June 23, 2013
June 23, 2013
June 26, 2013
Educational Research and Methods
23.138.1 - 23.138.9
Active Learning Requires Learning - Not Just ActivityDoes the use of active learning exercises in a traditional classroom tend to yield better studentoutcomes because of the learning value of the exercises, or because the students simply “wakeup” and become energized? To explore this question, we compared undergraduateengineering/science students’ retention of information presented in four different contexts, allwithin a standard lecture classroom setting: one in which the information was presented and thenimmediately reiterated during short active learning exercises (“mentally-active breaks”); one inwhich the information was presented immediately after a short session involving light physicalactivity (“physically-active breaks”) that did not reiterate any information; one in which theinformation of interest was presented immediately after a mentally-active break that focused onanother topic; and one in the absence of any breaks from the lecture. We created these contextsusing the same pre-recorded lecture (with pauses to direct breaks as needed) followedimmediately by the same information recall test in three groups of students. Twenty-threestudents participated in three mentally-active breaks during a class period, twelve participated inthree physically-active breaks during a class period, and nine watched the lecture with no breaks.We found that in the latter two of the three breaks, the mentally-active break that reiteratedinformation significantly increased student recall of that information, compared to the recall ofstudents in the group who took no breaks and to the recall of students who participated inphysically-active breaks (break 1: p = 0.785, F= 0.24; break 2: p < 0.001, F = 12.7; break 3: p <0.001, F = 19.3). However, students who participated in mentally-active breaks did not exhibitsignificantly better recall of the information presented immediately after such breaks (when, intheory, students should still have been relatively mentally alert). Additionally, students whoparticipated in physically-active breaks showed no significant difference in the recall of theinformation presented immediately after those breaks (when, in theory, students should still havebeen relatively energized/alert), compared to the recall of students who took no breaks during thelecture. Within the limitations of the small sample size of our investigation, these data suggestthat student learning is more strongly influenced by the pedagogical design or learning value ofactive learning exercises, rather than by becoming more alert or energized.
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015