Asee peer logo
Displaying all 6 results
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session II - Faculty Development
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Anna Friesel, Technical University of Denmark Ballerup Campus; Denis GENON-CATALOT, Grenoble Alpes University; Jean-Marc THIRIET, • Univ. Grenoble Alpes; CNRS, GIPSA-lab, F-38402 Grenoble; Michael Helmut Werner DUPE Hoffmann, Inst. of Microwave Techniques, University of Ulm, Germany
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development
in EIE, describedin the Official Journal of the European Union1.On the basis to the work of about one hundred teachers in higher education institutions across theEuropean Union, a synthesis of the LLL in the Electrical and Information Engineering field wasanalyzed with the objective of suggesting several experimental approaches and specificdemonstrators to advance understanding of LLL. The project described herein, in the field ofElectrical and Information Engineering, was aimed at fostering interchange, cooperation andmobility between education and training systems within the EU so that they become a qualityreference.ELLEIEC ProjectELLEIEC project consisted of three main parts:1. The first one was dedicated to LLL in EIE in Europe at the
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session II - Faculty Development
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Julia Ziyatdinova, Kazan National Research Technological University; Vasiliy Grigoryevich Ivanov, KAZAN NATIONAL RESEARCH TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY; Svetlana Vasilievna Barabanova, Kazan National Research Technological University
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development
at technical and engineering universities, wasaimed at reading and translating foreign publications. This approach, however, was shared atthat time by many European scholars [1]. The communicative approach [2] also entered theRussian educational system in the late 20th century, however, it did not spread everywhere.Moreover, there were very few native English language speakers in the faculty and thusopportunities to practice communication skills were limited to major cities like Moscow andSt. Petersburg. Furthermore the Russian language was used for communication in science andeducation in all the socialist countries. The result was that neither students nor faculty had areal need for English language proficiency
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session II - Faculty Development
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Danielle Marie Dowling, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Morgan M Hynes, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development
providing students with “opportunities toexperience how science is done” (NAS, 2012; p. 1) and encouraging them to focus on“modeling, developing explanations, and engaging in critique and evaluation” (NAS, 2012;p. 41). Not only can collaborative design-based projects faithfully enact authentic science and Page 21.34.2engineering practices, they have also been shown to help students reach a deeper understandingof the concepts (Crismond, 2001; Fortus et al, 2004; Kolodner, 2006; Sadler, Coyle & Schwartz,1991), gain theory-building, argumentation, and collaboration skills (Fortus et al, 2005;Kolodner, 2003; Mehalik, Doppelt & Schunn, 2008
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session II - Faculty Development
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Richard F. Vaz, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development
overwhelmingly positive about their advising experience, with 15 of 16 (94%) describing strong personal and professional benefits, while 1 respondent found time demands during preparation unexpectedly and undesirably demanding. About half of the participants indicated they would advise a colleague to advise off campus prior to tenure; the other half indicated that “it depends” on factors such as based on progress toward tenure. Off-campus project advisors described a wide range of benefits to teaching and advising, research, and the institution, as illustrated by the following quotes. o Understanding students: “I really learned a great deal about [student] abilities…I was able to connect with the students on a level which I
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session II - Faculty Development
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Mohammad Kamal Hossain, Tuskegee University; Stacy Benjamin, Northwestern University; Kwanju Kim, Hongik University; Manuel Löwer, RWTH Aachen University; Pradosh K. Ray, Tuskegee University
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development
2030, urban areas will be the home for more than 60% of the world’s 8 billion people. Figure1 shows the projected world population. This will create tremendous pressures in the form of Figure 1: Projected World Population Growth23pollution, congestion, energy security, and traffic safety. This will also challenge a publicinfrastructure that is already struggling to meet the growing demand for transportation and basicservices. The megacities will be so dense that the space for the traditional car will rapidlydecline. With population increases, global warming, depletion of natural resources, and vastlyimproved connected networks, the transportation and automotive industries are currently seekingsolutions to these
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session II - Faculty Development
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Lynn G Brown, The Boeing Company
Tagged Topics
Faculty Development
from CMC members, a totalof 20 competencies associated with the attributes of a global engineer emerged. These are:1. Demonstrates an understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics fundamentals2. Demonstrates an understanding of political, social, and economic perspectives3. Demonstrates an understanding of information technology, digital competency, and information literacy4. Demonstrates an understanding of stages/phases of product lifecycle (design, prototyping, testing, production, distribution channels, supplier management, etc.)5. Demonstrates an understanding of project planning, management, and the impacts of projects on various stakeholder groups (project team members, project sponsor, project client, end- users, etc