New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Diversity and NSF Grantees Poster Session
With the two year sponsorship from NSF between Fall 2012 and Spring 2014, an interdisciplinary research collaboration was formed between the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology (ECST) and the Charter College of Education (CCOE) at California State University Los Angeles. Through this partnership, a pilot research was conducted to investigate how students from traditionally underrepresented minority groups respond to the pedagogical components in Collaborative Project-based Learning (CPBL) in a senior engineering course. The investigation yielded interesting results that allowed us to better understand the learning characteristics of minority students in CPBL environments. These findings also laid a solid foundation to improve the course components so as to better address the learning needs of minority students. Subsequently, we re-examined the pedagogical model and enhance the instructional system based on the four building blocks of cognitive apprenticeship: content, method, sequence, and sociology (Collins, Brown, & Holum, 1991). Our redesign effort incorporated an innovative instructional design process using a strategy known as participatory design. The redesigned course was offered in Spring 2014 and Spring 2015, where multiple forms of data were collected to evaluate the effectiveness of the course redesign. Grounded in situated learning framework, the results of these studies highlighted several critical factors that positively impacted students' motivation which leads to a better retention rate.
The ground work completed through the interdisciplinary collaboration was productive with several milestone tasks completed, including an established participatory design process, the creation and piloting of a learning strategy website, and the development and validation of research instruments and protocols based on the situated learning framework. Over the past three years, we conducted a series of single-case studies and collected multiple forms of data, which allowed us to engage in in-depth exploration and analysis of the impact of CPBL and participatory design on different student groups in senior-level engineering classes. With the central purpose to increase minority students’ success in engineering, the goal of this paper is to present the findings based on our collective, multiple-case analysis. This analysis focuses on (a) course related knowledge and skill outcomes, (b) domain-specific efficacy in relation to situated learning, and (c) student engagement (deep vs. surface learning) and team dynamics. The data collected over the past three years will be analyzed collectively, triangulated, and related to relevant research and theories. This process allows us to work toward: (1) providing a more generalizable description of our overall findings, (2) gaining a greater understanding of the underlying classroom and course factors and their impact on the development of domain-specific efficacy among minority students, and (3) developing a set of guidelines to effectively incorporate participatory design based on the situated learning framework. The significance of the work presented in this paper highlights the need to accelerate current research on using participatory design as a means to empower minority students in engineering and technology related disciplines.
Hernandez, A., & Chen, P., & Clemmons, C. C., & Dong, J. (2016, June), Addressing the Learning Needs of Minority Students in Engineering through Participatory Design Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26526
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015