Paper ID #48037WIP - Outreach and Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning (EML) in STEMProf. Ghina Absi, Vanderbilt University Ghina Absi is an Assistant Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Vanderbilt University. She teaches classes at the freshmen, sophomore and junior classes in Civil Engineering (Intro to Engineering, Statics, Mechanics of Materials, Civil Engineering Lab and several electives including travel classes) . She earned her BE and ME from the Saint Joseph University (ESIB) in Beirut, Lebanon, and worked for 5 years as a steel structures design engineer at a multinational firm (Dar Al
Paper ID #46949Infusing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Undergraduate Researchers throughFaculty DevelopmentDr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu is the Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research in the College of Engineering and also an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. She holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her primary research expertise lies in the fields of thermal sciences and fluid mechanics, with a focus on addressing transport phenomena in energy processes. Her work primarily aims
Paper ID #48592Integrating Course-based Undergraduate Research and Entrepreneurial Mindset(CURE-E) in to Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Ozgul Yasar-Inceoglu, California State University, Chico Ozgul Yasar-Inceoglu is an Associate Professor in Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering and Advanced Manufacturing Department at California State University, Chico. She received her Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from University of California, Riverside.JoAna Brooks, California State University, Chico JoAna Brooks serves as Co-Principal Investigator and Project Director for the CEMUR Project (Course-based Experiential
Paper ID #46824Investigating Perceptions of Inventiveness and Entrepreneurial Mindsets inLate Elementary School StudentsJasmine N Patel, Georgia Institute of Technology Jasmine Patel is a Research Associate at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). She specializes in invention education and informal STEM learning within K-12 settings. Her work involves research into the implementation and effects of educational interventions. In her role, Jasmine collaborates with a diverse group of K-12 students, educators, and administrators to develop and
research and develop solutions to global challenges.Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into their approach fosters more inclusive and equitabledesigns. This paper presents the redesign of a Chemical Engineering Senior Design Capstonecourse aimed at embedding sustainability and social responsibility in engineering practices. Thecourse emphasizes core engineering design principles alongside an entrepreneurial mindset, witha specific focus on projects centered around sustainable technologies and markets. It furtherintroduces students to critical aspects of social responsibility by addressing global andenvironmental issues, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations, and the necessity ofsustainable technological innovations within
, students who had an interest in graduate programs were alsoencouraged to take an M-CURE that focused on writing peer reviewed papers and transition to graduateprograms [3,5].The last element of the CURE experiences was tied to development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM).EM for this project is defined as a set of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a uniqueapproach to problem-solving, innovation, and value creation. In the context of research, we are focused onhelping students connect research with value creation. We have defined a research mindset as a broaderidea that includes many facets of an entrepreneurial mindset. These factors in turn are connected to theidea of student-centered research [6].All of the CUREs in the
Paper ID #48054Fostering Entrepreneurial Mindset via Hands-On Learning: A Case Study onProject-Based Learning in Advanced Manufacturing and Additive ManufacturingCoursesDr. Anu R Osta, Rowan University Dr Anu Osta is an Associate Teaching Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department at Rowan University. His teaching interests are Engineering Mechanics, Materials Science, Manufacturing, and Design.Dr. Behrad Koohbor, Rowan University Behrad Koohbor is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Fostering Entrepreneurial Mindset via
Paper ID #47726Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset by Bridging Design and Construction– Incorporating Three Cs in Civil Engineering Technology CoursesDr. Amanda Y Bao P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology Amanda Bao is a Professor and Interim Chair in the Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Environmental Management and Safety at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). She got her Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder, USA, in 2006. Dr. Bao started teaching at RIT in 2010 and she regularly teaches structural engineering courses. Prior to RIT, she worked as a bridge
Paper ID #46728Faculty and Students’ Perceptions and Experiences in the STEM Patent PathwayProgram and Entrepreneurial Mindset Development: A Case StudyMs. Katherine Jiawen Ren, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Katherine Jiawen Ren is a Ph.D. student in the Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Katherine is currently a Graduate Research Assistant in the Educational Leadership Department in the Cato College of Education. Her research interests include educational psychology, research methodology, and STEM education. She had contributed to a
Paper ID #45742BOARD # 285: NSF REU Site: Developing the Entrepreneurial Mindset inEngineering Students through Energy-Focused New Product DevelopmentDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development.Rhea Dutta Rhea is a sophomore studying Industrial Engineering at the Purdue University College of Engineering and the John Martison Honors College. She is originally from Princeton, New Jersey, and will graduate in May
progress: How a Cornerstone Course Impacts Self-efficacy and EntrepreneurshipIntroductionEngineers have emerged as pivotal players in technological innovation in the past decadeby founding or actively participating in entrepreneurial ventures [1]. Consequently, policyinitiatives have increasingly supported integrating entrepreneurship programs withinengineering education [2]. Economic shifts and an evolving job market for graduates haveheightened the demand for engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset, which is defined asthe cognitive adaptability that preceeds entrepreneurial behaviors for acting onopportunities, learning from failures, and creating economic and social value throughproblem-solving [6]. Such a mindset
