, engineering and operations. His research interests include systems engineering, product design process and engineering education.Dr. Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary projects. She is active in the national Capstone Design Community, and received her BSE in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from Duke University and her MS and PhD from Purdue University.Shun Takai, Northern Illinois University Dr. Shun Takai is an associate professor
projects.IntroductionInternet of Things (IoT) capable products and applications continue to become more prevalent.As memory, digital storage, stand-alone processors, sensors, cloud-based storage andcommunication services have continued to generally become more affordable and readilyavailable, research on new IoT applications continues. This project has developed materials onIoT concepts to facilitate students gaining hands-on IoT experience. The students working withthe materials and or working on IoT related projects are enrolled in one of the following: 1. anIndependent Study course in which the student learns about IoT and works on a project thatutilizes IoT functionality, 2. a two-semester Capstone Senior Design course in which a studentteam works on a project
thepotential impact of the on-going work was evident [30]. It is well-accepted that the currentgeneration of college students have an affinity for environmental and social issues and thatlinking efforts to these “Grand Challenges” is inspirational and provides an external motivationfor long-term career goals [31], [32]. The Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation(LSAMP) program was used to give the RS students their first experience working in a modernresearch laboratory as a team member under faculty direction [33]. Once the students hadexperienced working under a faculty member, they were given a chance to direct a project oftheir own choosing. Similar to a capstone experience, self-directed technical work buildsconfidence and marketable
TwoAbstractIn this paper, we aim to summarize our efforts to understand how the identities of civil andmechanical engineering students engaged in capstone projects relate to their engagement indesign activity. Building upon our previous introductory study, we share insights from thecontent analysis of interviews with civil and mechanical engineering students engaged incapstone design courses and report initial findings related to how students’ self-perception asengineers impacts their role within the capstone team.IntroductionIn this paper, we summarize the initial results from a wider study funded through the NSF RFE(awards No. 2138019 and No. 2138106) program exploring engineering students' engagementand motivation in capstone design
fromProject DREAM. MU has developed and piloted 1) a two-week, immersive summer program on"Maker-Neering" targeting teaching 3D printing/design, arduino programming and VR design torecruit students into a new engineering program and 2) piloted the first semester of an innovativeyear-long introductory engineering course using low-cost makerspace technologies (including3D printers, arduino, python programming, and virtual-reality) in project-based experiences toimprove foundational engineering skills. We have successfully implemented the two-weeksummer program and the first semester of the year-long introductory engineering course, wherewe have seen students complete miniature capstone projects that address genuine communityneeds including gamifying
to the bayous of Louisiana. The final narrative, How doyou solve a problem like Fritz Haber? [6], discusses the German, Nobel-Prize-winning chemistand his discovery of a process to convert atmospheric nitrogen into liquid-ammonia fertilizer.Additional details regarding the narratives can be found in Brown et al. [ 7].The study was completed at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida,and included as participants senior students completing their capstone design projects inmechanical and aerospace engineering. The first phase of the project began with a pilot studythat sought to evaluate whether students were connecting with the narratives and, mostimportantly, able to draw connections between the narratives and
interventions were developed: (i)the use of international engineering case studies ina quantitative analysis course,(ii) the intentional formation of multinational student design teamswithin a capstone design course, (iii) a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL)research project in a transport phenomena course, and (iv) an engineering course coupled to acommunity-engaged project. The research aims to address the following questions: 1. To what extent can global competence be developed in engineering students through the use of the proposed global engagement interventions? 2. What are the relative strengths of each of the proposed global engagement interventions in developing global engineering competence?For this project, the
in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas - Austin, an MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California, and a BS in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India. Dr. Shekhar also holds a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Prior to his current appointment, he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher and Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan. He is the recipient of the 2018 Outstanding Postdoctoral Researcher Award at the University of Michigan; and serves as a PI/Co-PI on multiple projects funded by the National
Texas A&M UniversityAbstractThis paper presents the progress made in the first two years of a five-year NSF ER2 (Ethical andResponsible Research) project on ethical and responsible research and practices in science andengineering undertaken at a large public university in the southwestern United States. Overallobjectives of the project include: 1) conduct a survey of incoming freshmen college students toassess their ethical research competency and self-efficacy at the beginning of their tertiaryeducation and during their senior-level capstone course; 2) evaluate the ethical researchcompetency and self-efficacy of university students and identify any significantly contributingfactors to develop an intervention plan to improve their ethical
