Paper ID #34086IoT Environmental-monitoring System Development for Mosquito ResearchThrough Capstone Project Integration in Engineering TechnologyDr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2017, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011
. 22, no. 2, pp. 72-86, 2020.[4] A. Mehrabian, W. W. Buchanan, and A. Rahrooh, "Innovation is the name of the game: A case study of an online course in engineering and technology," in Proceedings 2014 ASEE Gulf-southwest section conference, 2014.[5] R. A. Machado, P. R. F. Bonan, D. E. d. C. Perez, and H. Martelli JÚnior, "COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on dental education: discussing current and future perspectives," Brazilian oral research, vol. 34, 2020.[6] P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, and M. A. Feder, Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2009.[7] M. Brown, "The effects of informal learning environments on
for Industrial Distribution Students. That course ex- plains different concepts in materials and manufacturing. Dr. Obeidat’s research focuses on inspection of machined surfaces using Coordinate machines (CMM). Dr. Obeidat works on Additive manufacturing of composite materials and nanoparticles. Dr. Obeidat is a reviewer for different journals in manufacturing and measurement. He has written more than 12 journal articles. Recently two papers have been published in journal of composites part B and journal of manufacturing processes. Three conference papers have been published in NAMRC 46 conference, which was held in June 2018 at Texas A&M University. An- other conference paper has been published also in
-workforce.[10] A. Doucet, J. Evers, E. Guerra, N. Lopez, M. Soskil, and K. Timmers, Teaching in the fourth industrial revolution: Standing at the precipice. Routledge, 2018.[11] C. B. Frey and M. A. Osborne, "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological forecasting and social change, vol. 114, pp. 254-280, 2017.[12] R. Morrar, H. Arman, and S. Mousa, "The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective," Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 12-20, 2017.[13] S. G. Cort, "Industry corner: industrial distribution: how goods will go to market in the electronic marketplace," Business Economics, pp. 53-55, 1999.[14] E. National
Engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University in 1986. Mr. Jones also earned the M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University in 1990. In addition, Mr. Jones graduated from the General Electric Advanced Course (A, B, and C courses) in Engineering as part of the Edison Engineering Program in 1989. Mr. Jones is a Licensed Professional Engineer, PE 054155E, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Mr. Jones began his engineering career in 1986 with General Electric Company in Erie, Pennsylvania. Subsequent to that time he worked for Morrison Knudsen Co. in Boise, ID, and Atchison Steel Castings Co. in Atchison, KS. He
software which allows storing the data which facilitates datasorting and analysis. Figure 7 shows an example of the data being plugged into a laptop while thecar under testing.Figure 5. Final revision of the 3D printed ground effect structure painted and installed on the scaled F1 car (a) side view and (b) rear view Figure 6. Model car tested inside the testing chamber with force sensors being installed underneath the car and behind it to measure the down and drag forces respectively Figure 7. Forces being recorded and saved into the laptopA total of 241 tests were conducted for each case. Samples of the recorded data for the down anddrag forces
our students: A Longitudinal‐Study of success and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 263-274. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00935.x[13] Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C. E., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 151-163. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00162.x[14] Geisinger, B. N., & Raman, D. R. (2013). Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications, 607. Retrieved from https
integration in south texas technical colleges,” in American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. [5] R. Radharamanan and H. E. Jenkins, “Laboratory learning modules on cad/cam and robotics in engineering education,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 433–443, 2008. [6] R. Jerz and G. Fischer, “Experiences in designing a design for manufacturing (dfm) course,” age, vol. 10, p. 1, 2005. [7] “Home.” [8] B. R. Belland, Instructional scaffolding in STEM education: Strategies and efficacy evidence. Springer Nature, 2017. [9] B. J. Reiser, “Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student
