Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 7 results

Incorporating a Unique Lean Six Sigma Learning Experience by Integrating Graduate and Undergraduate Students Across Two Lean Six Sigma Courses in the Engineering Technology and Engineering Management Curriculum

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yooneun Lee, University of Dayton; Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
specificskillsets and experience were considered. Topic assigned to the project teams and composition of groupsare summarized in Table 1 below:Table 1 Lean Six Sigma Project Teams Topic Team Section A Team Section B # # 1. UD New Employee On-Boarding A1 5 UG (1 FR, 1 JR, 3 SR) B1 2 UG (1 JR, 1 SR) + 3 GR Process 2. County Juvenile Court Mentoring A2 5 UG (1 SO, 2 JR, 2 SR) B2 1 UG (1 SR) + 4 GR Program Mentor Recruitment 3. University Bookstore Order A3 5 UG (1 JR, 4 SR) B3 2 UG (2 SR) + 3 GR
Relevance Score: 0.20865749

Using a Deming Lens to Investigate and Solve Managerial Challenges

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mustafa Shraim, Ohio University; Kelly Allan, Kelly Allan Associates, Ltd.
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Paper ID #32879Using a Deming Lens to Investigate and Solve Managerial ChallengesDr. Mustafa Shraim, Ohio University Dr. Mustafa Shraim is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology & Man- agement at Ohio University in Athens, Ohio. He received both of his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Ohio University in 1986 and 1989, respectively. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from West Virginia University in 1996. Dr. Shraim’s research interests are in the area of quality engineering. Specifically, they cover Lean / Quality methods and including incorporating experimental design to
Relevance Score: 0.17100124

Administering an Asynchronous Professional Master’s Degree: Effective Strategies for Design, Delivery, and Engagement

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Yaoling Wang, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
environment for the students.Once course development is completed, the ID will conduct a comprehensive syllabus andcourse review. Two rubrics (Appendix B and C) are used to support this endeavor. After thereview process, the SME will make some improvements by adopting the recommendationsprovided in the review forms. Once the SME has implemented recommendations by the ID, theMEM Director conducts a course review and provides recommendations to the faculty member.The entire process starts approximately 6 to 8 months prior to first day of class and concludesapproximately 2 weeks prior to first day of class to allow the instructor ample time to implementall recommendations before publishing the course in Canvas.Lower attrition rates are expected when
Relevance Score: 0.02650582

Strategic Design of an Introductory Engineering Management Course for Active and Flexible Hybrid Delivery

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kellie Grasman, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Suzanna Long, Missouri University of Science and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Paper ID #32944Strategic Design of an Introductory Engineering Management Course forActive and Flexible Hybrid DeliveryKellie Grasman, Missouri University of Science and Technology Kellie Grasman serves as an instructor in Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She holds graduate degrees in engineering and business admin- istration from the University of Michigan, and began teaching in 2001 after spending several years in industry positions. She was named the 2011-2012 Robert B. Koplar Professor of Engineering Manage- ment for her achievements in online learning
Relevance Score: 0.025569288

Transforming Curriculum to Improve STEM Learning and Advance Career Readiness

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University; Anna Sadovnikova, Monmouth University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Paper ID #34558Transforming Curriculum to Improve STEM Learning and Advance CareerReadinessDr. Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University Dr. Ekaterina Koromyslova is an Assistant Professor in Operations Management. She teaches several courses, including Operations and Supply Chain Management, Engineering Economic Analysis, and De- cision Making in Management. She has several years of industry experience as an analyst-consultant for manufacturing companies and as a leading manager in supply chain and logistics. Her research inter- ests are in engineering education, including learner-centered teaching strategies
Relevance Score: 0.0254654

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Project Management Curriculum: Exploration and Application to Time, Cost, and Risk

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ben D. Radhakrishnan, National University; James Jay Jaurez, National University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
techniques have been developed and in use now by many standard tools.One important method used in scheduling is the PERT technique (Program Evaluation andReview Technique) which uses probabilistic activity time estimates of all tasks in a project.PERT uses the flexible beta distribution technique (as opposed to a normal distribution) for thethree levels of estimation for each task which is generally asymmetrical. The three levels ofestimation for each task are noted as follows: optimistic time estimate (‘a’), pessimistic timeestimate (‘b’), and the most likely time estimate or mode (‘m’). The project is addressing tominimize the risk associated with each task completion with three estimates and estimates thebest possible completion time using beta
Relevance Score: 0.025215946

Managing Polarities: Perception of Value, Designer Roles, and Organizational Conditions that Influence Design Outcomes in Mechanical Engineering

Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Minha R. Ha, York University; Aleksander Czekanski , CEEA-ACEG
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
captured in this paper. We also acknowledge the financial support for thelarger study by Quanser, National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), andOntario Graduate Scholarships program.References[1] B. Johnson, “Reflections: A Perspective on Paradox and Its Application to Modern Management,” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 206–212, 2014.[2] W. K. Smith and M. W. Lewis, “Toward a Theory of Paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 381–403, 2011.[3] G. Calabresi, The Future of Law & Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.[4] H. Nowotny, P. Scott, and M. Gibbons, Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the public in an age of
Relevance Score: 0.022068046