Paper ID #11570The Relevance of K-12 Engineering Curricula to NGSS: An Analysis of TeachEngineeringNGSS Alignments (RTP Strand 1)Carleigh Samson, University of Colorado Boulder and TeachEngineering Carleigh Samson is a research associate and Ph.D. student at the University of Colorado Boulder. As a former secondary mathematics teacher and three-year K-12 engineering teaching fellow holding graduate degrees in both Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder and Secondary Education from The Johns Hopkins University, Carleigh has broad K-12 classroom teaching experience as well as deep conceptual and
physical science and is a National Board Certified Teacher now studying novice teachers’ decisions based on the design and implementation of their teaching practices. Page 26.1248.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Make Connections Between Science and Engineering Concepts Through Teamwork with Engineering Students (RTP, Strand 1)AbstractNGSS has called for the inclusion of engineering in K-12 classrooms. This has shifted
engineering or science. Is this a validassumption and does it apply to aerospace engineering students?Literature Review In engineering education, the number of studies exploring professional persistence islimited. Studies by Amelink and Creamer (2010), Eris et al. (2010), and Lichtenstein et al.(2009) indicate that a number of factors impact professional persistence. Between these differentstudies it was found that1,6,7: 1. respect from both peers and instructors was very important in keeping students satisfied with the engineering field and intending to work in the field for years in the future1. 2. the desire to pursue an engineering career increases throughout the education of the student in the case of persisters (those
Page 26.121.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A systematic review of undergraduate engineering students’ perception of the types of activities used to teach electric circuitsIntroduction Traditionally, the design of electrical circuits courses is a lecture format during whichconcepts are introduced and sample problems solved [1], [2]. This lecture approach is oftendiscussed and preferred by engineering professors as the most effective approach to cover vastamounts of content within the time period slotted for the class [3], [4]. An advantage of the use oflecturing is the opportunity to disseminate a great deal of information in a short period of time.However
. Garzolini, Boise State University Judith (Jude) Garzolini is the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant Project Manager for the Idaho STEP grant at Boise State University. She is responsible for managing the $1 Million grant to plan and implement activities focused on increasing the throughput of graduates in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. During her over 23-year career in industry she worked for Hewlett-Packard Company where she contributed as both an R&D project manager and program manager in the disk drive and printing supplies businesses. Jude received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Wayne State University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of California, Davis. She was
Interface (HMI) animation tool to achieve the desired outcome of theresearch. By using this process students will be familiar with the PLCs’, ladder diagram,electrical panel diagrams, HMI design even without having the real hardware.Enhanced Mechatronics System Design Methodology:There are 4 phases of a mechatronics system design process-1) Modeling and Simulation2) Emulation3) Prototyping4) Deployment and Life cycleModeling and Simulation:Modeling of a system means collecting information about how something will behave withoutactually testing it in real life [1]. It also represents the behavior of a real system by collection ofmathematical equations and logic. However in enhanced mechatronics system designmethodology the term modeling refers to
commonlyaccepted method of showing such contributions. With this in mind, we set out to design anddeliver a study abroad program composed from learning theory that would specifically appeal toengineering students, overcome their typical barriers to participation, and contribute to ABETstudent learning outcomes.This paper describes the motivation, key development elements, and outcomes for this course,titled Engineering Rome, which was delivered for the first time in 2013. Course outcomes aremeasured by student surveys and feedback comments and analysis is specifically tailored toaddress the following three questions: 1. To what extent did the framework of this course (time frame, subject matter, location) address issues that often impede students
Page 26.1129.2identified and interpreted.Aerospace Engineering Design ContextTo discuss coordinating knowledge within aerospace engineering design teams, we must firstdefine critical features of the engineering design context. Engineering design is a structuredapproach to developing, validating, and implementing complex systems.2 Aerospace engineeringdesign, specifically, can be characterized by many different representations of the engineeringdesign process.1, 12, 13 One methodology commonly used by aerospace engineering design firmsis the system engineering design approach. Systems engineering is an interdisciplinaryengineering management process that seeks to provide a balanced set of design solutions capableof meeting specified customer