data indicates that 78.2% of students attempted a different major prior to requesting a change of curriculum to engineering technology. Anecdotal information indicates that students made this change for two primary reasons. These include a) realizing their interests were more compatible with the less theoretical, more applications-oriented education afforded by an engineering technology degree; b) being required to change majors by their original department. In both cases, this often resulted in non-transferrable credit hours representing lost time and added financial burden. In the latter case, there was also often negative and long-lasting impacts on grade point as well as the emotional toll associated
attendance and participation (Att&P), assignmentsand quizzes (A&Q), two term exams & a comprehensive final exam (E), group project (P). Forfall 2019 online: Att&P 10%, A&Q 30%, E 45%, and P 15%.b. Challenges encountered by the instructors:The three instructors individually detailed the challenges they encountered in developing theircourses and teaching them. These are listed in Table 1 under the detailed list in the secondcolumn. Then these challenges were analyzed, organized, and grouped to form the first columnwith combined topics on identified challenges that were used to develop the rubric for allcomparisons. For example, the first row has many challenges that could all be combined underthe challenges on the left. And the
, and the worker can no longer come in contact with them. The bottom of the grinding belt can no longer be accessed while the machine is in operation. Figure 2a: Machine guard with mesh sieve at Figure 2 b: Machine guard with adjustable the bottom frameAnother group proposed a similar concept, which they considered ergonomic. It includes an adjustableframe adjusted by wing nuts and one bolt for securing the machine (figure 2b). Making the guard adaptableallows the operator to set the exact amount of belt he or she needs to be exposed, ultimately reducing thework envelope and reducing the contact with the belt. Using wingnuts allows the operator to make
applications. The PAC supports several communication protocols,such as serial communications via RS-232, RS-485 and USB; IP-based Ethernet communication;WiFi wireless; and communication via 5G cellular also is expected to be added to its futuregeneration. (a) Connected AMAX-5580 unit in (b) AMAX-5580 with EtherCat modules experiment (Courtesy of Advantech Co. Ltd.)Figure 2. AMAX-5580 PAC was used in this project as the substitute for the robot arm controller and network interfaceAMAX-5580 collects the most recent data from the online database over the cloud-based IoT inorder to adjust the speed of move of the robot arm. For this experiment, MECA-500 robot
) on students’ design abilities, we use the final design project since Spring 2019.Assessment of Program Criterion Indicators via Two Laboratory AssignmentsAs mentioned before, the indicators used to evaluate the Program Criteria include: 1) Constructing a 3D model of a mechanical part. 2) Using knowledge of statics and strength of materials to determine stresses in a component of an electromechanical system. 3) Using knowledge of engineering materials to select appropriate materials for the construction of a prototype electromechanical system. (a) I-Beam (b) Hub Figure 1: The I-Beam and Hub labs used for assessment of Program Criteria Indicators.Two lab assignments
easy solution. While the jobs are available andpossess an enjoyable challenge, the entry level wage may be a barrier to entry for many youngpeople who are looking to start a family and gain their independence. Of course, as demandincreases for qualified machinists, the wages will most likely increase to attract more employees.Based on these results, companies and educators need to work together to recruit more youngpeople, who are preparing for college, to choose a career as a machinist. REFERENCES[1] National Association of Manufacturers, "Manufacturers' Outlook Survey 2020 1st Quarter," 18 March 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nam.org/manufacturers-outlook-survey/.[2] C. Giffi, J. McNelly, B
program that was developed for the trainer utilizes different programming software acrosstwo microcontrollers. Most importantly, the Arduino Leonardo Microcontroller board [14] isused as the primary controller of the device, reading data from the sensor and user inputcomponents and sending a digital control signal to the fan [11]. Figure 5 describes the generalexecution of the developed code. Figure 5. Microcontroller Program Flow DiagramFirst the Arduino reads the ball’s position from the VL53L0X sensor [10] and sends that data tothe Raspberry Pi 4 4GB Model B [15] via a serial transmission. Then the Arduino reads the userP, I and D status switches (each switch has corresponding on/off control over the correspondingPID