Engineering, University of Arizona, Arizona, USAAbstractPrograms and resources aimed at fostering innovation and an entrepreneurial mindset are now commonacross many institutions of higher education. However, industrial engineering students often engageminimally with available innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) opportunities at our institution. Thisproject sought to address this challenge at a large public land-grant institution, aiming to increase studentengagement with these resources. Recognizing that engineering students tend to prioritize activities thatearn course credit, the project focused on bridging the gap between entrepreneurship and engineering. Theprimary objective of the project was to redesign a required third-year industrial
entrepreneurial mindset in undergraduates, students must encounterand learn to navigate obstacles at all levels of learning. Implementing MBL can provide a crucial first-step toward developing failure tolerance.The MBL framework employed by the authors [5, 6] requires students to demonstrate mastery offundamental skills to pass a course. Mastery is demonstrated by completing test questions with near-perfect solutions. Final grades are then based on the number and complexity of skills mastered duringthe semester. Unlike traditional grading systems, MBL does not award partial credit; assessments areevaluated as either Passed or Not Yet. However, students can retake assessments as needed until thecourse ends, allowing each failure to become a learning
Paper ID #47728WIP: Opening Doors for All: Creating an Inclusive and Equitable EngineeringEducation Model Inspired by the ASEE Mindset ReportHiba Assi, University of Detroit MercyDr. E. Prasad Venugopal, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. E. Prasad Venugopal is a Professor of Physics and Affiliate Faculty, African American Studies at the University of Detroit Mercy. His research interests include physics education research and science and technology studies.Dr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Professor of Mechanical
entrepreneurial thinking within engineering education throughpatterner institutions [1] . Developing this mindset implies not only technical expertise but alsothe ability for engineering students to identify as entrepreneurs[2]. Identity then becomes a usefullens for understanding individuals’ academic and career motivation [3]; [4]. However, integrationand compartmentalization of these identities can be challenging, as engineering andentrepreneurial skill sets often do not coexist easily within the same individual, leading to atension in identity formation[5]. Though, this integration of engineering innovations withsustainable entrepreneurship principles presents an area requiring further exploration [6] there isa notable absence of entrepreneurship
their work into several key categories,including technical problem-solving, interdisciplinary applications, societal impacts, anddiversity and inclusion initiatives. This classification is informed by KEEN cards, whichhighlight innovative teaching methodologies such as problem-solving studios, project-basedlearning, and entrepreneurship in engineering. Our analysis reveals trends in topics, teachingmethods, and content of the KEEN cards, offering insights into how fellows from differentdisciplines (e.g., mechanical, civil, and chemical engineering) bring distinct approaches tointegrating entrepreneurial mindsets in their curricula. We also identify workshops, such asProblem-Solving Studios and Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset
providestudents with the interdisciplinary knowledge, practical skills, and entrepreneurial mindset required toexcel in today’s workforce. To bridge this gap, the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) model has emergedas a transformative approach, fostering collaboration among undergraduate and graduate students andfaculty to solve complex, long-term, and large-scale challenges. The VIP model was initially introduced byPurdue University [1] and later expanded by Georgia Tech Institute of Technology to address gaps ininterdisciplinary education and research [2]. Since then, the model has been adopted globally, withvariations tailored to institutional goals and cultural contexts. VIP programs emphasize collaborativelearning, long-term project engagement
about how FWoC in STEM achieve success includingindividual and systemic factors. 10 Traditionally geared towards business-related endeavors. Predominantly student An individual focused. factor: Entrepreneurial Mindset Limited research exists on faculty with EM, especially people of
Engineering Education, 2025 Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship (FLiTE): S-STEM Program Third Year ProgressThe NSF S-STEM-funded program titled Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship(FLiTE) hosted by Western Carolina University has now completed its third year of operation.The program continues its mission to cultivate the entrepreneurial mindset and growth-orientedthinking among a cohort of engineering and technology students with the goal of creatinggraduates who become growth-oriented professionals and entrepreneurs. With the onboarding ofits second-year recruiting class, the program has begun to observe the productive interactions ofits vertically integrated cohort. Program activities for the
solutions, but these skillsare just as important for entrepreneurs to make strategic decisions for an organization. Engineersand entrepreneurs seek out opportunities, secure and employ resources, and provide leadership tocreate something of value. Engineers may lack entrepreneurship development and exposure dueto curricula focused on technical content, but these very skills and mindset can be developed. Aculture of coachability is a key factor in creating successful, fundable ventures. The Center forMedical Innovation’s Innovation Fellows (IF) Program has developed a distinctive mentoringstrategy to nurture innovation and engineering entrepreneurial mindsets in early-career engineersand scientists. This year-long program enhances expertise in
and motivations of student entrepreneurs, as well as their engagement and success. Dr. Wang employs advanced quantitative methods and mixed-methods approaches to analyze large-scale national survey data. Her work strives to contribute to the broader understanding of how to cultivate entrepreneurial mindsets and drive innovation in academic settings. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Potential Conflicts of Interest in Academic Entrepreneurship AbstractMany universities encourage academic researchers to participate in technologycommercialization and entrepreneurship to demonstrate economic and societal returns frominvestments in research
