Displaying all 4 results
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- J. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University ; Joel Alejandro Mejia, Angelo State University; Maja Husar Holmes, West Virginia University; Rachel R. Stoiko, West Virginia University
- Tagged Topics
- ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, Arizona State University; Bethany B Smith, Arizona State University
- Tagged Topics
- ASEE Diversity Committee, Engineering Deans Council
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
ideas. They prefer technical tasks to social or interpersonal issues. They learn through experimentation with new ideas, through simulations or laboratory experiments. 4. Diverger: People with this learning style prefer working in groups and listening to different points of view. They are emotional, imaginative and have broad cultural interests. They perform well in tasks that call for brainstorming new ideas.Philbin, Meier, Huffman, and Boverie conducted a study, based on ELT, to determine if therewere differences in learning styles by gender.9 The authors found that men were more than twiceas likely to have an assimilator learning style, implying a preference for reading, lectures andanalytical models in a
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Daniela Faas, Harvard University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University; Rebecca M. Reck, Kettering University; Mary C. Verstraete, The University of Akron; Deborah J. O'Bannon P.E., University of Missouri, Kansas City
- Tagged Topics
- ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering
contributed to the development of the new ProLine Fusion Flight Control System and served as the project lead for two aircraft. She earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering with a mathematics minor from Rose-Hulman Insti- tute of Technology in 2005. Her research interests include control systems, mechatronics, instructional laboratories, and experiential learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15210Dr. Mary C. Verstraete, The University of Akron Mary Verstraete is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and the Associate Chair for the Undergraduate
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University; Lori D. Lindley, Gannon University; Elisa M. Konieczko, Gannon University; Weslene Tallmadge, Gannon University
- Tagged Topics
- ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering
time for laboratory and field research which couldlead to scholarly products in the STEM fields. Prior to AY 2003, the scholarly requirement offaculty was significantly lower than it is at the present time. In addition, the ranks of associateand full professors have minimal female representation; at Gannon, tenure does not presumeadvancement in rank. Just as there has been increasing number of advanced degrees awarded tofemales across STEM disciplines, many of the recent hires affected by the increased emphasis onscholarship at Gannon University were female. Some STEM departments had no senior, femalefaculty to serve as mentors (see Table 7) and most full professors had received promotion whenthe university culture placed the majority of its