Chicago, Illinois
June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
2153-5965
International
11
11.46.1 - 11.46.11
10.18260/1-2--355
https://peer.asee.org/355
474
A Global Collaboration to Teach Global Product Development: Faculty perspectives
1 Introduction
In this age of globalization and diversification, it is important that our engineering students understand how to work effectively across cultural and geographic boundaries and exploit the intellectual diversities within a global team. Global Product Development (GPD) is a graduate course that was created because the instructors felt that one has to experience the challenges and rewards of working in a global team in order to understand it. Graduate students from the University of Michigan, Technical University of Berlin and Seoul National University study and experience the global development of products for global markets. GPD has been offered every Fall semester since 2000. Using videoconferencing, Groove Virtual Office for collaboration and other Internet-based tools a “global” classroom is created connecting Ann Arbor (USA), Berlin (Germany) and Seoul (South Korea). In addition to lectures on product development and engineering, guest speakers from different countries speak on diverse topics (e.g., culturally appropriate innovation, global branding, intellectual property and product liability, etc.) that are equally important to consider in such ventures. The students work in global teams throughout the semester and participate in two weeklong face-to-face meetings along with the faculty.
GPD is a collaboration experience not only for the students, but also for the faculty involved. Each university has a primary faculty member in charge of the course, a few participating faculty and an assistant (sometimes a senior research student of the primary faculty). Significant collaboration amongst faculty is necessary to determine almost every detail of the course, including the semester project, the associated lectures, project-relevant assignments, design reviews and overall grading strategies. The participating universities not only have different semester schedules, but also different guidelines and practices that pose significant challenges for the participating faculty. However, the course has been successfully offered each year since its inception in Fall 2000 and on each campus there is a strong student demand for this course.
The development of the initial content and format of this course took more than a year1,2,3. This is not uncommon for special courses. However, several issues have to be addressed in order to sustain such a course in the long term. These include the following: 1. How can such a course be integrated within the existing curriculum of three different universities? 2. How should students who have some basic skills in handling the challenges of distributed project work? 3. What are the financial requirements for this course and how can they be met? 4. How should infrastructure be used and maintained in such a “high-technology’’ course? 5. How should evaluation and assessment be done consistent with the grading policies of three different institutions? 6. How can faculty from three universities collaborate effectively in a distributed global team?
This paper elaborates on these issues and how they have been addressed by the participating faculty from University of Michigan (UM), Technical University of Berlin (TUB) and Seoul
Kim, J., & Kim, D. M., & Consiglio, S., & Severengiz, S., & Seliger, G., & Patil, L., & Dutta, D. (2006, June), A Global Collaboration To Teach Global Product Development: Faculty Perspectives Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--355
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015