July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Engineering Education is an evolving field whose boundaries have been redefined for at least the last three decades (Borrego & Bernhard, 2011; Colloquies, 2006; Jesiek, Newswander, & Borrego, 2009; National Research Council Board on Engineering Education, 1995). As a rich, invigorating, interdisciplinary body of scholarship we have noticed attributes that we consider powerful and central to our experience as junior scholars in the field. As we traversed through our Engineering Education pathways, we found ourselves positioned to add to the ongoing dialogue of what the field comprises. In this paper, we articulate, and draw attention to our experience of the field as we have been exposed to, interrogated with, and constructively become a part of it. We articulate our conception of “the soul” of engineering education by means of collaborative autoethnographic dialogue. We use the metaphor of the soul to narrate our experiences in the field, a majority of which include experiences we shared being in the same engineering education research program. The metaphor of the soul serves as a vehicle to communicate our experiences, conceptions, hopes, fears, and aspirations. The soul is as much an idea felt, as it is a scholarship known through inquiry. This essence moves across individuals in our department. It fuels continuous evolution by creating tension and using it as energy to find purpose in our work.
In three different, but related dialogues, we use the metaphor of sitting with tension as we hold a paradox together (Palmer, 1998). We invoke Palmer’s practice of sitting in tension with paradoxes because it helps conceptualize engineering education, which in itself represents the paradox between various paradigms of knowledge. Our discussions in this paper are informed by our ontology or sense of being. Such explorations in ontology are not traditional to engineering. We bring in this construct from the liberal arts because of the lack of such a device in engineering scholarship. We discuss: our conception of the soul of engineering education; the values the soul has brought to our academic journeys; and forward-looking speculation of the soul. In the first dialogue, we discuss what the soul of engineering education means to us by describing the tensions between clarity and dissonance, surrender and rebellion, and social and technical. In the second dialogue, reflecting upon the values we believe the soul has brought to our academic journeys, we discuss the tension between camaraderie and self-authorship, integration and separation, and conforming and contradicting. In the third dialogue, we explore the future of the soul and question it by exploring tensions between humanist and utilitarian values, inquiring and accepting, and innovating and reproducing.
As we write this paper our intention is to prompt reflection from the Engineering Education community by sharing our experience so that members continue to interrogate their scholarship as they intentionally engage in their research and teaching practices. We also hope to be able to provide space to struggle with the tension that the paradoxes of engineering education expose our hearts to, until the soul makes way for the transcendent love that helps make sense of the paradoxes we live in.
References: Borrego, M., & Bernhard, J. (2011). The emergence of engineering education research as an internationally connected field of inquiry. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 14–47. Colloquies. (2006). The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, (October), 259–261. Jesiek, B. K., Newswander, L. K., & Borrego, M. (2009). Engineering education research: discipline, community, or field? Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 39–52. National Research Council Board on Engineering Education. (1995). Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Palmer, P. (1998). Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher’s Life. In The Courage to Teach (pp. 61–88). Jossey-Bass.
Rodriguez-Simmonds, H. E., & Hira, A. (2021, July), A Collaborative Autoethnographic Dialog Exploring the Soul of Engineering Education Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--36559
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015