June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
22.106.1 - 22.106.19
A Student-Centered Course for Integration of Ethics into aBiomedical Engineering Research Experience for Undergraduates A number of recent, well-publicized incidents of irresponsible conduct inbiomedical research emphasize the importance of training students in researchethics. In order to properly address ethical issues students must be trained incontemporary issues in research ethics and how to address these issues. While theimportance of research ethics is clear, the best way to develop students who canaddress complicated ethical issues is unclear. The goal of the work described here was to develop and assess a student-led course in research ethics developed for a 10-week summer BiomedicalEngineering Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program focused onbiomedical topics. By making the course student-led, the instructors created astudent-centered learning environment which increased the engagement of thestudents relative to the instructor-led course.Pedagogical Approach Undergraduates developed presentations and led the weekly ethicsinstruction and discussion. Upon completion of this course, students wereexpected to be able to discuss ethical issues in laboratory research and identifyproblems that can occur when research is conducted without adherence to ethicalguidelines and principles. Students were divided into groups of two and assigneda specific topic in research ethics. Topics covered included: Advisor/studentrelationships, Issues facing women and underrepresented groups, Record keeping,Intellectual Property, Conflicts of Interest, Bias, Authorship, Animal Studies, andHuman Trials. Students were required to discuss the topic with their researchadvisor, graduate student mentors, and experts in the Center for the Study ofEthics in the Professions. The students then gave a presentation and ledclassroom discussion based on their findings. The students were expected tointegrate their own research experiences into the presentation.Assessment Multiple sources of formative assessment were built into the course. Anethics case study was provided to the students prior to the beginning of thesemester. The case study requested student feedback first in narrative form andthen responses to specific questions designed to assess specific aspects of theirapproach to the problem. A post study case report was administered in the samefashion. A grading rubric has been developed to assess student performance onthe pre and post case studies. The rubric was developed based on the combinedinput of two engineering faculty members and two members of the CSEP. Pre-tests were developed by the students in conjunction with the faculty members andadministered prior to each lecture. The undergraduates also provided case studiesand questionnaires that were completed at the end of the course. The pre-testswere administered again upon completion of the course in order to assess learningin the specific topic areas.Outcomes Preliminary results indicate that this strategy significantly increasedincreased student engagement for the ethics portion of the REU program when itwas student-led relative to instructor-led. Preliminary analysis of the assessmenttools indicate significant improvement in student knowledge of many topics,including: ethical codes, IP, conflict of interest, authorship, and animal studies.These tests and case studies are being further analyzed to provide greater insightinto the success of the educational program.
Brey, E. M., & Laas, K., & Gatchell, D. W. (2011, June), A Student-Centered Course for Integration of Ethics into a Biomedical Engineering Research Experience for Undergraduates Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17388
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015