Asee peer logo

Accreditation Of Engineering Technology Associate Degree Programs

Download Paper |


2008 Annual Conference & Exposition


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008



Conference Session

Two Year College Tech Session II

Tagged Division

Two Year College Division

Page Count


Page Numbers

13.139.1 - 13.139.9



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Warren Hill Weber State University

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Accreditation of Engineering Technology Associate Degree Programs Abstract

This paper discusses the issues involved with the accreditation of associate degree programs in Engineering Technology, and in particular looks at the concept of having differentiated criteria for such programs. The current Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. criteria makes no distinction between associate degree and baccalaureate degree programs in the general criteria. The author would like to suggest some ways that the general criteria could be modified so as to have a different or modified set of criteria for associate degree programs as opposed to baccalaureate degree programs. This distinction becomes important in light of ABET being a signatory to the Sydney and Dublin accords which provide for the differences between and among technicians, technologists, and engineers.


For the past two years the Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. (TAC of ABET), the commission of ABET that accredits technology programs, has been discussing the development of differentiated accreditation criteria. The criteria for technology programs would be rewritten in such a way as to hold two year associate degree programs in technology to a different or modified set of criteria than would be applied to four year baccalaureate degree programs. The main impetus behind revising the criteria was the idea that two year programs simply cannot cover the same amount of material as four year programs and therefore should not be held to the same standards. This discussion takes on more importance because of ABET’s consideration of becoming a signatory to the Dublin and Sydney accords. These accords will be discussed further on in this paper.

By way of background, the author served on the Technology Accreditation Commission for five years as a commissioner and most recently has completed his second year as an at-large member of the Executive Committee of TAC of ABET. As such, he has been directly involved with the discussions regarding the development of differentiated criteria and has supported efforts to develop such criteria.

The concept of differentiated criteria is not new to ABET. The Applied Science Accreditation Commission (ASAC) of ABET, Inc. has had differentiated criteria for many years. ASAC accredits programs in safety, industrial hygiene, health physics, environmental health & safety, industrial or quality management, and surveying or geomatics. The way in which ASAC makes the distinction between associate degree and baccalaureate degree programs will also be discussed later in this paper.

In reviewing the 2008-2009 TAC of ABET criteria1 for technology programs, it became clear that there were at least two of the nine general criteria that would have to be modified if there were to be a viable differentiation between two year and four year degree programs. It was apparent to both the TAC Criteria Committee and the TAC Executive Committee that Criterion 3 which deals with program outcomes a-k, and Criterion 5 which deals with curriculum, would need to be changed. It also appeared that the remaining six general criteria could pretty much

Hill, W. (2008, June), Accreditation Of Engineering Technology Associate Degree Programs Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3732

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015