June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
Minorities in Engineering
24.84.1 - 24.84.26
A Philosophy of Learning Engineering and a Native American Philosophy of Learning; An Analysis for CongruencyThe quality of engineering is affected by diversity, for diversity is the pathway to the creativityneeded to solve the “wicked” socio-technical problems of the modern day. Underrepresentedgroups in engineering have been targeted by national reports on engineering and engineeringprograms to increase the minority groups’ entry to and retention in engineering. However, theNative American population remains one of the most severely underrepresented groups inengineering, and yet may offer a unique perspective to solving engineering problems due to adistinct Native worldview. A problem for students with a traditional Native worldview is thatmany report feeling alienated from science and engineering due to the universalist view in whichscience and engineering is often taught. Engineering programs must be developed to supportalternative ways of knowing through curriculum that is culturally responsive. The long-term goalof this study is to determine how a culturally-responsive engineering curriculum might bedeveloped for the Navajo K-12 classroom. A first step to this study is determining how learningwithin a Navajo framework might fit with the philosophy of learning engineering. The Navajoframework can be established through the Dine philosophy of learning, called the DineEducational Philosophy, which is the foundation for learning in Navajo K-12 and highereducation schools. Philosophies of learning are sets of beliefs and ideas about how learningshould take place. This includes ideas about what content should be learned, how students shouldlearn it, how the teacher should support learning, and so on. This paper represents an endeavor ofphilosophical inquiry, where the question of what is Navajo education is explored and howengineering education can compliment it is analyzed. Such an approach is key to critiquing themodes of education, identifying the overlap and core differences between the modes, and will beuseful to transform engineering education into a field that has strength through its access tocultural diversity.
Foster, C. H., & Jordan, S. S. (2014, June), A Philosophy of Learning Engineering and a Native American Philosophy of Learning; An Analysis for Congruency Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--19976
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015