Asee peer logo

A Comparison of Succeeding Mission-Critical Mechanical Engineering Design/Fabrication Projects.

Download Paper |

Conference

2020 ASEE North Central Section conference

Location

Morgantown, West Virginia

Publication Date

March 27, 2020

Start Date

March 27, 2020

End Date

May 20, 2020

Page Count

10

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/35720

Download Count

15

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Russell L. Rhoton Baker College

visit author page

Dr. Russell L. Rhoton is currently a Professor and the Director of Engineering at the Jackson campus of Baker College. Dr. Rhoton took his doctoral, master's and bachelors' degrees from Eastern Michigan University, and taught there for many years prior to coming to Baker College of Engineering. His research areas are materials modification by use of energetic plasmas, and design of processing equipment.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

The project, aimed at drawing crowds of local people to our combination Charity event and Engineering Open house late in October, became known as “The Halloween Pumpkin Flinging for Charity at XXX College School of Engineering”. The first attempt was successful both from a financial standpoint ($350 raised) and perhaps more importantly, showed creditable data indicating that student groups, when faced with a problem beyond or outside their skill sets, naturally (with minimal steering) followed a plan of their own that turned out to be basically indistinguishable from that of Bloom’s Taxonomy. This paper is a report of the outcomes of the second attempt to allow a student design group to research, plan, design, fabricate and test a modern version of an ancient device (catapult) while watching for adherence to an ‘internalized’ version of Bloom’s as was seen in the previous group. Beginning with the same requirements as defined the first attempt, size, payload, distance, and overall time frame, we expected that the group, although smaller in number, would follow roughly the same path as the previous class and arrive at the end of the project after having spent the design/build period developing the same high-order skills. Results indicate, however, that while the standard tasks of the pyramid did indeed propel the group toward the project end, the addition of an unexpected failure added an additional test of the validity of the ‘internalized pyramid’ theory and its influence on the final outcome. Again, the group succeeded, although not without setbacks, as described in later sections.

Rhoton, R. L. (2020, March), A Comparison of Succeeding Mission-Critical Mechanical Engineering Design/Fabrication Projects. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE North Central Section conference, Morgantown, West Virginia. https://peer.asee.org/35720

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015