school to college is a notoriously difficult time for first-yearstudents. Adjusting to a new environment, coursework, and/or university demands can presentchallenges for students in their first year of college [1], [2]. For engineering students, thistransition can be particularly challenging due to the rigor of engineering coursework and theneed to navigate social integration into the
, access, and diversity for broadening participation and reducing systemic barriers a Gregory E. Triplett and aRachel L. Wasilewski a Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VAThe lack of equality in the traditional American educational system [1] poses an imminent threatto American innovation and global competitiveness. As the United States experiences changingdemographics [2] and a greater shift towards a technology-driven society [3], it is not tappinginto the entire talent pool, as the rest of the world is moving to more inclusive pedagogicalmodels [4]. Given the quality of the future engineering
to learn directly from their peers.IntroductionSince 2014, women have comprised just one-fifth of those graduating with associate degrees incomputing and information systems (CIS) [1]. Due to the growth in the number of CIS associatedegrees conferred to men, the proportion earned by women has diminished by more than halffrom 1999 levels [1]. The CIS gender gap in community colleges 1 (CCs) is particularlyconcerning from an equity perspective, since these institutions provide crucial access to post-secondary education, including for the socioeconomically disadvantaged, first-generation, older,and Hispanic college students they disproportionately serve [2]. However, relatively littleresearch and programming focuses on supporting gender equity
stuff like this is always going to happen to us. . . we're always taught to turn the other cheek, water down our back and to just keep moving forward. ~ChristinaLGBTQ+ students continue to be underrepresented in undergraduate engineering programsdespite decades of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) education [1]. Prior literature indicates that the underrepresentation ofLGBTQ+ students in STEM persists due to the heteronormative culture of engineering [2].Furthermore, Leyva et al. [3] theorized that queer students of color face
not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Dr. Edith GnanadassDr. Cathy D. Howell Dr. Lisa R. MerriweatherRev. Dr. Martin Luther KingBirth of a New Age, 195680% of all STEM faculty are white or Asian25% of all STEM full professors are womenLess than 10% are from racially minoritized groups 2.5% are Black 4.6% Latine 37% of American colleges and universities have no Black STEM faculty 28% have only 1 Black STEM faculty53% STEM professors at HBCUs are White men. 22% of STEM faculty are foreign-born/international75% of foreign-born/international faculty are in STEMUniversity Personally Cultural exchange Welcomed in departments Globalization
then transcribed via Rev, a professionaltranscription service. To initiate the data analysis process, each researcher reviewed the transcripts of twomembers to develop a set of inductive codes that categorized specific identity-relatedexperiences for the participants (Chandra & Shang, 2019). The research team then met andcondensed each of their emergent codes through pattern coding to yield three primary codes: 4(1) Immigrant Capital (descriptions of resources, positioning, and/or advantages of holdingimmigrant status); (2) Minority Status (descriptions from students involving experiences relatedto the racial/ethnic identities in
understand the reasons for the barriers butalso a framework for effective aspiration that addresses those barriers to improve the access,retention, and successes of URM in STEM education. For example, URM faculty are almostnonexistent in science and engineering departments at research universities due to this lack ofaccess compared to majority [1]. Thus, URM students are likely to find themselves withoutURM faculty needed to serve as optimal role models as those that “look like them,” and non-URM faculty members who are willing to engage in cross-racial mentorship often lack the multi-cultural competence to be comfortable in that role. These barriers limit the number of URMs completing the PhD in STEM and advancing tothe professoriate. The
better understand the thought process of individuals who are prospectiveor future employees of engineering organizations, we sought to address these research questions: 1. What does the content of National Lab websites convey to the engineering students about the nature of an engineering career? 2. What does the content of National Lab websites convey to the engineering students about organizational culture at these engineering organizations?Methods This study is a part of a larger project geared towards understanding career concepts ofstudents from historically underrepresented groups in engineering. We mention this because keyterms from an on-going systematic literature review informed the selection of data used in
twoother distinction programs, 1) Distinguished Engineer and 2) Distinguished Designer, which areappointments that lead to being a Fellow. All 3 positions are at the executive level and areoften referred to as IBM’s technical executives and thought leaders. They are the company’s“most exceptional” technical professionals and visionaries who are recognized inside andoutside IBM as experts in their field. They have won five Nobel Prizes, five Turing Awards, andbeen responsible for nearly 10,000 U.S. patents. This pre-eminent community of technicalprofessionals has since been emulated by other organizations as well.Today, this community acts as the “technical conscience” of the company, responsible formaintaining IBM’s technical edge. They also
theirexperiences are not well presented in considerable diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)initiatives, other subgroups, such as Southeast Asian Americans, are substantially underserved inengineering education. Limited research has been directed to explore the interactions betweentheir ethnic identities and the engineering identity among Asian American students. In this paper,we conduct a scoping review of the current literature in engineering education to explore thelandscape of Asian American students’ experience in engineering. This review addresses tworesearch questions: (1) What are the motivations of these studies in exploring Asian Americanengineering students’ experiences? (2) What are the gaps in the existing literature on AsianAmerican
unintended, lessons, attitudes, and beliefs thatindividuals experience as part of their engineering education [1]–[7]. HC manifests fromhistorical, structural issues, such as sexism and racism, to institutional and interpersonalmessages within engineering [8], [9]. For example, racist policies like segregation excludedAfrican American or Black people from higher education [10], and they remain marginalized asonly 4.5% of 2020 US engineering bachelor’s degree earners were African American or Black[11]. Researchers have contributed significant scholarship on the experiences of historicallymarginalized people in engineering [12]–[16]. However, given the stagnation of inclusion ofhistorically marginalized people in engineering, it is necessary to
equity in STEM:1. In what ways have big data and algorithms been used to understand equity in STEM?2. What are the limitations of using big data to analyze equity in STEM?3. What research is missing in the area of using big data and algorithms to understand equity in STEM, especially considering intersectionality? 10It is important to realize that current research focusesmore on documenting or predicting than understanding;big data and algorithm analysis have uncovered patternsof inequity in STEM but are not always able to explainhow those patterns arose nor how to ameliorate them.Datasets are themselves limited and thus limit our abilityto fully explore patterns.That said
students.Even more concerning is the drop in BIPOC men at the graduate degree level.Engineering drop-offs occur at key transition points but it’s not a simple “leakingpipeline” analogy.Associates level includes engineering technology and engineering.What’s not shown is that students can’t always get “back into the pipeline”(Cannady, Greenwald & Harris, 2014) [2].We prefer to refer to “pathway” not pipeline because a pathway is open, while apipeline is closed.Targets were identified from previous work with the “50k Coalition”(https://50kcoalition.org).Target #1: substantially increase the number of BIPOC and women undergraduatedegrees to 100,000 by 2026 (more than 31,000 beyond the current trajectory).Target #2: substantially increase the number of
been working on this project that I will be presenting today entitled; The College Experiences of College Students with ADHD: A Scoping Literature Review.● I will start by giving an introduction to the topic, followed by a discussion of the literature on the college experiences of these students. Followed by the purpose of our work, the methods, the results, and our future work.● Neurodiversity describes the idea that people experience and interact with the world around them in many different ways; there is no one "right" way of thinking, learning, and behaving [1]. Students with ADHD or other neurodiversity such as autism, dyslexia, or obsessive-compulsive disorder are an invisible minority [2], and