) Page 26.1136.2and second time (2014) the program was run.Major 2013 2014Engineering 14 14Business 3 2Biology 2 1International Affairs 2 0Cultural Anthropology 1 0Environmental Science 0 7Total # Students 22 24Table 1: Table comparing the number of students per major for each year the program was runThe Alternative Energy Technology CourseDevelopment and First Time TaughtThe alternative energy course was specifically developed for this
persist in the face of difficulty.1 Although researchers have shown Page 26.1616.2that undergraduate students’ achievement and persistence within undergraduate programs can belinked to individual students’ beliefs, less is known about how self-efficacy is related to studentsuccess (academic achievement such as grades) in large service courses at the university level. Because most undergraduate engineering students in their first two years take a materialsscience and engineering (MSE) service course that centers on understanding the fundamentalrelationships between the structures, properties, and processing of various materials, the
industrial sorting applications robotic technology adds specialbenefits to the process. When it comes to improved level of inspection accuracy and speed ofsorting, high speed articulated robot and machine vision system comes to focus. In thisinspection system, Allen-Bradley® MicroLogix™ Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) isdesigned as main controller that controls the MOTOMAN robot, Cognex[5] camera visionsystem, the servomotor, and ancillary units. The MOTOMAN robot is programmed using adifferent user frames such that the inspection criteria can be easily changed and implemented.Figure 1 represent a MOTOMAN HP3C robot mounted with Cognex[5] camera and pneumaticgripper. Figure 1: MOTOMAN HP3C robot mounted with Cognex[5] camera and pneumatic
program. The program was offered during the summer, but no academic credit wasoffered in lieu of a stipend and travel expenses. One of the few requirements imposed on thestudents was that they would commit themselves completely to this design and researchexperience. We employed a multi-faceted pedagogical approach that included three distinctelements. These elements were: (1) hands-on design-build-test-refine, (2) total culturalimmersion, and (3) allowing students the independence to define goals and manage their owntime.Hands-on experiences enhance learning and satisfaction for students.1-4 The need to teach designhas traditionally been addressed in capstone courses, but there has been a push to introducedesign earlier in engineering curricula
the Kinect in this approach were studied. Then, a technique for thesimultaneous tracking and reconstruction (STAR) of objects was developed and tested. Thistechnique was inspired by the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) approach, and itwas implemented using the Kinect and an iRobot Create platform. The prototype implementationshows that this STAR technique is feasible and suitable to be used in educational roboticslaboratories. This technique also has multiple advantages compared to traditional educationallaboratories, such as lower cost, more straightforward setup and less required preparation work bythe laboratory instructor.1. IntroductionInterest in robotics has increased tremendously over the past decade. Along with the
ImpactFrom the administrative side, WeBWorK uses resources efficiently. WeBWorK implementationrequires modest physical resources, and it is relatively simple to keep up to date over time. Onceproblem sets are implemented, it is easy to use them 1) between different sections of a course, 2)with different teachers, 3) for an indefinite period of time, 4) even with changes in textbooks.That is, once problem sets are created, it is not necessary to update the sets from one term or yearto the next or when a publishing company releases a new edition of a textbook. Instructors alsohave the flexibility to change textbooks entirely without the need to entirely recreate theircourse's homework sets. In this situation, usually only a reordering or regrouping of
different sections. The dataobtained for each question was analyzed using a basic excel spread sheet. The following surveyquestions (Q) were analyzed for this report.Q1. Have you taken Engineering Physics 2 or an equivalent course (electricity and magnetism) Page 26.256.3in the past? (Circle one) [Yes] [No]. 3Q2. Have you taken any other electrical eircuit related or equivalent course in the past? (Circleone) [Yes] [No].Q3. Rate in 5 (high) to 1 (low) scale, how much your previous physics background helps you tounderstand the electrical circuit concepts
