Displaying all 13 results
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Y. Curtis Wang, California State University, Los Angeles; Jim Kuo, California State University, Los Angeles; He Shen, California State University, Los Angeles; David E. Raymond, California State University, Los Angeles; Mathias J. Brieu, California State University, Los Angeles
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
theclass. The quantitative parameter identified to be the most closely related to this criterion was therate of success of students in the subsequent courses following statics (e.g., strength of materials,dynamics).Step 2: AnalysisA root-cause analysis was subsequently undertaken once the two quantitative criteria wereidentified. This analysis led to the following conclusions: 1. The high non-completion rate is likely linked to: a. The pace of the course, which may not correspond to the preparedness of the students entering the course. b. Inconsistencies in the grading practices of instructors teaching the course. c. Instructor-centric pedagogies. 2. The inadequacies of students’ statics knowledge and
- Conference Session
- Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Sayyad Zahid Qamar, Sultan Qaboos University; Ramanathan Arunachalam, Sultan Qaboos University; Sayyad Basim Qamar, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
]. ABET describes student outcomes as a collection of skills that engineering graduates mustpossess for success in the professional field. ABET has recently shifted from the earlier (a) to (k)scheme to a new (1) to (7) classification of student outcomes. However, this paper follows theprevious scheme, as the new one is still in a state of flux in terms of adaptation. Targeting moreaccurate and meaningful assessment, the Mechanical Engineering faculty at our department helda long series of deliberations, and sub-divided the ABET students outcomes (SOs) intoperformance indicators (PIs). For example, ABET SO (b) “an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data” was divided into three PIs: (b1) “ability todesign
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE)
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #33124Engineering in Videogames: A Case Study of Iconoclasts Narrative andInteractive Portrayal of EngineersDr. Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE) Corey Schimpf is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo with interest in engineering design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. One major strand of his work focuses on analyzing how expertise develops in engineering design across the continuum from novice pre-college students to practicing en- gineers. Another
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
definitions, general criterion 3 student outcomes, and general criterion 5 curriculum,” 2015.[3] B. Seely, “‘Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay,’” in Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, Washington D.C.: National Academcy Press, 2005, pp. 114–130.[4] M. S. Schiro, Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012.[5] E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students. 2005.[6] A. Akera, D. M. Riley, R. A. Cheville, J. Karlin, and T. A. DePree, “The Distributed System of Governance in Engineering Education: A Report on Initial Findings,” in Proc. of the Amer. Soc
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
different reasons. At one end of thespectrum will be issues for the taxpayer and investors: at the other end will be thoseimmediately affected by the failure such as the injured or bereaved. In the case of B737 Maxdisasters there will be millions who through no fault of their own will have to fly on B 737Max aircraft, and some will be afraid. Since the primary purpose of an inquiry, unlessotherwise stated, is to make recommendations that ensure that such accidents do not occuragain, there is an obligation on society to ensure that its citizens are in a position to verify theveracity of what is recommended. Here, that skill is called “technological competence” thesuccessful exercise of which is to be technologically literate. In this sense
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University; Darin R. Stephenson, Hope College
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
differentapproaches to algorithmic evaluation display trends comparable to by-hand assessment by aninstructor. Given that the software used in this work utilized unmodified versions of the basicalgorithms, it might be expected that agreement will improve as the algorithms are modified tobetter detect features most prevalent in diagrams of technological systems. Additional testing isplanned with both engineering students enrolled in an introduction to engineering and non-engineers in a general education engineering literacy course.References: 1. B. Richmond, The ‘Thinking’ in Systems Thinking: Seven Essential Skills. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications, 2000. 2. L. B. Sweeney and D. Meadows, The Systems Thinking Playbook. White River Junction
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
