June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
11.138.1 - 11.138.15
A Valid and Reliable Survey Instrument for Measuring K-12 Teachers' Perceptions and Needs In Design, Engineering, and Technology
Increasing the number of technologically literate people through teaching design, engineering, and technology (DET) in K-12 classrooms is increasingly becoming a national goal. National Science Education Standards, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, and Standards for Technological Literacy list similar objectives related to DET education. While the need and objectives are clear, teachers’ familiarity and confidence in teaching DET concepts are not well known. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to develop an instrument that would identify K-12 teachers’ perceptions of, and needs for, DET. The survey results will provide insights and information for curriculum developers who want to bring engineering concepts into the K-12 curriculum. The instrument was developed by collaboration among people with backgrounds in science education, K-12 teaching, counseling, and engineering. The principal component analysis method was used to validate the instrument. This analysis revealed four factors defined as: 1) the importance of DET; 2) teachers’ familiarity with DET; 3) teachers’ perceptions of stereotypical characteristics of engineers; and 4) teachers’ perceptions of characteristics of engineers. The internal consistency reliability estimate for the survey was 0.88. The analysis of 98 teachers’ responses to these items indicated that: a) the importance of DET in the curriculum was stronger for female teachers as compared to male teachers, t ( 96) = 2.42, p < 0.05; b) elementary school teachers were least likely to teach DET in their curriculum as compared to middle school and high school teachers, F (2, 28.81) = 4.35, p < 0.05; and c) DET was more likely to be integrated into the science curriculum by teachers with moderate experience compared to teachers with little experience or extensive teaching experience, F (2, 85) = 2.86, p < 0.05. In addition, teachers were unfamiliar with DET, lacked confidence in their ability to teach DET, and held stereotypes about the skills needed to be an engineer. Implications of the results are discussed in terms of K-12 pre-service teacher preparation and in-service teacher professional development.
On one hand, technology plays an important role in many aspects of our daily lives. On the other hand, 75% of the public has a narrow view of technology and thinks of technology as computers, electronics, and the internet1. There is increasing interest in making technology education a priority in the K-12 curriculum1, 2. Bringing design, engineering, and technology (DET) into the K-12 curriculum requires long term planning, as many teachers are not trained to teach DET. DET is a neglected tool in science education in the U.S. despite the potential uses of DET to foster student interest in science and provide familiar and concrete contexts for abstract science and math concepts3,4. Therefore, the first step before implementing a DET curriculum is to investigate teachers’ familiarity, perceptions, and views of DET. It is also necessary to understand the barriers teachers might face when implementing DET in their classrooms.
Kurpius-Robinson, S., & Baker, D., & Krause, S., & Roberts, C. (2006, June), A Valid And Reliable Survey Instrument For Measuring K 12 Teachers' Perceptions And Needs On Design, Engineering, And Technology Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--651
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015