Paper ID #42590Board 316: Innovation Self-Efficacy: Empowering Environmental EngineeringStudents to InnovateDr. Azadeh Bolhari, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Bolhari is a professor of environmental engineering in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broadening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the boundaries of engineering and social
engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Scott’s research relates to accessible and inexpensive engineering equipment for laboratory education.Wendy Cagle, Western Carolina UniversityDr. Andrew Ritenour, Western Carolina University Andrew Ritenour is currently an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering + Technology at Western Carolina University (WCU). In addition to teaching in the field of electrical engineering, he coordinates the senior engineering capstone program which is a multidisciplinary, two-semester course sequence with projects sponsored by industrial partners. Within this role, he focuses on industrial outreach and the teaching and assessment of professional skills. Prior to joining WCU in 2018
been completed. These surveys aimed toaddress a range of inquiries, including participant learning experiences, program alignment withprofessional goals, and perceived impact on student learning. The surveys also exploredparticipant experiences with Network Improvement Communities, Capstone Projects,satisfaction ratings, and suggestions for improvement. Findings from surveys administeredacross three cohorts were presented, with some noted discrepancies in respondent numbers dueto survey instrument inconsistencies. Analysis consisted of summary statistics and T-tests wereused to assess the significance of difference between pre-, post-, and follow-up responses.The external evaluation consisted of a mixed-methods approach for data collection and
always get that. But I think it is unique.Dominik had a similar observation about the long-term timeline for these projects andpartnerships, contrasting that timeline with more traditional design projects within the university. For example, most engineers go through a capstone program that's either six months or 12 months. That's a lot shorter than four years. And your horizon for things to go wrong and your horizon to get very deep technical in that timeframe is much less than a four- year project. So, I think it affords the opportunity to go deeper, broader, and gain skill in bringing new people into the fold, solving more technically complex problems. And it really gives the time horizon to work through
problems, developing knowledge that supports designers and decision-makers. Dr. Layton is an expert on bio-inspired systems design, with a focus on the use of biological ecosystems as inspiration for achieving sustainability and resilience in the design of complex human networks/systems/systems of systems. Examples include industrial resource networks, makerspaces, power grids, cyber-physical systems, supply chains, innovation processes, and water distribution networks. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Quantitative Network Analysis for Benchmarking and Improving Makerspaces: Project OutcomesAbstract: Makerspaces on university campuses have seen
, doi: 10.1109/te.2007.906894.[5] M. D. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, "Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories," Journal of Engineering Education, Article vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 540-573, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00026.x.[6] C. M. Cunningham and G. J. Kelly, "Epistemic practices of engineering for education," Science Education, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 486-505, 2017, doi: 10.1002/sce.21271.[7] M. D. Koretsky, E. J. Nefcy, S. B. Nolen, and A. B. Champagne, "Connected epistemic practices in laboratory‐based engineering design projects for large‐course instruction
yet to disambiguate the impactof design education from persistence behaviors. For instance, a survey study linked participatingin capstone design to stronger engineering identity, but without accounting for the differencesthat might be due to comparing seniors to students earlier in their educational careers [3].To address this gap, we extend typical models of persistence intentions to examine the effects ofengagement in a core engineering practice—design problem framing—across first-year andsenior students. We conjectured that framing agency—the capacity to make decisionsconsequential to design problem framing [4]—relates to engineering identity and engineeringdesign self-efficacy, which in turn predicts persistence intentions. We sought to
Engineering Education, 2024 Enabling In-Class Hands-On Electronics Opportunities through Flipped Classroom using Openly Available VideosAbstractThis discussion reports on our efforts to utilize open classroom time for hands-on experimentalmeasurements as well as other hands-on engineering (ECE) projects. These in-class interactionsincrease student confidence with hands-on tools, where class time becomes time for grouphardware discussions. This discussion will describe our efforts utilizing hardware-based classprojects throughout the undergraduate and graduate ECE curriculum. Revolutionary integratedcircuit platforms are part of these efforts, and a history of these efforts will be described in thispaper. These efforts improves the
development programs and mentoring activities. She developed, sheReadstoEarn, a semester-long project to connect female F1 visa holders to career education related to salary negotiation and networking. SBU awarded her with a Student Affairs Distinguished Service Award for Student Development. She also received the SUNY CDO Award for Excellence in Programming. She previously served as communications chair for the Graduate Career Consortium and contributed to InsideHigherEd’s Carpe Careers blog. She is currently a member of the Life Design Studio for University Educators. Dr. James has a Phd in American History as well as a masters degree in Higher Education Administration.Dr. Marianna Savoca, Stony Brook University
