Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 5 results

WIP: Engaging Software Engineering Students in Synchronous and Asynchronous On-line Course

Conference Session
Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan - Dearborn; Thomas Limbaugh, University of Michigan - Dearborn
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division
willing to meet with instructors outside ofclass9. Krause writes that engagement does not guarantee learning is taking place, but learningcan be enhanced if it provides students with opportunities to reflect on their learning activities10.In our project, students were encouraged to reflect on the lessons learned from the activitieseither in writing or in a class postmortem discussion.There is consensus among members of our department’s professional advisory board thatprofessional practice invariably requires strong verbal and written communication skills. Todevelop their oral communications skills, students need opportunities to present their work aswell as observe their peers doing the same. Some instructors believe that the project
Relevance Score: 0.025700955

Teaching Software Quality Assurance (SQA) During COVID-19 Using the HyFlex Approach -- Course Design, Results, and Experiences

Conference Session
Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tamaike Brown, State University of New York at Oswego; Bastian Tenbergen, State University of New York at Oswego
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division
categories,namely: ten learning journal entries to include reflections on the content learned in the lectures,ten lab journal entries to include reflections on the practical activities, three quizzes with multiplechoice/true-false questions, and two assignments to be completed in groups of up to three students.Evaluation was conducted on teaching components according to student participation and theirquantitative and qualitative feedback. The result of the study shows that students were appreciativeof the HyFlex mode delivered [6]. In another study conducted by Sowell et al., implemented HyFlex in a general electivenutritional course consisting of over 500 hundred students. The nutritional course provides abreadth of knowledge inScience &
Relevance Score: 0.012850477

Using Agile and Active Learning in Software Development Curriculum

Conference Session
Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ben Tribelhorn, University of Portland; Andrew M. Nuxoll, University of Portland
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division
decisions. • Students will increase their ability to identify and evaluate sources of information. • Students will learn and apply the software development lifecycle. • Students will learn real world development technologies. • Students will use Agile development practices. • Students will reflect on professionalism in software development. • Students will increase their ability to work in teams and communicate technical information.Course DesignScrum Roles: The biggest modification of Scrum in the classroom is the application of the threeroles: product owner, Scrum master, and development team. Naturally, the student teamscomprise the development team, however there are many methods to assign product
Relevance Score: 0.011612927

Evaluating a Software Project Management Course Collaboration Framework at a Second Institution

Conference Session
Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Stefan Christov, Quinnipiac University; James Walker, Michigan Technological University; Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division
Final Exam Review In-Class team meeting minutes, performance evaluations of team members, course reflection paper Table 2: Software Project Management Course Comparison during Fall 2020Students are then randomly assigned to teams of 4-5 members and propose software developmentprojects to work on, subject to the instructor’s approval. The next eight weeks are spent workingon these projects, divided into four two-week sprints, giving demonstrations and submittingreports at the end of each sprint. Projects are required to use revision control and include a robusttesting plan. During the final week, each team gives a 30-minute demonstration and presentationof their project and the course of its development for the
Relevance Score: 0.007662544

Experiences of Teaching Software Testing in an Undergraduate Class Using Different Approaches for the Group Projects

Conference Session
Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ingrid Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division
STEM Education (IUSE) program under Award Numbers DUE-1562773 and DUE-1525112. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authorswould like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful and encouraging feedback on improving thepaper.References [1] C. Ebert and S. Counsell, “Toward software technology 2050,” IEEE Software, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 82–88, 2017. [2] H. Krasner, “The cost of poor quality software in the us: A 2018 report,” Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ), September 2018, https://cra.org/data/Generation-CS/ (retrieved August, 2020). [3] R. Florea and V. Stray, “A global view on the hard skills
Relevance Score: 0.00478909