300 pharmaceutical, chemical,biotechnology, and medical device companies. His remarkable productivity in medical field hasearned him a nickname of “Edison of Medicine” [21]. Another pioneer, Donald A. B. Lindberg was committed to his visionary ideas ofapplying computer technology to healthcare. A pathologist by his medical training he was avisionary and became a leader in the use of computers in medicine. He was instrumental inestablishing the American Medical Informatics Association and became the Founding President.His pioneering work in biomedical research and health information has contributed globally inmedical informatics, patient care, cancer research, molecular biology, and other educationalprograms. He served as a director of
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
of college students,” J Affective Disorders, vol. 173, pp. 90-96.[4] J. Hunt and D. Eisenberg. 2010. “Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students,” J Adolescent Health, vol. 46, pp. 3-10.[5] D. Wynaden, M. McAllister, J. Tohotoa, O. Al Omari, K Heslop, R. Duggan, S. Murray, B. Happell, and L. Byrne. 2014. “The silence of mental health issues within university environments: A quantitative study,” Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, vol. 28, pp. 339-344.[6] J. Andrews and R. Clark. 2017. “Work in progress: Engineering invisible mountains! Mental health and undergraduate-level engineering education: The changing futures project,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; James Righter, The Citadel; Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel; Kevin Skenes, The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
/essential-learning-outcomes, retrieved 19 December 2019.[3] H. P. Sjursen, “The new alliance between engineering and humanities educators,” Glob. J. Engng. Educ, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 135—139, 2015.[4] B. Al-Sheeb, M. Abdulwahed, and A. Hamouda, “Impact of first-year seminar on student engagement, awareness, and general attitudes toward higher education,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol 10 (1) pp. 15-30, 2017.[5] D. Budny, “Integrating the freshman Seminar and Freshman Problem Solving Courses,” proceedings of the 31st Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, 2001, Reno NV, 2001.[6] National Academy of Engineering, “Understanding the Educational Careers and Pathways of Engineers,” National
- Conference Session
- Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Rachel Shannon, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
,andsocialjustice:areviewofAllan Luke’scollectedessays(2018)."JournalofCurriculumStudies(2021):1-13. [36]Cazden,C.,Cope,B.,Fairclough,N.,Gee,J.,Kalantzis,M.,Kress,G.,...&Nakata,M. (1996).Apedagogyofmultiliteracies:Designingsocialfutures.Harvardeducationalreview, 66(1),60-92. [37]Cope,B.,&Kalantzis,M.(Eds.).(2016).A pedagogyofmultiliteracies:Learningby design.Springer.
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Katherine Robert, University of Denver
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #34465WIP Knowing Engineering Through the Arts: The Impact of the Film Hid-denFigures on Perceptions of Engineering Using Arts-Based Research MethodsKatherine Robert, University of Denver Katherine is a doctoral candidate at the University of Denver’s Morgridge School of Education in the higher education department. In her dissertation research, she uses arts-based research methods, new materialist theory, and is guided by culturally responsive methodological principles to collaborate with underrepresented engineering students to uncover their experiences of socialization into the professional engineering culture
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
: Programs,best practices, and recommendations.”, Journal of Engineering Education, 100.1 (2011): 89-122.[8]. S. Rojstaczer, and C. Healy, “Grading in American colleges and universities”, TeachersCollege Record 4 (2010): 1-6.[9]. J. Schinske, and K. Tanner, “Teaching more by grading less (or differently)”, CBE - LifeSciences Education 13.2 (2014): 159-166.[10]. B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition fromengineering majors”, International Journal of Engineering Education, 29.4 (2013): 914.[11]. T. Kotzé and P. D. Plessis, “Students as ‘co‐producers’ of education: a proposed model ofstudent socialisation and participation at tertiary institutions,” Quality Assurance in Education,vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 186–201
- Conference Session
- Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Jayanta Kumar Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #32921Mastery Learning for Undergraduates in EngineeringDr. Jayanta Kumar Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Jayanta Banerjee is an ASEE Life Member and a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez campus. Dr. Banerjee received Ph.D. from the University of Waterloo and M.Ed. from Queen’s University, both in Canada. He has worked in industries and taught at the universities in Germany, Canada, USA and Latin America. He has over hundred publications in refereed journals and conference proceedings and a few books to his credit. Jayanta was Vice