Asee peer logo

A Case Study On The Use Of Seminars In Engineering Courses A Comparison Between A Graduate And An Undergraduate Course

Download Paper |


2007 Annual Conference & Exposition


Honolulu, Hawaii

Publication Date

June 24, 2007

Start Date

June 24, 2007

End Date

June 27, 2007



Conference Session

Engineering Economy: Beyond the Classroom

Tagged Division

Engineering Economy

Page Count


Page Numbers

12.11.1 - 12.11.9



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

J. Cunha University of Alberta

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

A Case Study on the Use of Seminars in Engineering Courses A Comparison Between a Graduate and an Undergraduate Course


This paper presents comparison of results obtained in two distinct courses, one graduate and one undergraduate, where engineering economy was one of the main components of the course.

The graduate course is the advanced version of the undergraduate course. In both it was used the same methodology of assigning projects that involved the preparation of a report and a subsequent presentation of the results in an internal seminar.

For the undergraduate course two seminars were presented by each group, one involving engineering economy and other involving managerial aspects of the industry. For the graduate course only one project was proposed since the project involved a more in depth analysis of the topic developed.

Both courses were taught two years in a row and the paper presents comments and observations regarding the different results obtained in graduate and undergraduate levels.


Undergraduate engineering courses with a seminar component appear to be very common in engineering programs across North American universities. Even though we could not find an academic work reporting how extensively this resource is utilized in engineering courses, an expedited research through 10 largely recognized engineering programs in United States and Canada indicated that all engineering curricula had some courses with a seminar component (see institutions listed in Table I.)

One of the main reasons for the presence of seminars in those programs is probably the recognition that engineers should have the ability to work in groups and communicate effectively1.

Seminars at the University of Alberta are part of various courses in all four engineering departments and ten different engineering programs. The most common format for the courses with seminars is to have a weekly work load of three hours of classes and one hour for seminars.

It must be noticed that, even though most programs have some courses with seminars, those courses do not constitute the majority in the program. Actually, most courses follow the traditional format of lectures, assignments, lab classes and exams. Courses with seminars may have all the previously mentioned tools. The seminars are an additional learning and/or evaluation tool.

Cunha, J. (2007, June), A Case Study On The Use Of Seminars In Engineering Courses A Comparison Between A Graduate And An Undergraduate Course Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--2780

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015