June 12, 2005
June 12, 2005
June 15, 2005
10.79.1 - 10.79.16
A Reflexive Course for Masters Students to Understand and Plan Their Own Continuing Professional Development
Llewellyn Mann, David Radcliffe
Catalyst Centre for Society and Technology The University of Queensland Australia
Abstract Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is seen as a vital part of a professional engineer’s career, by professional engineering institutions as well as individual engineers. Factors such as ever-changing workforce requirements and rapid technological change have resulted in engineers no longer being able to rely just on the skills they learnt at university or can pick up on the job; they must undergo a structured professional development with clear objectives to develop further professional knowledge, values and skills. This paper presents a course developed for students undertaking a Master of Engineering or Master of Project Management at the University of Queensland. This course was specifically designed to help students plan their continuing professional development, while developing professional skills such as communication, ethical reasoning, critical judgement and the need for sustainable development. The course utilised a work integrated learning pedagogy applied within a formal learning environment, and followed the competency based chartered membership program of Engineers Australia, the peak professional body of engineers in Australia.
The course was developed and analysed using an action learning approach. The main research question was “Can extra teaching and learning activities be developed that will simulate workplace learning?” The students continually assessed and reflected upon their current competencies, skills and abilities, and planed for the future attainment of specific competencies which they identified as important to their future careers. Various evaluation methods, including surveys before and after the course, were used to evaluate the action learning intervention. It was found that the assessment developed for the course was one of the most important factors, not only in driving student learning, as is widely accepted, but also in changing the students’ understandings and acceptance of the need for continuous professional development. The students also felt that the knowledge, values and skills they developed would be beneficial for their future careers, as they were developed within the context of their own professional development, rather than to just get through the course.
Introduction Professional development is a major part of all practicing engineers’ working lives. It is vital to be up to date with best practice, learning new techniques and knowledge, developing new skills and furthering their understanding of their responsibilities as engineers. What engineers learn at university in their undergraduate program will not give them all the knowledge, values and skills they require to be practicing engineers in the future. Over the past ten years it has been recognised instead that universities need to develop students as lifelong learners, who continue their professional development not just for the first few years out of university, but for the rest of their working lives. While part of this continuing professional Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
Mann, L., & Radcliffe, D. (2005, June), A Reflexive Course For Masters Students To Understand And Plan Their Own Continuing Professional Development Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/14405
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015