Asee peer logo

A Case for Student Led Global Learning

Download Paper |

Conference

2013 ASEE International Forum

Location

Atlanta, Georgia

Publication Date

June 22, 2013

Start Date

June 22, 2013

End Date

June 22, 2013

Conference Session

Track 1 - Session II - Student Development

Tagged Topic

Student Development

Page Count

8

Page Numbers

21.1.1 - 21.1.8

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/17206

Download Count

26

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Robert O. Warrington Jr. Michigan Technological University

visit author page

Director, Institute for Leadership and Innovation, Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Dean at Michigan Tech from 1996-2007.
Fellow ASME, AAAS

visit author page

author page

Madelyn Marie Espinosa Michigan Technological University - Pavlis Institute

author page

Helena Keller Michigan Technological University

Download Paper |

Abstract

A Case for Student Led Global LearningMichigan Technological University’s Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Leadership wasinitiated in 2005 to provide MTU students with international leadership skills throughcoursework and a student-led intensive international experience. The Pavlis certificate programrequires 25 semester hours of coursework with 13 semesters in the summer (nine hours areallocated to the five week in country experience) between the student’s junior and senior years.The additional hours are focused on preparing them to lead, work, and communicate effectivelywith one another and with their in-country contacts. The major differences between the Pavlisprogram and other intensive programs that prepare global engineers are threefold: 1. The Pavlis teams (typically 4-8 students) are multidisciplinary, approximately 70% engineers and science majors, with a few other majors from social science, business, and other disciplines. 2. The students work on multiple technology projects while in-country, some are ongoing from previous years and some are new. The students also check on completed projects for sustainability and identify future projects for the next cohort traveling to the project center. 3. The in-country teams are student led, a faculty member spends 1-3 days at the start of the experience for orientation and introductions and then leaves. A local person is “employed” by the university to be 24/7 contact for the student’s in case of emergencies and to facilitate some contacts.It is apparently this last difference that has made all the difference in the learning outcomes fromthe students that have completed the program.The current project centers for the Pavlis program include Chennai, India, Sunyani, Ghana, andMalta. Typical projects include K-12 technical instruction and demonstrations, remote powerinstallations (solar, Lister engine), clean water, and a retrofitted mobile health clinic that will bedelivered and tested in Ghana this summer. The outcomes assessment from the graduates fromthe program indicate that the project content and project center location are much less importantthan the experience itself and the fact that they are in charge and responsible. Students reportthat the international experience leaves them with a greater sense of self-confidence and selfawareness that has made a profound impact on their career choices and lives. Although hard todocument, learning outcome comparisons will be made with more traditional internationalengineering experiences at Michigan Tech, including our International Senior Design programwhich is faculty led. The Pavlis Institute’s unique student-led international experience providesstudents with the opportunity to practice their leadership, engineering problem-solving, andcommunication skills in an international context.

Warrington, R. O., & Espinosa, M. M., & Keller, H. (2013, June), A Case for Student Led Global Learning Paper presented at 2013 ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/17206

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015