Engineering Education, 90, 2, 223-229.Herkert, J.R. (2000). Engineering ethics education in the USA: content, pedagogy andcurriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25 (4), 303-313.Herkert, J.R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethicsand the role of professional societies. Science and Technology Ethics, 7, 3, 403-414.Jalali, Y., Matheis, C., & Lohani, V. K. (2019). Ethics instruction and the role of liberatorypraxis and theory. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa,Florida.Keating, A. (2002). Charting pathways, marking thresholds… a warning, an introduction, in G.E.Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation
and led theeffort to reorganize the resources on the site. Tom Powers of the Center for Science,Ethics and Public Policy at the University of Delaware is PI for that team’s effort toimprove the international offerings on the site. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the sponsoringinstitutions.References1. Herkert, Joseph R. (2001) Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3): 403-414.2. Herkert, Joseph R.; Benya, Frazier F.; Ellison, Karin; Hollander, Rachelle D.; Laas, Kelly
. (2007). The Impact of Business Education on Moral Judgement Competence: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 73-87.6. Linda K. Lau, Brandon Caracciolo, Stephanie Roddenberry, Abbie Scroggins, Longwood University: March 2012. “College students’ perception of ethics”.7. Shurden, S., Santandreu, J., and Shurden, M. (2010). How Student Perceptions of Ethics Can Lead to Future Business Behavior. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 13(1), 117-127.8. Weeks, F. (2012). How does a culture of learning impact on student behavior? Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 332-342.9. Kitahara, R., Westfall, F., and Mankelwicz, J. (2011). New, Multi-Faceted Hybrid Approaches to Ensuring Academic
,” Alexandria, VA, 2024. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[7] W. Sinnott-Armstrong, “Consequentialism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, p. 12, Oct. 04, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism[8] M. Mallinger, “Decisive decision making: an exercise using ethical frameworks,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 1997.[9] J. C. Flanagan, “The critical incident technique,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327–358, 1954.[10] K. FitzGerald, N. S. Seale, C. A. Kerins, and R. McElvaney, “The critical
this isgood professional advice, this also sends the message of not to delve into things that anengineer may not know enough about. One must wonder if such an advice encouragesengineers to focus mostly on the technical aspect but not as much on social, political, andhumanistic angles, and the broader impact of their decisions.In summary, a code of ethics sets the standards of professional conduct for a designprofession, while Design Justice is a broader framework that looks at the ways in whichdesign can be used for the betterment of marginalized communities and to rectify structuralinequalities.Table I Comparison of NSPE code of ethics [7] and the Design Justice Principles [1] NSPE Code of Ethics Design Justice
Know What’s Right. Yale University Press, 2010. doi: 10.12987/9780300161328.5 National Society of Professional Engineers, “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers.” [Online] Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics- engineers#:~:text=The%20first%20reference%20to%20a,a%20suggestion%20for%20membership%20cons ideration.6 American Society for Engineering Education, “Papers on Engineering Education Repository.” [Online] Available: https://peer.asee.org/?q=ethics.7 ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023.” [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs
website. http://courses.ics.hawaii.edu/ics314s17/morea/ethics/experience-se-ethics-case-study-privacy.html [Accessed October 21, 2018].[42] Princeton. Optimizing Schools: Case Study 3. Princeton Dialogues on AI and Ethics. 7 pp. https://aiethics.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/587/2018/10/Princeton-AI-Ethics-Case-Study-3.pdf [Accessed Oct 21, 2018].[43] A. Azuela and C. Herrera. Taking land around the world: International trends in the expropriation for urban and infrastructure projects. Paper commissioned by the World Bank and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy for the Urban Research Symposium, Washington, May 2007, 42 pp.[44] J.J. Kelly, “‘We shall not be moved’: urban communities, eminent domain and the
).7 Gloria Hauser-Kastenberg, William E. Kastenberg, and David Norris, Sci. Eng. Ethics 9, 377–387 (2003).8 Wm. A. Wulf, Bridge Link. Eng. Soc. 32, 3 (2002).9 Norman Augustine, Bridge Link. Eng. Soc. 32, 4–7 (2002).10 J. R. Herkert, Sci. Eng. Ethics 7, 403–414 (2001).11 Brock E. Barry and Matthew W. Ohland, J. Eng. Educ. 98, 377–388 (2009).12 D. R. Haws, J. Eng. Educ. 90, 223–230 (2001).13 Christopher Chung and Michael Alfred, Sci. Eng. Ethics 15, 189–199 (2009).14 A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, J. Eng. Educ. 97, 327–338 (2008).15 C. Didier, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 25, 325–335 (2000).16 C. E. Harris, M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, J. Eng. Educ.-Wash.- 85, 93–96 (1996).17 Herkert J. R, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 25, 303–313
Healthandsafety Economicconcerns Environmentalconcerns 30 Sustainability Notanengineeringpracticeatall 20 SocialJustice 16 12 12 Peace 10 Ethics 7 6 1 0 0
= 18) (n = 8) (n = 8)Philosophical 7 3 3 Peer Support (2), Encounter during Program (2), Cultural Activities (2)Moral & Ethics 7 4 2 Cultural Activities (4), Professional Exposure (3), Encounter during Program (3), Field Trips (3)Psychological 11 4 5 Cultural Activities (6), Peer Support (4), Instructor Support (4), Professional Exposure (4), Debrief/Reflection (4)Sociological 15 7 6 Cultural Activities (8), Encounter during Program (5), Field
focus areas. The expertise areas weredivided in the following categories: 1. Customer needs 2. Concept generation 3. Product reliability 4. Product architecture 5. Product robustness 6. Legal and ethical 7. BudgetingThe above mentioned expertise areas encompass the entire EDM syllabus and include the variousdesign tools and methods covered in class lectures. The main goals for including this approach areas follows: • Students are encouraged to not only grasp the aspects of the entire design cycle in general, but also are exposed to individual responsibility by choosing a focus area, a practice that they would take in working on their design projects. • Teams and their leaders learn the practice of