mentoring partnerships; and Characteristics of both the mentors and mentees. Another consideration in the degree of formality is the extent to which guidelines for the mentorship roles are outlined, including relationship goals, how and when to interact in the mentorship, and a prearranged length for the mentoring relationship. b. Tie strength: Intended closeness of the mentoring relationship. [30] The concept of tie strength can be used to define how close a mentoring relationship is, i.e. strongly or weakly tied. Typically formal faculty-student relationships evolve to strongly tied relationships, but ultimately it is a function of breadth, intensity, and duration of interactions. c
programming structures using the roboticconstructions LEGO Mindstorms", Tzimogiannis A., Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference,Teaching Informatics, University of Peloponnese.7. Eslami, A., "A remote-access robotics and PLC laboratory for distance learning program", Proceedingsof ASEE AC 2009-1410.8. International Federation of Robotics (http://www.ifr.org).9. Jones, T., "Trends and Motivations for Robot Purchases", www.robotics.org, 200610. Morey, B. "Robotics Seeks Its Role in Aerospace", Manufacturing Engineering. Vol. 139 No. 4.,2007.11. Ciaraldi, M., "Designing an undergraduate robotics engineering curriculum: unified robotics I andII", Proceedings of ASEE AC 2009-1161.12. Nieves, E., "Robots: More Capable, Still Flexible", Manufacturing
Lego robotics platform provided a solid rudimentary introduction to robotics topics. Others stated difficulties relating them to industrial robotics. Examples include: o Student A: “I got a good groundwork of how robots work in the industrial world; however, I don't believe I am knowledgeable enough to work in industrial robotics as of yet.” o Student B: “I feel there is so much to learn left. I feel that I know enough to play with Atlas Robotics hardware and figure it out.” Several students commented on the complexity of programming in LabVIEW as well as difficulty with mathematical models. Examples include: o
) (Total 6) Face to Face Hybrid Online Face to Face Hybrid Online (a) (b) 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20
Paper ID #34239Comparing the Effects of COVID-19 on ETAC and EAC Programs at a Re-gionalComprehensive UniversityDr. Andrew Ritenour, Western Carolina University Andrew Ritenour is currently an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering + Technology at West- ern Carolina University (WCU). Prior to joining WCU in 2018, he spent a decade in industry managing and developing innovative technologies across a broad spectrum of applications: high voltage transistors for energy-efficient power conversion, radio frequency (RF) surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters for mo- bile phones, and flexible paper-like displays for e
Paper ID #34108Solar Energy Certificate for Engineering Technology StudentsDr. Jesus A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Jesus Gonzalez is currently a lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering of the College of Engineering and Computer Science. He holds a PhD from The University of Sheffield in United Kingdom in Materials Science and Engineering. During the PhD, he received the Foster Research Prize given to the best PhD thesis related to glass technology. His research interest is in the mechanical properties of glass at room and high temperature. Dr. Gonzalez has
of malfunction since the material is notas sturdy as other materials. (a) (b) (c) Figure 6. Initial hand-drawn engineering design options for proposed prosthetics (a) spring attached, (b) various damping attachments, (c) a detailed 3D-printed prosthetic cutawayConstruction Phases of the both projectsLadder Activity BoardThe top, bottom, and sides of the board are constructed by plywood. The wood glue was used tohold the board together. The spray paint was used to finish the painting of the board. A 4’x4’CNC mill was planned to be used to precisely cut the board in the production lab. Instead,students used a laser cutter after learning how to convert an AutoCAD
cleartrends for the study.MethodsDuring the academic year, students were assigned various tasks to complete per week (AppendixA1 and 2). Group “A”, comprised of 9 students, worked on a project to build a moving devicewhich would be tested for dynamic performance, while Group “B”, comprised of 7 students,worked on building a structure to be tested for load-bearing performance.Students reported their previous week’s results using an individual-based Project Status Report(PSR), in which they also enter the time spent on all of the previous week’s tasks. The number oftasks to perform and points to be earned varied by week, and therefore a weekly percentile scorewas determined to be compared against the reported work time for that week.At the end of each
