June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
26.31.1 - 26.31.22
A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Student Perceptions and Experiences Related to Global ReadinessSession Choices: 1. Domestic Internationalization: Developing Global Competence Through On-Campus Activities 2. Needs, Opportunities, and Challenges for Global Engineering EducationIn 2012, the College of Engineering at a large mid-Atlantic research university began alongitudinal, cross-sectional study of engineering students’ perceptions and experiences relatingto global readiness. The purpose of the proposed four-year long study is to examine the impactof various activities, such as an increased focus on non-travel based international activities. Anonline survey was administered to first-year students during each fall semester and seniorstudents during each spring semester. Data are available for two full years. Students were askedquestions about previous international experiences and perceptions regarding global readiness.Also included was a 15-question Cultural Dispositions Index (CDI) (Ball, Zaugg, Davies,Tateishi, Parkinson, Jensen, & Magleby, 2012).Data are available from 1,682 first-year students (865 during the fall of 2012 and 817 during thefall of 2013) and 685 senior students (378 during the spring of 2013 and 307 during the spring of2014). The purpose of this paper is to describe differences between first-year and seniorstudents. Some of the study conclusions are listed below: 1. A greater proportion of first-year students anticipate working in the same state as the university after graduation as compared to seniors. A greater proportion of first-year students also anticipate working internationally. A greater proportion of seniors anticipate working in another state. 2. Seniors reported greater feelings of global readiness as compared to first-year students. First-year students scored higher on the following items: “Being globally ready is important to me professionally” and “I feel that global readiness is a competency that employers look for in engineering graduates.” 3. Seniors indicated that they most improved their global readiness by interacting with international students both in their courses and outside of classes. 4. No significant differences were found in students’ scores on the CDI, suggesting that first-year and senior students perceived themselves similarly in terms of openness and interest towards other cultures. 5. Senior students who studied or worked abroad had significantly higher scores on the CDI and the global readiness items.The full paper will describe the methodology, results, and study limitations in greater detail. Inaddition, implications of the results for engineering education will be discussed, particularlythose implications involving non-travel based international experiences.References:Ball, A. G., Zaugg, H., Davies, E., Tateishi, I., Parkinson, A. R., Jensen, C. G., Magleby, S. P. (2012). Identification and validation of a set of global competencies for engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education. 28(1): 156-168.
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015