enhance thecultural experience7, and utilize graduate students in active mentorship of visiting students.In the School of Engineering Technology capstone projects are one of the most effective avenues tosynthesize an engineer’s education and therefore present themselves as an opportunity to insert globalawareness. Accreditation bodies including ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)require such an experience in the curriculum particularly in (h) the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextand “j”: “a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and globalcontext.”1 In the School of Engineering Technology, a
involves more disagreements, ifnot arguments. Next, in addition to the peer-peer interactions among team members, everyonemust now interact with a variety of Information and Communication Technologies, which serveas the means and mediator to link members physically located in different places of the globe.Last but not least, some team activities (e.g., team meeting, social gathering) that can be easilyorganized by local teams become very difficult, if not impossible, for the global teams undermore boundaries and constraints (e.g., time difference, geographical separation). In the past, thestudy of distributed teams has been approached from both social dimension (e.g., organizationalscience [1] and psychology [2]) and engineering dimension (e.g
structure their lectures to accommodate to the students’ mathematics preparedness thatmight be varying from year to year.The test comprises about a dozen problems that have to be solved without the help of pocketcalculators. They cover essentially standard high school mathematics problems, supplementedby a few questions that go beyond the average high school mathematics curricula.Some typical tasks are: 1 1 − x y • Basic algebra: Simplify a compound fraction like y 1
courses in the MEM, chosen case studiesand their analyses and presentations and engagement in a team project. Out of thesethe first two were assessed on a formative basis. The team project and submitted caseanalysis were assessed on a summative basis. A table showing sample projects ispresented. Feedback obtained from a sample of the two past student cohorts indicatesthe effectiveness of the method.1 Introduction Capstones are integrative learning experiences near the end of a curriculum thatenhance student learning through reflection, application, and synthesis of previouslygained knowledge and skills throughout the program [1]. These gained knowledgeand skills allow the students to make valuable connections between theory they havelearnt and
, avariety of ‘E-Hex’ blocks which enclose thermal energy units of different BTU capacity and,thus, vary in weight from 10-18 kips. Finally, both the base and roof of the hexitat are to beconstructed of slightly heavier composites, each 1/2-ft thick weighing 1.0 kip per H/A. Besidesweight variations, each type construction unit (C/U) differs in its thermal conductivity andprocurement cost - critical design information known initially only to each team’s ThermalEngineer and Project Manager, respectively. A summary of the weights and characteristics ofeach C/U is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Principal Characteristics of Each Type Construction Unit Unit Properties P-Hex T-Hex 1/2-Hex A-Hex E-Hex Base Roof
popularexpression, used to depict the methodology of creating and after a standard method for doing thingsthat various associations can utilize. Best practices are inherent part of education that representsthe association and importance distinguished in instructive examination. They add special featuresinto the educational module by creating speculation and critical thinking abilities through joiningand dynamic learning [1].Grover J. Whitehurst, as assistant secretary for Educational Research and Improvement at the U.S.Department of Education, defined evidence-based education as “the integration of professionalwisdom with the best available empirical evidence in making decisions about how to deliverinstruction.” [2]. Thomas L. Friedman, author of The World
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Hybrid Approach to a Flipped Classroom for an Introductory Circuits Course for all Engineering MajorsAbstract:The use of technology that allows students to view lectures or concept modules outside theclassroom has become popular in recent years. The most straightforward and accepted definitionof a flipped-classroom was given by Lage, Platt, and Treglia “Inverting the classroom means thatevents that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom now take place outside theclassroom and vice versa”1. While many professors and instructors have taken the approach tocompletely flip the classroom, where the lectures are recorded and the classroom activities arepractice
Department Chair, choose either a thesis option (24 semester hoursplus a six hour Thesis), a project option (27 semester hours plus a three hour Project) or a courseonly option (36 semester hours). All options require an oral examination which is a Thesisdefense, a Project defense or a coursework exam respectively.There are approximately thirteen universities with MS and/or ME degree programs, [1] and [2],in Coastal and/or Ocean Engineering. Only one has the word Coastal in the title (MS and ME inCoastal and Ocean Engineering at the University of Florida). The University of North Floridahas a MS Civil Engineering degree with a major in Coastal Engineering. A number ofuniversities have MS or ME and PhD programs that have a specialty in Coastal
