Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut; Arash E. Zaghi, University of Connecticut; Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut; Sarira Motaref P.E., University of Connecticut; Shinae Jang P.E., University of Connecticut; Amvrossios Bagtzoglou, University of Connecticut; Caressa Adalia Wakeman, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

discussions. The course redesign process is further informed by the inclusion of studentstakeholders in the project, namely, undergraduate and graduate students who self-identify asneurodivergent. Student contributors share individual experiences and perspectives to identifybeneficial instructional practices and foster a personal connection with the faculty.Introduction of the I-StandardsThe I-Course Standards document resulted from the first stage of the I-Team process, emergingas a framework to guide the course redesign process throughout the life of the project. The I-Course Standards were inspired by the approach and format of Quality Matters, the certificationsystem for online courses, which is adopted at the university for all online classes

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura J. Carroll, University of Michigan; Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Matthew Charles Graham ; Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin; Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

ofinstructor disposition, lack of time to restructure courses, expectation of syllabus coverage, largeclass size/room inadequate, teaching-centered tradition, and a lack of incentives/rewards [25, p.970]. A corresponding summary has yet to be established for online instruction. Therefore, we explore the following research questions: RQ1: What barriers do instructors expect to experience when adopting active learning in online instruction? RQ2: How do the barriers instructors expect to experience when adopting active learning in online instruction differ from those for in-person instruction? We recruited instructors who used or planned to use active learning in teaching a STEMcourse for first- and/or second-year

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University; Faye R. Jones, Florida State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

gained by students who successfully completed AM coursework. The unit of analysis was a syllabus from an individual course. All occupational completion points, student performance outcomes, or standards and/or certifications covered in the material were be analyzed through an iterative process using a codebook derived from the Department of Labor Advanced Manufacturing Competency Models [13, 14]. Researchers also used established instruments to measure the extent to which the new professionals report entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions [15, 16, 17]. In addition to deriving areas of strong and weak alignment, the researchers calculated the extent of match between the syllabi and the standards. The team employed our

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves, Virginia Commonwealth University; Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

sustainability, and July focused on convertingproject course implementation to online formats (due to COVID-19).In order to facilitate effective sharing of information and peer learning, SUMMIT-P uses twoprotocols during project meetings that provide a format for effective and fruitful discussion. Thetwo protocols, Descriptive Consultancy protocol and Success Analysis with Reflective Questionsprotocol, have historically been applied in the K-12 education community [4]. The DescriptiveConsultancy protocol [5], originally developed by Nancy Mohr and revised by Connie Parrishand Susan Taylor in August 2013, was modified by McDonnough and Henschel [6] and has beenadapted for this project to help presenters think more expansively about a particular

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

]. Thus far, two faculty members have participated inthe summer industry immersion program, which has broadened faculty views and strengthenedtheir ties to industry. Although the Faculty Immersion program was interrupted by the pandemic,other faculty members plan on joining the immersion in the coming summers.b. Faculty training. Faculty have attended multiple training courses since the beginning of theproject. In the past year, the Center of Faculty Development, the Project Center, and the Centerfor Digital Leaning and Innovation at Seattle University led various training courses on topicssuch as inclusive pedagogy, building relationship-rich classroom experiences, and effectivelymoving our courses online. Some faculty also attended workshops