program and is impacted by the lack of accessibility on this technology." It is intended to be a "Plan B" that is created and then brought out when needed. The Plan does not require the person to have an identical experience but should offer an experience that can provide a similar body of knowledge and learning opportunities as that gained by people who do not have the affected disabilities. It is usually created at the time that the technology is acquired and is a core part of the University purchasing process. There is no one way to write an EEAAP. Each situation is different, and when put in to use for a specific person will be different. The EEAAP should be a general idea of what to do to work
thick infill of 3D-filament. The main components of the frame areshown in isometric view in Figure 4a in which both pillow blocks are included to support therotating shaft of the main servo motor running the system. There is also one sprocket included toattach to the links providing the rotating force necessary to drive the links forward. Figure 4bdepicts isometric view of the robotic arm built by all 3D-printed material. Figure 4. Isometric view of miscellaneous parts (a) and Robotic arm (b).Students in the senior design classes are required to prepare, report, and follow detailed Gantt Charts fortheir project implementations. The Gantt Chart of the project is shown in Figure 5 starting with projectproposal prepared earlier in
adjust to the distance learning mode include: a) decomposition of the course context into three modules and clear specification of the corresponding learning objectives of each module; b) combination of different technologies to create friendly and inclusive learning environment; c) frequent assessment of students' performance via online quizzes/tests; and d) carefully- designed laboratory assignments via MATLAB simulations that are able to demonstrate the entire feedback control process. A comparison of students' performance under the traditional face-to-face learning mode and the new distance learning mode is conducted. Based on assessment results, we will evaluate the effectiveness of our current teaching methodology/plan developed
traffic lanes, a pedestrian sidewalk, and safety barriers, with an overallwidth of 37’-6”. The traffic is along one direction from south to north.In this capstone project, the students are required to the following: a) Form groups: The students formed two groups of five individuals. The groups started a logbook to annotate each activity during the semester. b) Visit the site: The students observed the superstructure consisting in steel supports, steel beams, slabs, and protection railing. Also, part of the substructure (concrete beams and columns) can be observed. The bridge is close to the university campus and has safe access, allowing observation to verify and understand existing drawings. c) Employ computer assisted
price. The department bought the necessary number of DAQ boxes beforeclasses commence in the fall semester. Each student is required to buy the hardware for the classwith substantial discounts provided by the University. The sensors, actuators, and other requiredhardware is provided by the University for each student in class as required. In Fall 2020, duringthe pandemic, a local vendor was used to create a kit that was also bought by the students andwas subsequently used in Spring 2021. Appendix B lists the items that were included in this kit.Each class is broken down into two one-hour blocks. Depending on the topic most classes beginwith an introduction to a new topic in the first hour, followed by implementing LV and isgenerally then
Information Systems Initial Course," in IEEE Frontiers of Educations, Indianapolis, IN, 2017.[7] J. Garcia and J. Lumkes, "“Design of a low-cost water/air hydraulic trainer and curriculum for K-12."," SAE International , 2009.[8] F. Breidi, T. Helmus and J. Lumkes, "Development of a Portable Pneumatic Educational Tool for STEM Education," 53rd National Conference on Fluid Power, Las Vegas, NV, 2014.[9] K. Pate, J. Marx and F. Breidi, "Design of a Transparent Hydraulic/Pneumatic Excavator Arm for Teaching and Outreach Opportunities," in American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[10] C. J Zorro-Mendoza, J. Leon-Quiroga, B. Newell and J. Garcia, "Electro-Hydraulic Excavator 2.2: Teaching Fundamental
-winning outreach activities, teaching, and learning in the technical environment andsuccess in teaching in the online environment, and volunteering with kids of all ages. Drawingon that expertise, they were able to address the following questions through programdevelopment and execution. 1. What demographic would benefit most from a virtual STEM camp program? a. How do you interact with participants using similar materials and a range of ages? b. How do you engage with these students who may be experiencing video burnout? c. What timing works best to achieve the goal of fun but an educational program? 2. How does the program timing affect the impact of the material and engagement?MethodsOne hundred fifty participants from