sustainability andinnovation.4.1. Generative Design • By leveraging AI-driven optimization tools in generative design, learners are introduced to resource-efficient strategies that minimize material waste and energy consumption, promoting sustainable engineering practices [19]. • This module empowers students to adopt a forward-thinking, entrepreneurial mindset by exploring innovative design approaches that challenge conventional manufacturing paradigms [20]. • It demonstrates how computational tools can transform the product development process, encouraging the creation of environmentally conscious solutions tailored to market needs.4.2. Green Manufacturing (Bottle-to-Filament Conversion) • This module
the development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) amongengineering students, emphasizing creativity, connection, and creating value in real-worldcontexts. Students are encouraged to approach challenges with a mindset that values not onlytechnical expertise but also social impact, resilience, and adaptability—key concepts that alignwell with the principles of design justice. By infusing and intertwining both design justiceprinciples and the entrepreneurial mindset into our capstone coursework, we aim to empowerstudents to design solutions that are not only technically sound but also entrepreneurial, ethicallyresponsible, and inclusive, ensuring their work serves the broader community.Project course sequenceThe engineering program includes a
entrepreneurship,”Entrepreneurship Education andPedagogy, 1(1), 8–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286[3] Huang-Saad, A., Bodnar, C., & Carberry, A. (2020). “Examining current practice in engineering entrepreneurship education,”EntrepreneurshipEducation and Pedagogy, 3(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890828[4] D. R. Riley, H. M. Shuster, C. A. LeMasney, C. E. Silvestri, and K. E. Mallouk, “First-Year Engineering Students’ Conceptualization of Entrepreneurial Mindset,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, pp. 87-91,Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274211029207.[5
data, and making informed decisions, students practiced essential skills in data-drivendecision-making and communication of engineering decisions.To assess the impact of the activity, pre- and post-project surveys measured students’ awarenessand proficiency across three dimensions: trade-off evaluation, informed decision-making, andcommunication. Results showed significant improvements in all dimensions, with studentstransitioning from minimal to moderate or high levels of competence. Qualitative reflectionsfrom student reports highlighted an understanding of the complexities of material selection,emphasizing the importance of balancing technical, economic, and environmental factors.The findings align with the entrepreneurial mindset framework
examine how facultyCommunities of Practice (CoPs) contribute to developing an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) inengineering education. Participants showed a mindset consistent with EM principles, such asinitiating collaborative solutions, building connections to support innovation, and creating lastingvalue [12], [13]. Though EM was not an explicit focus of the CoP projects, these alignedpractices suggest that CoPs are a promising structure for cultivating EM among faculty. Futurestudies could explore how CoPs foster curiosity, build connections, and create value inengineering classrooms, also assess their impact on student learning. Examining this alignmentcould offer practical strategies for integrating adaptability and entrepreneurial thinking
andcurriculum development so that students can be further encouraged to reflect on theirprofessional goals and the ways in which they can make an impact throughout their career. Thisstudy can also result in recommendations that will strengthen the college of engineering’s abilityto expand students’ entrepreneurial mindsets [10].This project examines the activities each department is engaged in and provides in order tohighlight various career opportunities available to their students. In addition, this project exploreshow offerings differ across departments. Ultimately, the findings from this first case studydetailed in this paper will be used alongside student perception data to develop a career pathwaysassessment report and a framework for aligning
of Oregon and across institutions. Although itmay be challenging for other programs to integrate the full suite of trainings into theircurriculum, individual modules may be able to be incorporated. With a little customization, theseactivities are likely to be useful in disciplines beyond bioengineering, especially for programsthat already have a focus on communication, innovation, or entrepreneurial mindset.References[1] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, “Applying Authentic Learning through Cultivation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Engineering Classroom,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9010007.[2] L. R. Volpatti et al., “Quantitative Assessment of Students’ Revision Processes,” presented at
industry links and was awarded tenure. He then moved to Wichita State University’s Biomedical Engineering Dept. to assist in fostering an entrepreneurial mindset in students. He later became the inaugural chair of the Engineering Technology Dept., renamed to Applied Engineering. He also established the Applied Computing program, now part of the School of Computing.Mrs. Samantha Corcoran, Wichita State University SAMANTHA CORCORAN has a BS and MS in industrial engineering with experience in manufacturing, lean improvements, and quality control. She served the Wichita State University College of Engineering as Assistant Dean before joining the engineering faculty. She co-founded WSU GoBabyGo, created an Assistive
characterized by a combination of technical and non-technical roles, typically primarily engineering-conpar roles, and typically still within engineering intensive industries ● Entrepreneur: A career pathway characterized by roles focused on founding a company or organization, or standing up a department within an organization, and continuing in an entrepreneurial role for a number of years ● Invisible Engineer: A career pathway characterized by primarily by non-technical or engineering-conpar roles outside of engineering intensive industries ● Academic: A career pathway characterized primarily by academic roles focused on teaching or research, typically in higher education industryThe survey was