) monitorchanges in mental models of SETS as students transition from college to industry. To accomplishthese objectives, the research study will take place in three phases. Phase 1 is focused ondeveloping an instrument that measures engineering students’ mental models of SETS and howthese models relate to their design decisions. Phase 2 is not presented here but will involvesurveying a national sample of fourth-year civil and chemical engineering students about theirmental models of SETS when designing their senior capstone projects. The final phase willfollow students from Phase 2 as they transition into the engineering industry to investigate howtheir mental models change during the first six months of employment.This paper is a part of the project’s
(Integrated Design Projects, IDP) and a new integrated EE (Electrical Engineering) and DAQ (Data Acquisition) course sequence [3, 4, 33, 34, 35]. 3. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): Helping women and underrepresented minorities feel identified and one with the program was at the heart of our RED project. The initial report from the project’s external evaluator revealed that some female students (anonymized) felt excluded and diminished, occasionally by faculty and staff and sometimes by classmates. Therefore, the program undertook several actions to address DEI in the four areas of change [2]-[6].4. Engineers in Training (EIT): The senior capstone sequence, connecting seniors and the industry, was pivoted
Black (15%), Hispanic/Latinx (12%), and women (17%) [2].Approximately 62% of veterans are first generation students [3]. With 36% reporting a service-connected disability, post-9/11 veterans have the highest number of service members whoseparate from the military with a disability of any veteran cohort in history [2]. These factors, incombination with technical interests and skills, maturity and life experience, and leadership andteamwork training, make SVSM ideal candidates for supporting engineering education inmeeting workforce demands well into the 21st century [4].1.2 Project Goals and Work PlanThis NSF CAREER project aims to advance full participation of SVSM within higherengineering education and the engineering workforce. The project
. As a capstone, teachers developed research projects synthesizing this interdisciplinarycontent with their own interests and background. As a result, the teachers have submitted severalposters with abstracts to the 2024 ACM SIGCSE and IEEE ISEC conferences and will bedelivering grant-related lessons in their classes during the current academic year.1 Introduction and MotivationDeveloping and understanding data fluency is increasingly important given the rapid changesrelated to living, learning, and working in the knowledge society of the 21st century. Meeting thiscommitment requires well-prepared teachers with proper support, including tools and resources,and yet, professional development and teacher preparation around data fluency is spotty
workday, travel to theuniversity, attend the presentation, provide feedback to the presenter, and engage with students.While it is feasible on occasion, maintaining this regularly also poses challenges. Figure 2 – A mentee discussing his project with his peers and an industry mentorDuring the spring symposium, students highlight their projects, such as their capstone,internship, or class projects. This event also serves as a platform for students to make a positiveimpression on industry professionals, potentially leading to securing internships for theupcoming summer. The interactions during the symposium are often fantastic, but the follow-upengagement outside the event could be improved. Figure 3 – A mentor industry giving
Approach to affective, Orientation-Reflective Value Awareness Empathetic Electrical Engineering Courses [31] behavioral Being- Whole Profession Empathic approaches in engineering capstone Skill- Perspective Taking, Mode Switching cognitive, design projects: student beliefs and reported Orientation-Epistemological Openness, Reflective Value Awareness, Commitment to behavioral behavior [32] Values Pluralism Empathy and ethical becoming in biomedical
Paper ID #41936Board 304: Improving Engineering Mechanics Self-efficacy by Focusing onAbstracting the Physical World as a Precursor to AnalysisDr. Nigel Berkeley Kaye, Clemson University Professor of Civil EngineeringDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, and the past editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their
Paper ID #41371Board 428: Work in Progress: An Open Educational Resource to ImproveArchitectural Engineering Students Conceptual Knowledge When Writing-to-Learn:Investigation 1Dr. Ryan Solnosky P.E., Pennsylvania State University Ryan Solnosky is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park. Dr. Solnosky has taught courses for Architectural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Pre-Major Freshmen. He is the recipient of several teaching awards both within Penn State and Nationally. Ryan’s research centers on technology for teaching, capstones
engineering work [6] - [8], often touching on such aspects briefly inintroductory or capstone courses, if at all [9]. There is increasing interest in helping engineeringstudents develop socially engaged engineering skills, but instructors must be supported inaddressing potential challenges in doing so effectively, including time constraints, perceiveddisconnects between social dimensions and technical course content, and a need for additionaltools, resources, and training for integrating socially engaged engineering into their courses [10]- [12].The Center for Socially Engaged Engineering and Design (C-SED) in the University ofMichigan College of Engineering offers a number of resources to help advance the developmentof socially engaged thinking and
and ability to teach course content. Instead, the SPVEL connects students’ 1)appreciation for laboratory discipline content and relevance to their career aspirations, 2)engineering role identity development as a function of participation within the lab, and studentsociocultural identities (race, ethnicity, and gender).Research QuestionSPVEL was used to answer two research questions. How do student’s sociocultural identitycharacteristics relate to their perceptions of value in a virtual engineering lab? How are students’perceptions of virtual lab value related to the sociocultural identities and lab report grades?Research Methodology and EnvironmentThis study was conducted in a capstone senior Mechanical and Aerospace engineering