some basic information on the search area, the teams then moveforward with a process that essentially only had two constraints: 1) the relatively short period oftime of eight months from problem statement to demonstration and, 2) each team received amaximum of $15,000 for developing their solution. The role of the advisor was to keep theproject moving forward, but not to give direction or to provide solutions.The ProcessThe description of the project was provided by the project sponsor: “The Office of the Secretaryof Defense, Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO) is sponsoring a student design, build,and demonstrate project to explore how effectively motivated, intelligent persons with just ageneral background in engineering (role filled by
education (co-op) participation have been welldocumented; however, they have focused primarily on grade point averages (GPA) and careeroutcomes. Previous work on predictors of participation shows no significant differences bygender in the aggregate, but there are significant differences by ethnicity and major. One reasonstudents may not participate in co-op is the perception of increased time to graduation; however,other benefits may outweigh the perceived limitations. This research furthers the literature byexamining academic outcomes not previously considered, such as persistence in engineering andtime to graduation. The work aims to answer the following questions: 1) what are the academicoutcomes of co-op participation, and 2) focusing on
and ethicalresponsibility" as one of its required student outcomes.1 There are different approaches todealing with ethical or moral issues. One approach to ethical issues is based on virtues, that is, totake as a reference the moral qualities engineers should have, such as honesty, compassion,respectfulness, etc. Each decision is judged against these qualities or virtues. The decision thatseems to be most in line with the relevant moral virtue(s) is considered to be the best decision,even if it means that certain rules are broken with negative consequences. These approaches canbe found in the ethical codes of professional engineering organizations such as the IEEE Code ofEthics.2 Another approach is based on consequences,3 which requires an
duties, shallEthics for the National Society of Professional 1. Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfareEngineers (NSPE) are shown at Figure 1. The of the public.canons conform with and are similar to many 2. Perform services only in areas of theirlong-accepted ethical tenets in all engineering competence.disciplines, and especially in engineering 3. Issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner.education. To foster discussion based on these 4. Act for each employer or client as faithful agentsethical tenets in an undergraduate classroom of trustees.environment is challenging. Since 5. Avoid deceptive
smalland large group discussions, the class explored both the engineering and cultural implications ofrecent and historical disasters with examples take from recent and historical tragedies. Thecourse structure (Table 1) was based upon the Chiles text as way to ground the first year studentsin a recognizable study form for their work outside of lecture/discussion. Table 1. Topic list for Course Lec. # Daily Topic Chiles Reading 1 Introduction 2 Oil Exploration, Drilling, Transport Ch. 1: Shockwave 3 Nuclear Power Ch. 2: Blind Spot 4 Human Flight
. Figure 1 Attwood Marine – Pump Flow TestThis particular project required knowledge of Attwood’s preferred PLC’s, safety standards,programming standards, product line, internal specification system and purchasing requirements.Without the advantage of the students with co-op experience and direct experience with Attwoodthis project would not have been attempted. The pump flow test stand has been used for the lastthree years and is currently in service. Page 26.1091.5 Figure 2 Magnum – Lighted Dental Mirror Product DevelopmentThis project was focused on product development. Several design revisions and prototypes werecreated. Again
looked at as a negative by a tenure committee and others, since goodteaching requires a time investment – time the tenure-track faculty member might better havespent on writing another research proposal, for example).If you have the perspective of an undergraduate student, on the other hand, a faculty member’sshortcomings in their ability and training to effectively run a course might encourage you toemphatically state that “yes”, there is a problem. Students (and their parents) will voice theirdispleasure through formalized teaching evaluations, through external instructor rating sites,through emails/phone calls to administrators, through letters in the newspaper, etc. However,many/most undergraduate students will “play the game”1 – which means