June 26, 2011
June 26, 2011
June 29, 2011
22.141.1 - 22.141.27
Addressing Professional Practice Issues within the CurriculumMany programs struggle with how to accomplish all that is required in the current Bodyof Knowledge (BOK) while constantly facing state-mandated decreasing credit hours.Some programs are already beginning to investigate how to possibly add additionaloutcomes listed under the new BOK II document knowing that some of those outcomeswill migrate eventually into the ABET CE program criteria. How to do more with less(people, time, and resources) is a common theme on many campuses across the countryespecially with the current economic crisis. If these challenges are not enough to worryabout, many programs are faced with the challenge of limited to no coverage within thecurriculum of professional practice issues facing current graduates. This paper willprovide a methodology that one civil engineering program is using to addressprofessional practice issues within the curriculum.This paper will present the program’s current capstone course, the new senior levelcourse, and adjustments to other courses in the curriculum that provide coverage ofprofessional practice issues such as leadership. business practices, public policy andadministration, asset management , ethics, contemporary issues, constructability,solutions within a global and societal context). Through the sequencing of events andassessments of 10, 35, 100 percent submittals within the capstone as well as assignmentswithin other courses, students are required to demonstrate their abilities associated withprofessional practice issues. This type of assessment of the capstone along side ofselected embedded indicators in other courses and associated survey data provides a clearpicture of the actual demonstrated performance of professional practice outcomes bystudents. A number of embedded indicator assessment methods for capstone experienceswere assessed, evaluated and combined to build the resulting accumulation of rubricresults from each submittal to allow the program to determine if the students within ateam and the entire group of students have achieved the proper level of demonstration ofan outcome by performance level and percentage of overall grade.The process, rubrics, data collected over four cycles, assessment of the results andchanges instituted will be presented. The program results of the most recent ABET visitwill be presented as well as how the use of the embedded indicators in courses and thecapstone rubrics were viewed by the program evaluator and effected the overall programresults.
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015