Asee peer logo

A Structured Assessment Framework For Teamwork

Download Paper |


2008 Annual Conference & Exposition


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008



Conference Session

ECE Pedagogy and Assessment II

Tagged Division

Electrical and Computer

Page Count


Page Numbers

13.111.1 - 13.111.15



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Suk Kim Chin Australian Catholic University

visit author page

Suk Kim Chin is a Lecturer in the Institute of Business and Informatics in the Australian Catholic University, Sydney. She graduated from the University of Technology (Sydney, NSW) with a PhD in Telecommunications Engineering and a Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Teaching and Learning in 2003. Her research interests include multicast technology, enterprise resource planning, and developing effective teaching models in engineering education.

visit author page

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

A Structured Assessment Framework for Teamwork


Anecdotal evidence from students shows that ACU undergraduates have difficulty managing their time due to various commitments and responsibility outside university. As such, this paper proposes a cooperative learning model which endeavors to help students utilize their time optimally in a first year programming course in MATLAB. Included in this model is a structured assessment framework, as well as teamwork training to facilitate effective teamwork strategy. This model also places emphasis on strong alignment of curriculum objectives to progressive assessment tasks.

To deploy this framework, a MATLAB programming project is designed to be just large enough for a group of 3 students to finish in one semester. To solve the problem of slow start with poor planning, the project is divided into six tasks; the first two are to initiate students individually into the project, as teams are to be formed only during the fourth week of semester. The remaining tasks are for when teams are formed. It is expected that by the time the teams are formed, each student is already familiar with the project and this is shown via continuous online discussions as well as written reports. Students who contribute more towards the project, evidenced by online discussions as well as CATME student peer evaluation results, are given bonus marks. It is anticipated that this framework can change the high achievers’ perception of teamwork; in normal teamwork environment, these high achievers feel that the poorer students waste their time. Also, the less talented students can be encouraged to participate strongly in the project, thus eliminating a significant number of “passengers”.

1. Introduction

“We need to work to support ourselves and we want a life, therefore time for study is scarce” depicts the typical full-time student characteristics in ACU, Australia. Part-time students, with ages varying between 25 and 50, have one or more of the following responsibilities: • a demanding job; • family; and • the need to improve their career potential. The scarcity of time for study is witnessed by the aforementioned student characterization and as such, it is desirable to design courses which consider the factors that have negative impact on students’ lives, given their various responsibilities outside university. There are three ways this can be achieved: 1. ensure coverage of course materials is not too heavy; 2. ensure alignment between teaching / learning activities, course curriculum, and assessment; and 3. make teamwork a prominent feature of the course.

Accordingly, this study proposes a framework to incorporate these options. In order to make teamwork a successful endeavor for students, teamwork training is included in the course

Chin, S. K. (2008, June), A Structured Assessment Framework For Teamwork Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3971

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015