A Method Of Assessing Experimental Design In Mechanical Engineering Laboratories
- Conference
- Location
-
Austin, Texas
- Publication Date
-
June 14, 2009
- Start Date
-
June 14, 2009
- End Date
-
June 17, 2009
- ISSN
-
2153-5965
- Conference Session
- Tagged Division
-
Mechanical Engineering
- Page Count
-
13
- Page Numbers
-
14.52.1 - 14.52.13
- DOI
-
10.18260/1-2--5744
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/5744
- Download Count
-
1708
Paper Authors
Andre Butler Mercer University
Andre Butler is an associate professor of environmental and mechanical engineering at Mercer University. He earned the B.S.M.E. from the University of Illinois in mechanical engineering, the M.E. from Carnegie Mellon University in mechanical engineering and environmental management, and the Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology in environmental engineering. His research interests include pollutant measurement of the ambient atmosphere (ozone and particulate matter), air quality health effects, and design and development of particulate matter measurement instruments.
William Moses Mercer University
William Moses is an associate professor and former chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Mercer University. He earned the B.M.E. and M.S.M.E. in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and the Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. Prior to coming to Mercer, he held a faculty position in mechanical engineering at Texas A&M University. Research interests include experimental work in thermal contact conductance and thermal property measurement.
Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract
A Method of Assessment to Examine Experimental Design in Mechanical Engineering Laboratories
Students in the mechanical specialization at Mercer University are currently required to take two general mechanical engineering laboratory courses—one in the third year of the curriculum and the other in the fourth year. The first of these courses begins with seven or eight single period laboratories in which the students are directed to complete a well-defined set of procedures and perform simple analyses. In an effort to more formally introduce experimental design into the laboratory experience, this course ends with a three project sequence in which students are provided with an experimental objective (e.g., determine the coefficient of performance of a vapor-compression refrigeration system as a function of condenser pressure) and information regarding the function of an experimental apparatus. In two 3-hour lab periods, students are expected to independently develop and verify a procedure for accomplishing the objective, execute their procedure, and report the results. The purpose of the second course, the senior- level capstone laboratory experience, has always been to have students successfully design an experimental solution to more complex engineering problems, building upon the knowledge gained during the junior-level experience. The senior lab consists of only two experimental objectives, and students have seven weeks to define, execute, and conduct the series of experiments required to meet the objective. This laboratory structure has now been in place for about ten years and has been formally assessed for one and a half ABET cycles, including two ABET site visits. This paper has three main goals: (1) to present an overview of the current structure of these labs at Mercer University, (2) to examine details and results of the School of Engineering’s assessment scheme for demonstrating “an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data” when applied at the specialization level, and (3) to both quantitatively and qualitatively compare performance in the two lab courses to determine whether the junior-level experience is sufficient preparation for the senior-level experience.
Introduction
Laboratory experiences are an important component of mechanical engineering (ME) education. In lab courses, students learn to identify experimental objectives, apply basic measurement techniques, collect and evaluate data, and write technical reports. In addition, senior-level students often must design a set of experiments for achieving an open-ended research objective. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires that engineering programs demonstrate that their students attain eleven outcomes, including one that most specifically addresses laboratory courses1:
“Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain the following outcomes: . . . [including] an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data . . .”
At the Mercer University School of Engineering (MUSE), the mechanical engineering laboratory sequence consists of two courses. MAE 302L is a two-credit course that most students schedule
Butler, A., & Moses, W. (2009, June), A Method Of Assessing Experimental Design In Mechanical Engineering Laboratories Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--5744
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015