Cheville, R. A., & Appelhans, S., & Thomas, S., & Thomas, R. (2023, June), A Critique of EC 2000 from Amartya Sen’s Capability Framework  Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--42382

\bibitem{asee_peer_42382}
  Cheville, R. A., \& Appelhans, S., \& Thomas, S., \& Thomas, R. (2023, June), \emph{A Critique of EC 2000 from Amartya Sen’s Capability Framework}
  Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland.
  10.18260/1-2--42382

R. Alan Cheville, Sarah Appelhans, Stewart Thomas, and Rebecca Thomas.  "A Critique of EC 2000 from Amartya Sen’s Capability Framework".  2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland, 2023, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2023.  https://peer.asee.org/42382 Internet.  23 Apr, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_42382}
  R. Alan Cheville, Sarah Appelhans, Stewart Thomas, and Rebecca Thomas.
  "A Critique of EC 2000 from Amartya Sen’s Capability Framework".
  \emph{2023 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland, 2023, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2023.
  https://peer.asee.org/42382 Internet.  23 Apr, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_42382
author = "R. Alan Cheville, Sarah Appelhans, Stewart Thomas, and Rebecca Thomas"
title = "A Critique of EC 2000 from Amartya Sen’s Capability Framework"
booktitle = "2023 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2023"
month = "June"
address = "Baltimore , Maryland"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/42382}
number = {10.18260/1-2--42382}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Most engineering programs in the United States are accredited by ABET under the guidelines known as EC-2000.  The EC-2000 framework is broadly based on the continual quality management (CQM) movement in industry where programs are striving to constantly improve the quality of their output, in this case the skills of graduates.  Broadly speaking, ABET evaluates engineering programs on eight different criteria; some are related to processes, some to resources, but those central to CQM are program educational objectives, that define hoped for long-term accomplishments of graduates, and outcomes which articulate what students can do when they graduate.  Degree programs must convince ABET they have a documented and effective process to improve outcomes to gain accreditation.  

CQM of course is not the only framework by which educational development can be framed or measured.  This paper explores ABET processes through the lens of the economist Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which is broadly applied in the developing world in areas of inequity, poverty, and human rights.  The capability approach is often used when a focus on diverse individuals is desirable for understanding aspects of development.  Central to Sen’s approach are capabilities and functionings.  Capabilities are the resources and supports in an individual’s environment that provide opportunities to pursue a life they value.  Functionings are what they actually become and do.  Thus capabilities can be thought of as the potential for functionings; alternatively capabilities are opportunities and functionings are outcomes.  This paper compares ABET’s accreditation criteria with a published set of capabilities in education.  The comparison shows there are some areas where criteria overlap with capabilities, but also several areas where the overlap is low.   The capabilities that aligned most with ABET criteria overlap with engineering epistemologies and a view of students as the ‘product’ of engineering education.
AU  - R. Alan Cheville
AU  - Sarah Appelhans
AU  - Stewart Thomas
AU  - Rebecca Thomas
CY  - Baltimore , Maryland
DA  - 2023/06/25
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - A Critique of EC 2000 from Amartya Sen’s Capability Framework
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/42382
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--42382
ER  -