June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
11.22.1 - 11.22.21
A Comparative Observation of Full-Time Versus Part-Time Engineering Technology Students With Respect to Attitudes, Performance, Reliability, Maturity, and General Professionalism
Abstract - Educational institutions that have both day and evening engineering technology programs recruit students for these programs from a number of sources. Day students are primarily recruited from high school or vocational environments in addition to transfers from various two-year community colleges. Evening students, for the most part, have traditionally been comprised of a compendium of students who have already entered the work force and are looking to start or continue their education allowing them to move vertically within their respective companies. The quality, maturity, and behavior of these groups of students are markedly different. This paper discusses some of the differences as observed from these groups over the past several years and makes some suggestions as to how to equalize the playing field as far as curriculum is concerned due to these differences. Cooperative education programs also play a large role in molding day students’ attitudes with respect to maturity and professionalism. Students, participating in such curricula, tend to acquire much needed experience and maturity during their coop experiences resulting in a more professional student in the classroom. Comparisons among these groups will be made and suggestions offered as to possible adjustments in curricula to suit these vastly different student groups.
Some years ago, circa 1993, a discussion had taken place between a young faculty member and a much older, more experienced colleague. In that discussion, comments were made relative to the maturity of full-time day engineering technology students versus part-time evening engineering technology students. It seems that the younger professor, who had been teaching courses during the day, could not believe how immature his students were. In that same conversation, the older, more experienced professor commented that he felt that the part-time evening students were by far more mature in all aspects of their performance. This debate continued for some time with the younger faculty member arguing that full time students should inherently be more mature as they are essentially in school all day and have dedicated themselves to their educational programs with full time access to all of the necessary college resources. The older faculty member argued that this may be true for some and indeed was true when the younger faculty member had gone to school, but was no longer the case. He argued that evening students were more mature by virtue of their ages and responsibilities to themselves and their families. He argued that most, if not all, were working and supporting themselves and possibly a family. He reasoned that with the pressures of “real-life,” they were forced to make more mature decisions as these decisions would not only affect them, but their wives and children and maybe others.
Some years later, the younger professor had now became the older more experienced professor and had decided to review this issue of “student maturity”. From experience, this professor decided that his older colleague had indeed been right all along. In doing so, it was decided to survey evening students from all of the evening engineering technology disciplines: computer,
Tapper, J., & Di Bella, F., & Buchanan, W. (2006, June), A Comparative Observation Of Full Time Versus Part Time Engineering Technology Students With Respect To Attitudes, Performance, Reliability, Maturity, And General Professionalism Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--312
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015