Asee peer logo

A Shortage Of Technology Job Candidates And An Abundance Of Women In The Workplace: Why The Dilemma?

Download Paper |

Conference

2002 Annual Conference

Location

Montreal, Canada

Publication Date

June 16, 2002

Start Date

June 16, 2002

End Date

June 19, 2002

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education and Outreach

Page Count

7

Page Numbers

7.105.1 - 7.105.7

DOI

10.18260/1-2--10905

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/10905

Download Count

349

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Beverly Davis

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Main Menu Session #261

A Shortage of Technology Job Candidates and an Abundance of Women in the Workplace: Why the Dilemma?

Beverly Davis Purdue University

Abstract

Despite the feeling that women’s entrance into the workplace has been for the better, the economic status of women in the workplace remains lower than that of men (13). Recent evidence shows that the gender gap in earnings is increasing after a period of decline (13). This gap is partly due to workers in female- dominated occupations being paid lower average wages than workers in male-dominated occupations. J. A. Jacobs found that the most common explanation for occupational sex segregation is that women choose different occupations because they are socialized to prefer different types of work from men (10). Sex-role socialization plays a crucial role in the reproduction of gender inequality in the workplace (10). The American Association of University Women (AAUW) shared a recent study that concurred with these findings and found the girls they surveyed were not told directly they were not competent in technology and were not deterred from taking computer classes, however, they felt there were subtle messages that deterred them (1). And this disturbing trend continues through college and leads to the increasing gender gap in workplace earnings. The aforementioned AAUW study discovered when girls were asked to describe a person good with computers; a majority of those interviewed described a man. In a 1997 survey of 652 college-bound high school seniors in Silicon Valley, Boston and Austin, Texas, 50% of both male and female students said that the field of computer science was geared toward men (15). Yet, Prism (2000) recently reported that at least 800,000 Programming and Information Technology jobs could not be filled for lack of candidates (14). Unfortunately, the industry has failed to tap into 50% of the workforce: women. Prism reported that only about 20% of IT Professionals are women and in 1996-1997 only 33% of undergraduate degrees in computer and information sciences were awarded to women. Prism (2001) also reported that there are plenty of women in the general workforce, however, they do not have the technical skills to thrive in the new technology-driven economy (11). The article warned that facing this shortage of workers means the nation cannot remain competitive in the global marketplace. This topic will be explored in depth and suggestions and recommendations will be offered.

I. Women and the Workplace

Women have influenced workforce trends drastically in recent years. For example, in the United States, the labor force participation rate for women (i.e., the proportion of all adult women who were employed or seeking employment) increased from 43% in 1970 to 60% in 1998 (13). However, during the same period of time, the labor force participation rate for men decreased from 80% to 74%. As a result, the proportion of women in the labor force (i.e., the proportion of all adults employed or seeking employment who were women) increased from 38% in 1970 to 46% in 1998. There have been similar trends reported in other countries. And interestingly enough, 87% of women surveyed felt that the presence of women in the workplace has been a change for the better and 78% of men surveyed agreed (18). But where are women working today? And are they catching up economically with the men in the workplace?

Despite the feeling that women’s entrance into the workplace has been for the better, the economic status of women in the workplace remains lower than that of men (13). Recent evidence shows that the gender gap in earnings is increasing after a period of decline (13). This gap is partly due to workers in female- dominated occupations being paid lower average wages than workers in male-dominated occupations. The most common explanation for occupational sex segregation is that women choose different occupations because they are socialized to prefer different types of work from men (10). Girls who are encouraged to play with baby dolls and learn to take care of others may become elementary school teachers and nurses while boys who play with building blocks may become engineers (10). Author, J.A. Jacobs reported that occupational aspirations of young men and women are roughly as segregated as the occupational structure. Therefore, this author concludes, many believe that sex-role socialization plays a crucial role in the reproduction of gender inequality in the workplace (10).

Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002 American Society for Engineering Education

Main Menu

Davis, B. (2002, June), A Shortage Of Technology Job Candidates And An Abundance Of Women In The Workplace: Why The Dilemma? Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10905

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015